georgephillip
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #41
Roberts seems to think you're full of golden shit:Todd...what happens if everyone with a contract demands to take physical possession of their gold at the same time? Would the banksters get away with simply returning the buyers' money instead of bullion?Because part of their future contracts
He was talking about ETFs. Do you understand the difference between futures contracts and ETFs? Does he?
what happens if everyone with a contract demands to take physical possession of their gold at the same time?
Then the people who were short the gold futures would have to deliver gold.
What does that have to do with the gold ETFs you were talking about?
Would the banksters get away with simply returning the buyers' money instead of bullion?
Banksters? You mean the speculators, some of whom are mom and pop type investors?
I guess if you're really interested, you should look up the contract specifications on whichever exchange you are interested in. Be careful, you might learn something and make more sense the next time you post on the topic.
"Institutional investors who have bullion in their portfolio do not want the expense associated with storing it securely. Instead, they buy into Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) and hold their bullion in the form of a paper claim.
"The largest, the SPDR Gold Trust or GLD, trades on the New York Stock Exchange. The trustee and custodian is a bankster, and only other banksters are able to turn investments into delivery of physical bullion. Only shares in the amount of 100,000 can be redeemed in gold.
"The price of bullion is not set in the physical market where individuals take delivery of bullion purchases. It is set in the paper futures market where short selling can drive down the price even if the demand for physical possession is rising. The paper gold market is also the market in which people speculate and leverage their positions, place stop-loss orders, and are subject to margin calls."
See anything to object to in the above?