blackhawk
Diamond Member
I wonder if Dean receives his talking points through e-mail, text message, or the voices in his head?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Remember, the hundreds of thousands of Christians that were either killed or chased out of Iraq? Where did they go? They didn't come here. I thought US Right wingers liked Christians. The majority of them fled Iraq when Republicans controlled both houses and Bush was president. We know why Republicans refused to help them. Do USMB Republicans know why their party refused to help hundreds of thousands of Christians?
Now, you have Republicans willing to arm rebels in Syria and the Ukraine knowing nothing about them, but unwilling to let in children running from danger?
Republicans want neighboring countries in the middle east to take in 5 million refugees but willingly wants to send thousands of children back, for many, to certain death.
To me, these seem like very strange, extreme and dangerous positions. Anyone care to explain them?
Government assistance doesnt combat poverty. It creates more of it.
Individual hard work and charity on the other hand can.
Is that why trillions of US Government assistance in Iraq failed?
Failed in combatting Iraqi poverty? It was never intended to combat poverty. It was sent to rebuild after a war.
And it would have been far more effective if we didn't have the current abysmal foreign policy
Remember, the hundreds of thousands of Christians that were either killed or chased out of Iraq? Where did they go? They didn't come here. I thought US Right wingers liked Christians. The majority of them fled Iraq when Republicans controlled both houses and Bush was president. We know why Republicans refused to help them. Do USMB Republicans know why their party refused to help hundreds of thousands of Christians?
Now, you have Republicans willing to arm rebels in Syria and the Ukraine knowing nothing about them, but unwilling to let in children running from danger?
Republicans want neighboring countries in the middle east to take in 5 million refugees but willingly wants to send thousands of children back, for many, to certain death.
To me, these seem like very strange, extreme and dangerous positions. Anyone care to explain them?
In previous wars, America allowed a large number of foreign nationals into the country. Vietnam stands out in my mind. Personally, I've met and known quite a few former Vietnamese people and/or their children.
But Iraq was way different (Afghanistan too). Years ago I read that, under Bush and Cheney, the US was allowing VERY FEW Iraqis into this country. Even the ones who worked for us were basically cut loose to fend for themselves despite the fact that their lives were in danger due to their association with Americans. To this date, I've never met a average former Iraqi citizen or even seen one interviewed on TV, Christian or Muslim.
Remember, the hundreds of thousands of Christians that were either killed or chased out of Iraq? Where did they go? They didn't come here. I thought US Right wingers liked Christians. The majority of them fled Iraq when Republicans controlled both houses and Bush was president. We know why Republicans refused to help them. Do USMB Republicans know why their party refused to help hundreds of thousands of Christians?
Now, you have Republicans willing to arm rebels in Syria and the Ukraine knowing nothing about them, but unwilling to let in children running from danger?
Republicans want neighboring countries in the middle east to take in 5 million refugees but willingly wants to send thousands of children back, for many, to certain death.
To me, these seem like very strange, extreme and dangerous positions. Anyone care to explain them?
Remember, the hundreds of thousands of Christians that were either killed or chased out of Iraq? Where did they go? They didn't come here. I thought US Right wingers liked Christians. The majority of them fled Iraq when Republicans controlled both houses and Bush was president. We know why Republicans refused to help them. Do USMB Republicans know why their party refused to help hundreds of thousands of Christians?
Now, you have Republicans willing to arm rebels in Syria and the Ukraine knowing nothing about them, but unwilling to let in children running from danger?
Republicans want neighboring countries in the middle east to take in 5 million refugees but willingly wants to send thousands of children back, for many, to certain death.
To me, these seem like very strange, extreme and dangerous positions. Anyone care to explain them?
Obama is the one arming the paid mercenaries errrrrrrrrrrrrr rebels in Syria. ISIS is driving the Christians out of territory they hold.
You know ISIS. The worlds largest and best funded terror army on the planet that Obama turned a blind eye to because he desperately wants Assad deposed.
You know. ISIS the terror army beheading its way to Baghdad and Obama refusing to give air support to Maliki.
You've got some nerve blaming Republicans for ISIS. And hell's bells Obama backed the coup in the Ukraine you dolt. Obama's not arming the pro Russian rebels.
There is now one less place for Iraqs Christians to call home. Since the U.S. military-led invasion in 2003, the countrys minorities have watched as their places of worship have come under attack and the prospects for practicing their religion without persecution have become increasingly grim.
Now, the Islamic State armed group has solidified its grip on the northern city of Mosul and imposed a deadline over the weekend demanding Christians either convert, pay a tax or face the sword. With that ultimatum, thousands of Christians fled, leaving most of what they own behind. They made their way to Erbil in the Kurdish-controlled region in the north, as well as the Christian city of Qaraqosh, southeast of Mosul, and also under the protection of the Kurdish peshmerga.
For the first time in the history of Iraq, Mosul is now empty of Christians, said Patriarch Louis Sako, one of Iraqs senior Chaldean Catholic clerics.
The events over the weekend drew concern from the Vatican and anger from Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who said the Islamic State and its aggression against the churches and houses of worship in areas under their control reveals beyond any doubt the extremist criminal and terrorist nature of this group.
Those people, Maliki said, through their crimes, are revealing their true identity and the false allegations made here and there about the existence of revolutionaries among their ranks.
In Iraq, Christians fleeing Mosul take refuge with Kurds | Al Jazeera America
Remember, the hundreds of thousands of Christians that were either killed or chased out of Iraq? Where did they go? They didn't come here. I thought US Right wingers liked Christians. The majority of them fled Iraq when Republicans controlled both houses and Bush was president. We know why Republicans refused to help them. Do USMB Republicans know why their party refused to help hundreds of thousands of Christians?
Now, you have Republicans willing to arm rebels in Syria and the Ukraine knowing nothing about them, but unwilling to let in children running from danger?
Republicans want neighboring countries in the middle east to take in 5 million refugees but willingly wants to send thousands of children back, for many, to certain death.
To me, these seem like very strange, extreme and dangerous positions. Anyone care to explain them?
Obama is the one arming the paid mercenaries errrrrrrrrrrrrr rebels in Syria. ISIS is driving the Christians out of territory they hold.
You know ISIS. The worlds largest and best funded terror army on the planet that Obama turned a blind eye to because he desperately wants Assad deposed.
You know. ISIS the terror army beheading its way to Baghdad and Obama refusing to give air support to Maliki.
You've got some nerve blaming Republicans for ISIS. And hell's bells Obama backed the coup in the Ukraine you dolt. Obama's not arming the pro Russian rebels.
There is now one less place for Iraq’s Christians to call home. Since the U.S. military-led invasion in 2003, the country’s minorities have watched as their places of worship have come under attack and the prospects for practicing their religion without persecution have become increasingly grim.
Now, the Islamic State armed group has solidified its grip on the northern city of Mosul and imposed a deadline over the weekend demanding Christians either convert, pay a tax or “face the sword.” With that ultimatum, thousands of Christians fled, leaving most of what they own behind. They made their way to Erbil in the Kurdish-controlled region in the north, as well as the Christian city of Qaraqosh, southeast of Mosul, and also under the protection of the Kurdish peshmerga.
“For the first time in the history of Iraq, Mosul is now empty of Christians,” said Patriarch Louis Sako, one of Iraq’s senior Chaldean Catholic clerics.
The events over the weekend drew concern from the Vatican and anger from Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who said the Islamic State and its “aggression against the churches and houses of worship in areas under their control reveals beyond any doubt the extremist criminal and terrorist nature of this group.”
“Those people,” Maliki said, “through their crimes, are revealing their true identity and the false allegations made here and there about the existence of revolutionaries among their ranks.”
In Iraq, Christians fleeing Mosul take refuge with Kurds | Al Jazeera America
Stop the bullshit.
Isis are Sunni.
When Republicans invaded Iraq, they disbanded the Sunni Army leaving a couple of million armed men without jobs or a way to take care of their families.
Then they put together a Shiite government that has virtually excluded the Sunni's.
That the the birth if Isis. How can you not know that? Duh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Government assistance doesnt combat poverty. It creates more of it.
Individual hard work and charity on the other hand can.
Is that why trillions of US Government assistance in Iraq failed?
Failed in combatting Iraqi poverty? It was never intended to combat poverty. It was sent to rebuild after a war.
And it would have been far more effective if we didn't have the current abysmal foreign policy
I wonder if Dean receives his talking points through e-mail, text message, or the voices in his head?
![]()
Talk about "dazed and confused".
Government assistance doesnt combat poverty. It creates more of it.
Individual hard work and charity on the other hand can.
Remember, the hundreds of thousands of Christians that were either killed or chased out of Iraq? Where did they go? They didn't come here. I thought US Right wingers liked Christians. The majority of them fled Iraq when Republicans controlled both houses and Bush was president. We know why Republicans refused to help them. Do USMB Republicans know why their party refused to help hundreds of thousands of Christians?
Now, you have Republicans willing to arm rebels in Syria and the Ukraine knowing nothing about them, but unwilling to let in children running from danger?
Republicans want neighboring countries in the middle east to take in 5 million refugees but willingly wants to send thousands of children back, for many, to certain death.
To me, these seem like very strange, extreme and dangerous positions. Anyone care to explain them?
Remember, the hundreds of thousands of Christians that were either killed or chased out of Iraq? Where did they go? They didn't come here. I thought US Right wingers liked Christians. The majority of them fled Iraq when Republicans controlled both houses and Bush was president. We know why Republicans refused to help them. Do USMB Republicans know why their party refused to help hundreds of thousands of Christians?
'Republicans refused to help them' - Please provide legislation that the republicans voted down that would have helped 'Iraqi Christians'.
Now, you have Republicans willing to arm rebels in Syria and the Ukraine knowing nothing about them, but unwilling to let in children running from danger?
Please provide any evidence that 'republicans' are solely responsible for arming anyone, and how that is in any way related to the Iraqi 'Christians'.
Republicans want neighboring countries in the middle east to take in 5 million refugees but willingly wants to send thousands of children back, for many, to certain death.
Link? Which 'republicans' have control over what the middle east does or does not do?
.. to certain death...
To me, these seem like very strange, extreme and dangerous positions. Anyone care to explain them?
Link? What 'republicans' have these 'positions', where have they submitted legislation, or voted down legislation, for any of this?
Remember, the hundreds of thousands of Christians that were either killed or chased out of Iraq? Where did they go? They didn't come here. I thought US Right wingers liked Christians. The majority of them fled Iraq when Republicans controlled both houses and Bush was president. We know why Republicans refused to help them. Do USMB Republicans know why their party refused to help hundreds of thousands of Christians?
'Republicans refused to help them' - Please provide legislation that the republicans voted down that would have helped 'Iraqi Christians'.
Please provide any evidence that 'republicans' are solely responsible for arming anyone, and how that is in any way related to the Iraqi 'Christians'.
Link? Which 'republicans' have control over what the middle east does or does not do?
.. to certain death...
To me, these seem like very strange, extreme and dangerous positions. Anyone care to explain them?
Link? What 'republicans' have these 'positions', where have they submitted legislation, or voted down legislation, for any of this?
Hello, knock knock. When Republicans invaded Iraq they held both houses, the presidency and the Supreme Court. Why would they offer legislation to help people they ignore and then vote it down? That doesn't make sense. There was never any Republican legislation to help the Christians of Iraq. How can you not know that? It's been in papers all over the world except on Fox. Oh wait, that explains it.
Do yourself a favor. Go to Google and search out what happened and when to the Christians in Iraq. You could learn something valuable. It's not fair for me to post information and the ignorant not read it and then claim they never heard anything about it.
Is that why trillions of US Government assistance in Iraq failed?
Failed in combatting Iraqi poverty? It was never intended to combat poverty. It was sent to rebuild after a war.
And it would have been far more effective if we didn't have the current abysmal foreign policy
Ummm, let's see. Trillions spent to rebuild, but not combat poverty? You mean "rebuild poverty"? Wow, that sounds like the GOP deep thinkers came up with another successful plan. Well, it seems to have worked.
Remember, the hundreds of thousands of Christians that were either killed or chased out of Iraq? Where did they go? They didn't come here. I thought US Right wingers liked Christians. The majority of them fled Iraq when Republicans controlled both houses and Bush was president. We know why Republicans refused to help them. Do USMB Republicans know why their party refused to help hundreds of thousands of Christians?
'Republicans refused to help them' - Please provide legislation that the republicans voted down that would have helped 'Iraqi Christians'.
Please provide any evidence that 'republicans' are solely responsible for arming anyone, and how that is in any way related to the Iraqi 'Christians'.
Link? Which 'republicans' have control over what the middle east does or does not do?
.. to certain death...
To me, these seem like very strange, extreme and dangerous positions. Anyone care to explain them?
Link? What 'republicans' have these 'positions', where have they submitted legislation, or voted down legislation, for any of this?
Hello, knock knock. When Republicans invaded Iraq they held both houses, the presidency and the Supreme Court. Why would they offer legislation to help people they ignore and then vote it down? That doesn't make sense. There was never any Republican legislation to help the Christians of Iraq. How can you not know that? It's been in papers all over the world except on Fox. Oh wait, that explains it.
Do yourself a favor. Go to Google and search out what happened and when to the Christians in Iraq. You could learn something valuable. It's not fair for me to post information and the ignorant not read it and then claim they never heard anything about it.