FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Christophera]

roflmao

what a maroon

maroon is a color

These are facts.

Robertson of the September 13, Newsweek article describing a concrete core (not reasonable to suggest that when 3,000 are murdered that Newsweek would not make sure the information was good or that the engineering firm designing the building that collapsed would not demend, and recieve a correction)

August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE ground zero safety report. (He saw FEMA plans 2 weeks after 9-11 at ground zero and identifies a concrete core)

Concrete core of WTC 2,

then show a single photo from construction where they poured concrete in the core above grade, just ONE

Of course you will ask to see the evidence your masters took from the public view just as guiliani took the NYC WTC documents, AND refuse to produce evidence that should logically be available IF the steel core columns existed. An image from 9-11 showing them in the core area.

Here is concrete wall 400 feet off the ground as the east wall of WTC 1 core.

Note that tehe core is empty. The columns in the image are the spire on the opposite side of the core outside of it.out

 

[DiveCon]

someone PLEASE show me where a 12' thick concrete wall fits in there

 

[DiveCon]

maroon is a color

These are facts.

Robertson of the September 13, Newsweek article describing a concrete core (not reasonable to suggest that when 3,000 are murdered that Newsweek would not make sure the information was good or that the engineering firm designing the building that collapsed would not demend, and recieve a correction)

August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE ground zero safety report. (He saw FEMA plans 2 weeks after 9-11 at ground zero and identifies a concrete core)

Concrete core of WTC 2,

then show a single photo from construction where they poured concrete in the core above grade, just ONE

Of course you will ask to see the evidence your masters took from the public view just as guiliani took the NYC WTC documents, AND refuse to produce evidence that should logically be available IF the steel core columns existed. An image from 9-11 showing them in the core area.

Here is concrete wall 400 feet off the ground as the east wall of WTC 1 core.



Note that tehe core is empty. The columns in the image are the spire on the opposite side of the core outside of it.out

no, that is clearly a floor

 

[Christophera]

then show a single photo from construction where they poured concrete in the core above grade, just ONE

Of course you will ask to see the evidence your masters took from the public view just as guiliani took the NYC WTC documents, AND refuse to produce evidence that should logically be available IF the steel core columns existed. An image from 9-11 showing them in the core area.

Here is concrete wall 400 feet off the ground as the east wall of WTC 1 core.

Note that the core is empty. The columns in the image are the spire on the opposite side of the core outside of it.out

no, that is clearly a floor

Deceptive, manipulative agent, removes the image it lies about.

Not a floor. It starts staionary oriented as a vertical plane.

Because you have no evidence and what you are doing conceals the secret methods of mass murder used on 9-11, your only discernable motive is to protect the perpetrators.

 

[Joe_Penalty]

roflmao

what a maroon

Why do you think he is a moron?

because he sees concrete where none was

he claims a 12' thick concrete core wall that doesnt show up in a single plan or construction photo
his excuse is "they" destroyed all those photos

Regardless of the dimensions of the concrete and steel core, that does not dismiss whether the core was in fact concrete and steel.

What about what Leslie Robertson said about the core in the Newsweek article?

What about the passage from the Oxford Encyclopedia, about the core?

 

[DiveCon]

Of course you will ask to see the evidence your masters took from the public view just as guiliani took the NYC WTC documents, AND refuse to produce evidence that should logically be available IF the steel core columns existed. An image from 9-11 showing them in the core area.

Here is concrete wall 400 feet off the ground as the east wall of WTC 1 core.



Note that the core is empty. The columns in the image are the spire on the opposite side of the core outside of it.out

no, that is clearly a floor

Deceptive, manipulative agent, removes the image it lies about.

Not a floor. It starts staionary oriented as a vertical plane.

Because you have no evidence and what you are doing conceals the secret methods of mass murder used on 9-11, your only discernable motive is to protect the perpetrators.

i removed the image because you have posted it so many times i think EVERYONE has seen it
and since when can an object go from falling in one direction to a completely different direct in the matter of seconds with no show of that change?


your gif image(a group of still shots put together) doesnt show any transition
why not use an actual video if you want to be HONEST

 

[DiveCon]

Why do you think he is a moron?

because he sees concrete where none was

he claims a 12' thick concrete core wall that doesnt show up in a single plan or construction photo
his excuse is "they" destroyed all those photos

Regardless of the dimensions of the concrete and steel core, that does not dismiss whether the core was in fact concrete and steel.

What about what Leslie Robertson said about the core in the Newsweek article?

What about the passage from the Oxford Encyclopedia, about the core?

Robertson never said that
that is another lie chris keeps posting
and look at the PLANS for the building, no concrete in the core above grade
PERIOD

 

[Joe_Penalty]

because he sees concrete where none was

he claims a 12' thick concrete core wall that doesnt show up in a single plan or construction photo
his excuse is "they" destroyed all those photos

Regardless of the dimensions of the concrete and steel core, that does not dismiss whether the core was in fact concrete and steel.

What about what Leslie Robertson said about the core in the Newsweek article?

What about the passage from the Oxford Encyclopedia, about the core?

Robertson never said that
that is another lie chris keeps posting
and look at the PLANS for the building, no concrete in the core above grade
PERIOD

Okay. Leslie Robertson may have not actually said that about the core. So it is safe to say Newsweek is responsible for the listing some of the specifications of the buildings. If what Newsweek published about the specifications of the buildings is contrary to the official story, why has it not been changed?

What about the Oxford question?

 

[DiveCon]

Regardless of the dimensions of the concrete and steel core, that does not dismiss whether the core was in fact concrete and steel.

What about what Leslie Robertson said about the core in the Newsweek article?

What about the passage from the Oxford Encyclopedia, about the core?

Robertson never said that
that is another lie chris keeps posting
and look at the PLANS for the building, no concrete in the core above grade
PERIOD

Okay. Leslie Robertson may have not actually said that about the core. So it is safe to say Newsweek is responsible for the listing some of the specifications of the buildings. If what Newsweek published about the specifications of the buildings is contrary to the official story, why has it not been changed?

What about the Oxford question?

that could be an error
they do have them

and, if you look at the actual plans, you wont find concrete above grade in the core, the only place there was concrete above grade, was in the floors

 

[DiveCon]

where is the concrete?

 

[Christophera]

where is the concrete?

The source of your drawing is FEMA, Nistncstar1-1-fig2-4.png.

I know for certain there is a large possibility that the NYC did not even have a plan for the concrete core structure.

NIST basically admits, because they don't identify plans which are the normal source for the information they disclaim responsibility for not having, ...... in this.

Accordingly, a photo that will not lie and shows the actual core of WTC 2 must be considered the authority.

Add to that the information of L.E. Robertson, the cheif engineer of the Twins in the September 13, 2001 Newsweek article describing a concrete core.

 

[DiveCon]

where is the concrete?

The source of your drawing is FEMA, Nistncstar1-1-fig2-4.png.

I know for certain there is a large possibility that the NYC did not even have a plan for the concrete core structure.

NIST basically admits, because they don't identify plans which are the normal source for the information they disclaim responsibility for not having, ...... in this.



Accordingly, a photo that will not lie and shows the actual core of WTC 2 must be considered the authority.



Add to that the information of L.E. Robertson, the cheif engineer of the Twins in the September 13, 2001 Newsweek article describing a concrete core.

except HE NEVER SAID IT, MORON

 

[Christophera]

where is the concrete?

The source of your drawing is FEMA, Nistncstar1-1-fig2-4.png.

I know for certain there is a large possibility that the NYC did not even have a plan for the concrete core structure.

NIST basically admits, because they don't identify plans which are the normal source for the information they disclaim responsibility for not having, ...... in this.



Accordingly, a photo that will not lie and shows the actual core of WTC 2 must be considered the authority.

Add to that the information of L.E. Robertson, the cheif engineer of the Twins in the September 13, 2001 Newsweek article describing a concrete core.

except HE NEVER SAID IT, MORON

But the images show concrete and the fact is that when 3,000 die in a structure that is supposed to have collapse the engineers ARE VERY sensitive about structural issues.

The information, logically, IS CORRECT.

 

[DiveCon]

cant you ever just post a fucking link when the pic is so fucking HUGE?

and again, THAT IS NOT CONCRETE

 

[Christophera]

cant you ever just post a fucking link when the pic is so fucking HUGE?

and again, THAT IS NOT CONCRETE

It cannot be anything else but concrete because it was at the bottom of a pile of steel.

 

[DiveCon]

and it was PROTECTED by steel around and above it

 

[DiveCon]

http://www.bbacerts.co.uk/PDF/4377i1_web.pdf

gypsum wall board

 

[Christophera]

and it was PROTECTED by steel around and above it

Where is that steel? Everything you say is uncorroborated, ........... probably because its a lie.



Recall I showed an aerial of the site and those interior box columns with the massive concrete wall next to them columns were a lump buried in debris.

 

[DiveCon]

except you have shown NO CONCRETE

 

[Christophera]

except you have shown NO CONCRETE

Actually the reverse is true. I've show hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete and verified that is exactly what is supposed to be seen a number of different ways.

Here is 200,000 tons right here.

Just like the Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation published in 1992 describes.

Just like August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. writes in his safety report a few weeks after 9-11.