Funzo Hoss
Gold Member
- Mar 5, 2022
- 989
- 451
9/11
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's a liar...lying for the orange sexual abuser.
It is a lie if he made the statement even though it was untrue.Its not lying if he believed it when he made the statements
but he can't prove it because the election data was destroyed
Rudy is just another liar and cheat.![]()
Rudy Giuliani concedes he made false statements about two Georgia election workers
Former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani admitted he made false statements about two Georgia election workers to resolve their litigation against him.news.yahoo.com
He thinks he still has a case. Interesting.
Yahoo "News." Hahahahahahahahaha
Its not lying if he believed it when he made the statements.... but he can't prove it because the election data was destroyed....
Why did they destroy the data should be the question....
It's a yahoo "news" agitprop hit piece. At least 50% of it is pure concentrated bullshit.
Just add 12oz of Kool Aid.
View attachment 808159
Are you really that gullible?
Cult 45 has arrived
Krebs was fired by the Rapist and Traitor after Krebs said that the 2020 Election was one of most secure in recent history. I have feeling Krebs spilled everything he knew about the Rapist and Traitor's bogus bullshit.
TDS is bringing Trump and MAGA down.TDS.... it's obvious
Cult 45 has arrived
Brilliant analysis (as usual). Isn't there a minimum IQ requirement?Cult 45 has arrived
Evidently not.Brilliant analysis (as usual). Isn't there a minimum IQ requirement?
Rudy admits it was a lie but they suffered no damages
Good luck with that Rudy
Roodles admits that he lied about the election workers but claims that his lies are political speech that is protected under the first amendment. Just ridiculous"
Ted Goodman, Giuliani's political advisor, said, “Giuliani did not acknowledge that the statements were false but did not contest it in order to move on to the portion of the case that will permit a motion to dismiss.”
“This is a legal issue, not a factual issue. Those out to smear the mayor are ignoring the fact that this stipulation is designed to get to the legal issues of the case," Goodman said."
From the article you posted........
Roodles admits that he lied about the election workers but claims that his lies are political speech that is protected under the first amendment. Just ridiculous
This idiot was Grifty's personal lawyer. Blows your mindGhouli keeps talking out of sides of him mouth and he fails. It was NOT political speech, more like venomous lies.
Communist's are a cult which makes you a member of a cult....Cult 45 has arrived
The first amendment should protect Rudy... its called freedom of speech... just like you can call Trump a Russian colluder Rudy can call poll workers ballot cheats....The data was not destroyed. The allegations were made based on a video that Giuliani claimed showed the two poll workers passing a USB drive back and forth that was used, somehow, to corrupt the count.
The video was able to prove they were passing candy back and forth.
The MAGA idiots believed Giuliani and made the poor ladies life a living hell.
Defamation is not covered under the first amendment. Roodles is a lawyer and knows that. Or should know it, whateverThe first amendment should protect Rudy... its called freedom of speech... just like you can call Trump a Russian colluder Rudy can call poll workers ballot cheats....
See how that works?....
That’s not what happened but ok. Not contesting a point in court which has no bearing on the case (in their opinion) isn’t admitting that the point is accurate. It’s just not arguing it. From Gulianni’s legal team’s perspective if they don’t believe it matters whether what he said was true or not why waste time and resources arguing the point in court?Roodles admits that he lied about the election workers but claims that his lies are political speech that is protected under the first amendment. Just ridiculous
So then defamation was the basis for the Russian collusion hoax...Defamation is not covered under the first amendment. Roodles is a lawyer and knows that. Or should know it, whatever