tinydancer
Diamond Member
I never ever want to hear about Russian meddling ever fucking again. We in the west just overthrow governments and leaders and by the FUCKING WAY.........................................
fuck everything up.
White House: Obama method for regime change better than Bush method
This week’s toppling of the Qaddafi regime in Libya shows that the Obama administration’s multilateral and light-footprint approach to regime change is more effective than the troop-heavy occupation-style approach used by the George W. Bush administration in Iraq and Afghanistan, a top White House official told Foreign Policy today in a wide-ranging interview. "The fact ...
By Josh Rogin | August 24, 2011, 2:36 PM
This week’s toppling of the Qaddafi regime in Libya shows that the Obama administration’s multilateral and light-footprint approach to regime change is more effective than the troop-heavy occupation-style approach used by the George W. Bush administration in Iraq and Afghanistan, a top White House official told Foreign Policy today in a wide-ranging interview.
"The fact that it is Libyans marching into Tripoli not only provides a basis of legitimacy for this but also will provide contrast to situations when the foreign government is the occupier," said Ben Rhodes, deputy national security advisor for communications, in an exclusive interview on Wednesday with FP. "While there will be huge challenges ahead, one of the positive aspects here is that the Libyans are the ones who are undertaking the regime change and the ones leading the transition."
Libyan slave trade. Thanks Obama. Thanks Hillary. Thanks the D media for not giving one shit about these people.
More at link if you want to see the slave trade Obama gave Libya.
White House: Obama method for regime change better than Bush method
fuck everything up.
White House: Obama method for regime change better than Bush method
This week’s toppling of the Qaddafi regime in Libya shows that the Obama administration’s multilateral and light-footprint approach to regime change is more effective than the troop-heavy occupation-style approach used by the George W. Bush administration in Iraq and Afghanistan, a top White House official told Foreign Policy today in a wide-ranging interview. "The fact ...
By Josh Rogin | August 24, 2011, 2:36 PM
This week’s toppling of the Qaddafi regime in Libya shows that the Obama administration’s multilateral and light-footprint approach to regime change is more effective than the troop-heavy occupation-style approach used by the George W. Bush administration in Iraq and Afghanistan, a top White House official told Foreign Policy today in a wide-ranging interview.
"The fact that it is Libyans marching into Tripoli not only provides a basis of legitimacy for this but also will provide contrast to situations when the foreign government is the occupier," said Ben Rhodes, deputy national security advisor for communications, in an exclusive interview on Wednesday with FP. "While there will be huge challenges ahead, one of the positive aspects here is that the Libyans are the ones who are undertaking the regime change and the ones leading the transition."
Libyan slave trade. Thanks Obama. Thanks Hillary. Thanks the D media for not giving one shit about these people.
More at link if you want to see the slave trade Obama gave Libya.
White House: Obama method for regime change better than Bush method
