"Fingerprint" of Greenland ice melt seen in satellite sea level data

Incorrect. Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.
But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.

My fridge produces an incremental cooling effect inside because heat - which would have otherwise warmed the inside - was moved outside instead.
 
wrong. Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.


wrong.

Solar sourced electricty doesn't produce heat when used?

Tell me more!!!
 
I can’t think of a worse idea than replacing electricity generated from fossil fuels to electricity generated from solar power.
 
No better way to usher in the next glacial cycle than the widespread use in of solar power.
 
But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.

Isn't the cooling in one spot immediately offset by the warming in another spot?
If so, why keep mentioning it, it doesn't cool the planet.
 
Isn't the cooling in one spot immediately offset by the warming in another spot?
Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.
 
Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.

If only that was your original claim.

"Any solar radiation that is converted into electricity is solar radiation that will not heat the surface of the planet. It's a material balance"

Still funny.
 
If only that was your original claim.

"Any solar radiation that is converted into electricity is solar radiation that will not heat the surface of the planet. It's a material balance"

Still funny.
My claim has always been the best way to usher in the next ice age is the widespread use of solar.

It’s a really bad idea in the middle of an ice age.
 
My claim has always been the best way to usher in the next ice age is the widespread use of solar.

It’s a really bad idea in the middle of an ice age.

Your claim about solar leading to an ice age was based on an error.....Any solar radiation that is converted into electricity is solar radiation that will not heat the surface of the planet.
 
Your claim about solar leading to an ice age was based on an error.....Any solar radiation that is converted into electricity is solar radiation that will not heat the surface of the planet.
Less infrared radiation was measured at six solar farms after PV cells were installed.
 
Photons which would have otherwise produced heat from striking the surface of the planet are converted into electricity instead.

Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.
 
The missing heat is found where the electricity was used.
Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.
 
Less infrared radiation was measured at six solar farms after PV cells were installed.
 
Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.

Any solar radiation that is converted into electricity is solar radiation that will not heat the surface of the planet.


Still wrong.
 
And yet, still wrong.
Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.
 
Waste heat generated from electricity use is independent of the generating source. So replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn’t change the amount of waste heat from electricity usage. But solar does produce an incremental cooling effect at the solar farm because photons - which would have otherwise produced heat - was converted into electricity instead.

If I convert solar radiation into electricity, can I still heat the planet with it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top