Former Republican Prosecutors Release Damning Video Calling For Trumps Prosecution For Obsruction

[skews13]

A group of former Republican federal prosectors has combined efforts to push for the further investigation and possible prosecution of Trump for obstruction of justice. Calling itself Republicans for the Rule of Law, the group has released a video highlighting the case against Trump as set out in the Mueller report. The former deputy attorney general under President George H.W. Bush, Donald Ayer; the former deputy assistant secretary of homeland security under President George W. Bush, Paul Rosenzweig; and the former deputy associate attorney general under President Ronald Reagan, Jeffrey Harris, are all featured in the video, explaining in the most simple of terms how insanely corrupt a picture the Mueller report paints of the current administration.




I was wondering how long this was going to take.

 

[blackhawk]

Irrelevant.

 

[Oddball]

A group of former Republican federal prosectors has combined efforts to push for the further investigation and possible prosecution of Trump for obstruction of justice. Calling itself Republicans for the Rule of Law, the group has released a video highlighting the case against Trump as set out in the Mueller report. The former deputy attorney general under President George H.W. Bush, Donald Ayer; the former deputy assistant secretary of homeland security under President George W. Bush, Paul Rosenzweig; and the former deputy associate attorney general under President Ronald Reagan, Jeffrey Harris, are all featured in the video, explaining in the most simple of terms how insanely corrupt a picture the Mueller report paints of the current administration.




I was wondering how long this was going to take.

 

[Defiant1]

A group of former Republican federal prosectors has combined efforts to push for the further investigation and possible prosecution of Trump for obstruction of justice. Calling itself Republicans for the Rule of Law, the group has released a video highlighting the case against Trump as set out in the Mueller report. The former deputy attorney general under President George H.W. Bush, Donald Ayer; the former deputy assistant secretary of homeland security under President George W. Bush, Paul Rosenzweig; and the former deputy associate attorney general under President Ronald Reagan, Jeffrey Harris, are all featured in the video, explaining in the most simple of terms how insanely corrupt a picture the Mueller report paints of the current administration.




I was wondering how long this was going to take.

If these assholes need help changing their party, I'm more than happy to help them out.

 

[Rambunctious]

Where is the obstruction?...the swamp says Trump obstructed the investigation but no one is saying how or what he did?.....they will have to prove their case in the court of public opinion so tell the public specifically what the man did....

 

[cnm]

QED

 

[Rambunctious]

Surprise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A bunch of bottom feeding lawyers don't like Trump....Ambulance chasers not liking Trump is a good thing not a bad thing...let the dems side with the people that have bastardized our laws for their own gain....real smart libtards....

 

[blackhawk]

Every former federal prosector in the country Democrat, Republican and everything in between can give their opinion they can write letters make videos go on the cable news network of their choice and do an interview with the talking head of their choice it changes nothing. This has been investigated the decision has been made there will be no mulligan.

 

[Wapasha]

A group of former Republican federal prosectors has combined efforts to push for the further investigation and possible prosecution of Trump for obstruction of justice. Calling itself Republicans for the Rule of Law, the group has released a video highlighting the case against Trump as set out in the Mueller report. The former deputy attorney general under President George H.W. Bush, Donald Ayer; the former deputy assistant secretary of homeland security under President George W. Bush, Paul Rosenzweig; and the former deputy associate attorney general under President Ronald Reagan, Jeffrey Harris, are all featured in the video, explaining in the most simple of terms how insanely corrupt a picture the Mueller report paints of the current administration.




I was wondering how long this was going to take.

They should have called themselves "Shameless NeverTrumpers United."

Even the video does not want to play their game - it's broken

 

[Justin Richardson]

They have nothing...just the same crap the Democrats have been saying all along. It's not like it will matter anyways...to anyone or Trump.

 

[WEATHER53]

What if TV show fakery.

 

[Wapasha]

Every former federal prosector in the country Democrat, Republican and everything in between can give their opinion they can write letters make videos go on the cable news network of their choice and do an interview with the talking head of their choice it changes nothing. This has been investigated the decision has been made there will be no mulligan.

The only people with the clout to give an opinion on this, are those principal officers who by law must be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate.

Not even Mueller qualifies in that regard.

 

[Justin Richardson]

The only people with the clout to give an opinion on this

That's just it...only a pile of opinions. It's not like it means anything "factual".

 

[Tehon]

Where is the obstruction?...the swamp says Trump obstructed the investigation but no one is saying how or what he did?.....they will have to prove their case in the court of public opinion so tell the public specifically what the man did....

In the video they explain how Trump instructed his White House counsel to fire Mueller and when McGahn refuses Trump instructs him to put a false document in the file stating that Trump never gave the order.

That sounds like obstruction of justice to me.

 

[Justin Richardson]

"Immediately after the President takes Office, he begins to interfere with the Russian Investigation. The first thing he does, is to influence the head of the FBI (James Comey), asking him to go easy on Michael Flynn, and when that doesn't go well, he (Trump) fires Comey."

He (Trump) actively involved himself trying to prevent Mueller from becoming Special Counselor. Then ultimately have him (Mueller) be removed. The most notable obstructive act, the President's instruction was to to his White House Council Don McGhan to fire Mr Mueller. McGhan refused to do it. And then the President asked Don McGhan to put a false document in the file saying that the President never ordered him to fire Robert Mueller."

 

[Rambunctious]

In the video they explain how Trump instructed his White House counsel to fire Mueller and when McGahn refuses Trump instructs him to put a false document in the file stating that Trump never gave the order.

That sounds like obstruction of justice to me.

If you tell your lawyer to do something illegal its your lawyers job to say that is not legal and you shouldn't do it....Trump obviously took McGanhan's advise so once again where is the obstruction?....if the obstruction never took place because of the wise advice of your attorney there is no obstruction....the investigation went on....it was completed....right?...what am I missing here?....

 

[ThisIsMe]

They have got enough to start impeachment proceedings, they should start moving on it

 

[Tehon]

In the video they explain how Trump instructed his White House counsel to fire Mueller and when McGahn refuses Trump instructs him to put a false document in the file stating that Trump never gave the order.

That sounds like obstruction of justice to me.

If you tell your lawyer to do something illegal its your lawyers job to say that is not legal and you shouldn't do it....Trump obviously took McGanhan's advise so once again where is the obstruction?....if the obstruction never took place because of the wise advice of your attorney there is no obstruction....the investigation went on....it was completed....right?...what am I missing here?....

Obstruction of justice is pretty loosely defined. It comes down to intent. It sounds to me like Trump intended to obstruct justice and then cover it up.

Definition
18 U.S.C. § 1503 defines "obstruction of justice" as an act that "corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice."

Overview
Someone obstructs justice when that person has a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding. For a person to be convicted of obstructing justice, that person must not only have the specific intent to obstruct the proceeding, but that person must know (1) that a proceeding was actually pending at the time; and (2) there must be a connection between the endeavor to obstruct justice and the proceeding, and the person must have knowledge of this connection.

§ 1503 applies only to federal judicial proceedings. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1505, however, a defendant can be convicted of obstruction of justice by obstructing a pending proceeding before Congress or a federal administrative agency. A pending proceeding could include an informal investigation by an executive agency.
Obstruction of justice

 

[Rambunctious]

In the video they explain how Trump instructed his White House counsel to fire Mueller and when McGahn refuses Trump instructs him to put a false document in the file stating that Trump never gave the order.

That sounds like obstruction of justice to me.

If you tell your lawyer to do something illegal its your lawyers job to say that is not legal and you shouldn't do it....Trump obviously took McGanhan's advise so once again where is the obstruction?....if the obstruction never took place because of the wise advice of your attorney there is no obstruction....the investigation went on....it was completed....right?...what am I missing here?....

Obstruction of justice is pretty loosely defined. It comes down to intent. It sounds to me like Trump intended to obstruct justice and then cover it up.

Definition
18 U.S.C. § 1503 defines "obstruction of justice" as an act that "corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice."

Overview
Someone obstructs justice when that person has a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding. For a person to be convicted of obstructing justice, that person must not only have the specific intent to obstruct the proceeding, but that person must know (1) that a proceeding was actually pending at the time; and (2) there must be a connection between the endeavor to obstruct justice and the proceeding, and the person must have knowledge of this connection.

§ 1503 applies only to federal judicial proceedings. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1505, however, a defendant can be convicted of obstruction of justice by obstructing a pending proceeding before Congress or a federal administrative agency. A pending proceeding could include an informal investigation by an executive agency.
Obstruction of justice

But what did Trump do to obstruct the investigation that wasn't obstructed?....are you insane?....

 

[Tehon]

In the video they explain how Trump instructed his White House counsel to fire Mueller and when McGahn refuses Trump instructs him to put a false document in the file stating that Trump never gave the order.

That sounds like obstruction of justice to me.

If you tell your lawyer to do something illegal its your lawyers job to say that is not legal and you shouldn't do it....Trump obviously took McGanhan's advise so once again where is the obstruction?....if the obstruction never took place because of the wise advice of your attorney there is no obstruction....the investigation went on....it was completed....right?...what am I missing here?....

Obstruction of justice is pretty loosely defined. It comes down to intent. It sounds to me like Trump intended to obstruct justice and then cover it up.

Definition
18 U.S.C. § 1503 defines "obstruction of justice" as an act that "corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice."

Overview
Someone obstructs justice when that person has a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding. For a person to be convicted of obstructing justice, that person must not only have the specific intent to obstruct the proceeding, but that person must know (1) that a proceeding was actually pending at the time; and (2) there must be a connection between the endeavor to obstruct justice and the proceeding, and the person must have knowledge of this connection.

§ 1503 applies only to federal judicial proceedings. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1505, however, a defendant can be convicted of obstruction of justice by obstructing a pending proceeding before Congress or a federal administrative agency. A pending proceeding could include an informal investigation by an executive agency.
Obstruction of justice

But what did Trump do to obstruct the investigation that wasn't obstructed?....are you insane?....

He didn't have to obstruct it, all he had to do was try. That is how obstruction is defined by law.

No I'm not insane. It's called being objective. Apparently that is a foreign concept to you so you don't recognize it.