Genocide of white farmers in South africa

[IM2]

A song? you have entered the realm of the truly pathetic.

The "song" is what you earlier referred to as "chanting racist slogans", dimwit.

The fucking president of South Africa was "singing" about the slaughter of Boers at a time when racism and violence against whites in South Africa was trending up yet again, and at a time when Julius Malema was reprimanded by the South African supreme court for singing the same song.

What do you think Newsweek would say if Trump started to sing about killing blacks?

A song. That is your sole claim to genocidal intent.

Answer the question, bitch.

You retards freak out when Trump says that "some" of the people at the illegally cancelled Unite the Right rally are "good people" and then have the fucking gall to think Zuma voicing support for racism against whites is "just a song"?

You just want to keep digging yourself a hole and pretending I am just some dumbass "conservative" who will let you out for humanitarian reasons, don't you?

First let me answer your question. Had blacks invaded a white nation, murdered thousands to steal their land, make laws whereby whites could not own property in their own homeland, forced whites to carry pass cards, forcibly removed whites from their homes to bantustans and ruled by authoritarian force whereby they imprisoned or killed all opposition to black minority rule, the maybe Trump could sing a song about killing blacks.

Zuma is not the president of South Africa. He was voted out. So just shut up about that song junior. You can't be sane and truly be making the equivalence you just tried. .All you're doing is arguing from the Afrikaner perspective and they are the racists. You're a fucking idiot, young boy. You weren't alive during apartheid, so you really need to shut the hell up about things going on as a result of things that occurred before your ass got slapped by the doctor so you could start breathing. After all that's your standard for discussing white racism in America. Apply that to South Africa and shut the fuck up.

The new president is even worse, idiot.

His main campaign promise was based on a bill brought up by Malema.

You know nothing about the new president of South Africa and you have refused to recognize that whites there are getting what they deserve. No different than ISIS is getting what they deserve. Yeah I sad it. Because the whites in South Africa terrorized those people. And while a pussy like you can point fingers at every body else your punk ass cannot seem to get registered in your head that you white motherfuckers are not special or immune to the same rules as everyone else. So shut the fuck up about what the majority of South Africans have decided to do with a minority that decided to inflict terror and murder upon them.

 

[IM2]

It's funny how whites think. You go to churches with pictures of a white Jesus. You read a bible translated by a white man named King James. And in this bible it is written at if you live by the sword you will die by the sword. So whites go out and live by the sword worldwide for 500 years and now as they start dying by the sword they cry, whine and gnash teeth like it's not supposed to happen to them

Your hatred is breath-taking. You are the argument against tolerance. You are as vicious as any genocidalist ever.

Yeah right. I hate because I tell the truth about what whites have done.

 

[cnelsen]

The "song" is what you earlier referred to as "chanting racist slogans", dimwit.

The fucking president of South Africa was "singing" about the slaughter of Boers at a time when racism and violence against whites in South Africa was trending up yet again, and at a time when Julius Malema was reprimanded by the South African supreme court for singing the same song.

What do you think Newsweek would say if Trump started to sing about killing blacks?

A song. That is your sole claim to genocidal intent.

Answer the question, bitch.

You retards freak out when Trump says that "some" of the people at the illegally cancelled Unite the Right rally are "good people" and then have the fucking gall to think Zuma voicing support for racism against whites is "just a song"?

You just want to keep digging yourself a hole and pretending I am just some dumbass "conservative" who will let you out for humanitarian reasons, don't you?

First let me answer your question. Had blacks invaded a white nation, murdered thousands to steal their land, make laws whereby whites could not own property in their own homeland, forced whites to carry pass cards, forcibly removed whites from their homes to bantustans and ruled by authoritarian force whereby they imprisoned or killed all opposition to black minority rule, the maybe Trump could sing a song about killing blacks.

Zuma is not the president of South Africa. He was voted out. So just shut up about that song junior. You can't be sane and truly be making the equivalence you just tried. .All you're doing is arguing from the Afrikaner perspective and they are the racists. You're a fucking idiot, young boy. You weren't alive during apartheid, so you really need to shut the hell up about things going on as a result of things that occurred before your ass got slapped by the doctor so you could start breathing. After all that's your standard for discussing white racism in America. Apply that to South Africa and shut the fuck up.

The new president is even worse, idiot.

His main campaign promise was based on a bill brought up by Malema.

You know nothing about the new president of South Africa and you have refused to recognize that whites there are getting what they deserve. No different than ISIS is getting what they deserve. Yeah I sad it. Because the whites in South Africa terrorized those people. And while a pussy like you can point fingers at every body else your punk ass cannot seem to get registered in your head that you white motherfuckers are not special or immune to the same rules as everyone else. So shut the fuck up about what the majority of South Africans have decided to do with a minority that decided to inflict terror and murder upon them.

As a father of two impressionable teenage girls, I am having a tough and at times frustrating time trying to undo the damage done at school in the course of their history studies, where they seem to be learning little about European civilization other than that we “palefaces” should be remembered primarily as the masters of the slave trade and as avaricious colonialists who enjoyed being beastly brutes making life miserable for Africans. And of course here in South Africa there is little more they need to know beyond apartheid, which must be viewed as nothing less than one of the worst crimes against humanity in recorded history; and all people of European ancestry must somehow share the guilt, including them, the children. Lots of big talk about stamping out child abuse, but our progeny are victims of a pernicious form of mental cruelty aimed at inculcating a completely undeserved sense of shame. Many start out life feeling awful about their provenance, struggling with their self-esteem and lacking confidence.

Not a whisper about the fact that the government run by the Afrikaner Nationalists was so bloody terrible they had to build an expensive fence around much of the border to stop the flood of illegal migrants from the north who desperately wanted to join the “suffering” masses. The architects of “separate development,” damn them, were of the view that cultures and races inevitably collide; thank heaven we have Sweden, where the Muslim immigrants are blending in so beautifully, as a shining, modern-day example, to show us how wrong those miserable bastards were.

On the subject of slavery, very few children today are reminded that the process to abolish the Atlantic slave trade began over 200 years ago and was done primarily thanks to the intrepid mariners of the Royal Navy, who set about the arduous and dangerous task of enforcing legislation passed in the British Parliament. The West Africa Squadron, which was established for this single purpose, was not a popular posting because it brought with it enormous risks, not least of which was death from tropical diseases. But officers and men pursued the task with almost evangelical zeal and eventually prevailed.

Little or no mention in the history lessons of William Wilberforce, who was a primary player in the campaign to abolish slavery. He devoted his life to a cause that cost him his friendships and his health. Not a single African country, to my knowledge, acknowledges him, nor is there any memorial to him.

They are also not told that the Arabs (Muslims) were enslaving Africans long before the Europeans arrived, and that they continue to enslave Africans today. And as slaves their conditions were immeasurably harsher than those that prevailed in North America. Nothing in the textbooks about the fact that only a small percentage of the people forcibly removed from Africa ended up in what is today the USA, and that the Africans who came to America as slaves were the lucky ones who escaped the poverty, utter lawlessness, and endemic tribal wars in their homeland to be introduced to the most advanced civilization in history.

They are not told that a form of indentured labor that would be classified as slavery in any European country is widely prevalent in South Asia, especially in India, to this day. They are also not told that virtually every dominant society in history has at one time or another compelled people to work under conditions of slavery.

Also, nothing taught about the fact that in the 17th and 18th centuries, hundreds of thousands of Europeans were shipped to America against their will and into forced labor. Waifs and strays were swept off the streets of London and shipped to the tobacco fields of the Carolinas. White convicts were paraded for sale like cattle, and prostitutes were dragged from their brothels and shipped west against their will. Hundreds of thousands of Irishmen and -women were sold by decree to labor in the fields of America.

No mention of the fact that through the 17th century, over a million European slaves were abducted by Barbary pirates in raids on ships and coastal towns from Italy to the Netherlands and as far north as Iceland. In his book Economic Facts and Fallacies, Thomas Sowell (who is black) reports from references in the Library of Congress that more people were carried into slavery from Europe into North Africa than from Africa to North America.

Of course, when the cry for reparations goes out, there is no mention of the Arabs or anybody else who’s ever abused anyone owing anything; it’s only the “usual suspects” who must cough, because that’s just the way the modern world operates.

Naturally, little mention of the fact that there would have been no slave trade at all had it not been for the enthusiastic and ruthless support of African tribal chieftains who ensured a continuous supply of human merchandise was available to be loaded onto the waiting ships. Even some hardened white slavers were shaken by the brutality and savagery displayed by the Africans against one another in the competition to fill their vessels with live cargo. It should go without saying that if Africans had shown the same savage aggression in driving the slavers away, there may have been no trade at all. But the contrary was the norm; the ships were invariably welcomed.

This all brings me to the exposé recently aired by CNN on the modern-day slave trade that appears to be running out of Libya. There were lots of ugly visuals, as one would expect, but then rather surprisingly (for some—not so much for me), footage appeared that clearly showed some of the newly “enslaved” with rather strange smiles on their faces and a look of relieved contentment, almost as if they were jolly pleased they had made it safely into the hands of the slavers, who were about to drag them off and into the cruel clutches of the ghastly Europeans north of the Mediterranean.

This got me thinking, then excited, then fuming, and I sought to summon my girls to see what I was seeing, but my angry remonstrations and shouts of “You see? This is what I have been telling you all along!” had them darting from view with the slickness of a homesick mole sliding down a greased pole. But a little of the truth had slipped by the censorious eyes of the “thought police” who direct content at the home of “fake news.”

That “truth” goes right to the core of busting the myth about colonialism being a blight on the continent and the independence that followed being a blessing, when in fact, the very converse is true. That would be made embarrassingly obvious if the countries of Europe and North America were to make it known that they were back in the slave trade and boats were on their way to the ports. The response from the forsaken millions, destined for lives of endless poverty, would doubtless be overwhelming, and the rush for the ships would be unstoppable. If the demand were to be there, I have little doubt Africa would soon be bereft of people. The vast majority would choose to abandon their purported “freedom” on a continent fast reversing back into anarchy and savagery and become “unfree” again under European suzerainty.

Hobbes in Leviathan painted a grim picture when he suggested that the natural state of mankind is a “war of all against all” in which men’s lives are “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” Unfortunately, in most cases, especially in Africa, he’s been proved right. But if there is a chance to escape this dystopia, it rests with that part of the world where Europeans built societies on a foundation forged out of the Christian ethos. But of course, nobody is supposed to know that, either.

Slavery: The Inconvenient Truth

 

[Yarddog]

The fact is that it's not happening.

South Africa's Police Service says 74 people were murdered on farms between April 2016 and March 2017, up from 58 in the previous year. '

74 dead whites in one year does not build a case for white genocide.

It's probably not white genocide but the population as a whole is feeling the increase in crime. Farms make easy targets because they are a bit more isolated, and I do believe the murder rate for farmers is much higher than the murder rate for non- farmers in SA. If its 75 farmers murdered in one year that may not seem like genocide, but if that happens every year, it will become a genocide for South Africas economy no matter how people try to spin it. If that rate just continues, white farmers will eventually all leave and if black farmers are also being robbed and killed at the same rate, good luck for having hope as all the people who know how to do things dissapear.

 

[Yarddog]

It's funny how whites think. You go to churches with pictures of a white Jesus. You read a bible translated by a white man named King James. And in this bible it is written at if you live by the sword you will die by the sword. So whites go out and live by the sword worldwide for 500 years and now as they start dying by the sword they cry, whine and gnash teeth like it's not supposed to happen to them

If someone comes to kill you and your family, your going to cry and whine too, it doesn't matter what your ancestors did or didn't do. In this respect people are pretty much all the same. Though it is true that white people in america today are being trained to be docile, have no will to fight, or at least to have no pride worth fighting for. that is the goal by a faction within what we consider to be called academia.And those people are expected to roll over for what their ancestors may or may not have done. that is true

 

[IM2]

The fact is that it's not happening.

South Africa's Police Service says 74 people were murdered on farms between April 2016 and March 2017, up from 58 in the previous year. '

74 dead whites in one year does not build a case for white genocide.

It's probably not white genocide but the population as a whole is feeling the increase in crime. Farms make easy targets because they are a bit more isolated, and I do believe the murder rate for farmers is much higher than the murder rate for non- farmers in SA. If its 75 farmers murdered in one year that may not seem like genocide, but if that happens every year, it will become a genocide for South Africas economy no matter how people try to spin it. If that rate just continues, white farmers will eventually all leave and if black farmers are also being robbed and killed at the same rate, good luck for having hope as all the people who know how to do things dissapear.

No it's not white genocide and what's going on is an alt right lie and exaggeration by AFRIKANERS to create a false scenario whereby whites can regain political control in South Africa.

 

[ptbw forever]

The "song" is what you earlier referred to as "chanting racist slogans", dimwit.

The fucking president of South Africa was "singing" about the slaughter of Boers at a time when racism and violence against whites in South Africa was trending up yet again, and at a time when Julius Malema was reprimanded by the South African supreme court for singing the same song.

What do you think Newsweek would say if Trump started to sing about killing blacks?

A song. That is your sole claim to genocidal intent.

Answer the question, bitch.

You retards freak out when Trump says that "some" of the people at the illegally cancelled Unite the Right rally are "good people" and then have the fucking gall to think Zuma voicing support for racism against whites is "just a song"?

You just want to keep digging yourself a hole and pretending I am just some dumbass "conservative" who will let you out for humanitarian reasons, don't you?

First let me answer your question. Had blacks invaded a white nation, murdered thousands to steal their land, make laws whereby whites could not own property in their own homeland, forced whites to carry pass cards, forcibly removed whites from their homes to bantustans and ruled by authoritarian force whereby they imprisoned or killed all opposition to black minority rule, the maybe Trump could sing a song about killing blacks.

Zuma is not the president of South Africa. He was voted out. So just shut up about that song junior. You can't be sane and truly be making the equivalence you just tried. .All you're doing is arguing from the Afrikaner perspective and they are the racists. You're a fucking idiot, young boy. You weren't alive during apartheid, so you really need to shut the hell up about things going on as a result of things that occurred before your ass got slapped by the doctor so you could start breathing. After all that's your standard for discussing white racism in America. Apply that to South Africa and shut the fuck up.

The new president is even worse, idiot.

His main campaign promise was based on a bill brought up by Malema.

You know nothing about the new president of South Africa and you have refused to recognize that whites there are getting what they deserve. No different than ISIS is getting what they deserve. Yeah I sad it. Because the whites in South Africa terrorized those people. And while a pussy like you can point fingers at every body else your punk ass cannot seem to get registered in your head that you white motherfuckers are not special or immune to the same rules as everyone else. So shut the fuck up about what the majority of South Africans have decided to do with a minority that decided to inflict terror and murder upon them.

Do you even understand how many non-whites would be dead in Europe right now if Europeans were even a fraction as racist and homicidal as blacks in South Africa are?

 

[IM2]

It's funny how whites think. You go to churches with pictures of a white Jesus. You read a bible translated by a white man named King James. And in this bible it is written at if you live by the sword you will die by the sword. So whites go out and live by the sword worldwide for 500 years and now as they start dying by the sword they cry, whine and gnash teeth like it's not supposed to happen to them

If someone comes to kill you and your family, your going to cry and whine too, it doesn't matter what your ancestors did or didn't do. In this respect people are pretty much all the same. Though it is true that white people in america today are being trained to be docile, have no will to fight, or at least to have no pride worth fighting for. that is the goal by a faction within what we consider to be called academia.And those people are expected to roll over for what their ancestors may or may not have done. that is true

You make no sense. None of what you posted is true. If whites work to rid their community of racism, they will find they have plenty to fight for. If whites end their racism they will find they have plenty to be proud of. This is not about your fucking ancestors. It's about YOUR generation and how YOUR generation wants to keep being racists.

 

[ptbw forever]

It's funny how whites think. You go to churches with pictures of a white Jesus. You read a bible translated by a white man named King James. And in this bible it is written at if you live by the sword you will die by the sword. So whites go out and live by the sword worldwide for 500 years and now as they start dying by the sword they cry, whine and gnash teeth like it's not supposed to happen to them

If someone comes to kill you and your family, your going to cry and whine too, it doesn't matter what your ancestors did or didn't do. In this respect people are pretty much all the same. Though it is true that white people in america today are being trained to be docile, have no will to fight, or at least to have no pride worth fighting for. that is the goal by a faction within what we consider to be called academia.And those people are expected to roll over for what their ancestors may or may not have done. that is true

You make no sense. None of what you posted is true. If whites work to rid their community of racism, they will find they have plenty to fight for. If whites end their racism they will find they have plenty to be proud of. This is not about your fucking ancestors. It's about YOUR generation and how YOUR generation wants to keep being racists.

Just die already and leave your stupidity and ignorance about absolutely everything in your corpse.

 

[IM2]

A song. That is your sole claim to genocidal intent.

Answer the question, bitch.

You retards freak out when Trump says that "some" of the people at the illegally cancelled Unite the Right rally are "good people" and then have the fucking gall to think Zuma voicing support for racism against whites is "just a song"?

You just want to keep digging yourself a hole and pretending I am just some dumbass "conservative" who will let you out for humanitarian reasons, don't you?

First let me answer your question. Had blacks invaded a white nation, murdered thousands to steal their land, make laws whereby whites could not own property in their own homeland, forced whites to carry pass cards, forcibly removed whites from their homes to bantustans and ruled by authoritarian force whereby they imprisoned or killed all opposition to black minority rule, the maybe Trump could sing a song about killing blacks.

Zuma is not the president of South Africa. He was voted out. So just shut up about that song junior. You can't be sane and truly be making the equivalence you just tried. .All you're doing is arguing from the Afrikaner perspective and they are the racists. You're a fucking idiot, young boy. You weren't alive during apartheid, so you really need to shut the hell up about things going on as a result of things that occurred before your ass got slapped by the doctor so you could start breathing. After all that's your standard for discussing white racism in America. Apply that to South Africa and shut the fuck up.

The new president is even worse, idiot.

His main campaign promise was based on a bill brought up by Malema.

You know nothing about the new president of South Africa and you have refused to recognize that whites there are getting what they deserve. No different than ISIS is getting what they deserve. Yeah I sad it. Because the whites in South Africa terrorized those people. And while a pussy like you can point fingers at every body else your punk ass cannot seem to get registered in your head that you white motherfuckers are not special or immune to the same rules as everyone else. So shut the fuck up about what the majority of South Africans have decided to do with a minority that decided to inflict terror and murder upon them.

Do you even understand how many non-whites would be dead in Europe right now if Europeans were even a fraction as racist and homicidal as blacks in South Africa are?

Do you understand that your comment has nothing to do with what whites did in South Africa? You've got the world ass backwards little boy. When you grow up and study things you will find out just how wrong you were about life when you were 28. So you come back and talk to me about world affairs in 29 years punk, because you are way behind.

 

[IM2]

It's funny how whites think. You go to churches with pictures of a white Jesus. You read a bible translated by a white man named King James. And in this bible it is written at if you live by the sword you will die by the sword. So whites go out and live by the sword worldwide for 500 years and now as they start dying by the sword they cry, whine and gnash teeth like it's not supposed to happen to them

If someone comes to kill you and your family, your going to cry and whine too, it doesn't matter what your ancestors did or didn't do. In this respect people are pretty much all the same. Though it is true that white people in america today are being trained to be docile, have no will to fight, or at least to have no pride worth fighting for. that is the goal by a faction within what we consider to be called academia.And those people are expected to roll over for what their ancestors may or may not have done. that is true

You make no sense. None of what you posted is true. If whites work to rid their community of racism, they will find they have plenty to fight for. If whites end their racism they will find they have plenty to be proud of. This is not about your fucking ancestors. It's about YOUR generation and how YOUR generation wants to keep being racists.

Just die already and leave your stupidity and ignorance about absolutely everything in your corpse.

Like I just said come talk to me in 29 years junior because I'm right about what I say. You have no rebuttal.

 

[ptbw forever]

Answer the question, bitch.

You retards freak out when Trump says that "some" of the people at the illegally cancelled Unite the Right rally are "good people" and then have the fucking gall to think Zuma voicing support for racism against whites is "just a song"?

You just want to keep digging yourself a hole and pretending I am just some dumbass "conservative" who will let you out for humanitarian reasons, don't you?

First let me answer your question. Had blacks invaded a white nation, murdered thousands to steal their land, make laws whereby whites could not own property in their own homeland, forced whites to carry pass cards, forcibly removed whites from their homes to bantustans and ruled by authoritarian force whereby they imprisoned or killed all opposition to black minority rule, the maybe Trump could sing a song about killing blacks.

Zuma is not the president of South Africa. He was voted out. So just shut up about that song junior. You can't be sane and truly be making the equivalence you just tried. .All you're doing is arguing from the Afrikaner perspective and they are the racists. You're a fucking idiot, young boy. You weren't alive during apartheid, so you really need to shut the hell up about things going on as a result of things that occurred before your ass got slapped by the doctor so you could start breathing. After all that's your standard for discussing white racism in America. Apply that to South Africa and shut the fuck up.

The new president is even worse, idiot.

His main campaign promise was based on a bill brought up by Malema.

You know nothing about the new president of South Africa and you have refused to recognize that whites there are getting what they deserve. No different than ISIS is getting what they deserve. Yeah I sad it. Because the whites in South Africa terrorized those people. And while a pussy like you can point fingers at every body else your punk ass cannot seem to get registered in your head that you white motherfuckers are not special or immune to the same rules as everyone else. So shut the fuck up about what the majority of South Africans have decided to do with a minority that decided to inflict terror and murder upon them.

Do you even understand how many non-whites would be dead in Europe right now if Europeans were even a fraction as racist and homicidal as blacks in South Africa are?

Do you understand that your comment has nothing to do with what whites did in South Africa? You've got the world ass backwards little boy. When you grow up and study things you will find out just how wrong you were about life when you were 28. So you come back and talk to me about world affairs in 29 years punk, because you are way behind.

Correct, it has to do with what non-whites are doing to indigenous Europeans TODAY, retard.

Not to mention 100 years ago, and 1000 years ago....

You want to mass murder every single white person in South Africa for creating their own country and then giving it up to black people who are not even indigenous to the area and yet you think it is perfectly reasonable for lying thieving savages to rape and burn and kill off fully established indigenous European cultures and countries.

In 29 years EVERYTHING I have ever said or believed about the future will have come to pass and Europeans will have annihilated the traitors and the racists that seek to destroy them.

 

[IM2]

First let me answer your question. Had blacks invaded a white nation, murdered thousands to steal their land, make laws whereby whites could not own property in their own homeland, forced whites to carry pass cards, forcibly removed whites from their homes to bantustans and ruled by authoritarian force whereby they imprisoned or killed all opposition to black minority rule, the maybe Trump could sing a song about killing blacks.

Zuma is not the president of South Africa. He was voted out. So just shut up about that song junior. You can't be sane and truly be making the equivalence you just tried. .All you're doing is arguing from the Afrikaner perspective and they are the racists. You're a fucking idiot, young boy. You weren't alive during apartheid, so you really need to shut the hell up about things going on as a result of things that occurred before your ass got slapped by the doctor so you could start breathing. After all that's your standard for discussing white racism in America. Apply that to South Africa and shut the fuck up.

The new president is even worse, idiot.

His main campaign promise was based on a bill brought up by Malema.

You know nothing about the new president of South Africa and you have refused to recognize that whites there are getting what they deserve. No different than ISIS is getting what they deserve. Yeah I sad it. Because the whites in South Africa terrorized those people. And while a pussy like you can point fingers at every body else your punk ass cannot seem to get registered in your head that you white motherfuckers are not special or immune to the same rules as everyone else. So shut the fuck up about what the majority of South Africans have decided to do with a minority that decided to inflict terror and murder upon them.

Do you even understand how many non-whites would be dead in Europe right now if Europeans were even a fraction as racist and homicidal as blacks in South Africa are?

Do you understand that your comment has nothing to do with what whites did in South Africa? You've got the world ass backwards little boy. When you grow up and study things you will find out just how wrong you were about life when you were 28. So you come back and talk to me about world affairs in 29 years punk, because you are way behind.

Correct, it has to do with what non-whites are doing to indigenous Europeans TODAY, retard.

Not to mention 100 years ago, and 1000 years ago....

You want to mass murder every single white person in South Africa for creating their own country and then giving it up to black people who are not even indigenous to the area and yet you think it is perfectly reasonable for lying thieving savages to rape and burn and kill off fully established indigenous European cultures and countries.

In 29 years EVERYTHING I have ever said or believed about the future will have come to pass and Europeans will have annihilated the traitors and the racists that seek to destroy them.

Nothing you say will come to pass. White South Africans did not create their own country. They stole it by murder and terror. They are now reaping what they sowed. Whites are less than 10 percent of the worlds population. You need to think about that.

 

[ptbw forever]

The new president is even worse, idiot.

His main campaign promise was based on a bill brought up by Malema.

You know nothing about the new president of South Africa and you have refused to recognize that whites there are getting what they deserve. No different than ISIS is getting what they deserve. Yeah I sad it. Because the whites in South Africa terrorized those people. And while a pussy like you can point fingers at every body else your punk ass cannot seem to get registered in your head that you white motherfuckers are not special or immune to the same rules as everyone else. So shut the fuck up about what the majority of South Africans have decided to do with a minority that decided to inflict terror and murder upon them.

Do you even understand how many non-whites would be dead in Europe right now if Europeans were even a fraction as racist and homicidal as blacks in South Africa are?

Do you understand that your comment has nothing to do with what whites did in South Africa? You've got the world ass backwards little boy. When you grow up and study things you will find out just how wrong you were about life when you were 28. So you come back and talk to me about world affairs in 29 years punk, because you are way behind.

Correct, it has to do with what non-whites are doing to indigenous Europeans TODAY, retard.

Not to mention 100 years ago, and 1000 years ago....

You want to mass murder every single white person in South Africa for creating their own country and then giving it up to black people who are not even indigenous to the area and yet you think it is perfectly reasonable for lying thieving savages to rape and burn and kill off fully established indigenous European cultures and countries.

In 29 years EVERYTHING I have ever said or believed about the future will have come to pass and Europeans will have annihilated the traitors and the racists that seek to destroy them.

Nothing you say will come to pass. White South Africans did not create their own country. They stole it by murder and terror. They are now reaping what they sowed. Whites are less than 10 percent of the worlds population. You need to think about that.

It is precisely the fact that we are a minority that the status quo of white guilt and delusional beliefs of "white privilege" will die a very swift death, which will have cause the chain of events that will lead to a radical changed world in 29 years time.

The enemies of Europe will reap what they sowed very shortly.

 

[Tilly]

Coyote apparently you do not have very good comprehension skills and your math skills totally suck. Here is the international recognized definition of genocide for ya;

The legal definition of genocide (Including Discussion and Key terms)
The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide:

1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and

2) the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide."

Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity.

Excerpt from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (For full text click here)
"Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide. "

http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext-printerfriendly.htm

Or maybe your comprehension of genocide sucks and your mental tools are are dull. Like when the crime stats show black farm workers are being killed as well, and robbery seems to be the main motive. I guess that doesn’t fit your genocide claim too well.

----------------------------- best to ALWAYS kill / murder the witnesses of Genocide Coyote .

Also the black farm workers are are often being killed for working for the white farmers.

 

[pismoe]

last thing i do is laser in on the word Genocide . So called Genocide doesn't matter to me . But it is True that WHITE Farmers predominately are being murdered because they are White Farmers . The Murdered also include some Black farm workers that were employed by White farmers and land owners . ------------- I think that its silly to look for proof of Genocide when its clear to anyone with eyes that White Farmers are being Murdered because they are White Farmers , just a comment .

 

[pismoe]

the word Genocide was invented in 1944 by a Jewish Lawyer named Raphael Lemkin . Before Raphael murder was simply recognized as murder .

 

[RodISHI]

Coyote apparently you do not have very good comprehension skills and your math skills totally suck. Here is the international recognized definition of genocide for ya;

The legal definition of genocide (Including Discussion and Key terms)
The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide:

1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and

2) the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide."

Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity.

Excerpt from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (For full text click here)
"Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide. "

http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext-printerfriendly.htm

Or maybe your comprehension of genocide sucks and your mental tools are are dull. Like when the crime stats show black farm workers are being killed as well, and robbery seems to be the main motive. I guess that doesn’t fit your genocide claim too well.

When Jews were being slaughtered so were Polish and others. Again your math skills and comprehension skills suck. The blacks are being killed who stand in solidarity with the farmers. You put up the numbers now take into consideration that whites are only 9% of the population and being called White there means you are anyone who isn't black skinned.

 

[Tilly]

Coyote apparently you do not have very good comprehension skills and your math skills totally suck. Here is the international recognized definition of genocide for ya;

The legal definition of genocide (Including Discussion and Key terms)
The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide:

1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and

2) the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide."

Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity.

Excerpt from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (For full text click here)
"Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide. "

http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext-printerfriendly.htm

Or maybe your comprehension of genocide sucks and your mental tools are are dull. Like when the crime stats show black farm workers are being killed as well, and robbery seems to be the main motive. I guess that doesn’t fit your genocide claim too well.

When Jews were being slaughtered so were Polish and others. Again your math skills and comprehension skills suck. The blacks are being killed who stand in solidarity with the farmers. You put up the numbers now take into consideration that whites are only 9% of the population and being called White there means you are anyone who isn't black skinned.

The complete lack of even basic sympathy for the victims of murder and genocide when the victims are white is quite astonishing, isn’t it?
If these farmers were muslims, for example, we’d have NGOs branding this ethnic cleansing and genocide in a heartbeat, and of course the leftards here have already attempted to deflect and derail the thread in that direction.
The double standards are well beyond nauseating.

 

[pismoe]

i mean , hey , White and some Black farmers are being murdered in 's. africa' and those are the facts . Worrying about Genocide just muddies the waters in my opinion . Murder is murder no matter who is murdered . But the newly made word of GENOCIDE [from 1944] can be argued forever and ever .