Glaring evidence of just how completely unhinged the Democrats have become...

[Darkwind]

You are really a stupid fuker. Every year car makers work to make their products safer.

And they have been doing that for a long time.

Now what the fuk have your beloved gun manufactuers been doing to make their product safer?

How safe can a product be that's purpose is to kill people?

That makes no sense.

No shit sherlock. Why the dumb fuk wants to equate gun deaths to car deaths is a fine indicator of how stupid rottys are.

Guns and ammo have been getting better and better at killing and cars and trucks have been getting more safe every year. Why the fuk would anyone want to equate the two?

Your really have no business calling other people stupid when you display such ignorance.

What do the two have in common? They both will not kill anyone unless operated by a human.

In case you missed it. Auto deaths are higher than they were 70 years ago.

Here is an idea. Disarm yourself and then go about your life. You will be no less safe by just allowing law abiding citizens to live their lives than you were before.

If for some reason you cannot live your life without infringing upon the lives of others, you will no doubt get what you deserve when one day you attempt to infringe upon someones right and get the shit kicked out of you.

 

[rightwinger]

Statistical FACT: 3x's as many people die from lightening than do from mass shootings!

Mass Shootings, Political Correctness, and Magical Thinking | Diego Basch's Blog

More people die from auto accidents than die from guns

Does that mean we should ban cars?
Of course not. But we have done everything we can to make driving safer. Seat belts, air bags, crash survivable cars, safer roads, removing unsafe drivers.....all resulting is major decreases in traffic fatalities

Why can't we do the same for guns?

All that is with a vehicle that uses public roads. If you keep the vehicle on your own property you can do whatever you want.

In most states, people need a CCW permit, just like a driver's liscense.

Also cars are not a consitutional right.

Finally most things proposed by gun control people like trigger locks, keeping your gun unloaded at home, and in a locked safe remove the utility of said firearm when you need it. All the things you say about cars do not remove from the functionality of said car.

We can start with universal background checks and stricter controls on resales

And no, it will not prevent all gun deaths. Just like a seat belt does not prevent all auto deaths

 

[martybegan]

More people die from auto accidents than die from guns

Does that mean we should ban cars?
Of course not. But we have done everything we can to make driving safer. Seat belts, air bags, crash survivable cars, safer roads, removing unsafe drivers.....all resulting is major decreases in traffic fatalities

Why can't we do the same for guns?

All that is with a vehicle that uses public roads. If you keep the vehicle on your own property you can do whatever you want.

In most states, people need a CCW permit, just like a driver's liscense.

Also cars are not a consitutional right.

Finally most things proposed by gun control people like trigger locks, keeping your gun unloaded at home, and in a locked safe remove the utility of said firearm when you need it. All the things you say about cars do not remove from the functionality of said car.

We can start with universal background checks and stricter controls on resales

And no, it will not prevent all gun deaths. Just like a seat belt does not prevent all auto deaths

again, how would either of them prevented newtown?

 

[rightwinger]

All that is with a vehicle that uses public roads. If you keep the vehicle on your own property you can do whatever you want.

In most states, people need a CCW permit, just like a driver's liscense.

Also cars are not a consitutional right.

Finally most things proposed by gun control people like trigger locks, keeping your gun unloaded at home, and in a locked safe remove the utility of said firearm when you need it. All the things you say about cars do not remove from the functionality of said car.

We can start with universal background checks and stricter controls on resales

And no, it will not prevent all gun deaths. Just like a seat belt does not prevent all auto deaths

again, how would either of them prevented newtown?

Do seatbelts save lives in EVERY accident?

 

[martybegan]

We can start with universal background checks and stricter controls on resales

And no, it will not prevent all gun deaths. Just like a seat belt does not prevent all auto deaths

again, how would either of them prevented newtown?

Do seatbelts save lives in EVERY accident?

Is the right to not use seatbelts consitutionally protected?

When its explicitly in the consitution the burden on placing a restriction on said explcit right increases exponentially.

Heres a deal. Get Cuomo and Bloomberg to stop trampling on my rights and maybe I would consdier background checks.

 

[rightwinger]

again, how would either of them prevented newtown?

Do seatbelts save lives in EVERY accident?

Is the right to not use seatbelts consitutionally protected?

When its explicitly in the consitution the burden on placing a restriction on said explcit right increases exponentially.

Heres a deal. Get Cuomo and Bloomberg to stop trampling on my rights and maybe I would consdier background checks.

Background checks, assault weapon bans and gun registration are not constitutionally protected either

 

[martybegan]

Do seatbelts save lives in EVERY accident?

Is the right to not use seatbelts consitutionally protected?

When its explicitly in the consitution the burden on placing a restriction on said explcit right increases exponentially.

Heres a deal. Get Cuomo and Bloomberg to stop trampling on my rights and maybe I would consdier background checks.

Background checks, assault weapon bans and gun registration are not constitutionally protected either

What part of not to be infringed do you not understand? Yet progressives will basically make up crap about abortion being a right, and gay marriage being a right when neither concept is even FOUND in the amendments.

Also total BANS of commonly used firearms have been found unconsituional by the courts, proving that even broken clocks are right twice a day.

 

[tjvh]

a blog?

From the wiki link queen herself. Too funny!!!

 

[bripat9643]

If we can do something to reduce deaths by lightning we should do it

If we can do something to reduce deaths by guns we should do that also

That depends on how much it costs and how much it restricts our freedoms. Only libturds believe that cost is no object.

 

[martybegan]

If we can do something to reduce deaths by lightning we should do it

If we can do something to reduce deaths by guns we should do that also

That depends on how much it costs and how much it restricts our freedoms. Only libturds believe that cost is no object.

Or restrictions on our freedoms, or at least freedoms they dont agree with. When its something they agree with then all bets are off, including the constituion.

 

[rightwinger]

If we can do something to reduce deaths by lightning we should do it

If we can do something to reduce deaths by guns we should do that also

That depends on how much it costs and how much it restricts our freedoms. Only libturds believe that cost is no object.

Or the freedoms of those on the other end of a bullet

 

[Esmeralda]

Glaring evidence of just how completely unhinged the Democrats have become...

Oh, the irony.....

 

[bripat9643]

again, how would either of them prevented newtown?

Do seatbelts save lives in EVERY accident?

The gun control numskulls have yet to demonstrate any lives whatsoever would be saved. In fact, the statistical evidence all runs in the other direction.

 

[bripat9643]

If we can do something to reduce deaths by lightning we should do it

If we can do something to reduce deaths by guns we should do that also

That depends on how much it costs and how much it restricts our freedoms. Only libturds believe that cost is no object.

Or the freedoms of those on the other end of a bullet

killing people is already against the law.

 

[rightwinger]

That depends on how much it costs and how much it restricts our freedoms. Only libturds believe that cost is no object.

Or the freedoms of those on the other end of a bullet

killing people is already against the law.

And yet, people get shot every day

Shows how ineffective murder laws are

 

[martybegan]

Or the freedoms of those on the other end of a bullet

killing people is already against the law.

And yet, people get shot every day

Shows how ineffective murder laws are

Murder is not a consitutional right.