Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
Not enough morals on the right wing to around to even understand the concept?
You have no clue what the subject of the thread is, nor can you compose a coherent sentence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not enough morals on the right wing to around to even understand the concept?
Twitter and Facebook should open or buy a theme park in Florida b/c doing so grants you a special exemption from the bill.
The pedos should form a pedoparty,
so they can sue under Florida for banning political pedospeech.
Oh wait, that's not necessary. We already have the GOP. That was probably the ultimate intent of the law.
I hope it won't but this is Florida.
The state with a Supreme Court that ruled that Fox News has a first amendment right to lie and fire employees who refuse to lie.
It's a first amendment violation no matter who it's aimed at.
That's the difference between you and me, I can see that. You can't.
yeah,, like what do we have 200 active members??USMB Rules!republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.
They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.
What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.
They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.
Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.
![]()
Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians
Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.www.usatoday.com
Social media has become more powerful than government. That’s a problem
When USMB goes public the mods are going to make billions!
USMB already dwarfs Google and Facebook
your premise is a lie,,Wrong.one political POV is not being treated the same as the other,, and its effecting elections,,
All political points of view are being treated the same.
Participants who violate a platform’s terms of use are subject to removal, which is perfectly appropriate for private social media.
As the Supreme Court held in Citizens United, private entities have the right to participate in political discourse, to advocate for political positions, free from regulation by government.
your premise is a lie,,Wrong.its a public platform not a public publisher,, and they are not applying their own rules equally,,
Social media are a private platform and a private publisher, at liberty to apply their rules as they see fit.
If conservatives believe those rules are ‘unfair’ the solution is for conservatives to refuse to participate, not use the power and authority of government to violate social medias’ First Amendment rights.
one political POV is not being treated the same as the other,, and its effecting elections,,
One political POV is resorting to misinformation and and conspiracy theories
They are being held to the same standard as the Democrats
Tell the truth
The owners of USMB are among the wealthiest in the world. That is why mods are paid so well.yeah,, like what do we have 200 active members??USMB Rules!republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.
They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.
What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.
They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.
Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.
![]()
Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians
Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.www.usatoday.com
Social media has become more powerful than government. That’s a problem
When USMB goes public the mods are going to make billions!
USMB already dwarfs Google and Facebook
The owners of the platform.
Derp.
got a link?The owners of USMB are among the wealthiest in the world. That is why mods are paid so well.yeah,, like what do we have 200 active members??USMB Rules!republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.
They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.
What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.
They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.
Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.
![]()
Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians
Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.www.usatoday.com
Social media has become more powerful than government. That’s a problem
When USMB goes public the mods are going to make billions!
USMB already dwarfs Google and Facebook
Don’t need one, just visit USMB HQ complex and you can see how wealthy they aregot a link?The owners of USMB are among the wealthiest in the world. That is why mods are paid so well.yeah,, like what do we have 200 active members??USMB Rules!republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.
They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.
What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.
They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.
Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.
![]()
Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians
Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.www.usatoday.com
Social media has become more powerful than government. That’s a problem
When USMB goes public the mods are going to make billions!
USMB already dwarfs Google and Facebook
So you go from the first claiming it's not for corporations and get shot in one butt cheek and now you're trying for the other?
OK
When you sign up for a membership you agree to a ToS.
The ToS is politically neutral.
when you violate the ToS the company has every right to remove your content and even cancel your account.
they didn't cancel your account because of your race, nor because of your religion, or your politics.
THEY CANCELLED YOUR ACCONT BECAUSE YOU VIOLATED THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT TO WHICH YOU AGREED.
Now, please describe how this fits into any remote discussion of "equal protection."
We'll be waiting for your Rudy-Like mastering of the law.
Wrong.its a public platform not a public publisher,, and they are not applying their own rules equally,,
Social media are a private platform and a private publisher, at liberty to apply their rules as they see fit.
If conservatives believe those rules are ‘unfair’ the solution is for conservatives to refuse to participate, not use the power and authority of government to violate social medias’ First Amendment rights.
Of course. Translated it simply means, "Say things we approve of and we'll let you stay. Say things we don't and we'll kick you off". Legal or not, it's exclusionary and reflects the left's obsession with controlling speech."There's already a solution to deplatforming candidates on social media: Stop trafficking in conspiracy theories. That's the solution. Stop pushing misinformation if you're a candidate or an incumbent elected official. Stop retweeting QAnon. Stop lying on social media," Smith said.
]
Of course. Translated it simply means, "Say things we approve of and we'll let you stay. Say things we don't and we'll kick you off". Legal or not, it's exclusionary and reflects the left's obsession with controlling speech.
That never happened.pull a Gavin Newsom and use the full weight of the government to prohibit Christianity?
[/QUOTE]The owners of the platform.
Derp.
Even for you, that's just fucking stupid.
I know you're just a troll reading a script given to you by your handlers, but good Buddha that's fucking stupid.
"If I can't silence others, it's a restriction on my speech."
Do you EVER think? Just to see what it's like?