"Fingerprint" of Greenland ice melt seen in satellite sea level data

I can’t think of a better way to usher in the next glacial cycle other than the widespread use of solar.

Because "Any solar radiation that is converted into electricity is solar radiation that will not heat the surface of the planet. It's a material balance"?
 
Photons are energy. Heat is energy. But photons are not heat. Photons produce heat by striking atoms and causing atoms to excite and move. It is the movement of the atoms that the photons struck that produces the heat.
well actually it is when the energy is added to the grid and a load is available to draw current that heat occurs in the lines running from the panels to the grid and over the grid.
 
well actually it is when the energy is added to the grid and a load is available to draw current that heat occurs in the lines running from the panels to the grid and over the grid.

Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.
 
Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.
where is energy being replaced? you have failed every post, don't stop now.
 
where is energy being replaced? you have failed every post, don't stop now.


Even though the panels may reflect less solar radiation, the photons being converted into electricity more than offset the increased solar radiation absorbed by the lower albedo PV cells. Which is why there was less infrared heat emitted at the solar farms after the panels were installed.
 
the photons being converted into electricity more than offset the increased solar radiation absorbed by the lower albedo PV cells

Offset?

1667326104177.png
 
Even though the panels may reflect less solar radiation, the photons being converted into electricity more than offset the increased solar radiation absorbed by the lower albedo PV cells. Which is why there was less infrared heat emitted at the solar farms after the panels were installed.
Avoidance yet again. Lack of honesty becomes you
 
less infrared heat emitted at the solar farms after the panels were installed.
 
And more heat at point of use.
Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.
 
less infrared heat emitted at the solar farms after the panels were installed.
 
Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.

But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.

Right, the heat is produced a few seconds later, in the city.
No net cooling of the planet.
 
More infrared heat emitted at the city after the electricity is used.
Incorrect. Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.
 
But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.

Right, the heat is produced a few seconds later, in the city.
No net cooling of the planet.
Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.
 
More infrared heat emitted at the city after the electricity is used.
wrong. Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.
 

Forum List

Back
Top