2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,253
- 52,473
- 2,290
Martin O Malley announces bid for president On Air Videos Fox News
He announced yesterday at 10:58 AM, EST, from Federal Hill Park in Baltimore, MD, 528 days before the upcoming November 8th, 2016 General Election.
His speech, given on a beautiful Saturday and with his lovely wife Katie O'Malley present, was 22 minutes long.
With Lincoln Chafee (I-RI) announcing officially early in the coming week (he already announced unoficially on CNN on April 16th, 2015), that will now make for four Democratic Presidential contenders:
Hillary Clinton (NY)
Bernie Sanders (VT)
Martin O'Malley (MD)
Lincoln Chafee (RI)
I listed their states to illustrate a point: all four candidates hail from the NE/Acela region of the USA.
O'Malley's speech was a hard-hitting, populistic speech (see: FOX NEWS video above)
He also put out a candidacy video:
Some takeways I discovered:
-he seems charismatic, smart, looks "presidential" and is not afraid to take on bigger opponents.
-his speech was populistic from the first sentence on and he took on Wall Street right away.
-his wife, Katie, is one of the most beautiful candidate's wife I have ever seen.
-he is a real underdog and polling shows him buried under avalanche Clinton, but this could possibly change in the next months. Wait and see.
I personally think it's a good thing that there is now some competition in the Democratic field.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discuss. Watch the speech, then give input. Did Gov. O'Malley say anything that you strongly agree or disagree with?
I found this interview to be disturbing.
David Simon on Baltimore s Anguish The Marshall Project
Specifically, the tactics that O'Malley used (catch and release street sweeping, where anyone caught on the streets was arrested without charges and released the next morning), the focus on short term numbers over actual improvement, and how he straight up falsified crime stats so he could become governor. This in particular:
What can you do? You can’t artificially lower the murder rate – how do you hide the bodies when it’s the state health department that controls the medical examiner’s office? But the other felony categories? Robbery, aggravated assault, rape? Christ, what they did with that stuff was jaw-dropping.
So they cooked the books.
Oh yeah. If you hit somebody with a bullet, that had to count. If they went to the hospital with a bullet in them, it probably had to count as an aggravated assault. But if someone just took a gun out and emptied the clip and didn't hit anything or they didn't know if you hit anything, suddenly that was a common assault or even an unfounded report. Armed robberies became larcenies if you only had a victim’s description of a gun, but not a recovered weapon. And it only gets worse as some district commanders began to curry favor with the mayoral aides who were sitting on the Comstat data. In the Southwest District, a victim would try to make an armed robbery complaint, saying , ‘I just got robbed, somebody pointed a gun at me,’ and what they would do is tell him, well, okay, we can take the report but the first thing we have to do is run you through the computer to see if there's any paper on you. Wait, you're doing a warrant check on me before I can report a robbery? Oh yeah, we gotta know who you are before we take a complaint. You and everyone you’re living with? What’s your address again? You still want to report that robbery?
They cooked their own books in remarkable ways. Guns disappeared from reports and armed robberies became larcenies. Deadly weapons were omitted from reports and aggravated assaults became common assaults. The Baltimore Sun did a fine job looking into the dramatic drop in rapes in the city. Turned out that regardless of how insistent the victims were that they had been raped, the incidents were being quietly unfounded. That tip of the iceberg was reported, but the rest of it, no. And yet there were many veteran commanders and supervisors who were disgusted, who would privately complain about what was happening. If you weren’t a journalist obliged to quote sources and instead, say, someone writing a fictional television drama, they’d share a beer and let you fill cocktail napkins with all the ways in which felonies disappeared in those years.
I mean, think about it. How does the homicide rate decline by 15 percent, while the agg assault rate falls by more than double that rate. Are all of Baltimore’s felons going to gun ranges in the county? Are they becoming better shots? Have the mortality rates for serious assault victims in Baltimore, Maryland suddenly doubled? Did they suddenly close the Hopkins and University emergency rooms and return trauma care to the dark ages? It makes no sense statistically until you realize that you can’t hide a murder, but you can make an attempted murder disappear in a heartbeat, no problem.
But these guys weren't satisfied with just juking their own stats. No, the O'Malley administration also went back to the last year of the previous mayoralty and performed its own retroactive assessment of those felony totals, and guess what? It was determined from this special review that the preceding administration had underreported its own crime rate, which O'Malley rectified by upgrading a good chunk of misdemeanors into felonies to fatten up the Baltimore crime rate that he was inheriting. Get it? How better than to later claim a 30 or 40 percent reduction in crime than by first juking up your inherited rate as high as she'll go. It really was that cynical an exercise.
David Simon on Baltimore s Anguish The Marshall Project
If true, I don't want a man like that anywhere near the White House.
You already got one there...what you talking about?
At any rate ... Sound like a libs dream candidate.
Yes...he is a dream candidate for libs...he helped destroy a city, suppressed minorities in that city...and now he wants to do the same at the national level......the democrats are morons....