Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #1,061
which pretty much puts an end to this whole debate and proves beyond a doubt that explosives brought those towers down since NIST cant get around the fact that those towers fell at freefall speed which is only possible when explosives are used.![]()
Yes. If we were in a reasonable debate. If someone was taking notes or prepared to share those facts, yes, that would be the case. However, the infiltration of the truth movement is widespread and the deception opposed deeply ingrained and it appears that a number of people were artificially eelvated in stature within the truth movement and are now false leadership. They spread the lie for FEMA.
The agents are denying the concrete core are doing so in such incompetence that they cannot even describe how the columns were severed IF they existed. gamit did at one time supported demolition. Just to give everyone an idea of the nature of the infiltration of the truth movement works with "false opposition". When asked how the supposed steel core columns were cut, gamit had no good description. Setting cutting charges with adequate placement and distribution is impossible with a steel columned building. All for faces of the box must have intimate contact with explosives.
Accodingly the agents MUST oppose the only construction method that can accomodate free fall, concrete.
Concrete can be easily fractured to fall freely by a small amount of properly placed explosives. Steel cannot.
Last edited: