Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, you’re doubling down on your Trayvon was a thug stupidity.No, but you are, on stupid.^^^ Doubling down on stupid.LOLOL
To the brain-dead, an unarmed teen carrying candy back to his friend is “thug life.”
Yup. Dead thugs are dead.
TM ain't doubling down any more.
I'm not doubling down on Trayon's fatal stupidity.
Or maybe Zimmerman started the fight.Let’s see your proof Trayvon started the fight....LOLOLyes you did,,,^^^ Doubling down on stupid.
Great, what’s thuggery about carrying candy back to a friend...?
Thuggery was beating on a creepy cracka instead of walking home.
LOL!
Maybe Trayvon started beating on GZ after he was shot?
That's what he doesn't seem to understand, no matter how hard I try to explain.LOL!
Maybe Trayvon started beating on GZ after he was shot?
Or, maybe that is irrelevant AS FUCK!!!Or maybe Zimmerman started the fight.
I never said that,,,so stop lying,,,My claim is that he was never accused of stealing jewelry, as you falsely claimed he was.like you did either,,,LOLYeah, nobody is going to defend your obtuse stance on that. We're pretty much laughing at you, at this point.LOLOL
Oh look, yet another idiot who posts a link which doesn’t state Martin stole jewelry.
Laugh all you want, you still failed miserably to prove your claim.
You even posted a link that sided with me on that, not you.
Thugs tend to mercilessly beat the shit out of people.No, you’re doubling down on your Trayvon was a thug stupidity.
What a pity you don’t understand English, huh?You can’t prove Martin started beating on Zimmerman.You got me. I'm biased against thugs.
Martin wasn't breaking the law at that moment. He is protected by the law just as you and I are. Just because you deem him a "thug" doesn't mean Zimmerman is allowed to pursue, confront and create a situation while being armed.
Martin wasn't breaking the law at that moment.
Not until he started beating on GZ.
doesn't mean Zimmerman is allowed to pursue, confront and create a situation
Baloney. He can pursue, confront and create all he wants.
TM, stupidly, and fatally, escalated instead of going home or calling 911.
Stop making shit up.
Martin didn't beat on GZ?
No, you’re doubling down on your Trayvon was a thug stupidity.No, but you are, on stupid.^^^ Doubling down on stupid.Yup. Dead thugs are dead.
TM ain't doubling down any more.
I'm not doubling down on Trayon's fatal stupidity.
Or maybe Zimmerman started the fight.Let’s see your proof Trayvon started the fight....LOLOLyes you did,,,
Great, what’s thuggery about carrying candy back to a friend...?
Thuggery was beating on a creepy cracka instead of walking home.
LOL!
Maybe Trayvon started beating on GZ after he was shot?
”BUT, we know it wasn't rain, right?”BUT, we know it wasn't rain, right?Someone washed their car by your lawn... it’s from morning dew... a pipe under the ground burst... it was a sun shower... your neighbor pissed on your yard ... kids had a water balloon fight...
So, that is evidence that the sprinklers ran....RIGHT?
There may be some other explanation...but it would NOT be an improper inference that the sprinklers ran, right?
So, the FACT that Martin was in possession of women's jewelry AND had a tool commonly used in burglary WOULD support a PROPER inference that he stole that shit, RIGHT???
Please say no. Let everyone see how retarded you are.
.
as I explained,,,thats not my logic since in this case TM was on top slamming his head into the ground,,,Dumbass, I didn’t say you said those words. I said that’s your logic. You’re the one who says it’s justifiable to kill someone because “beating on one's face could be fatal.”LOLAnd yet, it took me only 3 seconds to find a case where someone was shoved once and died.You are wrong to equate the situations.
Being shoved once and surviving does not pose a threat of death if there is no second, or third, or 100th shove. After a few dangerous shoves and the assailant refuses to stop? Maybe.
Again, it is all factual.
Having your face smashed in while lacking the ability to flee....that would warrant deadly force.
.
liar,,,they were shoved to the ground and thats what killed them
And according to your logic, since getting shoved can lead to death, you should be legally allowed to kill someone who shoves you. <smh>
I never said that,,,
so dont put words in my mouth,,,
Well so can shoving someone.
What part of "clear skies" do you not understand, you dumb fuck?”BUT, we know it wasn't rain, right?”
No, you don’t know that either.
Again, beating someone up does not necessarily make one a thug. If someone hits you, but you’re the better fighter so you beat them up, you’re not a thug.Except the part where Martin was pinning Zimmerman down and beating on his face for an extended period of time.So? There’s no proof Martin was either.
Give it up.
Again, back to the irrelevant "who started it" nonsense BULLSHIT.Again, reviewing that night, his actions were to walk to a nearby convenience store to buy himself a soft drink and a bag of candy for a friend for them to watch an NBA game; to be followed for no good reason as far as he could tell; and to get into a fight, of which, we don’t know who started it.
We get it. You don't know fucking shit about the legal application of self defense and unreasonable force. Quit making your ignorance even MORE obvious.
.
just like they dont often die from being shoved,,,but most do die if their heads are repeatedly slammed against the concreteNo, that’s not a reasonable fear. People don’t often die from being punched in in the face.And you still have failed to spot the issue.And yet, it took me only 3 seconds to find a case where someone was shoved once and died.
Self defense is intended to prevent serious bodily injury or death. One shove that does not cause death or serious injury is not cause to believe deadly force is necessary UNLESS it appears that the assailant will shove you again, and the next one WILL be deadly....like....when your heals are hanging over the edge of a cliff.
Answer me this:
Is getting one's head repeatedly punched reason to fear serious injury or death?
Let's start there, shall we?
It does when you prevent their escape by siting on them. And you continue to beat the shit out of them after such a beating is no longer necessary to overcome the threat.Again, beating someone up does not necessarily make one a thug.
You are when you not only beat them up, but you continue beating on them long after their defeat is made clear. Moreso when you prevent their escape. That is the very definition of a thug.If someone hits you, but you’re the better fighter so you beat them up, you’re not a thug.
LOLOLMaking a PROPER inference from facts presented is MAKING SHIT UP???No, you made up the shit that he stole it;
Every jury in the world makes shit up then, right?
Jesus this is getting pathetic.
That IS proof. What the fuck are you talking about? Do you know what proof is?and as we’ve seen, you can’t actually prove that claim.
Well, that means it didn't happen then, right?He was never accused of stealing it.
Well, that means it didn't happen then, right?He was never charged with stealing it.
Well, that means it was perfectly legit, right?The police couldn’t match any of it up to reported stolen jewelry.
No thief has EVER used that line before, right?He said someone gave it to him.
How so? (this should be good)Which if true, also renders your point useless that it was mainly women’s jewelry.
AKA proper inferences.But g’head, keep living off your imagination.
That's all juries have too.Seems that’s all you have.
It's like arguing with a child.
.
LOLThugs tend to mercilessly beat the shit out of people.No, you’re doubling down on your Trayvon was a thug stupidity.
Martin beat the shit out of Zimmerman without mercy.
Thug.
.
Well since you’re the one imagining I denied Martin was beating up on Zimmerman, not really.What a pity you don’t understand English, huh?You can’t prove Martin started beating on Zimmerman.Martin wasn't breaking the law at that moment. He is protected by the law just as you and I are. Just because you deem him a "thug" doesn't mean Zimmerman is allowed to pursue, confront and create a situation while being armed.
Martin wasn't breaking the law at that moment.
Not until he started beating on GZ.
doesn't mean Zimmerman is allowed to pursue, confront and create a situation
Baloney. He can pursue, confront and create all he wants.
TM, stupidly, and fatally, escalated instead of going home or calling 911.
Stop making shit up.
Martin didn't beat on GZ?
Right back at ya, Chuckles.
Look up the word, “maybe.”Or maybe Zimmerman started the fight.Let’s see your proof Trayvon started the fight....LOLOL
Great, what’s thuggery about carrying candy back to a friend...?
Thuggery was beating on a creepy cracka instead of walking home.
LOL!
Maybe Trayvon started beating on GZ after he was shot?
You have any proof?
Holyfuckingshit!What part of "clear skies" do you not understand, you dumb fuck?”BUT, we know it wasn't rain, right?”
No, you don’t know that either.
