Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It needs to be explained to you? For the same reason I skip commericials on TV. It's just better that way.
How did you come up with that? Republicans range from liberal to very conservative. How big a gap do you need? Democrats these days are liberal to uber liberal, I haven't heard of a conservative one in a while, at least in high office.
No they don't. And you know they don't.
Yes, they do.
I guess rdean doesn't believe JakeStarkey is a Republican.
But it doesn't really matter what rdean believes, liberal Republicans do exist. This thread is about one.
There are no liberals in the Republican Party. You can't name any.
There are no liberals in the Republican Party. You can't name any.
Odd that until the ACA, the GOP expressed little or no concern about people losing their health insurance...which they did in droves.
Repeal isn't an idea. They have nothing to "replace" it with (probably since the whole damn thing was their idea in the first place)
you are as dumb as a bag of hammers. People were not losing insurance "in droves" before ACA. Thats just a left wing lie.
Total repeal will probably not happen, although it should. What should happen is to remove the crap from the law and limit it to the few good things that are in it: no rejection for pre-existing conditions, no lifetime maximums.
Tort reform should be added. interstate commerce of insurance should be added. and yes, some caps on medical charges and drug prices should be added.
What the dems passed and obozo signed is a terrible law, passed in the most corrupt way, and illegally changed over 30 times by the worst president in history.
Only 17 percent of individual market subscribers purchased the same plan for two straight years or longer.
Patterns Of Individual Health Insurance Coverage, 19962000
Remember health insurance before the Affordable Care Act?
There are no liberals in the Republican Party. You can't name any.
This Wisconsin Republican is 'embarrassed' by his party and won't 'defend them anymore'
Last week, Schultz argued that there were no legitimate justifications for some of the election reforms pushed by Republicans.
“It’s all predicated on some belief there is a massive fraud or irregularities, something my colleagues have been hot on the trail for three years and have failed miserably at demonstrating,” he said.
Dale Schultz: 'I am not willing to defend them anymore'
Later, Schultz attacked a bill aimed at helping companies escape asbestos litigation that has been criticized by groups representing veterans, who account for a disproportionate number of those suffering from mesothelioma, a cancer linked to asbestos exposure.
“This bill is certainly a slap in the face at the very least to some of the people who gave some of the most vital years of their life in the service of their country,” he said.
------------------------------------------------------------
Defending democracy AND veterans???? Doesn't sound very Republican. I suspect he's already being "shunned".
You can defend it to an honest person, never to a dishonest person.
They cant defend it to any person
That's nothing but useless platitudes with nothing but false rhetoric to back it up.
You're not being honest by any stretch.
<ore dimwits get in trouble for election fraud then repubs. If it wasn't for election fraud obamaturd would not be potus.This Wisconsin Republican is 'embarrassed' by his party and won't 'defend them anymore'
Last week, Schultz argued that there were no legitimate justifications for some of the election reforms pushed by Republicans.
Its all predicated on some belief there is a massive fraud or irregularities, something my colleagues have been hot on the trail for three years and have failed miserably at demonstrating, he said.
Dale Schultz: 'I am not willing to defend them anymore'
Later, Schultz attacked a bill aimed at helping companies escape asbestos litigation that has been criticized by groups representing veterans, who account for a disproportionate number of those suffering from mesothelioma, a cancer linked to asbestos exposure.
This bill is certainly a slap in the face at the very least to some of the people who gave some of the most vital years of their life in the service of their country, he said.
------------------------------------------------------------
Defending democracy AND veterans???? Doesn't sound very Republican. I suspect he's already being "shunned".
we are going through the same crap here in NC with the teahadists in charge
This Wisconsin Republican is 'embarrassed' by his party and won't 'defend them anymore'
Last week, Schultz argued that there were no legitimate justifications for some of the election reforms pushed by Republicans.
Its all predicated on some belief there is a massive fraud or irregularities, something my colleagues have been hot on the trail for three years and have failed miserably at demonstrating, he said.
Dale Schultz: 'I am not willing to defend them anymore'
Later, Schultz attacked a bill aimed at helping companies escape asbestos litigation that has been criticized by groups representing veterans, who account for a disproportionate number of those suffering from mesothelioma, a cancer linked to asbestos exposure.
This bill is certainly a slap in the face at the very least to some of the people who gave some of the most vital years of their life in the service of their country, he said.
------------------------------------------------------------
Defending democracy AND veterans???? Doesn't sound very Republican. I suspect he's already being "shunned".
wow, that Rachel Maddcow sure does the heavy political lifting for us eh? Don Yelton, FORMER precinct chairman....yawn
gawd scraping the bottom of the barrel.......... she's like a gutter rat...I don't how someone that goes so low keeps their job
you are as dumb as a bag of hammers. People were not losing insurance "in droves" before ACA. Thats just a left wing lie.
Total repeal will probably not happen, although it should. What should happen is to remove the crap from the law and limit it to the few good things that are in it: no rejection for pre-existing conditions, no lifetime maximums.
Tort reform should be added. interstate commerce of insurance should be added. and yes, some caps on medical charges and drug prices should be added.
What the dems passed and obozo signed is a terrible law, passed in the most corrupt way, and illegally changed over 30 times by the worst president in history.
Only 17 percent of individual market subscribers purchased the same plan for two straight years or longer.
Patterns Of Individual Health Insurance Coverage, 19962000
Remember health insurance before the Affordable Care Act?
Very few individual car buyers bought the same car that they drove last year. Does that mean that the government should take over the auto industry? Or, does it mean that nonsense is nonsense, regardless of how many times it is repeated.
I can remember health care before Medicare and Medicaid screwed it up. The good ole days, when doctors and hospitals charged reasonable prices, and charity cases were called charity cases. Perhaps you can explain how the federal government has improved that system?
I can remember public schools before the federal government got involved. The good ole days when high school graduates could read, write, and compute math. Perhaps you can explain how the federal government has improved that system?
Yes, they do.
There are no liberals in the Republican Party. You can't name any.
Bullshit. McCain, Boehner, Lindsey Graham...Mitch McConnell...for starters. Deany? YOU are such a recalcitrant MORON...that lives in his own fucking made up world.![]()
You are still the brainless twit.There are no liberals in the Republican Party. You can't name any.
Bullshit. McCain, Boehner, Lindsey Graham...Mitch McConnell...for starters. Deany? YOU are such a recalcitrant MORON...that lives in his own fucking made up world.![]()
Those are "liberals"??????????????????????????????