KevinWestern
Hello
- Mar 8, 2012
- 4,145
- 540
In other words they have access - but nowhere does it say unrestricted. if it was restricted, then it would say so. As it did with age restrictions. Duh!The Gym is a "Fitness Level"
Another Fitness level would be the pool.
And yet another Fitness level could be the cycling area, or pilates, and so on.
Learn how to read, DUMBASS.
Member Services
21 YMCA Locations
Open 7 days a week
No annual contracts
30-day money back guarantee
Access to Ys across the U.S.
Fitness
Nationally-certified fitness and wellness experts on staff
State-of-the-art fitness centers
Pools, gyms and running tracks. Check amenities
Free fitness consultations
"Ages 15+ can attend ALL FITNESS LEVELS." in other words: No restrictions OTHER THAN AGE.
In other words they have access - but nowhere does it say unrestricted. You already pointed out that it is restricted because the parts may be closed anyway for maintenance/cleaning etc. and it can be closed for classes. Thus they tell you to check the schedule.
Edited to add:
I've not heard your usage of "Fitness Levels" before as portions of the gym. Do you have somewhere that states that because when I look for YMCA Fitness levels it seems to refer to levels of physical difficulty.
You already pointed out that it is restricted because the parts may be closed anyway for maintenance/cleaning etc. and it can be closed for classes. Thus they tell you to check the schedule. and nowhere on any schedule ever is there a "women's only class"...Until Muslims showed up.
Edited to add:
I've not heard your usage of "Fitness Levels" before as portions of the gym. Do you have somewhere that states that because when I look for YMCA Fitness levels it seems to refer to levels of physical difficulty. Yeah? However you define fitness levels it still clearly says that ages 15+ can attend all fitness levels. That means ALL CAN ATTEND and there is GENDER NO SEGREGATION...
Does a few words promoting a facility on a website serve as a legal contract, Roudy?
Are your obscure interpretations of the wording (since none of the wording is specific to the issue at hand) going to hold up in a court of law?
If no, then why bother?
Last edited: