Fundie Wankers waste everyones time.

It is if you're a poor old person in Maine who needs to heat her house in subzero temps.
Ok. How can you condemn him and defend the cake nazis at the same time ?
Its the same issue.
I think he is out of order, just like the cake bigots.

You cant agree to that though because you lack any integrity.

The propane dealer isn't refusing due to his religious convictions, you freaking moron

Gawd homos are stupid
Neither are the cake bigots.They are using religion as a front.

But you can't use any kind of education for yours.

You are pretty transparent. Stupid and ignorant.....
 
''Tis funny how much tommytard allegedly cares about gays when it's Christians he perceives to be abusing them.
Has anyone seen Tammy start a single thread on how homosexuals are treated in Islam?

Hope and you won't, he's an appeaser....and the Muzzies would toss him off a roof in a heartbeat

But refusing a cake? Oh the horrors

I don't agree with them, but I don't call them bigots.

I don't know that much about them.

Just like I don't call true concentious objectors cowards.
 

You really think they are bigoted ?

I think you fit that adjective better.

It's hilarious when they bash Christians and call them bigots....not realizing they are being bigoted towards Christians.

You really can't fix stupid

I didn't take Tommy to be an arrogant left winger.

Not sure why....maybe he's drunk.
 

You really think they are bigoted ?

I think you fit that adjective better.

It's hilarious when they bash Christians and call them bigots....not realizing they are being bigoted towards Christians.

You really can't fix stupid

I didn't take Tommy to be an arrogant left winger.

Not sure why....maybe he's drunk.

He's an instigator....but incredibly ignorant and stupid
 
It is if you're a poor old person in Maine who needs to heat her house in subzero temps.
Ok. How can you condemn him and defend the cake nazis at the same time ?
Its the same issue.
I think he is out of order, just like the cake bigots.

You cant agree to that though because you lack any integrity.

so you think he should be forced to send gas to ppl and if he refuses, you think he should have his license yanked?
btw, the bakery didn't refuse to serve fags. They refused to bake wedding cakes only. And provided references to nearby bakers who would.
 
The usual response from the nodding dogs.
You have no case so resort to abuse.

I am sick of selective "Christians" deciding who they will and wont serve. They need to clean up their act and join civilisation.
 
The usual response from the nodding dogs.
You have no case so resort to abuse.

I am sick of selective "Christians" deciding who they will and wont serve. They need to clean up their act and join civilisation.
In America, freedom of association used to be a natural right.

Then the Progressives came.
 
The usual response from the nodding dogs.
You have no case so resort to abuse.

I am sick of selective "Christians" deciding who they will and wont serve. They need to clean up their act and join civilisation.
In America, freedom of association used to be a natural right.

Then the Progressives came.
Was that when black people couldnt get served ?
 
The usual response from the nodding dogs.
You have no case so resort to abuse.

I am sick of selective "Christians" deciding who they will and wont serve. They need to clean up their act and join civilisation.
In America, freedom of association used to be a natural right.

Then the Progressives came.
Was that when black people couldnt get served ?
Do you think that if white people were already freely and consistently refusing to serve black people, Democrat lawmakers would have felt compelled to pass segregation laws?
 
The usual response from the nodding dogs.
You have no case so resort to abuse.

I am sick of selective "Christians" deciding who they will and wont serve. They need to clean up their act and join civilisation.
In America, freedom of association used to be a natural right.

Then the Progressives came.
Was that when black people couldnt get served ?
Do you think that if white people were already freely and consistently refusing to serve black people, Democrat lawmakers would have felt compelled to pass segregation laws?
You need to translate that for me.
 
The usual response from the nodding dogs.
You have no case so resort to abuse.

I am sick of selective "Christians" deciding who they will and wont serve. They need to clean up their act and join civilisation.
In America, freedom of association used to be a natural right.

Then the Progressives came.
Was that when black people couldnt get served ?
Do you think that if white people were already freely and consistently refusing to serve black people, Democrat lawmakers would have felt compelled to pass segregation laws?
You need to translate that for me.
Forgive me; I thought English was your first language.

Progressive legislation segregated blacks and whites.

Many whites - Republicans - were already willing and happy to serve blacks in their establishments.

Had the government not abridged our right to associate freely, societal pressures would have continued to advance integration.
 
The usual response from the nodding dogs.
You have no case so resort to abuse.

I am sick of selective "Christians" deciding who they will and wont serve. They need to clean up their act and join civilisation.







Does this apply to the Welsh when they refuse to serve the English, or the muslims when they refuse to serve pig products or alcohol. When will you welsh be joining civilisation or is that a pipe dream ?
 
The usual response from the nodding dogs.
You have no case so resort to abuse.

I am sick of selective "Christians" deciding who they will and wont serve. They need to clean up their act and join civilisation.
In America, freedom of association used to be a natural right.

Then the Progressives came.
Was that when black people couldnt get served ?
Do you think that if white people were already freely and consistently refusing to serve black people, Democrat lawmakers would have felt compelled to pass segregation laws?
You need to translate that for me.
The usual response from the nodding dogs.
You have no case so resort to abuse.

I am sick of selective "Christians" deciding who they will and wont serve. They need to clean up their act and join civilisation.
In America, freedom of association used to be a natural right.

Then the Progressives came.
Was that when black people couldnt get served ?
Do you think that if white people were already freely and consistently refusing to serve black people, Democrat lawmakers would have felt compelled to pass segregation laws?
You need to translate that for me.






Here you go

Ydych chi'n meddwl bod os bydd pobl wyn eisoes yn rhydd ac yn gyson gwrthod gweini pobl dduon, byddai deddfwyr Democratiaid wedi teimlo rheidrwydd i basio deddfau arwahanu?
 
The usual response from the nodding dogs.
You have no case so resort to abuse.

I am sick of selective "Christians" deciding who they will and wont serve. They need to clean up their act and join civilisation.
In America, freedom of association used to be a natural right.

Then the Progressives came.
Was that when black people couldnt get served ?
Do you think that if white people were already freely and consistently refusing to serve black people, Democrat lawmakers would have felt compelled to pass segregation laws?
You need to translate that for me.
Forgive me; I thought English was your first language.

Progressive legislation segregated blacks and whites.

Many whites - Republicans - were already willing and happy to serve blacks in their establishments.

Had the government not abridged our right to associate freely, societal pressures would have continued to advance integration.







His first language is Cymru so I translated it for him
 
The usual response from the nodding dogs.
You have no case so resort to abuse.

I am sick of selective "Christians" deciding who they will and wont serve. They need to clean up their act and join civilisation.
In America, freedom of association used to be a natural right.

Then the Progressives came.
Was that when black people couldnt get served ?
Do you think that if white people were already freely and consistently refusing to serve black people, Democrat lawmakers would have felt compelled to pass segregation laws?
You need to translate that for me.
The usual response from the nodding dogs.
You have no case so resort to abuse.

I am sick of selective "Christians" deciding who they will and wont serve. They need to clean up their act and join civilisation.
In America, freedom of association used to be a natural right.

Then the Progressives came.
Was that when black people couldnt get served ?
Do you think that if white people were already freely and consistently refusing to serve black people, Democrat lawmakers would have felt compelled to pass segregation laws?
You need to translate that for me.






Here you go

Ydych chi'n meddwl bod os bydd pobl wyn eisoes yn rhydd ac yn gyson gwrthod gweini pobl dduon, byddai deddfwyr Democratiaid wedi teimlo rheidrwydd i basio deddfau arwahanu?
Lol - siared Cymraeg ?
 
The usual response from the nodding dogs.
You have no case so resort to abuse.

I am sick of selective "Christians" deciding who they will and wont serve. They need to clean up their act and join civilisation.
In America, freedom of association used to be a natural right.

Then the Progressives came.
Was that when black people couldnt get served ?
Do you think that if white people were already freely and consistently refusing to serve black people, Democrat lawmakers would have felt compelled to pass segregation laws?
You need to translate that for me.
Forgive me; I thought English was your first language.

Progressive legislation segregated blacks and whites.

Many whites - Republicans - were already willing and happy to serve blacks in their establishments.

Had the government not abridged our right to associate freely, societal pressures would have continued to advance integration.
Well if I accepted your pre programmed response.............
They still needed legislation to make the bigots behave. How will we get these fundie wankers to join us in the C21st ?
 
In America, freedom of association used to be a natural right.

Then the Progressives came.
Was that when black people couldnt get served ?
Do you think that if white people were already freely and consistently refusing to serve black people, Democrat lawmakers would have felt compelled to pass segregation laws?
You need to translate that for me.
Forgive me; I thought English was your first language.

Progressive legislation segregated blacks and whites.

Many whites - Republicans - were already willing and happy to serve blacks in their establishments.

Had the government not abridged our right to associate freely, societal pressures would have continued to advance integration.
Well if I accepted your pre programmed response.............
They still needed legislation to make the bigots behave. How will we get these fundie wankers to join us in the C21st ?
The bigots were the ones who passed the legislation.

And we don't get the Muzzies to join the 21st century. We can't. We blow them into it.

As for Christians, they've been a part of every American century. Regimentation, on the other hand, has only been with us since the 20th century - the Progressive Era.

If you think people who believe differently than you do ought to be coerced into their associations, you will not cull the herd to your liking; you will only clash with it.
 
Was that when black people couldnt get served ?
Do you think that if white people were already freely and consistently refusing to serve black people, Democrat lawmakers would have felt compelled to pass segregation laws?
You need to translate that for me.
Forgive me; I thought English was your first language.

Progressive legislation segregated blacks and whites.

Many whites - Republicans - were already willing and happy to serve blacks in their establishments.

Had the government not abridged our right to associate freely, societal pressures would have continued to advance integration.
Well if I accepted your pre programmed response.............
They still needed legislation to make the bigots behave. How will we get these fundie wankers to join us in the C21st ?
The bigots were the ones who passed the legislation.

And we don't get the Muzzies to join the 21st century. We can't. We blow them into it.

As for Christians, they've been a part of every American century. Regimentation, on the other hand, has only been with us since the 20th century - the Progressive Era.

If you think people who believe differently than you do ought to be coerced into their associations, you will not cull the herd to your liking; you will only clash with it.
So the "bigots" were the ones who ensured that black folks didnt have to go to the back of the bus ?

Ok, yup, I see what you are saying.
 
In America, freedom of association used to be a natural right.

Then the Progressives came.
Was that when black people couldnt get served ?
Do you think that if white people were already freely and consistently refusing to serve black people, Democrat lawmakers would have felt compelled to pass segregation laws?
You need to translate that for me.
Forgive me; I thought English was your first language.

Progressive legislation segregated blacks and whites.

Many whites - Republicans - were already willing and happy to serve blacks in their establishments.

Had the government not abridged our right to associate freely, societal pressures would have continued to advance integration.
Well if I accepted your pre programmed response.............
They still needed legislation to make the bigots behave. How will we get these fundie wankers to join us in the C21st ?








By you coming out of the 7C mindset you have introduced for yourself
 

Forum List

Back
Top