Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not quite accurate, you drooling imbecile. What you need to is to make allegations (of a factual nature) which provide probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed. And? So what?You cannot get a search warrant without outlining what laws have been broken, retard.
Seriously. I keep exposing just HOW totally stupid you are.Seriously, you are really making yourself look stupid.
I don’t. I’m just pointing at your obvious retardation and laughing at you. So is everyone.No
It's easy to lose track of all the criminals in Trumpland.
I wouldn't high-five yourself TOO much.
You never do.Even a broken clock gets it right twice a day.
Wrong again, scum sucker. I’ve been perfectly consistent. No need to pivot. And unlike you, I’ve also been correct. It’s fun. You you should being accurate a try, someday.You need to be focused on your next pivot and deflection when the indictments come down.
Or possession of national defense documents.Actually violation can lead to criminal charges, if that violation involves other crimes. Such as theft of government property, by not turning it over to the National Archives.
How would I know? You clowns have been claiming any day now for 6 years. You are the ones having trouble with the calendar, Simp.
Exactly!How would I know?
What have YOU ever been "accurate" about?I don’t. I’m just pointing at your obvious retardation and laughing at you. So is everyone.
Also, you haven’t identified ANY “criminals,” you bumbling asshole.
You never do.
Wrong again, scum sucker. I’ve been perfectly consistent. No need to pivot. And unlike you, I’ve also been correct. It’s fun. You you should being accurate a try, someday.
Thanks for the correction though.I don’t. I’m just pointing at your obvious retardation and laughing at you. So is everyone.
Also, you haven’t identified ANY “criminals,” you bumbling asshole.
You never do.
Wrong again, scum sucker. I’ve been perfectly consistent. No need to pivot. And unlike you, I’ve also been correct. It’s fun. You you should being accurate a try, someday.
That’s what all you liars and losers claim once I’ve exposed you for the lowlife lying ignorant shits you are.What have YOU ever been "accurate" about?
You just make shit up as you go along.
I don’t care what a lying moron like you recalls seeing or admits to having seen.I don't remember seeing you EVER cite a FACT or anything.
Once Patel has cleared the way of the “declassification” fallacy, Trump no longer has anything to form a defense around.I thought Kash Patel was testifying in front of a grand jury already?
What your latest you think an indictment will come?
I don't think Patel is a RINO, but we'll see.What is going to be hilarious is watching the MAGAt SPIN when Patel throws Trump under the bus.
So he can claim a win when you miss it even though Trump has been perp walked.Why are you so attached to a specific date?
Assholes like you are utterly incapable of explaining all the mule stuff he showed. And you certainly can’t refuting it. You don’t even try. Instead, being the cowards you are, you resort to just spewing bullshit about him. You gutless pussies.Thanks for the correction though.
Patel is a DIFFERENT MAGAt whacko than the MAGAt whacko behind 2000 Mules.
Hmmm....
Zzz. All you libtards ARE the same. Worthless pussies. Committed to libel and slander and dishonesty.After a while all the MAGAt whackos start seeming the same.
Yes. It was.Yes, my mistake.
He’s been given immunity. That means he can’t plead the fifth or lie. He either must prove trump declassified them, which we all know he cannot, or admit he didn’t. That removes any possible defense Trump could make for retaining those docs.No. It doesn’t. If he confirms that Trump declassified the documents, it clears the way for the DOJ to skulk away.
That’s what all you liars and losers claim once I’ve exposed you for the lowlife lying ignorant shits you are.
I don’t care what a lying moron like you recalls seeing or admits to having seen.
Assholes like you are utterly incapable of explaining all the mule stuff he showed. And you certainly can’t refuting it. You don’t even try. Instead, being the cowards you are, you resort to just spewing bullshit about him. You gutless pussies.
Of course not. That’s why he’s already plead the fifth in testimony. Granting him immunity strips him of that option and forces him to fess up.He will not do that.
He knows it is not a legally tenable position.
We’ll watch for your conspicuous absence.Watch for an indefinite time, during which you will constantly claim impending victory, and always with a straight face?
Sounds fun, I'll do it!
I hope you won't mind occasional reminders . . .
Yes. It does mean the 5th isn’t available.He’s been given immunity. That means he can’t plead the fifth
No reason to believe he would lie anyway. But if he did lie, one way or the other, the gubmint would be obliged to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.or lie.
False. He wouldn’t have any obligation to prove anything. All he would have to do is simply testify about what he knew.He either must prove trump declassified them,
We don’t “know” any such thing. You don’t believe he can say it honestly. I believe he can. So?which we all know he cannot,
Or acknowledge that he did hear what he said he heard. You keep forgetting that one.or admit he didn’t.
No. It doesn’t. But it would make it a tad less easy. For, despite your usual vacancy, we do know of at least one other person who says that President Trump declassified the previously classified documents at issue.That removes any possible defense Trump could make for retaining those docs.
What is Merrick Gestapoland waiting for? You should call him with your open and shut case, Simp.Trump stole presidential records after he left office. Violation: 44 U.S.C. 2202
Trump illegally possessed the documents. Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 793(e)
Trump lied to the National Archives about possessing the records. Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 1519
Trump concealed government-owned documents when subpoenaed to produce them. Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 2071
Yeah. When did he plead immunity? Cite it. Be very specific. No bullshit speculation.Of course not. That’s why he’s already plead the fifth in testimony. Granting him immunity strips him of that option and forces him to fess up.
