Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We'll see if the Democrats that said end it and we can negotiate will be true to their word.
negotiations will probably include more cash to repair or replace existing barriers, man power & tech support.
I doubt the Democrats will do that.
we'll see. i'm betting DACA will also be part of that cash incentive.
Why do Democrats want to reward those illegally here?
there are (R)s in favor of allowing a path to citizenship for those that are 'illegally' here thru no fault of their own.
negotiations will probably include more cash to repair or replace existing barriers, man power & tech support.
I doubt the Democrats will do that.
we'll see. i'm betting DACA will also be part of that cash incentive.
Why do Democrats want to reward those illegally here?
there are (R)s in favor of allowing a path to citizenship for those that are 'illegally' here thru no fault of their own.
They're no different than the POS D(s) that support it.
Putting quotes around illegally doesn't lessen the fact that they shouldn't be here.
If someone's parent(s) robbed a bank and gave their children the money, should they get to keep it. That's illegal to have it but the kids got it through no fault of their own. That does seem to be the qualifying factor you use to try and justify something that is against the law.
I doubt the Democrats will do that.
we'll see. i'm betting DACA will also be part of that cash incentive.
Why do Democrats want to reward those illegally here?
there are (R)s in favor of allowing a path to citizenship for those that are 'illegally' here thru no fault of their own.
They're no different than the POS D(s) that support it.
Putting quotes around illegally doesn't lessen the fact that they shouldn't be here.
If someone's parent(s) robbed a bank and gave their children the money, should they get to keep it. That's illegal to have it but the kids got it through no fault of their own. That does seem to be the qualifying factor you use to try and justify something that is against the law.
lol... oh please. (R)s have given out amnesty.
-------------------------------- they are part of the 'dem' base and they are also the NEW arriving 'americans' Con65 .Just remember who had your back Trump cared more about putting you back to work than Popo and Shoomi did.
Trump concedes to temporarily end shutdown - CNNPolitics
We'll see if the Democrats that said end it and we can negotiate will be true to their word.
negotiations will probably include more cash to repair or replace existing barriers, man power & tech support.
I doubt the Democrats will do that.
we'll see. i'm betting DACA will also be part of that cash incentive.
Why do Democrats want to reward those illegally here?
we'll see. i'm betting DACA will also be part of that cash incentive.
Why do Democrats want to reward those illegally here?
there are (R)s in favor of allowing a path to citizenship for those that are 'illegally' here thru no fault of their own.
They're no different than the POS D(s) that support it.
Putting quotes around illegally doesn't lessen the fact that they shouldn't be here.
If someone's parent(s) robbed a bank and gave their children the money, should they get to keep it. That's illegal to have it but the kids got it through no fault of their own. That does seem to be the qualifying factor you use to try and justify something that is against the law.
lol... oh please. (R)s have given out amnesty.
Oh, the it's different excuse,huh?
How about the child of the bank robber keeping the money? The standard applied to that situation is the one you're OK with when it comes to illegal POS being here.
------------------------------------ agree , 'reagan and old man bush' started the problem in 1986 that exists in the USA with imported third worlders .I doubt the Democrats will do that.
we'll see. i'm betting DACA will also be part of that cash incentive.
Why do Democrats want to reward those illegally here?
there are (R)s in favor of allowing a path to citizenship for those that are 'illegally' here thru no fault of their own.
They're no different than the POS D(s) that support it.
Putting quotes around illegally doesn't lessen the fact that they shouldn't be here.
If someone's parent(s) robbed a bank and gave their children the money, should they get to keep it. That's illegal to have it but the kids got it through no fault of their own. That does seem to be the qualifying factor you use to try and justify something that is against the law.
lol... oh please. (R)s have given out amnesty.
Why do Democrats want to reward those illegally here?
there are (R)s in favor of allowing a path to citizenship for those that are 'illegally' here thru no fault of their own.
They're no different than the POS D(s) that support it.
Putting quotes around illegally doesn't lessen the fact that they shouldn't be here.
If someone's parent(s) robbed a bank and gave their children the money, should they get to keep it. That's illegal to have it but the kids got it through no fault of their own. That does seem to be the qualifying factor you use to try and justify something that is against the law.
lol... oh please. (R)s have given out amnesty.
Oh, the it's different excuse,huh?
How about the child of the bank robber keeping the money? The standard applied to that situation is the one you're OK with when it comes to illegal POS being here.
because money is a thing. children aren't. different circumstances.
------------------------------------ agree , 'reagan and old man bush' started the problem in 1986 that exists in the USA with imported third worlders .we'll see. i'm betting DACA will also be part of that cash incentive.
Why do Democrats want to reward those illegally here?
there are (R)s in favor of allowing a path to citizenship for those that are 'illegally' here thru no fault of their own.
They're no different than the POS D(s) that support it.
Putting quotes around illegally doesn't lessen the fact that they shouldn't be here.
If someone's parent(s) robbed a bank and gave their children the money, should they get to keep it. That's illegal to have it but the kids got it through no fault of their own. That does seem to be the qualifying factor you use to try and justify something that is against the law.
lol... oh please. (R)s have given out amnesty.
Just remember who had your back Trump cared more about putting you back to work than Popo and Shoomi did.
Trump concedes to temporarily end shutdown - CNNPolitics
I know everyone has been busy breaking their arm while patting themselves on the back for a job well done and losing their voice proclaiming we won but has anyone bothered to ask themselves what happens at the end of these three weeks? We have had these immigration and border security issueses for decades and Congress has failed deal with them I for one have zero confidence they will do so in the next three weeks.
Just remember who had your back Trump cared more about putting you back to work than Popo and Shoomi did.
Trump concedes to temporarily end shutdown - CNNPolitics
Government workers will not forget.......
That Trump had a confirmed CR and shot it down
How Trump was proud of denying them pay
How Congress recommended a 2.6 percent cost of living increase and Trump came back with zero
How Trump froze all promotions
How Trump mocks the Federal Workforce at his rallies
.>Just remember who had your back Trump cared more about putting you back to work than Popo and Shoomi did.
Trump concedes to temporarily end shutdown - CNNPolitics
That's why I hate those cocksucking motherfuckers. Fuck the useless GOP.lol... oh please. (R)s have given out amnesty.
Which was a pragmatic solution...and a correct one..'reagan and the old pwick bush' gave out the FIRST Amnesty in 1986 Con65 .
Employee benefits - Wikipedia
With this kind of benefit package they should keep their mouth shut and do their job
