Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You cannot read your own fucking link?Troops were certainly targeted. The US doesn't target civilians.
SignOnSanDiego.com > News > Military -- Officials confirm dropping firebombs on Iraqi troops
similar to the controversial napalm used in the Vietnam War â in March and April as Marines battled toward Baghdad.web.archive.org
Of course I can. It shows that the US Marines conducted napalm airstrikes against Iraqi troops in 2003.You cannot read your own fucking link?
I'll gladly have a nice day, but I will not be silent.Now, have a nice fucking day, and STFU!
Obviously not, because your link says they were NOT napalm, but "remarkably similar".Of course I can. It shows that the US Marines conducted napalm airstrikes against Iraqi troops in 2003.
I'll gladly have a nice day, but I will not be silent.
So you can’t then? Pretty much what I figuredAre you that stupid?
Pretending that it isn't actually napalm just because it is made from a new and improved formula is pretty silly.Obviously not, because your link says they were NOT napalm, but "remarkably similar".
Your reliance on name-calling is evidence that your position is indefensible.Try reading for once. I posted it already, you fucking illiterate dumbass!
You won't be silent, so you must enjoy showing the world how ignorant you are!
Name-calling? I guess the truth hurts, huh?Pretending that it isn't actually napalm just because it is made from a new and improved formula is pretty silly.
Your reliance on name-calling is evidence that your position is indefensible.
I advise changing to a position that can be defended with facts and logic.
Yes. You spout childish name-calling because you are unable to defend your position using facts or logic.Name-calling?
Not really. But you haven't been posting the truth. All you've managed to post is childish name-calling.I guess the truth hurts, huh?
Your only defense is childish name-calling. That really isn't much of a defense.I defended my position,
You're the only person here who has failed to post an intelligent argument.and you are too stupid to acknowledge it.
More childish name-calling because you are unable to come up with an intelligent argument.Open Bolts are useless, just like you!
Welcome to my ignore list for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty.Yes. You spout childish name-calling because you are unable to defend your position using facts or logic.
Not really. But you haven't been posting the truth. All you've managed to post is childish name-calling.
Your only defense is childish name-calling. That really isn't much of a defense.
You're the only person here who has failed to post an intelligent argument.
More childish name-calling because you are unable to come up with an intelligent argument.
Again, you are the only person here who isn't posting anything intelligent.Welcome to my ignore list for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty.
You might be in the wrong thread...Here is what we have since after last night's overwheming victory of Women's Rights.
1. The Republican bleated and bloviated and screamed for years about letting the "People" decide what they wanted. The People of Kansas decided that they would vote to uphold, under Kansas State Constitution to protect a Woman's Right To Choose.
2. The Republicans should have been careful of what they wish for. They got their wish and it went South on them. They never expect that a Deep Red State like Kansas would come down on the side of Women and their right to decide for themselves if they want to have an Abortion and the State of Kansas will not interfere in that decision.
3. By putting a Woman's Right To Chose on the ballot, the Republicans could not control the vote. Tueday Night's vote was driven by Voter Turnout. There was a huge turnout and it worked against Conservative Republicans.
4. By putting a Woman's Right To Choose on the ballot, the Tuesday Vote shows that it can win at the ballot box.
5. Turn Out when a Woman's Right To Choose is huge out of the gate. Polls have constantly proven than an overwhelming number of American's support a Woman's Right To Choose.
The Conservative's got exactly what they wanted, to give the State, give the Voter's a Right To Choose to support a Woman's Right To Choose. Tuesday Night shows that while Cons may want that, they cannot control how what they want will turn out.
Suck it Butter cup, you fucking got what you fucking wanted. The People of Kansas have spoken and they have decided with one voice, Women Have A Constitual Right To Abortion.
I am fucking loving it.
What president did ISIS start under?Trump destroyed the Isis caliphate within months of taking office the same caliphate that raged across the middle east and killed 100s of thousands and grew in power and operated for yrs when Obama and Biden were in the WH .
Humbolt Pie.Keep in mind that stout Hermann Goring who wasWe already have him in custody. However, lethal injection (after conviction in a fair trial) sounds like a great idea.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does any of this leftist nonsense have to do with Ayman al-Zawahiri?Here is what we have since after last night's overwheming victory of Women's Rights.
Isis became a major terrorist threat to the world and established a caliphate when Obama and Biden were in the WH .What president did ISIS start under?
Isis was formed in 2004, Obama wasn't President at that time.Isis became a major terrorist threat to the world and established a caliphate when Obama and Biden were in the WH .
they were only the JV team until obama and xiden drafted them to varsityIsis was formed in 2004, Obama wasn't President at that time.
in 2004 they werent the threat they grew to when Obama and Bidens weak leadership paved they way for them .Isis was formed in 2004, Obama wasn't President at that time.
2004.they were only the JV team until obama and xiden drafted them to varsity
