JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
- 2,165
- Banned
- #41
It was right the first time, HBH. Why are you lying?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just went back and checked.
Indeed you said "Every president".
You'll learn the use of the edit function in time.
Or not.
the biggest LIAR ever..but he played you all like a fiddle...be proud you were duped
SNIP:
Obama 2008: Bypassing Congress Unconstitutional - YouTube
Pretty stunning quote when you consider what Obama is doing now.
Obama in 2008:
ALL of it here
FLASHBACK: Obama Says ?He Intends To Reverse? George W. Bush?s Use of Executive Orders To ?Bring More And More Power Into The Executive Branch?? | Weasel Zippers
It wasn't meant as a defense. Hough pointed out the another poster changed his position on executive orders from against them to for them when Obama became president. I am merely pointing out that Hough is doing the same thing he condemned. When bush was president we didn't hear a peep out of Hough when bush issued an executive order. Hough had no problem with executive orders under bush but he is strongly against them when issued by Obama. Try to keep up.Gee MOM! They did it toooooooo...is NO defense. Obama is out of control. Did you hear ONE POTUS in history overtly state HE was circumventing the Congress on purpose? What was that? NO?! I thought so.So did yours!OK, so your belief that Bush was wrong to use Executive Orders suddenly reversed the day Your New Messiah was anointed.
We get it......
I just went back and checked.
Indeed you said "Every president".
You'll learn the use of the edit function in time.
Or not.
Does that apply to all partisans, both left and right?Just another in his long list of lies. His supporters don't care. Honesty and integrity have no meaning to partisans.
Prove that any of the presidents didn't do it.
However, if true, it does not invalidate that the OP is stupid, and that the presidents have thrown out the predecessor's EOs.
No, Shakey, you were very specific that EVERY PRESIDENT had reversed stuff done by Bush. That made no exception for presidents who were even born, died, and rotted back into the soil before Bush was even conceived.Prove that any of the presidents didn't do it.
However, if true, it does not invalidate that the OP is stupid, and that the presidents have thrown out the predecessor's EOs.
It is what it is, its OK for his presidents to do it but not for the other side.
Aside: have folks here noticed just how poorly the last year has been the argumentation coming from the libertarians and the far right reactionaries?
An executive order issued by President Barack Obama that was designed to cut red tape has added $10.2 billion in regulatory costs to the economy, according to a new report.
Has Washington actually cut red tape? On net, final rules from Order 13563 have added more than $10.2 billion in costs, mostly from new regulations labeled as retrospective, Batkins said. Final rules have cut 7.9 million hours of paperwork, but Dodd-Frank and the Affordable Care Act have easily outpaced those deregulatory gains.
The deregulatory measures resulting from the executive order actually add over $10 billion in costs to the economy. For example, a final rule imposing energy standards for transformers carries a $5.22 billion cost to comply and 58,320 hours of paperwork.
Taken with the proposed regulations under the executive order, the total burden to the economy would reach $13.7 billion.
President Obama promised that the order would reduce paperwork in a January 2011 Wall Street Journal editorial.
While Obama has said he will use his executive authority to push his climate agenda and other policies during what he dubbed his "year of action," the president would need approval from Congress for the fund.
Double Standards...NO principle...Obama's followers don't give a hoot how he's cost the economy or us people with EO'S
their standard, but but Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh and every President
They wailed over Bush's EO's and now look at them
Precisely what I've been stating...What RIGHT does he have to do this and WHY isn't the Congress on FASTRACK to Impeaching this SOB?Number of e.o's is not what is relevant. Impact, type of, and cost of e.o.'s is what should be looked at. For instance:
Obama Executive Order Has Added $10.2 Billion in Costs to Economy - Fox NationAn executive order issued by President Barack Obama that was designed to cut red tape has added $10.2 billion in regulatory costs to the economy, according to a new report.
Has Washington actually cut red tape? On net, final rules from Order 13563 have added more than $10.2 billion in costs, mostly from new regulations labeled as retrospective, Batkins said. Final rules have cut 7.9 million hours of paperwork, but Dodd-Frank and the Affordable Care Act have easily outpaced those deregulatory gains.
The deregulatory measures resulting from the executive order actually add over $10 billion in costs to the economy. For example, a final rule imposing energy standards for transformers carries a $5.22 billion cost to comply and 58,320 hours of paperwork.
Taken with the proposed regulations under the executive order, the total burden to the economy would reach $13.7 billion.
President Obama promised that the order would reduce paperwork in a January 2011 Wall Street Journal editorial.
THAT IS...IF YOU consider yourself a PARTISAN...from your posts? YOU reek PARTISAN SCUMBAG.Does that apply to all partisans, both left and right?Just another in his long list of lies. His supporters don't care. Honesty and integrity have no meaning to partisans.
How about the havoc wreaked on the Constitution and the DAMGE it's doing? NEVER consider that do you Fakey?OK, now that we are all back in sanity about the fact that presidents revoke each others' EOs, can anybody do an analysis of say WJC, GWB, and BHO and their EOs. We need more than 'good' and 'bad'.
WHY isn't the Congress on FASTRACK to Impeaching this SOB?