Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1. No one is above the law.2 years and running, and Trump is still relevant.
Any. Day. Now.That would be when they could either impanel or select a grand jury for the purpose of rendering an indictment. Add to that the time to get people to honor subpoenas, and the grand jury returning a true bill.
So it could easily take until January or later.
No one pleads immunity.Yeah. When did he plead immunity? Cite it. Be very specific. No bullshit speculation.
Go.
A statement of fact by an Attorney General who has more knowledge of the facts in the sole of his shoe than you have in your entire deluded body.So what? Another mere opinion offered from a loser like you.
Which agencies whose docs Trump possessed and allegedly declassified were informed of or were otherwise aware of their declassification?Yes. It does mean the 5th isn’t available.
No reason to believe he would lie anyway. But if he did lie, one way or the other, the gubmint would be obliged to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
False. He wouldn’t have any obligation to prove anything. All he would have to do is simply testify about what he knew.
We don’t “know” any such thing. You don’t believe he can say it honestly. I believe he can. So?
Or acknowledge that he did hear what he said he heard. You keep forgetting that one.
No. It doesn’t. But it would make it a tad less easy. For, despite your usual vacancy, we do know of at least one other person who says that President Trump declassified the previously classified documents at issue.
Derp…Yeah. When did he plead immunity? Cite it. Be very specific. No bullshit speculation.
Go.
The classification issue is a red herring. It doesn't matter if they were classified or not.Which agencies whose docs Trump possessed and allegedly declassified were informed of or were otherwise aware of their declassification?
None of course. The DOJ knows this. They’ve already determined that. It’s how the National Archives knew what was missing and that it was classified.
The very phrasing of your question reveals your staggering ignorance.Yeah. When did he plead immunity?
Funny how quickly you all threw Bill Barr under the bus just as soon as he stopped playing your game.So what? Another mere opinion offered from a loser like you.
I agree. The classified docs are a whole other set of legal problems for Trump. It’s his personalThe classification issue is a red herring. It doesn't matter if they were classified or not.
The US Codes under which Crooked Donald is in jeopardy deal with the theft of government property, and the concealment thereof.
What law was broken? Why can't you liberal airheads come up with something?Patel is Trump’s only defender of his supposed declassifications. He’ll have to put up or shut it down. Either way it clears the way for prosecuting Trump.
Charged with what?Won’t be long. I predict he’ll be charged shortly after the new year.
No one pleads immunity.
Incorrect. They assert it. (Meaning the fifth.). Except in very rare circumstances, judges can’t compel a witness to testify despite the invocation of the fifth.They ask for it, and the court decides whether or not to grant it.
Cite it. The court cannot offer immunity unless the prosecutor has requested it.Patel has been offered immunity by the court.
Finally, you’ve said one thing correct. Of course, it’s not disputed.You can't plead the Fifth if you have immunity.
You don’t know that he invoked the fifth. And you don’t know it because you can’t know it. Grand jury proceedings are secret. For all you know, albeit unlikely, Patel instead invoked a Trump claim of Executive Privilege.It is precisely because Patel hid behind the Fifth that the court has now given him immunity.
Seriously, girl. I’m only exposing you as the completely ignorant dishonest ywat you always are. You’re welcome.Seriously, man. Stop. Stop making a complete ass of yourself in public.
Grossly impudent twattery.Charged with what?
You really should read the link, ignoramus. Don't be so willfully stupid.True. I meant plead the fifth. Again when did he do that?
Incorrect. They assert it. (Meaning the fifth.). Except in very rare circumstances, judges can’t compel a witness to testify despite the invocation of the fifth.
Cite it. The court cannot offer immunity unless the prosecutor has requested it.
Finally, you’ve said one thing correct. Of course, it’s not disputed.
You don’t know that he invoked the fifth. And you don’t know it because you can’t know it. Grand jury proceedings are secret. For all you know, albeit unlikely, Patel instead invoked a Trump claim of Executive Privilege.
But, let’s go further let’s assume for the sake of discussion that your speculation is right. Let’s say that Patel had been called before the Grand Jury. And let’s further assume that he invoked the fifth. (Why? I wouldn’t know. But maybe he fears that something he says could be used against him by our vindictive politicized DOJ?)
Now, frustrated, the DOJ has to meekly ask a judge to confer immunity on the witness. And being that this is the upside down new universe, the judge says “uh. Ok.” So, now, when Patel says “yep. Trump did say that he was making a standing order to declassify the documents” what follows?
Seriously, girl. I’m only exposing you as the completely ignorant dishonest ywat you always are. You’re welcome.
Your final link is to the NY Slimes which is not exactly a credible source for news, anymore. Besides, it’s behind a paywall. But let’s assume it’s the truth. Again: so what?
Didn't read the article, did you dumbass?So he’ll claim the fifth of course
