Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First of all, if it’s so obvious to everyone, why did you bring it up?You are kidding I hope , if not you are fucking dumb. the court is bought and owned by corporation and people with money. Try a little research before you dumb fuck the world with your ignorance.
hay dumb fuck so his 8 picks didn't pack the court , air head , no one has chosen more supreme court justices the FDR, that's in our total history. You are a idiot.Hey bozo FDR had 12 years to make appt's. but in 1937 he tried packing the court and it blew up in his face, like it will yours.
Just do a little research on Uncle Tom Thomas. You have to be quite unaware if you don't know about Thomas , Justices have been allowed to do this for ever. They are owned.First of all, if it’s so obvious to everyone, why did you bring it up?
Secondly, if what you say is true, it was true long before the recent ruling. So why are you only now bitching about it?
Third, what corporations and people with money are involved?
The idea is that the supreme court is just their to decide constitutionality of a law. That's generally. But the are bought and paid for and that's on both sides of the isle. But record wise The republican have been way worse, seems to be in their make up more. Lots of criminals on the right.In one sense, it's like the big complaint I have about the United Nations. There are all of these diplomats in New York making decisions on solutions for what is the best path forward in sub-Saharan Africa. Its nuts. Put the UN in Kinshasa and I bet you'd get a different type of diplomat making different types of decisions. The recent rulings on bump stocks and this nutty edict that the President enjoys immunity unless he expressly shoots someone in the face on fifth avenue do nothing to improve the lives of the people in the nation. So, correctly, the population sees their actions and makes the conclusion that they are out of touch. Perhaps, if we were to do it all over again (which we're not going to), having a council of districts attorneys from fifth avenue, St. Louis, Bosier City, LA, Cody, WY, Seattle, Honolulu would render different rulings based on the body count in their districts--folks who work with law enforcement. When was the last time Elena Kagan spoke with a sheriff ya think? Probably decades if ever.
Some practicality is all I ask for .
MAGAism, since it is the center and gensis of all American political criminality, is going to have to be stamped out in America as was Naziism in Germany after the war. It has created a crime wave generated by an Orange pervert that adores anti-American verbiage and behavior. Death politically and culturally to all that is MAGA. YUP!Because there will be a massive Blue sweep, that will be the very first legislation.
stupid.Actually it worked out quite well for him. Prior to the threat SCOTUS stood against his communist dictates, but after the threat they crumbled like Republicans being called racists.
Thank you!MAGAism, since it is the center and gensis of all American political criminality, is going to have to be stamped out in America as was Naziism in Germany after the war. It has created a crime wave generated by an Orange pervert that adores anti-American verbiage and behavior. Death politically and culturally to all that is MAGA. YUP!
Allowed to do what?Just do a little research on Uncle Tom Thomas. You have to be quite unaware if you don't know about Thomas , Justices have been allowed to do this for ever. They are owned.
Less than 1/2 for Pubs, about 50% for Dems?Expanding the court whenever you don't like it is just a band aid.
Maybe the Dems would be smart to look in the mirror and ask why so much of this country votes the way it does.
You need to investigate yourself as to why you asked the last two questions. Do your duty, skippy.Allowed to do what?
You brought it up and you made the allegation. The onus is on you to present evidence for your accusation. I’m not doing your work for you.
Having said that, you didn’t answer my other questions:
If all this is so obvious then why did you bother to tell us?
If this corruption has been ongoing then why are you only now bitching about it?
Whatever the numbers are, they got Trump elected in 2016 and he's looking pretty good right now.Less than 1/2 for Pubs, about 50% for Dems?
He will get maybe 200 electoral votes if he has some luck,Whatever the numbers are, they got Trump elected in 2016 and he's looking pretty good right now.
There is no good excuse for that. Elections are about contrasts, choices. I would be asking how it's even close.
I need to investigate why I asked the questions of someone who made an unsubstatiated allegation?You need to investigate yourself as to why you asked the last two questions. Do your duty, skippy.
Wait, did you just thank yourself?Thank you!
So you don't know what you are talking about, skippy, then. You just made youself look like you intellectually shat in your pants.I need to investigate why I asked the questions of someone who made an unsubstatiated allegation?
I’m afraid it doesn’t work like that. I didn’t make the accusation, ergo, I was not obligated to find the evidence. Skippy.
I haven’t “talked” about anything except to ask j-what’s-his-face to provide evidence for his allegation.So you don't know what you are talking about, skippy, then. You just made youself look like you intellectually shat in your pants.
And he continues to do it,I haven’t “talked” about anything except to ask j-what’s-his-face to provide evidence for his allegation.
What it is it you think I’m talking about?
