Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A. I made my much of my wealth designing automated machines, some over a hundred feet long. I used a hundred man hours for discussion purposes. Most people have the intellect to understand this. My bad for leaving you behind in the discussion.So you build a robot. 100 man hours. Takes the job of a full time employee who was working 170 hours a month.Onward march of progress. This is how it works. There were a lot of buggy-whip manufacturers that lost their jobs when cars became ubiquitous.
If robot restaurants are more efficient than human-staffed restaurants, then so be it. We, as a society, adapt. Every advancement will create jobs as well - building and maintaining these robots, for example.
Blaming a minimum wage for progress is a little silly.
Now you maintain it. A technician works one hour a month taking care of it.
I know math r hard, but this technology is a dead end street with civilization running full speed into a jobless society with no one being able to obtain anything except what the government decides to hand them that day.
So what do you suggest?
Stifle innovation to protect unskilled and inefficient jobs?
As a side note - the robot in your link is 14 feet long, several thousand pounds and cost millions of dollars to build. We're not talking just "100 man hours".
Lack of jobs in blue cities is what the left specializes in.Irrelivent. Starbucks is pulling out of #15NOW cities as are many establishments.150 stores being closed due to increased wages.Leftist Starbucks just announced they're closing 150 stores in the #fightfor15 cities due to wages.
And yet Starbucks has been paying $11 an hour since they first opened in Canada and are now paying $15 without closing stores.
Starbucks words, not mine.
Out of how many?
There are almost twice as many Starbucks as that, just in Manhattan.
Closing less than .01% of their American stores does not translate to them "pulling out" of anywhere - and it's only "irrelevant" in the sense that it completely destroys your point.
Lack of jobs in blue cities is what the left specializes in.Irrelivent. Starbucks is pulling out of #15NOW cities as are many establishments.150 stores being closed due to increased wages.And yet Starbucks has been paying $11 an hour since they first opened in Canada and are now paying $15 without closing stores.
Starbucks words, not mine.
Out of how many?
There are almost twice as many Starbucks as that, just in Manhattan.
Closing less than .01% of their American stores does not translate to them "pulling out" of anywhere - and it's only "irrelevant" in the sense that it completely destroys your point.
A. I made my much of my wealth designing automated machines, some over a hundred feet long. I used a hundred man hours for discussion purposes. Most people have the intellect to understand this. My bad for leaving you behind in the discussion.So you build a robot. 100 man hours. Takes the job of a full time employee who was working 170 hours a month.Onward march of progress. This is how it works. There were a lot of buggy-whip manufacturers that lost their jobs when cars became ubiquitous.
If robot restaurants are more efficient than human-staffed restaurants, then so be it. We, as a society, adapt. Every advancement will create jobs as well - building and maintaining these robots, for example.
Blaming a minimum wage for progress is a little silly.
Now you maintain it. A technician works one hour a month taking care of it.
I know math r hard, but this technology is a dead end street with civilization running full speed into a jobless society with no one being able to obtain anything except what the government decides to hand them that day.
So what do you suggest?
Stifle innovation to protect unskilled and inefficient jobs?
As a side note - the robot in your link is 14 feet long, several thousand pounds and cost millions of dollars to build. We're not talking just "100 man hours".
B. I have no solution for the problem. It's 2 high speed trains running towards each other and no way to stop it.
So you can't address the fact the Left destroy jobs so you go on a personal attack. Who could have seen that coming?Lack of jobs in blue cities is what the left specializes in.Irrelivent. Starbucks is pulling out of #15NOW cities as are many establishments.150 stores being closed due to increased wages.
Starbucks words, not mine.
Out of how many?
There are almost twice as many Starbucks as that, just in Manhattan.
Closing less than .01% of their American stores does not translate to them "pulling out" of anywhere - and it's only "irrelevant" in the sense that it completely destroys your point.
Duck, dodge and weave!
And when that doesn't work, bargle about "liberals".
You're too fucking predictable.
Wow, more personal attacks, you're on a roll!A. I made my much of my wealth designing automated machines, some over a hundred feet long. I used a hundred man hours for discussion purposes. Most people have the intellect to understand this. My bad for leaving you behind in the discussion.So you build a robot. 100 man hours. Takes the job of a full time employee who was working 170 hours a month.Onward march of progress. This is how it works. There were a lot of buggy-whip manufacturers that lost their jobs when cars became ubiquitous.
If robot restaurants are more efficient than human-staffed restaurants, then so be it. We, as a society, adapt. Every advancement will create jobs as well - building and maintaining these robots, for example.
Blaming a minimum wage for progress is a little silly.
Now you maintain it. A technician works one hour a month taking care of it.
I know math r hard, but this technology is a dead end street with civilization running full speed into a jobless society with no one being able to obtain anything except what the government decides to hand them that day.
So what do you suggest?
Stifle innovation to protect unskilled and inefficient jobs?
As a side note - the robot in your link is 14 feet long, several thousand pounds and cost millions of dollars to build. We're not talking just "100 man hours".
B. I have no solution for the problem. It's 2 high speed trains running towards each other and no way to stop it.
Much of your "wealth"?
You can be anything you want on the internet. Did you know that I invented Pop Tarts, and I've been to Mars twice?
As for your apocalyptic delusions, you'll have to pardon me, I don't have any pearls to clutch.
So you can't address the fact the Left destroy jobs so you go on a personal attack. Who could have seen that coming?Lack of jobs in blue cities is what the left specializes in.Irrelivent. Starbucks is pulling out of #15NOW cities as are many establishments.Out of how many?
There are almost twice as many Starbucks as that, just in Manhattan.
Closing less than .01% of their American stores does not translate to them "pulling out" of anywhere - and it's only "irrelevant" in the sense that it completely destroys your point.
Duck, dodge and weave!
And when that doesn't work, bargle about "liberals".
You're too fucking predictable.
Wow, more personal attacks, you're on a roll!A. I made my much of my wealth designing automated machines, some over a hundred feet long. I used a hundred man hours for discussion purposes. Most people have the intellect to understand this. My bad for leaving you behind in the discussion.So you build a robot. 100 man hours. Takes the job of a full time employee who was working 170 hours a month.Onward march of progress. This is how it works. There were a lot of buggy-whip manufacturers that lost their jobs when cars became ubiquitous.
If robot restaurants are more efficient than human-staffed restaurants, then so be it. We, as a society, adapt. Every advancement will create jobs as well - building and maintaining these robots, for example.
Blaming a minimum wage for progress is a little silly.
Now you maintain it. A technician works one hour a month taking care of it.
I know math r hard, but this technology is a dead end street with civilization running full speed into a jobless society with no one being able to obtain anything except what the government decides to hand them that day.
So what do you suggest?
Stifle innovation to protect unskilled and inefficient jobs?
As a side note - the robot in your link is 14 feet long, several thousand pounds and cost millions of dollars to build. We're not talking just "100 man hours".
B. I have no solution for the problem. It's 2 high speed trains running towards each other and no way to stop it.
Much of your "wealth"?
You can be anything you want on the internet. Did you know that I invented Pop Tarts, and I've been to Mars twice?
As for your apocalyptic delusions, you'll have to pardon me, I don't have any pearls to clutch.
Should I report you to a Mod?
OH WAIT, YOURE THE MOD TROLL!
Oh my. Robots as fast food workers. How ever will they pay the 3000 buck per month rent now?
With that said...I doubt I would ever participate in such a place. Kinda like those big warehouse grocery stores with cheaper prices...it just isn't the same as a regular grocery store. Just like it isn't the same to watch a big ticket movie on your couch versus a filled theater.
Same here, always use a teller. Going to be no middle class in a few decades.Oh my. Robots as fast food workers. How ever will they pay the 3000 buck per month rent now?
With that said...I doubt I would ever participate in such a place. Kinda like those big warehouse grocery stores with cheaper prices...it just isn't the same as a regular grocery store. Just like it isn't the same to watch a big ticket movie on your couch versus a filled theater.
Same here, always use a teller. Going to be no middle class in a few decades.Oh my. Robots as fast food workers. How ever will they pay the 3000 buck per month rent now?
With that said...I doubt I would ever participate in such a place. Kinda like those big warehouse grocery stores with cheaper prices...it just isn't the same as a regular grocery store. Just like it isn't the same to watch a big ticket movie on your couch versus a filled theater.
True. But is the solution minimum wage increases? Or does that drive the tech? Unless the left starts charging robots minimum wage the tech is going to win. And actually the tech still wins they don’t call in sick or drunk.That's the issue. And one day they'll make a robot to replace you.I do robots and other such worker replacement tech. We do way better than 15 an hour but my job is to replace 20 people at 15 so it works for me.Tech support is some guy in India and maintenance is an Pakistani here on a workers visa.Well, tech support and maintenance workers should make 15.00 or more an hour.
There's 2 lines on a collision path - reducing headcount with technology and the lack of a middle class to support spending money on technology.
Like I said earlier, I see no solution until everything crashes and somehow civilization resets itself.True. But is the solution minimum wage increases? Or does that drive the tech? Unless the left starts charging robots minimum wage the tech is going to win. And actually the tech still wins they don’t call in sick or drunk.That's the issue. And one day they'll make a robot to replace you.I do robots and other such worker replacement tech. We do way better than 15 an hour but my job is to replace 20 people at 15 so it works for me.Tech support is some guy in India and maintenance is an Pakistani here on a workers visa.Well, tech support and maintenance workers should make 15.00 or more an hour.
There's 2 lines on a collision path - reducing headcount with technology and the lack of a middle class to support spending money on technology.
How is acting like a retarded child helping the situation?A. I made my much of my wealth designing automated machines, some over a hundred feet long. I used a hundred man hours for discussion purposes. Most people have the intellect to understand this. My bad for leaving you behind in the discussion.So you build a robot. 100 man hours. Takes the job of a full time employee who was working 170 hours a month.Onward march of progress. This is how it works. There were a lot of buggy-whip manufacturers that lost their jobs when cars became ubiquitous.
If robot restaurants are more efficient than human-staffed restaurants, then so be it. We, as a society, adapt. Every advancement will create jobs as well - building and maintaining these robots, for example.
Blaming a minimum wage for progress is a little silly.
Now you maintain it. A technician works one hour a month taking care of it.
I know math r hard, but this technology is a dead end street with civilization running full speed into a jobless society with no one being able to obtain anything except what the government decides to hand them that day.
So what do you suggest?
Stifle innovation to protect unskilled and inefficient jobs?
As a side note - the robot in your link is 14 feet long, several thousand pounds and cost millions of dollars to build. We're not talking just "100 man hours".
B. I have no solution for the problem. It's 2 high speed trains running towards each other and no way to stop it.
Much of your "wealth"?
You can be anything you want on the internet. Did you know that I invented Pop Tarts, and I've been to Mars twice?
As for your apocalyptic delusions, you'll have to pardon me, I don't have any pearls to clutch.
How is acting like a retarded child helping the situation?A. I made my much of my wealth designing automated machines, some over a hundred feet long. I used a hundred man hours for discussion purposes. Most people have the intellect to understand this. My bad for leaving you behind in the discussion.So you build a robot. 100 man hours. Takes the job of a full time employee who was working 170 hours a month.Onward march of progress. This is how it works. There were a lot of buggy-whip manufacturers that lost their jobs when cars became ubiquitous.
If robot restaurants are more efficient than human-staffed restaurants, then so be it. We, as a society, adapt. Every advancement will create jobs as well - building and maintaining these robots, for example.
Blaming a minimum wage for progress is a little silly.
Now you maintain it. A technician works one hour a month taking care of it.
I know math r hard, but this technology is a dead end street with civilization running full speed into a jobless society with no one being able to obtain anything except what the government decides to hand them that day.
So what do you suggest?
Stifle innovation to protect unskilled and inefficient jobs?
As a side note - the robot in your link is 14 feet long, several thousand pounds and cost millions of dollars to build. We're not talking just "100 man hours".
B. I have no solution for the problem. It's 2 high speed trains running towards each other and no way to stop it.
Much of your "wealth"?
You can be anything you want on the internet. Did you know that I invented Pop Tarts, and I've been to Mars twice?
As for your apocalyptic delusions, you'll have to pardon me, I don't have any pearls to clutch.
That very well could be what has to happen. In the mean time though the government will never be able to enforce hiring people and paying them more than they’re worth on business.Like I said earlier, I see no solution until everything crashes and somehow civilization resets itself.True. But is the solution minimum wage increases? Or does that drive the tech? Unless the left starts charging robots minimum wage the tech is going to win. And actually the tech still wins they don’t call in sick or drunk.That's the issue. And one day they'll make a robot to replace you.I do robots and other such worker replacement tech. We do way better than 15 an hour but my job is to replace 20 people at 15 so it works for me.Tech support is some guy in India and maintenance is an Pakistani here on a workers visa.Well, tech support and maintenance workers should make 15.00 or more an hour.
There's 2 lines on a collision path - reducing headcount with technology and the lack of a middle class to support spending money on technology.
The June primaries in California showed a lot of surprising backlash against Democrats. I think people are fed up and want someone to act. That's what got Trump the outsider elected.That very well could be what has to happen. In the mean time though the government will never be able to enforce hiring people and paying them more than they’re worth on business.Like I said earlier, I see no solution until everything crashes and somehow civilization resets itself.True. But is the solution minimum wage increases? Or does that drive the tech? Unless the left starts charging robots minimum wage the tech is going to win. And actually the tech still wins they don’t call in sick or drunk.That's the issue. And one day they'll make a robot to replace you.I do robots and other such worker replacement tech. We do way better than 15 an hour but my job is to replace 20 people at 15 so it works for me.Tech support is some guy in India and maintenance is an Pakistani here on a workers visa.
There's 2 lines on a collision path - reducing headcount with technology and the lack of a middle class to support spending money on technology.
Maybe we have reached peak big city here. Millions in a city fighting over check out clerk jobs may not be the solution.
I do like the idea of a burger made maybe cleaner...so many go to work sick. Or don't wash their hands. However, the machine can get just as nasty if nobody cleans it well enough.Oh my. Robots as fast food workers. How ever will they pay the 3000 buck per month rent now?
With that said...I doubt I would ever participate in such a place. Kinda like those big warehouse grocery stores with cheaper prices...it just isn't the same as a regular grocery store. Just like it isn't the same to watch a big ticket movie on your couch versus a filled theater.
They can go down the street, and get jobs at the burger robot factory. Or get trained to maintain burger robots.
