Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
sorry. probably put a lot on you based on the posts of other idiots.good god you are retarded. How in the fuck did you get that from me pointing out the "free" fallacy?good god you're dumb."free"? LOL
you want to complain about the cost of giving out contraception while ignoring the costs that unwanted pregnancies have on a state.
do you not understand how idiotic that is? you'd rather pay $5 later over $1 today because of the use of the word 'free?'
The same people who pay for an unwanted baby's food, clothing, shelter, and health insurance.http://www.bustle.com/articles/9528...riment-proves-the-whole-country-needs-free-bc
They did it in Colorado, seems it reduced abortions, reduced unwanted pregnancies, reduced healthcare spending etc.
"According to a study published in October 2014, unintended pregnancies dropped in the state by 40 percent from 2009-2013, and abortion fell by 42 percent over the same period."
"The program saved the state millions in public health coverage for unintended pregnancies, further proving the well-known fact that preventative care is cost-effective and sensible health policy."
Question, what did Republicans do to a program that saves money, reduces problems, and reduces abortion?
"Colorado Republicans succeeded in shooting it down, leaving the program in peril."
The question is, WHY???? Why would someone take something that WORKS on many levels and destroy it just so they can go around preaching their nonsense to others? They want to stop abortion, well this reduces abortion, but without abortion they've got nothing to get people hysterical about, so no one would vote for them if abortion isn't an issue.
OK, who's going to pay for the free birth control?
you're right, it's not free."free"? LOL
How many times do we have to point out to dumb as a brick liberals that this shit is not free.
You're the one being "dumb as a brick". People that support these programs know they are paid for by taxes. We also know that these preventative programs save considerable taxpayer money.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So stop LYING its not free. Here's an idea keep your dick in your pants, your legs closed if you can't afford your own damn birth control. God its like being swarmed by blood sucking vampire bats having to pay for everyone's 'free' shit.
good god you're dumb."free"? LOL
you want to complain about the cost of giving out contraception while ignoring the costs that unwanted pregnancies have on a state.
do you not understand how idiotic that is? you'd rather pay $5 later over $1 today because of the use of the word 'free?'
super. that's not reality, though.good god you're dumb."free"? LOL
you want to complain about the cost of giving out contraception while ignoring the costs that unwanted pregnancies have on a state.
do you not understand how idiotic that is? you'd rather pay $5 later over $1 today because of the use of the word 'free?'
Unwanted pregnancies should costs the state absolutely nothing. If what a woman does with her body is her choice, when that choice produces a result she doesn't like, it's not the state's place to pay for it.
It's not $5 later or $1 today. If it's her choice the only one paying that $5 or $1 is her, not anyone else.
Why should anyone but the woman pay for the choices she said she makes with her body are only hers to make?
It would be if we were not abound with statistssuper. that's not reality, though.good god you're dumb."free"? LOL
you want to complain about the cost of giving out contraception while ignoring the costs that unwanted pregnancies have on a state.
do you not understand how idiotic that is? you'd rather pay $5 later over $1 today because of the use of the word 'free?'
Unwanted pregnancies should costs the state absolutely nothing. If what a woman does with her body is her choice, when that choice produces a result she doesn't like, it's not the state's place to pay for it.
It's not $5 later or $1 today. If it's her choice the only one paying that $5 or $1 is her, not anyone else.
Why should anyone but the woman pay for the choices she said she makes with her body are only hers to make?
"free"? LOL
maybe. but the associated costs might be even higher.It would be if we were not abound with statistssuper. that's not reality, though.good god you're dumb."free"? LOL
you want to complain about the cost of giving out contraception while ignoring the costs that unwanted pregnancies have on a state.
do you not understand how idiotic that is? you'd rather pay $5 later over $1 today because of the use of the word 'free?'
Unwanted pregnancies should costs the state absolutely nothing. If what a woman does with her body is her choice, when that choice produces a result she doesn't like, it's not the state's place to pay for it.
It's not $5 later or $1 today. If it's her choice the only one paying that $5 or $1 is her, not anyone else.
Why should anyone but the woman pay for the choices she said she makes with her body are only hers to make?
You're the one being "dumb as a brick". People that support these programs know they are paid for by taxes. We also know that these preventative programs save considerable taxpayer money.
The same people who pay for an unwanted baby's food, clothing, shelter, and health insurance.http://www.bustle.com/articles/9528...riment-proves-the-whole-country-needs-free-bc
They did it in Colorado, seems it reduced abortions, reduced unwanted pregnancies, reduced healthcare spending etc.
"According to a study published in October 2014, unintended pregnancies dropped in the state by 40 percent from 2009-2013, and abortion fell by 42 percent over the same period."
"The program saved the state millions in public health coverage for unintended pregnancies, further proving the well-known fact that preventative care is cost-effective and sensible health policy."
Question, what did Republicans do to a program that saves money, reduces problems, and reduces abortion?
"Colorado Republicans succeeded in shooting it down, leaving the program in peril."
The question is, WHY???? Why would someone take something that WORKS on many levels and destroy it just so they can go around preaching their nonsense to others? They want to stop abortion, well this reduces abortion, but without abortion they've got nothing to get people hysterical about, so no one would vote for them if abortion isn't an issue.
OK, who's going to pay for the free birth control?
Which cost is lower?
http://www.bustle.com/articles/9528...riment-proves-the-whole-country-needs-free-bc
They did it in Colorado, seems it reduced abortions, reduced unwanted pregnancies, reduced healthcare spending etc.
"According to a study published in October 2014, unintended pregnancies dropped in the state by 40 percent from 2009-2013, and abortion fell by 42 percent over the same period."
"The program saved the state millions in public health coverage for unintended pregnancies, further proving the well-known fact that preventative care is cost-effective and sensible health policy."
Question, what did Republicans do to a program that saves money, reduces problems, and reduces abortion?
"Colorado Republicans succeeded in shooting it down, leaving the program in peril."
The question is, WHY???? Why would someone take something that WORKS on many levels and destroy it just so they can go around preaching their nonsense to others? They want to stop abortion, well this reduces abortion, but without abortion they've got nothing to get people hysterical about, so no one would vote for them if abortion isn't an issue.
OK, who's going to pay for the free birth control?
super. that's not reality, though.good god you're dumb."free"? LOL
you want to complain about the cost of giving out contraception while ignoring the costs that unwanted pregnancies have on a state.
do you not understand how idiotic that is? you'd rather pay $5 later over $1 today because of the use of the word 'free?'
Unwanted pregnancies should costs the state absolutely nothing. If what a woman does with her body is her choice, when that choice produces a result she doesn't like, it's not the state's place to pay for it.
It's not $5 later or $1 today. If it's her choice the only one paying that $5 or $1 is her, not anyone else.
Why should anyone but the woman pay for the choices she said she makes with her body are only hers to make?
so you can bitch and moan about what you think should be, and try to convince others that it's somehow in the interests of the state to leave kids hungry and without medical care
or you can do the same thing while paying for the food and medical care of fewer unwanted kids.
which option sounds better?
http://www.bustle.com/articles/9528...riment-proves-the-whole-country-needs-free-bc
They did it in Colorado, seems it reduced abortions, reduced unwanted pregnancies, reduced healthcare spending etc.
"According to a study published in October 2014, unintended pregnancies dropped in the state by 40 percent from 2009-2013, and abortion fell by 42 percent over the same period."
"The program saved the state millions in public health coverage for unintended pregnancies, further proving the well-known fact that preventative care is cost-effective and sensible health policy."
Question, what did Republicans do to a program that saves money, reduces problems, and reduces abortion?
"Colorado Republicans succeeded in shooting it down, leaving the program in peril."
The question is, WHY???? Why would someone take something that WORKS on many levels and destroy it just so they can go around preaching their nonsense to others? They want to stop abortion, well this reduces abortion, but without abortion they've got nothing to get people hysterical about, so no one would vote for them if abortion isn't an issue.
OK, who's going to pay for the free birth control?
Who's going to pay for the baby? Certainly just the cost of 1 ultrasound appt. for a mother on Medicaid is more than the pill or IUD.
good god you're dumb."free"? LOL
you want to complain about the cost of giving out contraception while ignoring the costs that unwanted pregnancies have on a state.
do you not understand how idiotic that is? you'd rather pay $5 later over $1 today because of the use of the word 'free?'
I think "tax payer provided" would be more accurate than "free". Free is very misleading. Kind of like offering free college and free medical care. None of it is free. Someone has to pay for it. I do agree it is cheaper before than after.
good god you're dumb."free"? LOL
you want to complain about the cost of giving out contraception while ignoring the costs that unwanted pregnancies have on a state.
do you not understand how idiotic that is? you'd rather pay $5 later over $1 today because of the use of the word 'free?'
I think "tax payer provided" would be more accurate than "free". Free is very misleading. Kind of like offering free college and free medical care. None of it is free. Someone has to pay for it. I do agree it is cheaper before than after.
At no cost to the user.
http://www.bustle.com/articles/9528...riment-proves-the-whole-country-needs-free-bc
They did it in Colorado, seems it reduced abortions, reduced unwanted pregnancies, reduced healthcare spending etc.
"According to a study published in October 2014, unintended pregnancies dropped in the state by 40 percent from 2009-2013, and abortion fell by 42 percent over the same period."
"The program saved the state millions in public health coverage for unintended pregnancies, further proving the well-known fact that preventative care is cost-effective and sensible health policy."
Question, what did Republicans do to a program that saves money, reduces problems, and reduces abortion?
"Colorado Republicans succeeded in shooting it down, leaving the program in peril."
The question is, WHY???? Why would someone take something that WORKS on many levels and destroy it just so they can go around preaching their nonsense to others? They want to stop abortion, well this reduces abortion, but without abortion they've got nothing to get people hysterical about, so no one would vote for them if abortion isn't an issue.
OK, who's going to pay for the free birth control?
Who's going to pay for the baby? Certainly just the cost of 1 ultrasound appt. for a mother on Medicaid is more than the pill or IUD.
The one that chose to spread her legs that resulted in the baby being born.
The cost to anyone but the mother or those that want to volunteer to pay for it needs to be nothing. It's not the taxpayer's place to pay for a choice someone else made especially when the one making it said butt out when she made it.
good god you're dumb."free"? LOL
you want to complain about the cost of giving out contraception while ignoring the costs that unwanted pregnancies have on a state.
do you not understand how idiotic that is? you'd rather pay $5 later over $1 today because of the use of the word 'free?'
I think "tax payer provided" would be more accurate than "free". Free is very misleading. Kind of like offering free college and free medical care. None of it is free. Someone has to pay for it. I do agree it is cheaper before than after.
At no cost to the user.
Yeah, yeah, I get it. More free stuff in exchange for their votes. We know the scam.
you really think contraceptives are buying votes?good god you're dumb."free"? LOL
you want to complain about the cost of giving out contraception while ignoring the costs that unwanted pregnancies have on a state.
do you not understand how idiotic that is? you'd rather pay $5 later over $1 today because of the use of the word 'free?'
I think "tax payer provided" would be more accurate than "free". Free is very misleading. Kind of like offering free college and free medical care. None of it is free. Someone has to pay for it. I do agree it is cheaper before than after.
At no cost to the user.
Yeah, yeah, I get it. More free stuff in exchange for their votes. We know the scam.
http://www.bustle.com/articles/9528...riment-proves-the-whole-country-needs-free-bc
They did it in Colorado, seems it reduced abortions, reduced unwanted pregnancies, reduced healthcare spending etc.
"According to a study published in October 2014, unintended pregnancies dropped in the state by 40 percent from 2009-2013, and abortion fell by 42 percent over the same period."
"The program saved the state millions in public health coverage for unintended pregnancies, further proving the well-known fact that preventative care is cost-effective and sensible health policy."
Question, what did Republicans do to a program that saves money, reduces problems, and reduces abortion?
"Colorado Republicans succeeded in shooting it down, leaving the program in peril."
The question is, WHY???? Why would someone take something that WORKS on many levels and destroy it just so they can go around preaching their nonsense to others? They want to stop abortion, well this reduces abortion, but without abortion they've got nothing to get people hysterical about, so no one would vote for them if abortion isn't an issue.
OK, who's going to pay for the free birth control?
Who's going to pay for the baby? Certainly just the cost of 1 ultrasound appt. for a mother on Medicaid is more than the pill or IUD.
The one that chose to spread her legs that resulted in the baby being born.
The cost to anyone but the mother or those that want to volunteer to pay for it needs to be nothing. It's not the taxpayer's place to pay for a choice someone else made especially when the one making it said butt out when she made it.
Great, you've identified a problem but offer no solution other than she shouldn't have done it. The reality is people are going to fuck. It's what we do. I believe it should be at no cost to everyone up to and including sterilization. Responsible choices around sex should be taught and reinforced the entire time in school from day one. Sex is a fundamental part of every human's life. A biological function as eating and using the bathroom is and a choice every living soul will make.
