Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis To Sign Bill Banning Social Media ‘Deplatforming’

[progressive hunter]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Mitt Romney "Corporations are people my friend"

Not that it makes your comment less nonsensical.
The 1st is meant for the government.
Does not say what people or corporations or businesses can or cannot do.
Only the government

You've a complete failure to understand either the meaning or intent of the 1st.

There's not a conservative alive that has even the vaguest ideas what the constitution is for or what it's about. I was told on another forum, by a person who claimed to be a lawyer, that the preamble didn't matter because it isn't really part of the document.

The Constitution does not say socialism, fascism, capitalism, communism. None of it. It does say freedom and liberty and tells us about positive real money. Not the debt derived fiat currency we have today. So you must include that. But you can't. Because all of the agendas you have will fall like dominoes.

We have a more solid currency than our founders ever envisioned

Between 1790 and 1936 the US had easily a dozen depressions and dozens of regional recessions generally traceable to liquidity issues.
So long as the Fed acts to keep the lid on hyper-inflation the currency along with the euro will remain the model of currency stability.
And isn't it great the Fed is (sort of) politically independent.

youre forgetting they didnt have huge debt like we have now,,

the feds are eating us up with allowing that debt and getting filthy rich in the process,,

 

[Dadoalex]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Mitt Romney "Corporations are people my friend"

Not that it makes your comment less nonsensical.
The 1st is meant for the government.
Does not say what people or corporations or businesses can or cannot do.
Only the government

You've a complete failure to understand either the meaning or intent of the 1st.

There's not a conservative alive that has even the vaguest ideas what the constitution is for or what it's about. I was told on another forum, by a person who claimed to be a lawyer, that the preamble didn't matter because it isn't really part of the document.

The preamble is not legally enforceable any more than the ideas in the Declaration are legally enforceable.

BUT

They set a moral tone for the direction of this country meaning they are every bit as important as the rest of the documents
BECAUSE
Without them we are not the USA.

The preamble is what the rest of the document is all about.

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Mitt Romney "Corporations are people my friend"

Not that it makes your comment less nonsensical.
The 1st is meant for the government.
Does not say what people or corporations or businesses can or cannot do.
Only the government

You've a complete failure to understand either the meaning or intent of the 1st.

There's not a conservative alive that has even the vaguest ideas what the constitution is for or what it's about. I was told on another forum, by a person who claimed to be a lawyer, that the preamble didn't matter because it isn't really part of the document.

The Constitution does not say socialism, fascism, capitalism, communism. None of it. It does say freedom and liberty and tells us about positive real money. Not the debt derived fiat currency we have today. So you must include that. But you can't. Because all of the agendas you have will fall like dominoes.

We have a more solid currency than our founders ever envisioned

Between 1790 and 1936 the US had easily a dozen depressions and dozens of regional recessions generally traceable to liquidity issues.
So long as the Fed acts to keep the lid on hyper-inflation the currency along with the euro will remain the model of currency stability.
And isn't it great the Fed is (sort of) politically independent.

youre forgetting they didnt have huge debt like we have now,,

the feds are eating us up with allowing that debt and getting filthy rich in the process,,

Sigh....

So let's go gold.
First, do we float or set a value? If we float prices will be generally competitive but subject to massive bouts of inflation and deflation. Set a value and imports could become prohibitively expensive.
Issue currency backed by gold or do business with actual gold? In either case, what do you do about hoarding?

We know all the answers to all the questions surrounding "going gold" because, to borrow a phrase, we've been there before.
Between 1790 and 1936 this country suffered literally dozens of recessions and depressions traceable to a lack of liquidity in the markets. The government's inability to print more money and remove money from the market meant there were no mechanisms to slow these bouts of depression and hyperinflation. Since 1936 the US has suffered zero depressions and, outside of 08/09 generally good economic growth thanks in good part to the Fed.

The ideas you're pushing are literally failed 19th century economic thought.

 

[progressive hunter]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Mitt Romney "Corporations are people my friend"

Not that it makes your comment less nonsensical.
The 1st is meant for the government.
Does not say what people or corporations or businesses can or cannot do.
Only the government

You've a complete failure to understand either the meaning or intent of the 1st.

There's not a conservative alive that has even the vaguest ideas what the constitution is for or what it's about. I was told on another forum, by a person who claimed to be a lawyer, that the preamble didn't matter because it isn't really part of the document.

The preamble is not legally enforceable any more than the ideas in the Declaration are legally enforceable.

BUT

They set a moral tone for the direction of this country meaning they are every bit as important as the rest of the documents
BECAUSE
Without them we are not the USA.

The preamble is what the rest of the document is all about.

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Mitt Romney "Corporations are people my friend"

Not that it makes your comment less nonsensical.
The 1st is meant for the government.
Does not say what people or corporations or businesses can or cannot do.
Only the government

You've a complete failure to understand either the meaning or intent of the 1st.

There's not a conservative alive that has even the vaguest ideas what the constitution is for or what it's about. I was told on another forum, by a person who claimed to be a lawyer, that the preamble didn't matter because it isn't really part of the document.

The Constitution does not say socialism, fascism, capitalism, communism. None of it. It does say freedom and liberty and tells us about positive real money. Not the debt derived fiat currency we have today. So you must include that. But you can't. Because all of the agendas you have will fall like dominoes.

We have a more solid currency than our founders ever envisioned

Between 1790 and 1936 the US had easily a dozen depressions and dozens of regional recessions generally traceable to liquidity issues.
So long as the Fed acts to keep the lid on hyper-inflation the currency along with the euro will remain the model of currency stability.
And isn't it great the Fed is (sort of) politically independent.

youre forgetting they didnt have huge debt like we have now,,

the feds are eating us up with allowing that debt and getting filthy rich in the process,,

Sigh....

So let's go gold.
First, do we float or set a value? If we float prices will be generally competitive but subject to massive bouts of inflation and deflation. Set a value and imports could become prohibitively expensive.
Issue currency backed by gold or do business with actual gold? In either case, what do you do about hoarding?

We know all the answers to all the questions surrounding "going gold" because, to borrow a phrase, we've been there before.
Between 1790 and 1936 this country suffered literally dozens of recessions and depressions traceable to a lack of liquidity in the markets. The government's inability to print more money and remove money from the market meant there were no mechanisms to slow these bouts of depression and hyperinflation. Since 1936 the US has suffered zero depressions and, outside of 08/09 generally good economic growth thanks in good part to the Fed.

The ideas you're pushing are literally failed 19th century economic thought.

how about we start by not taking on new debt we can never pay off??

I think is a little disrespectful to future generations dont you??

 

[Coyote]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Corporate personhood and free speech.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Oh, is THAT how you think it works?

So, how do you think it's going to work?

Make sure your method doesn't violate the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, in addition to violating the First Amendment. Not that you've ever cared about the Constitution, but you should at least pretend.

Yes, the Nazi hate sites said something about the 1st that you morons so violently fight to destroy.

This is about election tampering, Your filthy Reich is breaking election laws. with the actions of the tech fascists.

 

[progressive hunter]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Corporate personhood and free speech.

when was their free speech denied??

or are you just trolling??

 

[Coyote]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Corporate personhood and free speech.

when was their free speech denied??

or are you just trolling??

You claimed "the 1st is meant for the people not companies,," but you're wrong. Corporations are recognized as "people" for the purpose of first amendment rights.

 

[Rocko]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

Social media has become more powerful than government. That’s a problem

USMB Rules!

When USMB goes public the mods are going to make billions!

 

[progressive hunter]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Corporate personhood and free speech.

when was their free speech denied??

or are you just trolling??

You claimed "the 1st is meant for the people not companies,," but you're wrong. Corporations are recognized as "people" for the purpose of first amendment rights.

that was a stupid call on SCOTUS,,

but in this case whos speech was restricted,,,

the bigger point is coming out its not a 1st issue,,,

 

[Coyote]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Corporate personhood and free speech.

when was their free speech denied??

or are you just trolling??

You claimed "the 1st is meant for the people not companies,," but you're wrong. Corporations are recognized as "people" for the purpose of first amendment rights.

that was a stupid call on SCOTUS,,

but in this case whos speech was restricted,,,

the bigger point is coming out its not a 1st issue,,,

Agree with you on that.

Actually, DeSantis' law is more an infringement on the rights of private businesses to control their property then a free speech issue I think.

 

[progressive hunter]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Corporate personhood and free speech.

when was their free speech denied??

or are you just trolling??

You claimed "the 1st is meant for the people not companies,," but you're wrong. Corporations are recognized as "people" for the purpose of first amendment rights.

that was a stupid call on SCOTUS,,

but in this case whos speech was restricted,,,

the bigger point is coming out its not a 1st issue,,,

Agree with you on that.

Actually, DeSantis' law is more an infringement on the rights of private businesses to control their property then a free speech issue I think.

its a public platform not a public publisher,, and they are not applying their own rules equally,,

one political POV is not being treated the same as the other,, and its effecting elections,,

 

[Coyote]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Corporate personhood and free speech.

when was their free speech denied??

or are you just trolling??

You claimed "the 1st is meant for the people not companies,," but you're wrong. Corporations are recognized as "people" for the purpose of first amendment rights.

that was a stupid call on SCOTUS,,

but in this case whos speech was restricted,,,

the bigger point is coming out its not a 1st issue,,,

Agree with you on that.

Actually, DeSantis' law is more an infringement on the rights of private businesses to control their property then a free speech issue I think.

its a public platform not a public publisher,, and they are not applying their own rules equally,,

one political POV is not being treated the same as the other,, and its effecting elections,,

It's private property that provides a platform to the public for their use within certain rules.

You have to prove they aren't applying their rules equally. So far, it's just conservatives whining because they keep breaking the rules and don't think rules should apply to them.

 

[progressive hunter]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Corporate personhood and free speech.

when was their free speech denied??

or are you just trolling??

You claimed "the 1st is meant for the people not companies,," but you're wrong. Corporations are recognized as "people" for the purpose of first amendment rights.

that was a stupid call on SCOTUS,,

but in this case whos speech was restricted,,,

the bigger point is coming out its not a 1st issue,,,

Agree with you on that.

Actually, DeSantis' law is more an infringement on the rights of private businesses to control their property then a free speech issue I think.

its a public platform not a public publisher,, and they are not applying their own rules equally,,

one political POV is not being treated the same as the other,, and its effecting elections,,

It's private property that provides a platform to the public for their use within certain rules.

You have to prove they aren't applying their rules equally. So far, it's just conservatives whining because they keep breaking the rules and don't think rules should apply to them.

its been well proven they don apply equally,,

 

[progressive hunter]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Corporate personhood and free speech.

when was their free speech denied??

or are you just trolling??

You claimed "the 1st is meant for the people not companies,," but you're wrong. Corporations are recognized as "people" for the purpose of first amendment rights.

that was a stupid call on SCOTUS,,

but in this case whos speech was restricted,,,

the bigger point is coming out its not a 1st issue,,,

Agree with you on that.

Actually, DeSantis' law is more an infringement on the rights of private businesses to control their property then a free speech issue I think.

its a public platform not a public publisher,, and they are not applying their own rules equally,,

one political POV is not being treated the same as the other,, and its effecting elections,,

It's private property that provides a platform to the public for their use within certain rules.

You have to prove they aren't applying their rules equally. So far, it's just conservatives whining because they keep breaking the rules and don't think rules should apply to them.

its been well proven they don apply equally,,

you can disagree allday long,, it doesnt mean your right, just that your ignorant or a liar,,

 

[progressive hunter]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

I'm thinking youre a little confused how the 1st A works,,,

Nope. You are.

and yet you failed to explain why I'm wrong,,

the 1st is meant for the people not companies,,

Corporate personhood and free speech.

when was their free speech denied??

or are you just trolling??

You claimed "the 1st is meant for the people not companies,," but you're wrong. Corporations are recognized as "people" for the purpose of first amendment rights.

that was a stupid call on SCOTUS,,

but in this case whos speech was restricted,,,

the bigger point is coming out its not a 1st issue,,,

Agree with you on that.

Actually, DeSantis' law is more an infringement on the rights of private businesses to control their property then a free speech issue I think.

its a public platform not a public publisher,, and they are not applying their own rules equally,,

one political POV is not being treated the same as the other,, and its effecting elections,,

It's private property that provides a platform to the public for their use within certain rules.

You have to prove they aren't applying their rules equally. So far, it's just conservatives whining because they keep breaking the rules and don't think rules should apply to them.

its been well proven they don apply equally,,

you can disagree allday long,, it doesnt mean your right, just that your ignorant or a liar,,

cant help but notice you have no response,, so you must be lying again,,

 

[WEATHER53]

It invites people in and then wants to control expression

 

[rightwinger]

republicans strike again. Now they are taking first amendment rights from social media.

They are regulating the internet. And violating the first amendment to do it. They are also violating section 230 of the communications decency act.

What happened to their screaming that business owners have the right to decide who they serve or do business with? That was a lie too.

They are showing that their hate for regulations was all a lie. They love regulating business just not in a responsible way.

Their beliefs are of convenience not real beliefs.

Ban Trump? Not so fast. Florida is about to pass a law to stop Facebook and Twitter from censoring politicians

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is likely to sign into law a bill that would stop Facebook, Twitter and YouTube from censoring politicians such as Donald Trump.

www.usatoday.com

Social media has become more powerful than government. That’s a problem

USMB Rules!

When USMB goes public the mods are going to make billions!

USMB already dwarfs Google and Facebook

 

[rightwinger]

one political POV is not being treated the same as the other,, and its effecting elections,,

One political POV is resorting to misinformation and and conspiracy theories

They are being held to the same standard as the Democrats
Tell the truth

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

its a public platform not a public publisher,, and they are not applying their own rules equally,,

Wrong.

Social media are a private platform and a private publisher, at liberty to apply their rules as they see fit.

If conservatives believe those rules are ‘unfair’ the solution is for conservatives to refuse to participate, not use the power and authority of government to violate social medias’ First Amendment rights.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

one political POV is not being treated the same as the other,, and its effecting elections,,

Wrong.

All political points of view are being treated the same.

Participants who violate a platform’s terms of use are subject to removal, which is perfectly appropriate for private social media.

As the Supreme Court held in Citizens United, private entities have the right to participate in political discourse, to advocate for political positions, free from regulation by government.