Marion Morrison
Diamond Member
- Feb 10, 2017
- 59,298
- 16,841
- 2,190
- Banned
- #21
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
. In response to your take on this, I would say that if the products that black people use, are being stolen at a high rate then the response (no matter how sad the situation is), most certainly was appropriate in which the Walmart took. Walmart would only be in a no win situation if they can't somehow prove to the court that a high rate of products were stolen by black people as opposed to the rate of theft being found on other products being stolen by other races. Camera footage will probably be key in the case.I do not know the facts.
If Walmart puts only so-called black cosmetics behind glass but does not put other cosmetics behind glass, then a fair-minded person, I feel, would agree that such a policy is insulting. (Let's not use that now meaningless word "racist.")
Walmart is in a no-win situation.
Suppose Walmart -- because of too many thefts -- decides not to stock those so-called black cosmetics. Then some people would sue Walmart for discrimination.
*****
I have read that Walmart is sued daily by many people in nuisance suits. Walmart, I hear, gives them some money just to get rid of them.
Being a businessperson is not an easy job.
Many customers (of ALL ethnicities) are not very nice people.
Of course, MOST human beings are not very nice --- in my opinion and experience.
`On cuz they steal. You can't get shampoo without asking a counter person in the dark side of town grocery store. True story, that was um, informative.
Walmart would only be in a no win situation if they can't somehow prove to the court that a high rate of products were stolen by black people as opposed to the rate of theft being found on other products being stolen by other races.
This is mistakenly deemed white flight, when the reality is it is success.Walmart has every right to ... close the store entirely.
Absolutely!
That is why some communities do not have any big stores. The owners have left because of all kinds of problems.
I feel so sorry for the good people of those communities.
I feel, however, that the situation is hopeless.
When the good people get enough money, they just leave and move to a better community.
Their former community never changes.
Yep.....typical lib attack.I guess it's too late for Melania to hope hookers are locked up behind glass so Trump can't get to them. There may be a legitimate reason stores keep items behind glass, and there may not be. Courts decide for sure.
. Above, someone has added words to make it appear that I had said something I didn't say. The words were "Walmart has every right to ... close the store entirely".Walmart has every right to ... close the store entirely.
Absolutely!
That is why some communities do not have any big stores. The owners have left because of all kinds of problems.
I feel so sorry for the good people of those communities.
I feel, however, that the situation is hopeless.
When the good people get enough money, they just leave and move to a better community.
Their former community never changes.
The famed attorney held a news conference with Essie Grundy, who said she was discriminated against based on her race at a Perris, Calif., Walmart on Jan. 12. Allred alleges Walmart is in violation of California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, prohibiting businesses from discriminating against customers based on race.
Due to rampant theft by black people, Walmart stores nationwide are forced to lock up or use security products on black-oriented products. And Gloria Alred takes up the cause and sues Walmart.
I'm a Second Amendment supporter and they keep all the ammo locked up in glass cases. Can I sue them too?
Walmart to Face Discrimination Suit Over Hair Products: Atty
![]()
The policy is revealing, not "insulting."I do not know the facts.
If Walmart puts only so-called black cosmetics behind glass but does not put other cosmetics behind glass, then a fair-minded person, I feel, would agree that such a policy is insulting. (Let's not use that now meaningless word "racist.")
[...]
It has been many years since I stopped at a gas station that let me pump first then pay.At the nearest Big Oil Company gas station, if I want to pay cash I press a button at the pump and the cashier's voice says something like, " OK pump # 6, see you inside." I pump and go inside to pay.
About a half-mile or so down the road at another of the same Co's stations, if I want to pay cash I must go inside first, tell the cashier the pump #, pay, go back out and pump.
Why the Big Oil Company's two different procedures for the same exact sales transactions with their valued customers?
Think: D-word...(that doesn't end in -tion)
A voice of reason. Thank you.As someone who has worked in retail, I don't find this racist. And not because all black people steal.
Generally the items that get stolen the most get locked up.
My Walmart in Philly doesn't have black hair care products locked up. But if a Walmart locks something up, it must have been a significant number of products stolen.
I've lived in white areas and razors and deodorant were locked up. Does it mean all white people steal personal hygiene items? No.
I personally don't feel Walmart decision racist. But unfortunately black people will take it the wrong way and white supremacist will use this to fuel their racist agenda