Genocide of white farmers in South africa

[ptbw forever]

Some interesting information...
South African farm attacks - Wikipedia

In attacks on South African farms, predominantly white farmers and black farm workers[1] are subjected to violent crime, including murder. Farm attacks have been described as "frequent" in the post-Apartheid period, and, although some analysts believe they may be linked to racial animosity within South African society.[2][3][4][5] the South African government, and other analysts, as well as Afrikaner civil rights group Afriforum maintain that farm attacks are part of a broader crime problem in South Africa, and do not have a racial motivation.[1][6][7][8] It also remains unclear if white farmers are victims of violence at a higher rate than the general population,[9][10] with some research showing that black farm workers are the victims of violent criminal attacks at a "far higher rate", by criminal intruders, than white farm workers.[1

A November 2017 analysis by the BBC found that there is insufficient data to estimate a murder rate for South African farmers.[9] Between 1994 and March 2012, there had been 361,015 murders in all of South Africa and between 1990 and March 2012, there had been an estimated 1,544 murders on South African farms of which 208 of the victims were Black.[11] The data for farm attacks is self-reported to a commercial farmer's organisation, Transvaal Agricultural Union. The last government analysis of farm attack victims by race was conducted in 2001. In their report, the police’s Crime Information Analysis Centre stated that of the 1,398 people attacked on farms, 61.6% were white, 33.3% were black, 4.4% were Asian and 0.7% were listed as “other”. Racial statistics around crime are no longer collected by the South African government.[12] In January 2015, AfriForum reported that there had been an increase in farm attacks and murders in the previous five years.[13]​

And

The South African government believes the chief motive for attacks is robbery.[6][22] This position is shared by Afrikaner civil rights group Afriforum, which does not believe that there is a racial motive associated with most attacks.[1] A Committee of Inquiry into Farm Attacks was appointed in 2001 by the National Commissioner of Police. The purpose of the committee was to "inquire into the ongoing spate of attacks on farms, which include violent criminal acts such as murder, robbery, rape, to determine the motives and factors behind these attacks and to make recommendations on their findings".[8] Monetary theft occurred in most of the attacks,[8] firearms were stolen in 23.0%,[8] and 16.0% of farm attacks involved vehicular thefts.[8] The committee noted that "there is a common misconception that in a large proportion of farm attacks little is stolen"[8] and "various items are stolen fin by far the greater majority of cases, and, in those cases where nothing is taken, there is almost always a logical explanation, such as that the attackers had to leave quickly because help arrived."[8]



There are a lot of false claims circulating as well...
FACT CHECK: Did a Little Girl Have a 'Joker Smile' Carved Into Her Face in South Africa?

Afriforum(and the BBC for that matter) is full of shit. They only care about the rights of blacks, just like the South African government.

 

[ptbw forever]

Every single possible method of genocide is being used against white people around the globe and ample websites have shown this while you cowards run away from the facts and delete those sites. South Africa is simply the culmination of that genocidal campaign against the most vulnerable white population with the annihilation of their language, mass land grabbing without compensation that specifically targets whites and the high numbers of rapes and murders that they suffer as a small and declining part of the population(not to mention the rampant government sanctioned discrimination in hiring, rampant abuse by the nearly all black police and the highest elected officials happily singing about killing "the Boer", among other things) . Obama would never tell you the truth about this if his own mother was killed by Malema himself btw.

I know more about what genocide is than your entire family ever will. Denial never was and never will be an argument.

Let’s stick to facts. Genocide, like Nazi, gets thrown around casually.

By you pieces of shit who refuse to admit that people of European descent are in fact human beings and do in fact qualify as victims of genocide when it is in fact happening. All this whining and crying about brown people killing brown people who look EXACTLY like them and genetically are basically the same and yet an ongoing genocide against whites by blacks and Jewish financiers has literally been going on since the late 90s and you fuckers and the UN pretend like we are the ones overusing the term while you soulless assholes go back to your reactionary stances against "fascism" that for some peculiar reason always seems to pop up when white people are getting fucked over.

Everything I said about South Africa is now COMMON knowledge around the globe btw, and when added together these facts result in overwhelming evidence of MULTIPLE genocides against whites in South Africa, not just one.

I consider all people to be human beings. Do you?

You have failed to provide evidence of genocide within any commonly accepted definition. This might be racism in action, but not genocide. Jewish financiers? You are throwing everything but the kitchen sink into this rant.

To understand what genocide is..review the Holocaust, Rwanda, Bosnia, Yazidis, Rohinga.

No, you don't.

You repeatedly side with entities that deny the most basic and most common sense rights to whites for political gain. It doesn't matter that these groups will eventually directly oppress you and your family because you too are white, you still side with them and therefore you are as anti-white as they are.

I am not sure what you mean here. I have always supported and will always support equality of rights for all. I am not going to go along with racial fear mongering as a means to further divide people.

THIS is what genocide(extermination of GENES, not just a group of individuals of a similar genetic makeup) actually is btw:
United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect

"In the present Convention, genocide means ANY of the following acts committed with intent("Kill the Boer" definitely qualifies) to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

1. Killing members of the group;
2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

Did you miss the part about “with intent”? Intent to destroy an entire ethnic group? Chanting racist slogans is not genocide.

1. is clearly happening for any idiot to see
2 is clearly happening for any idiot to see
3. is happening in multiple facets(destroying the Afrikaners' language, land grabs, police brutality/negligence etc etc)
4. White South African children have all but abandoned their racist home country so the birth rate has dropped considerably for white South Africans over the years.
Over the span of over 20 years this is easily 4 or more genocides that coincide with each other.

1. No it isn’t. All you have done is pointed out an increased crime rate directed against white farmers.

2. Commitment with Intent to destroy an entire group?

3. Land is an underlying issue, that has been simmering since they ended apartheid. What land grabs do you mean? If the 9% who are white own 72% of the land, I am not seeing how this is genocide. How is their language being intentionally destroyed.

4. How is birthdate being intentionally restricted in white South Africans?

And just to further obliterate your idiotic Democrat derived talking points about what "genocide" supposedly is:
"The Genocide Convention establishes in Article I that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but ALSO in the context of a PEACEFUL situation(like the so-called "Rainbow nation" created after Apartheid). The latter is less common but still possible. The same article establishes the obligation of the contracting parties to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide."

Yes, it doesn’t have to be in the context of a war but it does require intent.

It is also a complex situation and if the law and justice system fails to support all South Africans equally or encourages racial violence, it could become genocide but I would not call it that now.

THIS is intent, dumbass.

 

[Soupnazi630]

IMHO:

1. The media are ignoring the current slaughter because it's Caucasians who are being murdered.

a. It is politically correct in the States and in Europe to demonize Caucasians. A presidential candidate in 2016 tried to whip up ethnic antagonism by constantly referring to "white privilege."

2. It is astonishing that those Caucasian farmers are still in a state of denial. They simply cannot believe that some individuals can be so cruel and heartless to kill them in cold blood.

3. Presumably some elderly and middle-aged Caucasians now realize that they were wrong to support majority rule in South Africa.

4. We ordinary people cannot do anything about this ethnic cleansing.

a. At the very least, however, one should refrain from visiting South Africa.

5. Hopefully, there are good people right now who are quietly assisting those political refugees in arranging to come to the States.

No the media is not ignoring it. It's broadcast all over he alt right media. It's just that 74 farmers were killed and that's no indication of any white genocide. There is no ethnic cleansing going on.

Many more than 74 were murdered.

The South African police ignores most of them as the government encourages said murders and ignores them

Your earlier statement of WRONG is a lie.,

The investigations such as the one in the OP proves this.

 

[pismoe]

Let’s stick to facts. Genocide, like Nazi, gets thrown around casually.

By you pieces of shit who refuse to admit that people of European descent are in fact human beings and do in fact qualify as victims of genocide when it is in fact happening. All this whining and crying about brown people killing brown people who look EXACTLY like them and genetically are basically the same and yet an ongoing genocide against whites by blacks and Jewish financiers has literally been going on since the late 90s and you fuckers and the UN pretend like we are the ones overusing the term while you soulless assholes go back to your reactionary stances against "fascism" that for some peculiar reason always seems to pop up when white people are getting fucked over.

Everything I said about South Africa is now COMMON knowledge around the globe btw, and when added together these facts result in overwhelming evidence of MULTIPLE genocides against whites in South Africa, not just one.

I consider all people to be human beings. Do you?

You have failed to provide evidence of genocide within any commonly accepted definition. This might be racism in action, but not genocide. Jewish financiers? You are throwing everything but the kitchen sink into this rant.

To understand what genocide is..review the Holocaust, Rwanda, Bosnia, Yazidis, Rohinga.

No, you don't.

You repeatedly side with entities that deny the most basic and most common sense rights to whites for political gain. It doesn't matter that these groups will eventually directly oppress you and your family because you too are white, you still side with them and therefore you are as anti-white as they are.

I am not sure what you mean here. I have always supported and will always support equality of rights for all. I am not going to go along with racial fear mongering as a means to further divide people.

THIS is what genocide(extermination of GENES, not just a group of individuals of a similar genetic makeup) actually is btw:
United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect

"In the present Convention, genocide means ANY of the following acts committed with intent("Kill the Boer" definitely qualifies) to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

1. Killing members of the group;
2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

Did you miss the part about “with intent”? Intent to destroy an entire ethnic group? Chanting racist slogans is not genocide.

1. is clearly happening for any idiot to see
2 is clearly happening for any idiot to see
3. is happening in multiple facets(destroying the Afrikaners' language, land grabs, police brutality/negligence etc etc)
4. White South African children have all but abandoned their racist home country so the birth rate has dropped considerably for white South Africans over the years.
Over the span of over 20 years this is easily 4 or more genocides that coincide with each other.

1. No it isn’t. All you have done is pointed out an increased crime rate directed against white farmers.

2. Commitment with Intent to destroy an entire group?

3. Land is an underlying issue, that has been simmering since they ended apartheid. What land grabs do you mean? If the 9% who are white own 72% of the land, I am not seeing how this is genocide. How is their language being intentionally destroyed.

4. How is birthdate being intentionally restricted in white South Africans?

And just to further obliterate your idiotic Democrat derived talking points about what "genocide" supposedly is:
"The Genocide Convention establishes in Article I that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but ALSO in the context of a PEACEFUL situation(like the so-called "Rainbow nation" created after Apartheid). The latter is less common but still possible. The same article establishes the obligation of the contracting parties to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide."

Yes, it doesn’t have to be in the context of a war but it does require intent.

It is also a complex situation and if the law and justice system fails to support all South Africans equally or encourages racial violence, it could become genocide but I would not call it that now.

THIS is intent, dumbass.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- i also saw video of 'kill the Boer' sung the presence of 'nelson mandela' who was tapping his toes !!

 

[RodISHI]

Coyote apparently you do not have very good comprehension skills and your math skills totally suck. Here is the international recognized definition of genocide for ya;

The legal definition of genocide (Including Discussion and Key terms)
The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide:

1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and

2) the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide."

Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity.

Excerpt from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (For full text click here)
"Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide. "

http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext-printerfriendly.htm

 

[RodISHI]

Dumb asses like Farrakhan have been working over time to keep the flames fanned in an attempt to get that type shit started here in the U.S.



The truth is the Mexicans and the Blacks always had a line of separation between their communities but some stupid people thought bringing in and letting in more illegals was a good idea to displace the blacks in Southern California. Those of us who are a little older can still recall the race wars between gang factions back in the seventies and today many decent black families are no longer safe as the Latino Nazi types go after decent families no matter what the color of their skin is. The names of their shit organizations are changed when the people started learning what they are really all about.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

South Africa will be another Zimbabwe. The question is, why don't we just let these people starve to death or eat one another. It's what they want.

I doubt that happens and I also doubt Zimbabwe's situation will be permanent.

It's been like this in Zimbabwe since 1979. When do you imagine it will improve?

Introduce a pathogen, make sure everyone has adequate firepower to address their neighbors. Nuke the place. Eliminate the natives. THEN Zimbabwe will become a decent place to live and who knows might be farmed again.

 

[Coyote]

Coyote apparently you do not have very good comprehension skills and your math skills totally suck. Here is the international recognized definition of genocide for ya;

The legal definition of genocide (Including Discussion and Key terms)
The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide:

1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and

2) the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide."

Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity.

Excerpt from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (For full text click here)
"Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide. "

http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext-printerfriendly.htm

Or maybe your comprehension of genocide sucks and your mental tools are are dull. Like when the crime stats show black farm workers are being killed as well, and robbery seems to be the main motive. I guess that doesn’t fit your genocide claim too well.

 

[Coyote]

South Africa will be another Zimbabwe. The question is, why don't we just let these people starve to death or eat one another. It's what they want.

I doubt that happens and I also doubt Zimbabwe's situation will be permanent.

It's been like this in Zimbabwe since 1979. When do you imagine it will improve?

Introduce a pathogen, make sure everyone has adequate firepower to address their neighbors. Nuke the place. Eliminate the natives. THEN Zimbabwe will become a decent place to live and who knows might be farmed again.

Let’s stick to facts. Genocide, like Nazi, gets thrown around casually.

By you pieces of shit who refuse to admit that people of European descent are in fact human beings and do in fact qualify as victims of genocide when it is in fact happening. All this whining and crying about brown people killing brown people who look EXACTLY like them and genetically are basically the same and yet an ongoing genocide against whites by blacks and Jewish financiers has literally been going on since the late 90s and you fuckers and the UN pretend like we are the ones overusing the term while you soulless assholes go back to your reactionary stances against "fascism" that for some peculiar reason always seems to pop up when white people are getting fucked over.

Everything I said about South Africa is now COMMON knowledge around the globe btw, and when added together these facts result in overwhelming evidence of MULTIPLE genocides against whites in South Africa, not just one.

I consider all people to be human beings. Do you?

You have failed to provide evidence of genocide within any commonly accepted definition. This might be racism in action, but not genocide. Jewish financiers? You are throwing everything but the kitchen sink into this rant.

To understand what genocide is..review the Holocaust, Rwanda, Bosnia, Yazidis, Rohinga.

No, you don't.

You repeatedly side with entities that deny the most basic and most common sense rights to whites for political gain. It doesn't matter that these groups will eventually directly oppress you and your family because you too are white, you still side with them and therefore you are as anti-white as they are.

I am not sure what you mean here. I have always supported and will always support equality of rights for all. I am not going to go along with racial fear mongering as a means to further divide people.

THIS is what genocide(extermination of GENES, not just a group of individuals of a similar genetic makeup) actually is btw:
United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect

"In the present Convention, genocide means ANY of the following acts committed with intent("Kill the Boer" definitely qualifies) to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

1. Killing members of the group;
2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

Did you miss the part about “with intent”? Intent to destroy an entire ethnic group? Chanting racist slogans is not genocide.

1. is clearly happening for any idiot to see
2 is clearly happening for any idiot to see
3. is happening in multiple facets(destroying the Afrikaners' language, land grabs, police brutality/negligence etc etc)
4. White South African children have all but abandoned their racist home country so the birth rate has dropped considerably for white South Africans over the years.
Over the span of over 20 years this is easily 4 or more genocides that coincide with each other.

1. No it isn’t. All you have done is pointed out an increased crime rate directed against white farmers.

2. Commitment with Intent to destroy an entire group?

3. Land is an underlying issue, that has been simmering since they ended apartheid. What land grabs do you mean? If the 9% who are white own 72% of the land, I am not seeing how this is genocide. How is their language being intentionally destroyed.

4. How is birthdate being intentionally restricted in white South Africans?

And just to further obliterate your idiotic Democrat derived talking points about what "genocide" supposedly is:
"The Genocide Convention establishes in Article I that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but ALSO in the context of a PEACEFUL situation(like the so-called "Rainbow nation" created after Apartheid). The latter is less common but still possible. The same article establishes the obligation of the contracting parties to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide."

Yes, it doesn’t have to be in the context of a war but it does require intent.

It is also a complex situation and if the law and justice system fails to support all South Africans equally or encourages racial violence, it could become genocide but I would not call it that now.

THIS is intent, dumbass.

A song? you have entered the realm of the truly pathetic.

 

[ptbw forever]

Coyote apparently you do not have very good comprehension skills and your math skills totally suck. Here is the international recognized definition of genocide for ya;

The legal definition of genocide (Including Discussion and Key terms)
The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide:

1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and

2) the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide."

Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity.

Excerpt from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (For full text click here)
"Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide. "

http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext-printerfriendly.htm

Or maybe your comprehension of genocide sucks and your mental tools are are dull. Like when the crime stats show black farm workers are being killed as well, and robbery seems to be the main motive. I guess that doesn’t fit your genocide claim too well.

Robbery is almost never the motive. Quit hiding behind the black fascists in charge of South Africa and just admit that you have no ground to stand on concerning this issue.

Whites are far more likely to be tortured, raped and killed during a "robbery" than blacks are.

 

[Coyote]

Kii

By you pieces of shit who refuse to admit that people of European descent are in fact human beings and do in fact qualify as victims of genocide when it is in fact happening. All this whining and crying about brown people killing brown people who look EXACTLY like them and genetically are basically the same and yet an ongoing genocide against whites by blacks and Jewish financiers has literally been going on since the late 90s and you fuckers and the UN pretend like we are the ones overusing the term while you soulless assholes go back to your reactionary stances against "fascism" that for some peculiar reason always seems to pop up when white people are getting fucked over.

Everything I said about South Africa is now COMMON knowledge around the globe btw, and when added together these facts result in overwhelming evidence of MULTIPLE genocides against whites in South Africa, not just one.

I consider all people to be human beings. Do you?

You have failed to provide evidence of genocide within any commonly accepted definition. This might be racism in action, but not genocide. Jewish financiers? You are throwing everything but the kitchen sink into this rant.

To understand what genocide is..review the Holocaust, Rwanda, Bosnia, Yazidis, Rohinga.

No, you don't.

You repeatedly side with entities that deny the most basic and most common sense rights to whites for political gain. It doesn't matter that these groups will eventually directly oppress you and your family because you too are white, you still side with them and therefore you are as anti-white as they are.

I am not sure what you mean here. I have always supported and will always support equality of rights for all. I am not going to go along with racial fear mongering as a means to further divide people.

THIS is what genocide(extermination of GENES, not just a group of individuals of a similar genetic makeup) actually is btw:
United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect

"In the present Convention, genocide means ANY of the following acts committed with intent("Kill the Boer" definitely qualifies) to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

1. Killing members of the group;
2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

Did you miss the part about “with intent”? Intent to destroy an entire ethnic group? Chanting racist slogans is not genocide.

1. is clearly happening for any idiot to see
2 is clearly happening for any idiot to see
3. is happening in multiple facets(destroying the Afrikaners' language, land grabs, police brutality/negligence etc etc)
4. White South African children have all but abandoned their racist home country so the birth rate has dropped considerably for white South Africans over the years.
Over the span of over 20 years this is easily 4 or more genocides that coincide with each other.

1. No it isn’t. All you have done is pointed out an increased crime rate directed against white farmers.

2. Commitment with Intent to destroy an entire group?

3. Land is an underlying issue, that has been simmering since they ended apartheid. What land grabs do you mean? If the 9% who are white own 72% of the land, I am not seeing how this is genocide. How is their language being intentionally destroyed.

4. How is birthdate being intentionally restricted in white South Africans?

And just to further obliterate your idiotic Democrat derived talking points about what "genocide" supposedly is:
"The Genocide Convention establishes in Article I that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but ALSO in the context of a PEACEFUL situation(like the so-called "Rainbow nation" created after Apartheid). The latter is less common but still possible. The same article establishes the obligation of the contracting parties to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide."

Yes, it doesn’t have to be in the context of a war but it does require intent.

It is also a complex situation and if the law and justice system fails to support all South Africans equally or encourages racial violence, it could become genocide but I would not call it that now.

THIS is intent, dumbass.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- i also saw video of 'kill the Boer' sung the presence of 'nelson mandela' who was tapping his toes !!

link?

 

[pismoe]

Coyote apparently you do not have very good comprehension skills and your math skills totally suck. Here is the international recognized definition of genocide for ya;

The legal definition of genocide (Including Discussion and Key terms)
The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide:

1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and

2) the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide."

Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity.

Excerpt from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (For full text click here)
"Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide. "

http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext-printerfriendly.htm

Or maybe your comprehension of genocide sucks and your mental tools are are dull. Like when the crime stats show black farm workers are being killed as well, and robbery seems to be the main motive. I guess that doesn’t fit your genocide claim too well.

----------------------------- best to ALWAYS kill / murder the witnesses of Genocide Coyote .

 

[pismoe]

By you pieces of shit who refuse to admit that people of European descent are in fact human beings and do in fact qualify as victims of genocide when it is in fact happening. All this whining and crying about brown people killing brown people who look EXACTLY like them and genetically are basically the same and yet an ongoing genocide against whites by blacks and Jewish financiers has literally been going on since the late 90s and you fuckers and the UN pretend like we are the ones overusing the term while you soulless assholes go back to your reactionary stances against "fascism" that for some peculiar reason always seems to pop up when white people are getting fucked over.

Everything I said about South Africa is now COMMON knowledge around the globe btw, and when added together these facts result in overwhelming evidence of MULTIPLE genocides against whites in South Africa, not just one.

I consider all people to be human beings. Do you?

You have failed to provide evidence of genocide within any commonly accepted definition. This might be racism in action, but not genocide. Jewish financiers? You are throwing everything but the kitchen sink into this rant.

To understand what genocide is..review the Holocaust, Rwanda, Bosnia, Yazidis, Rohinga.

No, you don't.

You repeatedly side with entities that deny the most basic and most common sense rights to whites for political gain. It doesn't matter that these groups will eventually directly oppress you and your family because you too are white, you still side with them and therefore you are as anti-white as they are.

I am not sure what you mean here. I have always supported and will always support equality of rights for all. I am not going to go along with racial fear mongering as a means to further divide people.

THIS is what genocide(extermination of GENES, not just a group of individuals of a similar genetic makeup) actually is btw:
United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect

"In the present Convention, genocide means ANY of the following acts committed with intent("Kill the Boer" definitely qualifies) to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

1. Killing members of the group;
2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

Did you miss the part about “with intent”? Intent to destroy an entire ethnic group? Chanting racist slogans is not genocide.

1. is clearly happening for any idiot to see
2 is clearly happening for any idiot to see
3. is happening in multiple facets(destroying the Afrikaners' language, land grabs, police brutality/negligence etc etc)
4. White South African children have all but abandoned their racist home country so the birth rate has dropped considerably for white South Africans over the years.
Over the span of over 20 years this is easily 4 or more genocides that coincide with each other.

1. No it isn’t. All you have done is pointed out an increased crime rate directed against white farmers.

2. Commitment with Intent to destroy an entire group?

3. Land is an underlying issue, that has been simmering since they ended apartheid. What land grabs do you mean? If the 9% who are white own 72% of the land, I am not seeing how this is genocide. How is their language being intentionally destroyed.

4. How is birthdate being intentionally restricted in white South Africans?

And just to further obliterate your idiotic Democrat derived talking points about what "genocide" supposedly is:
"The Genocide Convention establishes in Article I that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but ALSO in the context of a PEACEFUL situation(like the so-called "Rainbow nation" created after Apartheid). The latter is less common but still possible. The same article establishes the obligation of the contracting parties to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide."

Yes, it doesn’t have to be in the context of a war but it does require intent.

It is also a complex situation and if the law and justice system fails to support all South Africans equally or encourages racial violence, it could become genocide but I would not call it that now.

THIS is intent, dumbass.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- i also saw video of 'kill the Boer' sung the presence of 'nelson mandela' who was tapping his toes !!

-

 

[ptbw forever]

South Africa will be another Zimbabwe. The question is, why don't we just let these people starve to death or eat one another. It's what they want.

I doubt that happens and I also doubt Zimbabwe's situation will be permanent.

It's been like this in Zimbabwe since 1979. When do you imagine it will improve?

Introduce a pathogen, make sure everyone has adequate firepower to address their neighbors. Nuke the place. Eliminate the natives. THEN Zimbabwe will become a decent place to live and who knows might be farmed again.

By you pieces of shit who refuse to admit that people of European descent are in fact human beings and do in fact qualify as victims of genocide when it is in fact happening. All this whining and crying about brown people killing brown people who look EXACTLY like them and genetically are basically the same and yet an ongoing genocide against whites by blacks and Jewish financiers has literally been going on since the late 90s and you fuckers and the UN pretend like we are the ones overusing the term while you soulless assholes go back to your reactionary stances against "fascism" that for some peculiar reason always seems to pop up when white people are getting fucked over.

Everything I said about South Africa is now COMMON knowledge around the globe btw, and when added together these facts result in overwhelming evidence of MULTIPLE genocides against whites in South Africa, not just one.

I consider all people to be human beings. Do you?

You have failed to provide evidence of genocide within any commonly accepted definition. This might be racism in action, but not genocide. Jewish financiers? You are throwing everything but the kitchen sink into this rant.

To understand what genocide is..review the Holocaust, Rwanda, Bosnia, Yazidis, Rohinga.

No, you don't.

You repeatedly side with entities that deny the most basic and most common sense rights to whites for political gain. It doesn't matter that these groups will eventually directly oppress you and your family because you too are white, you still side with them and therefore you are as anti-white as they are.

I am not sure what you mean here. I have always supported and will always support equality of rights for all. I am not going to go along with racial fear mongering as a means to further divide people.

THIS is what genocide(extermination of GENES, not just a group of individuals of a similar genetic makeup) actually is btw:
United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect

"In the present Convention, genocide means ANY of the following acts committed with intent("Kill the Boer" definitely qualifies) to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

1. Killing members of the group;
2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

Did you miss the part about “with intent”? Intent to destroy an entire ethnic group? Chanting racist slogans is not genocide.

1. is clearly happening for any idiot to see
2 is clearly happening for any idiot to see
3. is happening in multiple facets(destroying the Afrikaners' language, land grabs, police brutality/negligence etc etc)
4. White South African children have all but abandoned their racist home country so the birth rate has dropped considerably for white South Africans over the years.
Over the span of over 20 years this is easily 4 or more genocides that coincide with each other.

1. No it isn’t. All you have done is pointed out an increased crime rate directed against white farmers.

2. Commitment with Intent to destroy an entire group?

3. Land is an underlying issue, that has been simmering since they ended apartheid. What land grabs do you mean? If the 9% who are white own 72% of the land, I am not seeing how this is genocide. How is their language being intentionally destroyed.

4. How is birthdate being intentionally restricted in white South Africans?

And just to further obliterate your idiotic Democrat derived talking points about what "genocide" supposedly is:
"The Genocide Convention establishes in Article I that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but ALSO in the context of a PEACEFUL situation(like the so-called "Rainbow nation" created after Apartheid). The latter is less common but still possible. The same article establishes the obligation of the contracting parties to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide."

Yes, it doesn’t have to be in the context of a war but it does require intent.

It is also a complex situation and if the law and justice system fails to support all South Africans equally or encourages racial violence, it could become genocide but I would not call it that now.

THIS is intent, dumbass.

A song? you have entered the realm of the truly pathetic.

The "song" is what you earlier referred to as "chanting racist slogans", dimwit.

The fucking president of South Africa was "singing" about the slaughter of Boers at a time when racism and violence against whites in South Africa was trending up yet again, and at a time when Julius Malema was reprimanded by the South African supreme court for singing the same song.

What do you think Newsweek would say if Trump started to sing about killing blacks?

 

[Coyote]

South Africa will be another Zimbabwe. The question is, why don't we just let these people starve to death or eat one another. It's what they want.

I doubt that happens and I also doubt Zimbabwe's situation will be permanent.

It's been like this in Zimbabwe since 1979. When do you imagine it will improve?

Introduce a pathogen, make sure everyone has adequate firepower to address their neighbors. Nuke the place. Eliminate the natives. THEN Zimbabwe will become a decent place to live and who knows might be farmed again.

I consider all people to be human beings. Do you?

You have failed to provide evidence of genocide within any commonly accepted definition. This might be racism in action, but not genocide. Jewish financiers? You are throwing everything but the kitchen sink into this rant.

To understand what genocide is..review the Holocaust, Rwanda, Bosnia, Yazidis, Rohinga.

No, you don't.

You repeatedly side with entities that deny the most basic and most common sense rights to whites for political gain. It doesn't matter that these groups will eventually directly oppress you and your family because you too are white, you still side with them and therefore you are as anti-white as they are.

I am not sure what you mean here. I have always supported and will always support equality of rights for all. I am not going to go along with racial fear mongering as a means to further divide people.

THIS is what genocide(extermination of GENES, not just a group of individuals of a similar genetic makeup) actually is btw:
United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect

"In the present Convention, genocide means ANY of the following acts committed with intent("Kill the Boer" definitely qualifies) to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

1. Killing members of the group;
2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

Did you miss the part about “with intent”? Intent to destroy an entire ethnic group? Chanting racist slogans is not genocide.

1. is clearly happening for any idiot to see
2 is clearly happening for any idiot to see
3. is happening in multiple facets(destroying the Afrikaners' language, land grabs, police brutality/negligence etc etc)
4. White South African children have all but abandoned their racist home country so the birth rate has dropped considerably for white South Africans over the years.
Over the span of over 20 years this is easily 4 or more genocides that coincide with each other.

1. No it isn’t. All you have done is pointed out an increased crime rate directed against white farmers.

2. Commitment with Intent to destroy an entire group?

3. Land is an underlying issue, that has been simmering since they ended apartheid. What land grabs do you mean? If the 9% who are white own 72% of the land, I am not seeing how this is genocide. How is their language being intentionally destroyed.

4. How is birthdate being intentionally restricted in white South Africans?

And just to further obliterate your idiotic Democrat derived talking points about what "genocide" supposedly is:
"The Genocide Convention establishes in Article I that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but ALSO in the context of a PEACEFUL situation(like the so-called "Rainbow nation" created after Apartheid). The latter is less common but still possible. The same article establishes the obligation of the contracting parties to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide."

Yes, it doesn’t have to be in the context of a war but it does require intent.

It is also a complex situation and if the law and justice system fails to support all South Africans equally or encourages racial violence, it could become genocide but I would not call it that now.

THIS is intent, dumbass.

A song? you have entered the realm of the truly pathetic.

The "song" is what you earlier referred to as "chanting racist slogans", dimwit.

The fucking president of South Africa was "singing" about the slaughter of Boers at a time when racism and violence against whites in South Africa was trending up yet again, and at a time when Julius Malema was reprimanded by the South African supreme court for singing the same song.

What do you think Newsweek would say if Trump started to sing about killing blacks?

A song. That is your sole claim to genocidal intent.

 

[Coyote]

Coyote apparently you do not have very good comprehension skills and your math skills totally suck. Here is the international recognized definition of genocide for ya;

The legal definition of genocide (Including Discussion and Key terms)
The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide:

1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and

2) the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide."

Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity.

Excerpt from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (For full text click here)
"Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide. "

http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext-printerfriendly.htm

Or maybe your comprehension of genocide sucks and your mental tools are are dull. Like when the crime stats show black farm workers are being killed as well, and robbery seems to be the main motive. I guess that doesn’t fit your genocide claim too well.

----------------------------- best to ALWAYS kill / murder the witnesses of Genocide Coyote .

Really now...even though in some cases only blacks were killed? Guess that must have been to throw them off the track so no one would know it was “genocide”.

 

[ptbw forever]

South Africa will be another Zimbabwe. The question is, why don't we just let these people starve to death or eat one another. It's what they want.

I doubt that happens and I also doubt Zimbabwe's situation will be permanent.

It's been like this in Zimbabwe since 1979. When do you imagine it will improve?

Introduce a pathogen, make sure everyone has adequate firepower to address their neighbors. Nuke the place. Eliminate the natives. THEN Zimbabwe will become a decent place to live and who knows might be farmed again.

No, you don't.

You repeatedly side with entities that deny the most basic and most common sense rights to whites for political gain. It doesn't matter that these groups will eventually directly oppress you and your family because you too are white, you still side with them and therefore you are as anti-white as they are.

I am not sure what you mean here. I have always supported and will always support equality of rights for all. I am not going to go along with racial fear mongering as a means to further divide people.

THIS is what genocide(extermination of GENES, not just a group of individuals of a similar genetic makeup) actually is btw:
United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect

"In the present Convention, genocide means ANY of the following acts committed with intent("Kill the Boer" definitely qualifies) to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

1. Killing members of the group;
2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

Did you miss the part about “with intent”? Intent to destroy an entire ethnic group? Chanting racist slogans is not genocide.

1. is clearly happening for any idiot to see
2 is clearly happening for any idiot to see
3. is happening in multiple facets(destroying the Afrikaners' language, land grabs, police brutality/negligence etc etc)
4. White South African children have all but abandoned their racist home country so the birth rate has dropped considerably for white South Africans over the years.
Over the span of over 20 years this is easily 4 or more genocides that coincide with each other.

1. No it isn’t. All you have done is pointed out an increased crime rate directed against white farmers.

2. Commitment with Intent to destroy an entire group?

3. Land is an underlying issue, that has been simmering since they ended apartheid. What land grabs do you mean? If the 9% who are white own 72% of the land, I am not seeing how this is genocide. How is their language being intentionally destroyed.

4. How is birthdate being intentionally restricted in white South Africans?

And just to further obliterate your idiotic Democrat derived talking points about what "genocide" supposedly is:
"The Genocide Convention establishes in Article I that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but ALSO in the context of a PEACEFUL situation(like the so-called "Rainbow nation" created after Apartheid). The latter is less common but still possible. The same article establishes the obligation of the contracting parties to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide."

Yes, it doesn’t have to be in the context of a war but it does require intent.

It is also a complex situation and if the law and justice system fails to support all South Africans equally or encourages racial violence, it could become genocide but I would not call it that now.

THIS is intent, dumbass.

A song? you have entered the realm of the truly pathetic.

The "song" is what you earlier referred to as "chanting racist slogans", dimwit.

The fucking president of South Africa was "singing" about the slaughter of Boers at a time when racism and violence against whites in South Africa was trending up yet again, and at a time when Julius Malema was reprimanded by the South African supreme court for singing the same song.

What do you think Newsweek would say if Trump started to sing about killing blacks?

A song. That is your sole claim to genocidal intent.

Answer the question, bitch.

You retards freak out when Trump says that "some" of the people at the illegally cancelled Unite the Right rally are "good people" and then have the fucking gall to think Zuma voicing support for racism against whites is "just a song"?

You just want to keep digging yourself a hole and pretending I am just some dumbass "conservative" who will let you out for humanitarian reasons, don't you?

 

[IM2]

I doubt that happens and I also doubt Zimbabwe's situation will be permanent.

It's been like this in Zimbabwe since 1979. When do you imagine it will improve?

Introduce a pathogen, make sure everyone has adequate firepower to address their neighbors. Nuke the place. Eliminate the natives. THEN Zimbabwe will become a decent place to live and who knows might be farmed again.

I am not sure what you mean here. I have always supported and will always support equality of rights for all. I am not going to go along with racial fear mongering as a means to further divide people.

Did you miss the part about “with intent”? Intent to destroy an entire ethnic group? Chanting racist slogans is not genocide.

1. No it isn’t. All you have done is pointed out an increased crime rate directed against white farmers.

2. Commitment with Intent to destroy an entire group?

3. Land is an underlying issue, that has been simmering since they ended apartheid. What land grabs do you mean? If the 9% who are white own 72% of the land, I am not seeing how this is genocide. How is their language being intentionally destroyed.

4. How is birthdate being intentionally restricted in white South Africans?



Yes, it doesn’t have to be in the context of a war but it does require intent.

It is also a complex situation and if the law and justice system fails to support all South Africans equally or encourages racial violence, it could become genocide but I would not call it that now.

THIS is intent, dumbass.

A song? you have entered the realm of the truly pathetic.

The "song" is what you earlier referred to as "chanting racist slogans", dimwit.

The fucking president of South Africa was "singing" about the slaughter of Boers at a time when racism and violence against whites in South Africa was trending up yet again, and at a time when Julius Malema was reprimanded by the South African supreme court for singing the same song.

What do you think Newsweek would say if Trump started to sing about killing blacks?

A song. That is your sole claim to genocidal intent.

Answer the question, bitch.

You retards freak out when Trump says that "some" of the people at the illegally cancelled Unite the Right rally are "good people" and then have the fucking gall to think Zuma voicing support for racism against whites is "just a song"?

You just want to keep digging yourself a hole and pretending I am just some dumbass "conservative" who will let you out for humanitarian reasons, don't you?

First let me answer your question. Had blacks invaded a white nation, murdered thousands to steal their land, make laws whereby whites could not own property in their own homeland, forced whites to carry pass cards, forcibly removed whites from their homes to bantustans and ruled by authoritarian force whereby they imprisoned or killed all opposition to black minority rule, the maybe Trump could sing a song about killing blacks.

Zuma is not the president of South Africa. He was voted out. So just shut up about that song junior. You can't be sane and truly be making the equivalence you just tried. .All you're doing is arguing from the Afrikaner perspective and they are the racists. You're a fucking idiot, young boy. You weren't alive during apartheid, so you really need to shut the hell up about things going on as a result of things that occurred before your ass got slapped by the doctor so you could start breathing. After all that's your standard for discussing white racism in America. Apply that to South Africa and shut the fuck up.

 

[ptbw forever]

It's been like this in Zimbabwe since 1979. When do you imagine it will improve?

Introduce a pathogen, make sure everyone has adequate firepower to address their neighbors. Nuke the place. Eliminate the natives. THEN Zimbabwe will become a decent place to live and who knows might be farmed again.

THIS is intent, dumbass.

A song? you have entered the realm of the truly pathetic.

The "song" is what you earlier referred to as "chanting racist slogans", dimwit.

The fucking president of South Africa was "singing" about the slaughter of Boers at a time when racism and violence against whites in South Africa was trending up yet again, and at a time when Julius Malema was reprimanded by the South African supreme court for singing the same song.

What do you think Newsweek would say if Trump started to sing about killing blacks?

A song. That is your sole claim to genocidal intent.

Answer the question, bitch.

You retards freak out when Trump says that "some" of the people at the illegally cancelled Unite the Right rally are "good people" and then have the fucking gall to think Zuma voicing support for racism against whites is "just a song"?

You just want to keep digging yourself a hole and pretending I am just some dumbass "conservative" who will let you out for humanitarian reasons, don't you?

First let me answer your question. Had blacks invaded a white nation, murdered thousands to steal their land, make laws whereby whites could not own property in their own homeland, forced whites to carry pass cards, forcibly removed whites from their homes to bantustans and ruled by authoritarian force whereby they imprisoned or killed all opposition to black minority rule, the maybe Trump could sing a song about killing blacks.

Zuma is not the president of South Africa. He was voted out. So just shut up about that song junior. You can't be sane and truly be making the equivalence you just tried. .All you're doing is arguing from the Afrikaner perspective and they are the racists. You're a fucking idiot, young boy. You weren't alive during apartheid, so you really need to shut the hell up about things going on as a result of things that occurred before your ass got slapped by the doctor so you could start breathing. After all that's your standard for discussing white racism in America. Apply that to South Africa and shut the fuck up.

The new president is even worse, idiot.

His main campaign promise was based on a bill brought up by Malema.

 

[cnelsen]

It's funny how whites think. You go to churches with pictures of a white Jesus. You read a bible translated by a white man named King James. And in this bible it is written at if you live by the sword you will die by the sword. So whites go out and live by the sword worldwide for 500 years and now as they start dying by the sword they cry, whine and gnash teeth like it's not supposed to happen to them

Your hatred is breath-taking. You are the argument against tolerance. You are as vicious as any genocidalist ever.