Fired Sally Yates: ‘Firing Rosenstein Would Be an Unconscionable Assault on the Rule of Law’

Steve_McGarrett

Gold Member
Jul 11, 2013
19,272
4,371
Like McCabe, soon she'll be checking in the crossbar hotel along with Rosenstein and Comey. How dare she talk about the rule of law when refused to enforce the law pertaining to allowing Trump to initiate a travel ban. Nevertheless, I expect Rosenstein to be fired or impeached Monday, the deadline he has to turn over the Comey memos to Congress.

Read the comments in the link. They're glorious!
Fired AG Sally Yates Lashes Out at Trump 'Firing Rosenstein Would Be an Unconscionable Assault on the Rule of Law'
 
Like McCabe, soon she'll be checking in the crossbar hotel along with Rosenstein and Comey. How dare she talk about the rule of law when refused to enforce the law pertaining to allowing Trump to initiate a travel ban. Nevertheless, I expect Rosenstein to be fired or impeached Monday, the deadline he has to turn over the Comey memos to Congress.

Read the comments in the link. They're glorious!
Fired AG Sally Yates Lashes Out at Trump 'Firing Rosenstein Would Be an Unconscionable Assault on the Rule of Law'

No, Sally won't end up in jail. Don't you ever get tired of spewing your NaziCon fake news and hate? You should be on Putin's payroll. Maybe you already are...
 
Last edited:
What does a person who refused to uphold a Presidential travel-ban EO know about the "rule of law"?

She richly deserved to be shitcanned.
 
Like McCabe, soon she'll be checking in the crossbar hotel along with Rosenstein and Comey. How dare she talk about the rule of law when refused to enforce the law pertaining to allowing Trump to initiate a travel ban. Nevertheless, I expect Rosenstein to be fired or impeached Monday, the deadline he has to turn over the Comey memos to Congress.

Read the comments in the link. They're glorious!
Fired AG Sally Yates Lashes Out at Trump 'Firing Rosenstein Would Be an Unconscionable Assault on the Rule of Law'

No, Sally won't end up in jail. Don't you ever get tired to spewing your NaziCon fake news and hate? You should be on Putin's payroll. Maybe you already are...

Is that the go-to claim now? It used to be "racist racist racist", now it's "Russian Russian Russian"

You guys crack me so consistently up.
 
What does a person who refused to uphold a Presidential travel-ban EO know about the "rule of law"?

She richly deserved to be shitcanned.
dummy, Sally KNEW it was unconstitutional and refused to argue for it.... and she swore under oath in her confirmation hearing that if a president asked her to do something unconstitutional, what would she do? and her answer was, I WOULD NOT DO IT....

AND guess what silly one?

IT WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL! And ruled as such....and Trump's E/O was shut down....
 
Like McCabe, soon she'll be checking in the crossbar hotel along with Rosenstein and Comey. How dare she talk about the rule of law when refused to enforce the law pertaining to allowing Trump to initiate a travel ban. Nevertheless, I expect Rosenstein to be fired or impeached Monday, the deadline he has to turn over the Comey memos to Congress.

Read the comments in the link. They're glorious!
Fired AG Sally Yates Lashes Out at Trump 'Firing Rosenstein Would Be an Unconscionable Assault on the Rule of Law'

Actually firing and impeachment doesn't go far enough for these traitors.......Pentangeli did the honorable thing when his plot against the emperor failed.......

 
It is amazing how the Swamp Rats project. As everyone has noted Rosenstine and his ilk not only attacked our democracy, but our Constitution and English Common law from which are legal system is derived from
 
she is right...if trump gets rosenstein fired that would be the last straw in trump's slow mo Saturday night massacre, and it would be impeachment hearings beginning....

there are 43 republican retiring in the house with no worries of Trump's Wrath...added to the dems and impeachment would happen if Rosenstein goes by the wayside and it would seal the deal on Trump's OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE charge.
 
Last edited:
What does a person who refused to uphold a Presidential travel-ban EO know about the "rule of law"?

She richly deserved to be shitcanned.
dummy, Sally KNEW it was unconstitutional and refused to argue for it.... and she swore under oath in her confirmation hearing that if a president asked her to do something unconstitutional, what would she do? and her answer was, I WOULD NOT DO IT....

AND guess what silly one?

IT WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL! And ruled as such....and Trump's E/O was shut down....

It wasn't completely shut down. The ban is still in place if you're traveling from Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen.
 
What does a person who refused to uphold a Presidential travel-ban EO know about the "rule of law"?

She richly deserved to be shitcanned.
dummy, Sally KNEW it was unconstitutional and refused to argue for it.... and she swore under oath in her confirmation hearing that if a president asked her to do something unconstitutional, what would she do? and her answer was, I WOULD NOT DO IT....

AND guess what silly one?

IT WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL! And ruled as such....and Trump's E/O was shut down....

It wasn't completely shut down. The ban is still in place if you're traveling from Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen.
it was ban NUMBER 3 that finally made it through....Ban Number 1 proposal was knocked flat out on day 1, and that one was the one she refused to defend.
 
What does a person who refused to uphold a Presidential travel-ban EO know about the "rule of law"?

She richly deserved to be shitcanned.
dummy, Sally KNEW it was unconstitutional and refused to argue for it.... and she swore under oath in her confirmation hearing that if a president asked her to do something unconstitutional, what would she do? and her answer was, I WOULD NOT DO IT....

AND guess what silly one?

IT WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL! And ruled as such....and Trump's E/O was shut down....

It wasn't completely shut down. The ban is still in place if you're traveling from Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen.
it was ban NUMBER 3 that finally made it through....Ban Number 1 proposal was knocked flat out on day 1, and that one was the one she refused to defend.

No matter now. She's unemployed, which is where she should be.

Forever dismissed to being an obscure footnote in American history, whom nobody will ever remember. "Sally who?"

Unless of course she sets herself on fire, in which case she'd be relevant for awhile. :biggrin:
 
Like McCabe, soon she'll be checking in the crossbar hotel along with Rosenstein and Comey. How dare she talk about the rule of law when refused to enforce the law pertaining to allowing Trump to initiate a travel ban. Nevertheless, I expect Rosenstein to be fired or impeached Monday, the deadline he has to turn over the Comey memos to Congress.

Read the comments in the link. They're glorious!
Fired AG Sally Yates Lashes Out at Trump 'Firing Rosenstein Would Be an Unconscionable Assault on the Rule of Law'

No, Sally won't end up in jail. Don't you ever get tired to spewing your NaziCon fake news and hate? You should be on Putin's payroll. Maybe you already are...
Don't you get tired of parroting the same old crap ??
 
What does a person who refused to uphold a Presidential travel-ban EO know about the "rule of law"?

She richly deserved to be shitcanned.
dummy, Sally KNEW it was unconstitutional and refused to argue for it.... and she swore under oath in her confirmation hearing that if a president asked her to do something unconstitutional, what would she do? and her answer was, I WOULD NOT DO IT....

AND guess what silly one?

IT WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL! And ruled as such....and Trump's E/O was shut down....

It wasn't completely shut down. The ban is still in place if you're traveling from Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen.
it was ban NUMBER 3 that finally made it through....Ban Number 1 proposal was knocked flat out on day 1, and that one was the one she refused to defend.
And she was wrong then, and she's still wrong now.
 
What does a person who refused to uphold a Presidential travel-ban EO know about the "rule of law"?

She richly deserved to be shitcanned.
dummy, Sally KNEW it was unconstitutional and refused to argue for it.... and she swore under oath in her confirmation hearing that if a president asked her to do something unconstitutional, what would she do? and her answer was, I WOULD NOT DO IT....

AND guess what silly one?

IT WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL! And ruled as such....and Trump's E/O was shut down....

It wasn't completely shut down. The ban is still in place if you're traveling from Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen.
it was ban NUMBER 3 that finally made it through....Ban Number 1 proposal was knocked flat out on day 1, and that one was the one she refused to defend.
And she was wrong then, and she's still wrong now.
She was not wrong then....she was right. What Trump asked her to defend was unconstitutional and was stopped, almost immediately, Ban number 2 was completely re-written and was also stopped for being unconstitutional, but ban number 3 which modified ban number 2, was then approved.

Ban number 1 was clearly, with no doubt, unconstitutional.... she stood up for what she swore by God, she would do.
 
she is right...if trump gets rosenstein fired that would be the last straw in trump's slow mo Saturday night massacre, and it would be impeachment hearings beginning....

there are 43 republican retiring in the house with no worries of Trump's Wrath...added to the dems and impeachment would happen if Rosenstein goes by the wayside and it would seal the deal on Trump's OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE charge.
It won't be Trump's fault he's impeached by congress. It will be Rosensteins'
 
What does a person who refused to uphold a Presidential travel-ban EO know about the "rule of law"?

She richly deserved to be shitcanned.
dummy, Sally KNEW it was unconstitutional and refused to argue for it.... and she swore under oath in her confirmation hearing that if a president asked her to do something unconstitutional, what would she do? and her answer was, I WOULD NOT DO IT....

AND guess what silly one?

IT WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL! And ruled as such....and Trump's E/O was shut down....

It wasn't completely shut down. The ban is still in place if you're traveling from Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen.
it was ban NUMBER 3 that finally made it through....Ban Number 1 proposal was knocked flat out on day 1, and that one was the one she refused to defend.
And she was wrong then, and she's still wrong now.
She was not wrong then....she was right. What Trump asked her to defend was unconstitutional and was stopped, almost immediately, Ban number 2 was completely re-written and was also stopped for being unconstitutional, but ban number 3 which modified ban number 2, was then approved.

Ban number 1 was clearly, with no doubt, unconstitutional.... she stood up for what she swore by God, she would do.
So the interpretation of the first ban you say was seen as an assault on the Constitution ? Otherwise, this was figured to be the case by someone like you or your co-horts, but doesn't it all depend on the majority interpretation of the ban in respect to the Constitution ??? Sadly for you the majority in this country don't agree with much that the left has to say anymore, much less in the way that the left interprets the law aside from the Constitution.
 
Like McCabe, soon she'll be checking in the crossbar hotel along with Rosenstein and Comey. How dare she talk about the rule of law when refused to enforce the law pertaining to allowing Trump to initiate a travel ban. Nevertheless, I expect Rosenstein to be fired or impeached Monday, the deadline he has to turn over the Comey memos to Congress.

Read the comments in the link. They're glorious!
Fired AG Sally Yates Lashes Out at Trump 'Firing Rosenstein Would Be an Unconscionable Assault on the Rule of Law'

Tell us, how is right-wing, anti-Islam, fascist Cristina Laila's Twitter account going???.......LOL
 
she is right...if trump gets rosenstein fired that would be the last straw in trump's slow mo Saturday night massacre, and it would be impeachment hearings beginning....

there are 43 republican retiring in the house with no worries of Trump's Wrath...added to the dems and impeachment would happen if Rosenstein goes by the wayside and it would seal the deal on Trump's OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE charge.
It won't be Trump's fault he's impeached by congress. It will be Rosensteins'
congress can impeach him? If so, for what? he's the president's appointment....if the president has legal reasons to fire him, that ha nothing to do with Mueller, the special counsel, or Cohen's search warrant signed off on then he could....

the problem is, Trump has been mouthing off about Rosenstein for a year now on the Mueller investigation and Rosenstein's firing or impeachment (which won't happen), would be known BY EVERYONE, that it was to obstruct the mueller investigation.....

many liberals are hoping he has it done or does it....they are ready to impeach!

if you do not want him to be impeached, then you all need to tell him NOT to do it!!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top