dilloduck
Diamond Member
If it's not lost why are we fighting to get it back ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NF 9912684 regarding EC022 9909634Iraq is not lost you fraud.
DD 9915082 regarding NF 9915036, EC 9914259Admit it along with Obama's compadres-----he let Iraq go to shit. Why do you bother trying to defend his decision to withdraw ?
Admit what. Iraq 'went to shit' long before Obama became president.
The point is that Iraq is not lost. When are you Obama haters going to admit that its not lost?
All the crying from the former failed liberal neo-cons means nothing.
You are not going to get American heavy combat units to do what Arabs must do themselves.
Obama and the American public will not let you do that.
NOTFOOLED you've been so thoroughly trounced on this topic out in the press, esp because of Panetta now.... that I won't ever have to type another word countering your lies, LOL.
...but I might cuz it's so fun....
.Privately, the various leadership factions in Iraq all confided that they wanted some U.S. forces to remain as a bulwark against sectarian violence. But none was willing to take that position publicly, and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki concluded that any Status of Forces Agreement, which would give legal protection to those forces, would have to be submitted to the Iraqi parliament for approval. That made reaching
EC 9914271 regarding NF 9912714, BB036 9912554, NF 9911955, JS029 9911663.NOTFOOLED you've been so thoroughly trounced on this topic out in the press, esp because of Panetta now.... that I won't ever have to type another word countering your lies, LOL.
...but I might cuz it's so fun....
You mean the Panetta that is calling you a liar for pushing that nonsense that it was Obama that forced the Iraqis to have the SOFA approved by the legislature?
.Privately, the various leadership factions in Iraq all confided that they wanted some U.S. forces to remain as a bulwark against sectarian violence. But none was willing to take that position publicly, and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki concluded that any Status of Forces Agreement, which would give legal protection to those forces, would have to be submitted to the Iraqi parliament for approval. That made reaching
You are such a phony EconChick, You were so easily busted.
EC 9914271 regarding NF 9912714, BB036 9912554, NF 9911955, JS029 9911663.NOTFOOLED you've been so thoroughly trounced on this topic out in the press, esp because of Panetta now.... that I won't ever have to type another word countering your lies, LOL.
...but I might cuz it's so fun....
You mean the Panetta that is calling you a liar for pushing that nonsense that it was Obama that forced the Iraqis to have the SOFA approved by the legislature?
.Privately, the various leadership factions in Iraq all confided that they wanted some U.S. forces to remain as a bulwark against sectarian violence. But none was willing to take that position publicly, and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki concluded that any Status of Forces Agreement, which would give legal protection to those forces, would have to be submitted to the Iraqi parliament for approval. That made reaching
You are such a phony EconChick, You were so easily busted.
If it's not lost why are we fighting to get it back ?
EC 9914271 regarding NF 9912714, BB036 9912554, NF 9911955, JS029 9911663.NOTFOOLED you've been so thoroughly trounced on this topic out in the press, esp because of Panetta now.... that I won't ever have to type another word countering your lies, LOL.
...but I might cuz it's so fun....
You mean the Panetta that is calling you a liar for pushing that nonsense that it was Obama that forced the Iraqis to have the SOFA approved by the legislature?
.Privately, the various leadership factions in Iraq all confided that they wanted some U.S. forces to remain as a bulwark against sectarian violence. But none was willing to take that position publicly, and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki concluded that any Status of Forces Agreement, which would give legal protection to those forces, would have to be submitted to the Iraqi parliament for approval. That made reaching
You are such a phony EconChick, You were so easily busted.
I keep telling you guys to read your own damn sources.
DD 9915333If it's not lost why are we fighting to get it back ?
The Iraqis are fighting, not Americans. Americans, French, and finally the Brits are conducting airstrikes. There is no fighting going on more than nine feet off the ground. You do realize the IS terrorists don't have an Air Force don't you?
We've basically gone back to the NFZs over Iraq which means all the people Bush got killed were not necessary and now we are back to square one.
EC 9914271 regarding NF 9912714, BB036 9912554, NF 9911955, JS029 9911663.NOTFOOLED you've been so thoroughly trounced on this topic out in the press, esp because of Panetta now.... that I won't ever have to type another word countering your lies, LOL.
...but I might cuz it's so fun....
You mean the Panetta that is calling you a liar for pushing that nonsense that it was Obama that forced the Iraqis to have the SOFA approved by the legislature?
.Privately, the various leadership factions in Iraq all confided that they wanted some U.S. forces to remain as a bulwark against sectarian violence. But none was willing to take that position publicly, and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki concluded that any Status of Forces Agreement, which would give legal protection to those forces, would have to be submitted to the Iraqi parliament for approval. That made reaching
You are such a phony EconChick, You were so easily busted.
I keep telling you guys to read your own damn sources.
LOL, thanks. Yep, I bet I've spent about 80 manhours/womanhours trying to explain exactly what that short little blurp said to NF. It's quite satisfying to get him to give it back to me.
Libs are such empty people when it comes to these important topics. They're great on other things....like the symphony, gardening, baby names, ......
I am an older than you, Antares, and have been a pub all my life.
My grand dad and uncle sat on the vetting board for RMN back in 1946 in Orange County. My aunt was VP of the CA women's group; I was the my university and state college YR president.
I am a Ford Republican. You are to my right. We are in the same party. Although not nearly as diverse as it was in the later sixties and seventies, it will be again within ten years, I believe.