Good Life Lessons for Liberals!!!

Obamanation

Silver Member
Sep 6, 2012
1,856
248
Checking out at the store, the young cashier suggested to the older woman, that she should bring her own grocery bags because plastic bags weren't good for the ...environment.

The woman apologized and explained, "We didn't have this green thing back in my earlier days." The young clerk responded, "That's our problem today. Your generation did not care enough to save our environment f or future generations."

She was right -- our generation didn't have the green thing in its day.

Back then, we returned milk bottles, soda bottles and beer bottles to the store. The store sent them back to the plant to be washed and sterilized and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and over. So they really were truly recycled. But we didn't have the green thing back in our day.

Grocery stores bagged our groceries in brown paper bags, that we reused for numerous things, most memorable besides household garbage bags, was the use of brown paper bags as book covers for our schoolbooks. This was to ensure that public property, (the books provided for our use by the school) was not defaced by our scribbling's. Then we were able to personalize our books on the brown paper bags. But too bad we didn't do the green thing back then.

We walked up stairs, because we didn't have an escalator in every store and office building. We walked to the grocery store and didn't climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time we had to go two blocks. But she was right. We didn't have the green thing in our day.

Back then, we washed the baby's diapers because we didn't have the throwaway kind. We dried clothes on a line, not in an energy-gobbling machine burning up 220 volts -- wind and solar power really did dry our clothes back in our early days. Kids got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not always brand-new clothing. But that young lady is right; we didn't have the green thing back in our day.

Back then, we had one TV, or radio, in the house -- not a TV in every room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a handkerchief (remember them?), not a screen the size of the state of Montana.

In the kitchen, we blended and stirred by hand because we didn't have electric machines to do everything for us. When we packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, we used wadded up old newspapers to cushion it, not Styrofoam or plastic bubble wrap.

Back then, we didn't fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut the lawn. We used a push mower that ran on human power. We exercised by working so we didn't need to go to a health club to run on treadmills that operate on electricity. But she's right; we didn't have the green thing back then.

We drank from a fountain when we were thirsty instead of using a cup or a plastic bottle every time we had a drink of water. We refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we replaced the razor blades in a razor instead of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull. But we didn't have the green thing back then.

Back then, people took the streetcar or a bus and kids rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their moms into a 24-hour taxi service. We had one electrical outlet in a room, not an entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances. And we didn't need a computerized gadget to receive a signal beamed from satellites 23,000 miles out in space in order to find the nearest burger joint.

But isn't it sad the current generation laments how wasteful we old folks were just because we didn't have the green thing back then?

Please forward this on to another selfish old person who needs a lesson in conservation from a smart-ass young person!
 
LOL I read this on Facebook a few months ago. Very witty and clever. Environmentalism is nothing more than trying to fix what ain't broke. It was just fine the way it was then. Admittedly though technology will progress, however common sense should still be a part of it.
 
Cute, and so true....except your slam on liberals...

I covered my books with those brown paper bags, we used them in our trash cans, we used them to cover a package that we were going to mail at the post office, we even covered presents with them if we had to....

(reminds me of wire coat hangers.....there wasn't a thing that needed to be fixed that my Dad could not fix with a coat hanger....he held his muffler on with one, he unstopped the stopped up toilet with one, he wired under my bed with one or two of them where the slats broke....it was the Duct Tape of the day) :)

Technology /advancements don't always move us forward as it seems....
 
If Obamanatation had thought this through a little more, he might have realised that the reason companies stopped using and recycling glass bottles was because it was not as profitable as using disposable items.

In many cases, companies chose short-term profitability over long-term ethics.
 
If Obamanatation had thought this through a little more, he might have realised that the reason companies stopped using and recycling glass bottles was because it was not as profitable as using disposable items.

In many cases, companies chose short-term profitability over long-term ethics.

It takes more energy to wash a glass bottle than it does to make a new aluminum can or plastic bottle, so your claim is idiotic. Corporations do things because it makes their products better and cheaper. That's the only way they can increase their profits. they couldn't make a dime if consumers didn't buy what they were selling.

All you proved is that liberal idiocy has no natural limit.
 
Corporations do things because it makes their products better and cheaper.

Exactly.

So then why is the OP calling that "liberalism"?
 
Last edited:
Obamanation -

Can you show me where I called "that" liberalism?

In the name of this thread.

Strangely enough, one of the last places on earth where aluminium cans have rarely been used (for beer) has been Denmark, where left-wing politicians fought for decades to have them preserved on environmental grounds. The right wing won in the end, but not before an entire generation of Danes had enjoyed the benefits of recycling glass.
 
If Obamanatation had thought this through a little more, he might have realised that the reason companies stopped using and recycling glass bottles was because it was not as profitable as using disposable items.

In many cases, companies chose short-term profitability over long-term ethics.

All because liberals thought the sky was gonna burn up and the polar bears were going to die. Using the environment for profit. Guess what, that's a liberal idea!

How does it feel to be wrong, genius?
 
Obamanation -

Can you show me where I called "that" liberalism?

In the name of this thread.

Strangely enough, one of the last places on earth where aluminium cans have rarely been used (for beer) has been Denmark, where left-wing politicians fought for decades to have them preserved on environmental grounds. The right wing won in the end, but not before an entire generation of Danes had enjoyed the benefits of recycling glass.

I said this was a life lesson for libs --- wow Sai, you just made one huge leap there...
 
LOL I read this on Facebook a few months ago. Very witty and clever. Environmentalism is nothing more than trying to fix what ain't broke. It was just fine the way it was then. Admittedly though technology will progress, however common sense should still be a part of it.

What?! You mean Obamanation did not write that? Damn! I thought he wrote it. Do you think that is what he intended?

You assholes will oppose anything that hints at being liberal. That is the primary criteria for whether you are for something or against it. If it is seen by you as a liberal cause.......you will oppose it. Period.

What should be seen as common sense......keeping the place we live as clean as possible..........reducing waste in general.....becomes a limp-wristed flaming lib ideal. If you even consider the benefits of electric delivery vehicles and high speed rail.......you are starting on that slippery slope toward European socialism.

Life lessons for liberals? What a joke.
 
Obamanation -

Can you show me where I called "that" liberalism?

In the name of this thread.

Strangely enough, one of the last places on earth where aluminium cans have rarely been used (for beer) has been Denmark, where left-wing politicians fought for decades to have them preserved on environmental grounds. The right wing won in the end, but not before an entire generation of Danes had enjoyed the benefits of recycling glass.


Some are so dense, even about what they themselves posted, that ya gotta state the obvious. And then they still don't get it. smh...


What makes all this recycling necessary was the arrival of the "disposable society". It ain't the consumer who came up with that. It's all around us; every time I go to the freaking grocery store they insist on putting my 28 items in 22 plastic bags; then I have to sit there and re-bag it all or else get buried in plastic bags at home. It ain't my choice.


From Quirks and Quarks:
>> The irony of this perspective is that the senior citizen is likely talking about the hard times during the Depression, when the economy was in the worst shape it's ever been in. Back then, conservation was a matter of survival. Now, it's a matter of cutting back on the excesses we created for ourselves since the Depression.

...So, should we go back to the days of the Depression? Of course not, but we could go back to the attitude that there isn't much to go around, and make every effort to get the most out of what we have before we buy more.

... In fact, some, such as energy expert Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute, have demonstrated in their report, "Re-inventing Fire," that reducing consumption through efficiencies alone could take care of most of the energy and climate change problems.
<<

From the sub-link above, and more on Denmark:
>> Many other countries have lately pulled ahead of the United States in capturing the burgeoning potential for greater energy productivity and more durable and benign supplies. During 1980&#8211;2009, for example, the Danish economy grew by two-thirds, while energy use returned to its 1980 level and carbon emissions fell 21%. Now the conservative Danish government has adopted a virtually self-financing strategy to get completely off fossil fuels by 2050 by further boosting efficiency and switching to renewables (already 36% of electric generation, which is the most reliable and among the cheapest pretax in Europe). Why? To strengthen Denmark&#8217;s economy and national security. Europe as a whole is going in the same direction, led by Germany, and now Japan and China are moving that way. What could the U.S. do?

In 2010, the United States (excluding non-combustion uses as raw materials) used 93 quadrillion BTU of primary energy, four-fifths of it fossil fuels. Official projections show this growing to 117 quads in 2050. But delivering those same services with less energy, more productively used, could shrink 2050 usage to 71 quads, eliminate the need for oil, coal, nuclear energy, and one-third of the natural gas, and save $5 trillion in net-present-valued cost. As a better-than-free byproduct of efficient use and a continued shift to renewable supplies, fossil carbon emissions would also shrink by 82&#8211;86% below their 2000 levels despite the assumed 2.58-fold bigger economy than in 2010.
<<

Obviously this is not a "Politics" topic (duh). Arguably belongs under "Energy".
 
Last edited:
Urban legend bullshit.
:clap2:


Checking out at the store, the young cashier suggested to the older woman, that she should bring her own grocery bags because plastic bags weren't good for the ...environment.

The woman apologized and explained, "We didn't have this green thing back in my earlier days." The young clerk responded, "That's our problem today. Your generation did not care enough to save our environment f or future generations."

She was right -- our generation didn't have the green thing in its day.

Back then, we returned milk bottles, soda bottles and beer bottles to the store. The store sent them back to the plant to be washed and sterilized and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and over. So they really were truly recycled. But we didn't have the green thing back in our day.

Grocery stores bagged our groceries in brown paper bags, that we reused for numerous things, most memorable besides household garbage bags, was the use of brown paper bags as book covers for our schoolbooks. This was to ensure that public property, (the books provided for our use by the school) was not defaced by our scribbling's. Then we were able to personalize our books on the brown paper bags. But too bad we didn't do the green thing back then.

We walked up stairs, because we didn't have an escalator in every store and office building. We walked to the grocery store and didn't climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time we had to go two blocks. But she was right. We didn't have the green thing in our day.

Back then, we washed the baby's diapers because we didn't have the throwaway kind. We dried clothes on a line, not in an energy-gobbling machine burning up 220 volts -- wind and solar power really did dry our clothes back in our early days. Kids got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not always brand-new clothing. But that young lady is right; we didn't have the green thing back in our day.

Back then, we had one TV, or radio, in the house -- not a TV in every room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a handkerchief (remember them?), not a screen the size of the state of Montana.

In the kitchen, we blended and stirred by hand because we didn't have electric machines to do everything for us. When we packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, we used wadded up old newspapers to cushion it, not Styrofoam or plastic bubble wrap.

Back then, we didn't fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut the lawn. We used a push mower that ran on human power. We exercised by working so we didn't need to go to a health club to run on treadmills that operate on electricity. But she's right; we didn't have the green thing back then.

We drank from a fountain when we were thirsty instead of using a cup or a plastic bottle every time we had a drink of water. We refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we replaced the razor blades in a razor instead of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull. But we didn't have the green thing back then.

Back then, people took the streetcar or a bus and kids rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their moms into a 24-hour taxi service. We had one electrical outlet in a room, not an entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances. And we didn't need a computerized gadget to receive a signal beamed from satellites 23,000 miles out in space in order to find the nearest burger joint.

But isn't it sad the current generation laments how wasteful we old folks were just because we didn't have the green thing back then?

Please forward this on to another selfish old person who needs a lesson in conservation from a smart-ass young person!
 
Obamanation -

Can you show me where I called "that" liberalism?

In the name of this thread.

Strangely enough, one of the last places on earth where aluminium cans have rarely been used (for beer) has been Denmark, where left-wing politicians fought for decades to have them preserved on environmental grounds. The right wing won in the end, but not before an entire generation of Danes had enjoyed the benefits of recycling glass.

I said this was a life lesson for libs --- wow Sai, you just made one huge leap there...

Good Lord! Who is that in your avatar?
 
Obamanation -

I'm not doing this to humiliate you, but you started this thread, so presumably found the topic interesting.

Assuming you understand that environmentalism, recycling and sustainaiblity are concepts more backed by the left wing than right wing - can you explain why you think it is the left that needs to learn the values of recycling and not the right?
 
Obamanation -

I'm not doing this to humiliate you, but you started this thread, so presumably found the topic interesting.

Assuming you understand that environmentalism, recycling and sustainaiblity are concepts more backed by the left wing than right wing - can you explain why you think it is the left that needs to learn the values of recycling and not the right?

I wouldn't fret about the humiliation. That was already self-inflicted.

Perhaps the "life lesson for liberals" is "don't bother reading threads by Obamanation". It's possible, since he was giving us the cheap cut-and-paste-the-old-viral-email that he copied the title verbatim from some previous wag (the e-mail's been around for years), and didn't bother to read that it didn't make sense. I'm willing to bet he got this e-mail, scanned for the word "liberals" and just dumped it into a thread without reading the content at all.
 
Last edited:
Obamanation -

Can you show me where I called "that" liberalism?

In the name of this thread.

Strangely enough, one of the last places on earth where aluminium cans have rarely been used (for beer) has been Denmark, where left-wing politicians fought for decades to have them preserved on environmental grounds. The right wing won in the end, but not before an entire generation of Danes had enjoyed the benefits of recycling glass.

What "benefits?" You mean like having stacks of used bottles sitting around attracting bugs and germs? You mean like paying more for beverages than other countries?
 
What "benefits?" You mean like having stacks of used bottles sitting around attracting bugs and germs? You mean like paying more for beverages than other countries?

The benefits pointed out by the OP, which you obviously did not read. If you wish to argue the point - address your comments to the OP.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top