john doe 101
Platinum Member
- Sep 6, 2021
- 13,958
- 7,318
- 938
Plenty of cases were overturned on the basis of lack of evidence. Some were overturned because they provided NO evidence. I realize I will never, ever change your mind because you are too far down the rabbit hole. The only thing I ask is you stick with your own kind and stop attempting to destroy America with your made up bullshit.The courts have uniformly shut down Trump by ruling on procedural grounds and completely ignoring
and avoiding substantial issues raised.
Like the Texas suit John Roberts and the Supremes gave the deep six by ruling that the election laws
and procedures that Pennsylvania put into place improperly and illegally are not the business of
Texas (and all the states that signed onto the complaint)...which could only be true IF the Texas suit
did not have far reaching political implications and consequences for ALL the states as a whole.
The Swing States That Will Determine Who Wins the Presidency
Donald Trump's fate is in the hands of these major Electoral College votes.www.marieclaire.com
It's entirely proper and legal for a class action case against a small handful of states that were
funded and weaponized to tip the election by rigging voting laws in those individual states.
If Ohio dumps toxic wastes into rivers that poison and ruin water in Pennsylvania then the court
has every right to address what one state is doing to another.
Claiming Texas has no right to object to jury rigging of election laws by a small handful of
crucial states in a presidential election is a cowardly and pitiful move by Roberts, the Bush
Manchurian judicial appointment.
The judiciary was in on the fix, as John Roberts signaled unconsciously. Roberts made a ruling, that like
the enormous iceberg that sank the Titanic, dealt exclusively with the 30% of the matter he wanted to
deal with and NOT the 70% that under lied the entire legal matter.
I doubt you are moral and honest enough to see the crime, however.