FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[DiveCon]

except you have shown NO CONCRETE

Actually the reverse is true. I've show hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete and verified that is exactly what is supposed to be seen a number of different ways.

Here is 200,000 tons right here.



Just like the Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation published in 1992 describes.



Just like August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. writes in his safety report a few weeks after 9-11.

you can claim those two images show concrete, but they dont
that second one is not even making the claim you seem to think it does, since it is WRONG

 

[Christophera]

except you have shown NO CONCRETE

Actually the reverse is true. I've shown hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete and verified that is exactly what is supposed to be seen a number of different ways.

Here is 200,000 tons right here.

Just like the Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation published in 1992 describes.

Just like August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. writes in his safety report a few weeks after 9-11.

you can claim those two images show concrete, but they dont
that second one is not even making the claim you seem to think it does, since it is WRONG

This guy knows, just like Robertson identified for Newsweek September 13, 2001. See chap. 2.1

August Domel, Jr., Ph.D., S.E., P.E. November 2001

Groundbreaking for construction of the World Trade Center took place on August 5, 1966 Tower One, standing 1368 feet high, was completed in 1970, and Tower Two, at 1362 feet high, was completed in 1972. The structural design for the World Trade Center Towers was done by Skilling, Helle, Christiansen and Robertson. It was designed as a tube building that included a perimeter moment-resisting frame consisting of steel columns spaced on 39-inch centers. The load carrying system was designed so that the steel facade would resist lateral and gravity forces and the interior concrete core would carry only gravity loads.

Dr. Domel received a Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Chicago in 1988 and a Law Degree from Loyola University in 1992. He is a licensed Structural Engineer and Attorney at Law in the .State of Illinois and a Professional Engineer in twelve states, including the State of New York. Dr. Domel is authorized by the Department of Labor (OSHA) as a 10 and 30 hour construction safety trainer.

http://www.ncsea.com/downloads/wtcseerp.pdf

 

[DiveCon]

Actually the reverse is true. I've shown hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete and verified that is exactly what is supposed to be seen a number of different ways.

Here is 200,000 tons right here.



Just like the Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation published in 1992 describes.



Just like August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. writes in his safety report a few weeks after 9-11.

you can claim those two images show concrete, but they dont
that second one is not even making the claim you seem to think it does, since it is WRONG

This guy knows, just like Robertson identified for Newsweek September 13, 2001. See chap. 2.1

August Domel, Jr., Ph.D., S.E., P.E. November 2001

Groundbreaking for construction of the World Trade Center took place on August 5, 1966 Tower One, standing 1368 feet high, was completed in 1970, and Tower Two, at 1362 feet high, was completed in 1972. The structural design for the World Trade Center Towers was done by Skilling, Helle, Christiansen and Robertson. It was designed as a tube building that included a perimeter moment-resisting frame consisting of steel columns spaced on 39-inch centers. The load carrying system was designed so that the steel facade would resist lateral and gravity forces and the interior concrete core would carry only gravity loads.

Dr. Domel received a Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Chicago in 1988 and a Law Degree from Loyola University in 1992. He is a licensed Structural Engineer and Attorney at Law in the .State of Illinois and a Professional Engineer in twelve states, including the State of New York. Dr. Domel is authorized by the Department of Labor (OSHA) as a 10 and 30 hour construction safety trainer.

http://www.ncsea.com/downloads/wtcseerp.pdf

no, he doesnt know, because he is WRONG

 

[Christophera]

you can claim those two images show concrete, but they dont
that second one is not even making the claim you seem to think it does, since it is WRONG

This guy knows, just like Robertson identified for Newsweek September 13, 2001. See chap. 2.1

August Domel, Jr., Ph.D., S.E., P.E. November 2001

Groundbreaking for construction of the World Trade Center took place on August 5, 1966 Tower One, standing 1368 feet high, was completed in 1970, and Tower Two, at 1362 feet high, was completed in 1972. The structural design for the World Trade Center Towers was done by Skilling, Helle, Christiansen and Robertson. It was designed as a tube building that included a perimeter moment-resisting frame consisting of steel columns spaced on 39-inch centers. The load carrying system was designed so that the steel facade would resist lateral and gravity forces and the interior concrete core would carry only gravity loads.

Dr. Domel received a Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Chicago in 1988 and a Law Degree from Loyola University in 1992. He is a licensed Structural Engineer and Attorney at Law in the .State of Illinois and a Professional Engineer in twelve states, including the State of New York. Dr. Domel is authorized by the Department of Labor (OSHA) as a 10 and 30 hour construction safety trainer.

http://www.ncsea.com/downloads/wtcseerp.pdf

no, he doesnt know, because he is WRONG

His .pdf states he was at GZ 2 weeks after 9-11 and FEMA engineers showed him plans. He's been contactde since by somone checking, they asked "Is the concrete core info a mistake?" He said "No, it is a design method."

As usual, you are wrong.

The cause of death in 3,000 murders is invalid.

 

[DiveCon]

This guy knows, just like Robertson identified for Newsweek September 13, 2001. See chap. 2.1

August Domel, Jr., Ph.D., S.E., P.E. November 2001

Groundbreaking for construction of the World Trade Center took place on August 5, 1966 Tower One, standing 1368 feet high, was completed in 1970, and Tower Two, at 1362 feet high, was completed in 1972. The structural design for the World Trade Center Towers was done by Skilling, Helle, Christiansen and Robertson. It was designed as a tube building that included a perimeter moment-resisting frame consisting of steel columns spaced on 39-inch centers. The load carrying system was designed so that the steel facade would resist lateral and gravity forces and the interior concrete core would carry only gravity loads.

Dr. Domel received a Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Chicago in 1988 and a Law Degree from Loyola University in 1992. He is a licensed Structural Engineer and Attorney at Law in the .State of Illinois and a Professional Engineer in twelve states, including the State of New York. Dr. Domel is authorized by the Department of Labor (OSHA) as a 10 and 30 hour construction safety trainer.

http://www.ncsea.com/downloads/wtcseerp.pdf

no, he doesnt know, because he is WRONG

His .pdf states he was at GZ 2 weeks after 9-11 and FEMA engineers showed him plans. He's been contactde since by somone checking, they asked "Is the concrete core info a mistake?" He said "No, it is a design method."

As usual, you are wrong.

The cause of death in 3,000 murders is invalid.

no, he is wrong
there was ZERO concrete in the CORE above grade

 

[Christophera]

no, he doesnt know, because he is WRONG

His .pdf states he was at GZ 2 weeks after 9-11 and FEMA engineers showed him plans. He's been contactde since by somone checking, they asked "Is the concrete core info a mistake?" He said "No, it is a design method."

As usual, you are wrong.

The cause of death in 3,000 murders is invalid.

no, he is wrong
there was ZERO concrete in the CORE above grade

Going on the theory that you are always wrong when it comes to the Twins or will always say the opposite of what I say, which is evidenced, relating to where concrete was/wasn't, and the fact that you have no evidence of the alternative steel core columns, there was concrete to the top where it would have had to have been for part of WTC 2 concrete core to end up falling onto WTC 3. The brownish block behind the periemter wall is concrete.

 

[DiveCon]

His .pdf states he was at GZ 2 weeks after 9-11 and FEMA engineers showed him plans. He's been contactde since by somone checking, they asked "Is the concrete core info a mistake?" He said "No, it is a design method."

As usual, you are wrong.

The cause of death in 3,000 murders is invalid.

no, he is wrong
there was ZERO concrete in the CORE above grade

Going on the theory that you are always wrong when it comes to the Twins or will always say the opposite of what I say, which is evidenced, relating to where concrete was/wasn't, and the fact that you have no evidence of the alternative steel core columns, there was concrete to the top where it would have had to have been for part of WTC 2 concrete core to end up falling onto WTC 3. The brownish block behind the periemter wall is concrete.

as i have told you before, THAT image is of a FLOOR
you can even see the ribs of the floor mold

 

[Christophera]

no, he is wrong
there was ZERO concrete in the CORE above grade

Going on the theory that you are always wrong when it comes to the Twins or will always say the opposite of what I say, which is evidenced, relating to where concrete was/wasn't, and the fact that you have no evidence of the alternative steel core columns, there was concrete to the top where it would have had to have been for part of WTC 2 concrete core to end up falling onto WTC 3. The brownish block behind the periemter wall is concrete.

as i have told you before, THAT image is of a FLOOR
you can even see the ribs of the floor mold

If you compare the dimensions of the perimeter columns on the outside it is easily seen that there is a panel of perimeter columns cought underneath it.

The floors had a 4 inch corrugation on 2 foot spacing, moron.

 

[DiveCon]

Going on the theory that you are always wrong when it comes to the Twins or will always say the opposite of what I say, which is evidenced, relating to where concrete was/wasn't, and the fact that you have no evidence of the alternative steel core columns, there was concrete to the top where it would have had to have been for part of WTC 2 concrete core to end up falling onto WTC 3. The brownish block behind the periemter wall is concrete.

as i have told you before, THAT image is of a FLOOR
you can even see the ribs of the floor mold

If you compare the dimensions of the perimeter columns on the outside it is easily seen that there is a panel of perimeter columns cought underneath it.

The floors had a 4 inch corrugation on 2 foot spacing, moron.

you are wrong again
or is it lying

 

[Christophera]

as i have told you before, THAT image is of a FLOOR
you can even see the ribs of the floor mold

If you compare the dimensions of the perimeter columns on the outside it is easily seen that there is a panel of perimeter columns cought underneath it.

The floors had a 4 inch corrugation on 2 foot spacing, moron.

you are wrong again
or is it lying

No, this time you were wrong, usually you are just lying.

The floors.

9-11 Research: The Floors

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/docs/fig_2_9.jpg

 

[DiveCon]

If you compare the dimensions of the perimeter columns on the outside it is easily seen that there is a panel of perimeter columns cought underneath it.

The floors had a 4 inch corrugation on 2 foot spacing, moron.

you are wrong again
or is it lying

No, this time you were wrong, usually you are just lying.

The floors.

9-11 Research: The Floors

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/docs/fig_2_9.jpg

AND that looks exactly like the falling piece of concrete, a FLOOR

 

[DiveCon]

but hey, thanks for that link

9-11 Research: The Core Structures

ROFLMAO
there is your core

NO CONCRETE

 

[DiveCon]

so, this is a FLOOR

as proved by your very own evidence

 

[Joe_Penalty]

no, he doesnt know, because he is WRONG

His .pdf states he was at GZ 2 weeks after 9-11 and FEMA engineers showed him plans. He's been contactde since by somone checking, they asked "Is the concrete core info a mistake?" He said "No, it is a design method."

As usual, you are wrong.

The cause of death in 3,000 murders is invalid.

no, he is wrong
there was ZERO concrete in the CORE above grade

Is it possible for you to link a source affirming this claim?

 

[DiveCon]

His .pdf states he was at GZ 2 weeks after 9-11 and FEMA engineers showed him plans. He's been contactde since by somone checking, they asked "Is the concrete core info a mistake?" He said "No, it is a design method."

As usual, you are wrong.

The cause of death in 3,000 murders is invalid.

no, he is wrong
there was ZERO concrete in the CORE above grade

Is it possible for you to link a source affirming this claim?

been done

 

[DiveCon]

but hey, thanks for that link

9-11 Research: The Core Structures

ROFLMAO
there is your core

NO CONCRETE

see?

 

[Christophera]

no, he is wrong
there was ZERO concrete in the CORE above grade

Is it possible for you to link a source affirming this claim?

been done

It's not been done if it comes back to FEMA data.

Independently verified evidence shows a concrete core all the way to the top.

Robertson of the September 13, Newsweek article (not reasonable to suggest that when 3,000 are murdered, Newsweek would NOT make sure the information was good or that the engineering firm designing the building that collapsed would NOT demend, and recieve a correction)

Robertson DID give that information to Newsweek and no unevidenced denial from FEMA origin can be used to counter it.

This is a 400 foot tall piece of the WTC 2 concrete core.

and assertions that it is drywall over steel columns are absurd. The top and sides woul be wiped out and showing much protruding steel.

 

[DiveCon]

if that was concrete, why didnt it remain standing?

 

[Christophera]

if that was concrete, why didnt it remain standing?

Listen moron, if you want to talk demo there are plenty that will do that. I'm discussing a simple deprivation of Constitutional due process.

FEMA said this was the core.

But on 9-11 we see a 400 foot tall concrete structure (Psyops agents have been told to say this is steel clumns covered with drywall, as if the public was as dumb as the perps want them to be.)

The cause of death, supposedly "collapse" cannot be correct because NIST did not have the proper structure to analyze.

 

[DiveCon]

if that was concrete, why didnt it remain standing?

Listen moron, if you want to talk demo there are plenty that will do that. I'm discussing a simple deprivation of Constitutional due process.

FEMA said this was the core.

NO!!! they did not, that was a simplified diagram of the tube within a tube concept

But on 9-11 we see a 400 foot tall concrete structure (Psyops agents have been told to say this is steel clumns covered with drywall, as if the public was as dumb as the perps want them to be.)



The cause of death, supposedly "collapse" cannot be correct because NIST did not have the proper structure to analyze.

again, that image you have posted 100's of times does NOT prove anything