"Governor signs bill mandating sex ed in schools across California"

Sex education which teaches abstinence is the most successful type of sex education, which reduces STDs, teenage pregnancies etc.

Abstinence only programs are the least successful, they lead to the highest levels of STDs and teenage pregnancies.

Ya, the parents of Cali are too stupid to teach their own kids... Or I should say the lack of parental caring.

Let the schools indoctrinate a state full of a$$ hats... They deserve it.

Do you understand the concept of people specialising in things? Like, if I want a plumbing job done, I call a plumber, if I want an electrical job I call and electrician?

Parents often don't have time to teach their kids everything they need to know in life. Also, it's been shown that kids (remember, kids?) suffer less when the education they get at school is relevant to their life. Why do you want kids to get STDs and be teenage parents because their parents are too busy working and earning money.

Or, hey, how about this, instead of sex ed, no one is allowed to work more than 30 hours a week. You prefer that? So then parents will have enough time to teach their kids how to put a condom on.
Sh!tty parents are a dime a dozen... It's called too lazy to care.

That is the root of why the country is in such sh!tty shape.

So you get shitty parents, and you're screwed in life because no one else is going to teach you, right?

Or maybe the country is in a shitty shape because the right demands all parents be good parents and teach their kids everything there is, but this doesn't happen, so schools don't do it either, and then it all goes wrong.

You can't make parents do it, but you can make schools do it. So there's only ONE solution and you decide to tell everyone not to do this solution because it's better that parents do something, when clearly it isn't, because it doesn't work.

Great
Well make it a choice than... Indoctrination is second nature to any government.
The good parents can do their duty and enthusiastically will, the bad parents can let some stranger indoctrinate their kids.

But, make it a choice for gods sake.

So parents teach kids and it's okay, schools teach the same thing and it's indoctrination. Hmmm.

But then again even if it's indoctrination (it's not usually) they're less likely to get STDs and be teenage parents. I'd say that kind of indoctrination is worth it, wouldn't you?

If you read the OP it says parents do have the choice.

Firstly, they have the choice to not send their kids to school.
Secondly they have the choice to take them out of sex ed.

Is that not enough choice for you?
 
Sex education which teaches abstinence is the most successful type of sex education, which reduces STDs, teenage pregnancies etc.

Abstinence only programs are the least successful, they lead to the highest levels of STDs and teenage pregnancies.

Well, the whole responsibility thing has shifted. Back in my day it was the male's responsibility to take care of things. All boys back then carried a condom in their wallets. If one failed in his responsibility, marriage was the alternative. There were few marriages because condoms cost from twenty-five cents each to fifty cents each. Today, it appears to be the female's responsibility and even with free condoms and contraceptives, the female is not enforcing the male to use a condom.
 
Sure, tell them how to do something even monkey can figure out. Great.

Meanwhile math and science ranks 48th in the world.

Sh!tty teachers make for st!ttyer parents...

See: most every urban area in the country... One word -------- CRIME
 
Sex education which teaches abstinence is the most successful type of sex education, which reduces STDs, teenage pregnancies etc.

Abstinence only programs are the least successful, they lead to the highest levels of STDs and teenage pregnancies.

Ya, the parents of Cali are too stupid to teach their own kids... Or I should say the lack of parental caring.

Let the schools indoctrinate a state full of a$$ hats... They deserve it.

Do you understand the concept of people specialising in things? Like, if I want a plumbing job done, I call a plumber, if I want an electrical job I call and electrician?

Parents often don't have time to teach their kids everything they need to know in life. Also, it's been shown that kids (remember, kids?) suffer less when the education they get at school is relevant to their life. Why do you want kids to get STDs and be teenage parents because their parents are too busy working and earning money.

Or, hey, how about this, instead of sex ed, no one is allowed to work more than 30 hours a week. You prefer that? So then parents will have enough time to teach their kids how to put a condom on.
Sh!tty parents are a dime a dozen... It's called too lazy to care.

That is the root of why the country is in such sh!tty shape.

So you get shitty parents, and you're screwed in life because no one else is going to teach you, right?

Or maybe the country is in a shitty shape because the right demands all parents be good parents and teach their kids everything there is, but this doesn't happen, so schools don't do it either, and then it all goes wrong.

You can't make parents do it, but you can make schools do it. So there's only ONE solution and you decide to tell everyone not to do this solution because it's better that parents do something, when clearly it isn't, because it doesn't work.

Great
Well make it a choice than... Indoctrination is second nature to any government.
The good parents can do their duty and enthusiastically will, the bad parents can let some stranger indoctrinate their kids.

But, make it a choice for gods sake.

Again, my parents never taught me anything at all about sex. It was second nature. Most girls took care of their siblings, some had baby-sitting jobs, etc. They all knew where babies came from and so did the boys.
 
Governor signs bill mandating sex ed in schools across California

"Individual parents can opt out, but schools cannot.

The law ensures not only that school districts offer sex education, but that they teach a comprehensive curriculum that includes abstinence, a range of contraceptives, issues related to sexuality and gender identity as well as “an objective discussion of all legally available pregnancy outcomes, including, but not limited to, parenting, adoption and abortion.”

The new law combines the previously required curriculum on HIV/AIDS prevention and sex education into one required set of knowledge and skills kids should be taught before the end of eighth grade, and one they should be taught before the end of high school.

Districts can start offering the curriculum in seventh grade.

“Our schools are a critical environment for providing young people with the knowledge and skills that they will need to protect their sexual health,” said the bill’s author, Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, in a statement. “This is about empowering all young men and women — whatever their orientation or gender — to make the healthiest decisions possible.”

Weber’s measure also requires the curriculum to “affirmatively recognize that people have different sexual orientations and, when discussing or providing examples of relationships and couples, shall be inclusive of same-sex relationships.”

“This legislation ensures that all students have access to medically accurate and unbiased sexual health education,” said state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson in a statement. “By affirmatively recognizing that people have different sexual orientations and teaching pupils about gender identity, LGBTQ youth will be safer in school.”"


Thank goodness the part about 'medically accurate' info. Some states don't require the sex-ed be medically accurate. Always imagine something like "the man inserts his penis into the woman's cloiaca..." :)

Apparently kids are a lot more stupid now than they were 50 or more years ago. When I was in the eighth grade, we knew all about sex without any classes on the subject.

Some people know, some don't.

I remember the Sports Teachers doing sex ed. They were talking about Masturbation. I had absolutely no idea what they were talking about. I mean, the whole time just went right over my head. I learned nothing. However it was clear quite a few kids did know because they were discussing it with the sports teachers. I probably wasn't even listening.

I've always been young for my age. I look young for my age. I still have a full head of hair. People were losing hair ages ago from my age group. Bald patches galore. So I wasn't in a hurry to get girlfriends, learn about sex and all of that when I was at high school.

Well, I don't know where you're from but you're certainly not like any of the guys I grew up with.


Well, maybe you didn't talk to people like me.
 
Apparently kids are a lot more stupid now than they were 50 or more years ago. When I was in the eighth grade, we knew all about sex without any classes on the subject.
Really? Because 50 years ago there were a lot more teen pregnancies than there are today.

Why is the teen birth rate falling?

Probably in the inner cities. Most young ladies 50 years ago were more selective and "hard to get" than they are today. 50 years ago there was a concept of "saving myself for my husband". Yes, there has always been that element within the ghettos and inner cities. There was also a higher moral standard adhered to 50 years ago.
 
Governor signs bill mandating sex ed in schools across California

"Individual parents can opt out, but schools cannot.

The law ensures not only that school districts offer sex education, but that they teach a comprehensive curriculum that includes abstinence, a range of contraceptives, issues related to sexuality and gender identity as well as “an objective discussion of all legally available pregnancy outcomes, including, but not limited to, parenting, adoption and abortion.”

The new law combines the previously required curriculum on HIV/AIDS prevention and sex education into one required set of knowledge and skills kids should be taught before the end of eighth grade, and one they should be taught before the end of high school.

Districts can start offering the curriculum in seventh grade.

“Our schools are a critical environment for providing young people with the knowledge and skills that they will need to protect their sexual health,” said the bill’s author, Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, in a statement. “This is about empowering all young men and women — whatever their orientation or gender — to make the healthiest decisions possible.”

Weber’s measure also requires the curriculum to “affirmatively recognize that people have different sexual orientations and, when discussing or providing examples of relationships and couples, shall be inclusive of same-sex relationships.”

“This legislation ensures that all students have access to medically accurate and unbiased sexual health education,” said state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson in a statement. “By affirmatively recognizing that people have different sexual orientations and teaching pupils about gender identity, LGBTQ youth will be safer in school.”"


Thank goodness the part about 'medically accurate' info. Some states don't require the sex-ed be medically accurate. Always imagine something like "the man inserts his penis into the woman's cloiaca..." :)

Apparently kids are a lot more stupid now than they were 50 or more years ago. When I was in the eighth grade, we knew all about sex without any classes on the subject.

LOL. I figured the OP would attract kooks, this one ^^^ maybe the most ridiculous.
 
Governor signs bill mandating sex ed in schools across California

"Individual parents can opt out, but schools cannot.

The law ensures not only that school districts offer sex education, but that they teach a comprehensive curriculum that includes abstinence, a range of contraceptives, issues related to sexuality and gender identity as well as “an objective discussion of all legally available pregnancy outcomes, including, but not limited to, parenting, adoption and abortion.”

The new law combines the previously required curriculum on HIV/AIDS prevention and sex education into one required set of knowledge and skills kids should be taught before the end of eighth grade, and one they should be taught before the end of high school.

Districts can start offering the curriculum in seventh grade.

“Our schools are a critical environment for providing young people with the knowledge and skills that they will need to protect their sexual health,” said the bill’s author, Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, in a statement. “This is about empowering all young men and women — whatever their orientation or gender — to make the healthiest decisions possible.”

Weber’s measure also requires the curriculum to “affirmatively recognize that people have different sexual orientations and, when discussing or providing examples of relationships and couples, shall be inclusive of same-sex relationships.”

“This legislation ensures that all students have access to medically accurate and unbiased sexual health education,” said state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson in a statement. “By affirmatively recognizing that people have different sexual orientations and teaching pupils about gender identity, LGBTQ youth will be safer in school.”"


Thank goodness the part about 'medically accurate' info. Some states don't require the sex-ed be medically accurate. Always imagine something like "the man inserts his penis into the woman's cloiaca..." :)

Apparently kids are a lot more stupid now than they were 50 or more years ago. When I was in the eighth grade, we knew all about sex without any classes on the subject.

Some people know, some don't.

I remember the Sports Teachers doing sex ed. They were talking about Masturbation. I had absolutely no idea what they were talking about. I mean, the whole time just went right over my head. I learned nothing. However it was clear quite a few kids did know because they were discussing it with the sports teachers. I probably wasn't even listening.

I've always been young for my age. I look young for my age. I still have a full head of hair. People were losing hair ages ago from my age group. Bald patches galore. So I wasn't in a hurry to get girlfriends, learn about sex and all of that when I was at high school.

Well, I don't know where you're from but you're certainly not like any of the guys I grew up with.


Well, maybe you didn't talk to people like me.

Sounds like that may have been your problem. The guys didn't associate with you. You were "strange".
 
Governor signs bill mandating sex ed in schools across California
The new law combines the previously required curriculum on HIV/AIDS prevention and sex education into one required set of knowledge and skills kids should be taught before the end of eighth grade, and one they should be taught before the end of high school.
“Our schools are a critical environment for providing young people with the knowledge and skills that they will need to protect their sexual health,” said the bill’s author, Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, in a statement. “This is about empowering all young men and women — whatever their orientation or gender — to make the healthiest decisions possible.”

Does that include the instruction that the anus and colon are lower parts of the digestive tract and not sexual organs? And that the colon has a direct interface with the bloodstream where large particles like viruses have no barrier whatsoever or bodily defense from moving right across that permeable membrane directly into the bloodstream?

Does it include that nobody should ever stick anything in the anus or colon, most especially not a penis with HIV infected semen, condom (which break during rough sex like anal sex) or not?

Well does this curriculum include the instruction of the body's organs and their purpose/weaknesses or not?
 
Sex education which teaches abstinence is the most successful type of sex education, which reduces STDs, teenage pregnancies etc.

Abstinence only programs are the least successful, they lead to the highest levels of STDs and teenage pregnancies.

Well, the whole responsibility thing has shifted. Back in my day it was the male's responsibility to take care of things. All boys back then carried a condom in their wallets. If one failed in his responsibility, marriage was the alternative. There were few marriages because condoms cost from twenty-five cents each to fifty cents each. Today, it appears to be the female's responsibility and even with free condoms and contraceptives, the female is not enforcing the male to use a condom.

Well, it's about education. Back in the day people were worried about having a kid. In the modern world less so because that social stigma isn't so great as it was.

Education before was about fear. With that gone you have to make education about knowledge.
 
Governor signs bill mandating sex ed in schools across California

"Individual parents can opt out, but schools cannot.

The law ensures not only that school districts offer sex education, but that they teach a comprehensive curriculum that includes abstinence, a range of contraceptives, issues related to sexuality and gender identity as well as “an objective discussion of all legally available pregnancy outcomes, including, but not limited to, parenting, adoption and abortion.”

The new law combines the previously required curriculum on HIV/AIDS prevention and sex education into one required set of knowledge and skills kids should be taught before the end of eighth grade, and one they should be taught before the end of high school.

Districts can start offering the curriculum in seventh grade.

“Our schools are a critical environment for providing young people with the knowledge and skills that they will need to protect their sexual health,” said the bill’s author, Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, in a statement. “This is about empowering all young men and women — whatever their orientation or gender — to make the healthiest decisions possible.”

Weber’s measure also requires the curriculum to “affirmatively recognize that people have different sexual orientations and, when discussing or providing examples of relationships and couples, shall be inclusive of same-sex relationships.”

“This legislation ensures that all students have access to medically accurate and unbiased sexual health education,” said state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson in a statement. “By affirmatively recognizing that people have different sexual orientations and teaching pupils about gender identity, LGBTQ youth will be safer in school.”"


Thank goodness the part about 'medically accurate' info. Some states don't require the sex-ed be medically accurate. Always imagine something like "the man inserts his penis into the woman's cloiaca..." :)

Apparently kids are a lot more stupid now than they were 50 or more years ago. When I was in the eighth grade, we knew all about sex without any classes on the subject.

LOL. I figured the OP would attract kooks, this one ^^^ maybe the most ridiculous.

Why? Because YOU are backward?
 
Governor signs bill mandating sex ed in schools across California

"Individual parents can opt out, but schools cannot.

The law ensures not only that school districts offer sex education, but that they teach a comprehensive curriculum that includes abstinence, a range of contraceptives, issues related to sexuality and gender identity as well as “an objective discussion of all legally available pregnancy outcomes, including, but not limited to, parenting, adoption and abortion.”

The new law combines the previously required curriculum on HIV/AIDS prevention and sex education into one required set of knowledge and skills kids should be taught before the end of eighth grade, and one they should be taught before the end of high school.

Districts can start offering the curriculum in seventh grade.

“Our schools are a critical environment for providing young people with the knowledge and skills that they will need to protect their sexual health,” said the bill’s author, Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, in a statement. “This is about empowering all young men and women — whatever their orientation or gender — to make the healthiest decisions possible.”

Weber’s measure also requires the curriculum to “affirmatively recognize that people have different sexual orientations and, when discussing or providing examples of relationships and couples, shall be inclusive of same-sex relationships.”

“This legislation ensures that all students have access to medically accurate and unbiased sexual health education,” said state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson in a statement. “By affirmatively recognizing that people have different sexual orientations and teaching pupils about gender identity, LGBTQ youth will be safer in school.”"


Thank goodness the part about 'medically accurate' info. Some states don't require the sex-ed be medically accurate. Always imagine something like "the man inserts his penis into the woman's cloiaca..." :)

Apparently kids are a lot more stupid now than they were 50 or more years ago. When I was in the eighth grade, we knew all about sex without any classes on the subject.

Some people know, some don't.

I remember the Sports Teachers doing sex ed. They were talking about Masturbation. I had absolutely no idea what they were talking about. I mean, the whole time just went right over my head. I learned nothing. However it was clear quite a few kids did know because they were discussing it with the sports teachers. I probably wasn't even listening.

I've always been young for my age. I look young for my age. I still have a full head of hair. People were losing hair ages ago from my age group. Bald patches galore. So I wasn't in a hurry to get girlfriends, learn about sex and all of that when I was at high school.

Well, I don't know where you're from but you're certainly not like any of the guys I grew up with.


Well, maybe you didn't talk to people like me.

Sounds like that may have been your problem. The guys didn't associate with you. You were "strange".

It doesn't matter what I was or wasn't. The point being that there are kids out there who aren't in the know about these things. There are those who appear younger than their age, who aren't in a hurry to be an adult, get a pension and die.

Your point was that ALL kids knew, I bet this isn't true. Probably that those who didn't know you just put a label of "weird" on them and ignore them.
 
Sex education which teaches abstinence is the most successful type of sex education, which reduces STDs, teenage pregnancies etc.

Abstinence only programs are the least successful, they lead to the highest levels of STDs and teenage pregnancies.

Well, the whole responsibility thing has shifted. Back in my day it was the male's responsibility to take care of things. All boys back then carried a condom in their wallets. If one failed in his responsibility, marriage was the alternative. There were few marriages because condoms cost from twenty-five cents each to fifty cents each. Today, it appears to be the female's responsibility and even with free condoms and contraceptives, the female is not enforcing the male to use a condom.

Well, it's about education. Back in the day people were worried about having a kid. In the modern world less so because that social stigma isn't so great as it was.

Education before was about fear. With that gone you have to make education about knowledge.

No. There was little education. The emphasis was on responsibility. That's where the emphasis should still be placed.
 
I've always been young for my age. I look young for my age. I still have a full head of hair. People were losing hair ages ago from my age group. Bald patches galore. So I wasn't in a hurry to get girlfriends, learn about sex and all of that when I was at high school.

The full head of hair might be because you're a lesbian, ie: female. And your girlfriends were homosexual partners. Which explains why you post the way you do on all topics Church of LGBT.

Frigid, do you know if the CA curriculum includes the following:

Does that include the instruction that the anus and colon are lower parts of the digestive tract and not sexual organs? And that the colon has a direct interface with the bloodstream where large particles like viruses have no barrier whatsoever or bodily defense from moving right across that permeable membrane directly into the bloodstream?

Does it include that nobody should ever stick anything in the anus or colon, most especially not a penis with HIV infected semen, condom (which break during rough sex like anal sex) or not?
 
Apparently kids are a lot more stupid now than they were 50 or more years ago. When I was in the eighth grade, we knew all about sex without any classes on the subject.

Some people know, some don't.

I remember the Sports Teachers doing sex ed. They were talking about Masturbation. I had absolutely no idea what they were talking about. I mean, the whole time just went right over my head. I learned nothing. However it was clear quite a few kids did know because they were discussing it with the sports teachers. I probably wasn't even listening.

I've always been young for my age. I look young for my age. I still have a full head of hair. People were losing hair ages ago from my age group. Bald patches galore. So I wasn't in a hurry to get girlfriends, learn about sex and all of that when I was at high school.

Well, I don't know where you're from but you're certainly not like any of the guys I grew up with.


Well, maybe you didn't talk to people like me.

Sounds like that may have been your problem. The guys didn't associate with you. You were "strange".

It doesn't matter what I was or wasn't. The point being that there are kids out there who aren't in the know about these things. There are those who appear younger than their age, who aren't in a hurry to be an adult, get a pension and die.

Your point was that ALL kids knew, I bet this isn't true. Probably that those who didn't know you just put a label of "weird" on them and ignore them.

Probably so. And they were weird.
 
Ya, the parents of Cali are too stupid to teach their own kids... Or I should say the lack of parental caring.

Let the schools indoctrinate a state full of a$$ hats... They deserve it.

Do you understand the concept of people specialising in things? Like, if I want a plumbing job done, I call a plumber, if I want an electrical job I call and electrician?

Parents often don't have time to teach their kids everything they need to know in life. Also, it's been shown that kids (remember, kids?) suffer less when the education they get at school is relevant to their life. Why do you want kids to get STDs and be teenage parents because their parents are too busy working and earning money.

Or, hey, how about this, instead of sex ed, no one is allowed to work more than 30 hours a week. You prefer that? So then parents will have enough time to teach their kids how to put a condom on.
Sh!tty parents are a dime a dozen... It's called too lazy to care.

That is the root of why the country is in such sh!tty shape.

So you get shitty parents, and you're screwed in life because no one else is going to teach you, right?

Or maybe the country is in a shitty shape because the right demands all parents be good parents and teach their kids everything there is, but this doesn't happen, so schools don't do it either, and then it all goes wrong.

You can't make parents do it, but you can make schools do it. So there's only ONE solution and you decide to tell everyone not to do this solution because it's better that parents do something, when clearly it isn't, because it doesn't work.

Great
Well make it a choice than... Indoctrination is second nature to any government.
The good parents can do their duty and enthusiastically will, the bad parents can let some stranger indoctrinate their kids.

But, make it a choice for gods sake.

So parents teach kids and it's okay, schools teach the same thing and it's indoctrination. Hmmm.

But then again even if it's indoctrination (it's not usually) they're less likely to get STDs and be teenage parents. I'd say that kind of indoctrination is worth it, wouldn't you?

If you read the OP it says parents do have the choice.

Firstly, they have the choice to not send their kids to school.
Secondly they have the choice to take them out of sex ed.

Is that not enough choice for you?
There again, it should be a choice. Mandatory and choice are two different words, is that hard for you?

If the parents what the school to do the parenting, fine.
But, good parents want that responsibility all their own and want just basics taught and leave it at that.
And don't want do gooder teachers, schools and politicians meddling in their duty.
 
Governor signs bill mandating sex ed in schools across California
The new law combines the previously required curriculum on HIV/AIDS prevention and sex education into one required set of knowledge and skills kids should be taught before the end of eighth grade, and one they should be taught before the end of high school.
“Our schools are a critical environment for providing young people with the knowledge and skills that they will need to protect their sexual health,” said the bill’s author, Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, in a statement. “This is about empowering all young men and women — whatever their orientation or gender — to make the healthiest decisions possible.”

Does that include the instruction that the anus and colon are lower parts of the digestive tract and not sexual organs? And that the colon has a direct interface with the bloodstream where large particles like viruses have no barrier whatsoever or bodily defense from moving right across that permeable membrane directly into the bloodstream?

Does it include that nobody should ever stick anything in the anus or colon, most especially not a penis with HIV infected semen, condom (which break during rough sex like anal sex) or not?

Gee, I learned something new, I guess it's best to learn from those who have experience; even though I never considered having anal sex, it's always interesting to hear from those who engage in such acts.

What brand of condom did you break?
 
Gee, I learned something new, I guess it's best to learn from those who have experience; even though I never considered having anal sex, it's always interesting to hear from those who engage in such acts.

What brand of condom did you break?
None. I learned about the colon and its purpose in biology in high school. I learned about how it evolved to resorb large particles and fluids as a means of recycling the digestion in times of famine or drought.

It is precisely because of this evolved specialty that makes introducing any foreign object into the colon especially dangerous. The surface of the colon is like a sponge that goes directly back into the bloodstream. You couldn't ask for a more dangerous place to have sex. And that's not even talking about the dangerous bacteria lingering there for the "inserter".
 
Sex education which teaches abstinence is the most successful type of sex education, which reduces STDs, teenage pregnancies etc.

Abstinence only programs are the least successful, they lead to the highest levels of STDs and teenage pregnancies.

Well, the whole responsibility thing has shifted. Back in my day it was the male's responsibility to take care of things. All boys back then carried a condom in their wallets. If one failed in his responsibility, marriage was the alternative. There were few marriages because condoms cost from twenty-five cents each to fifty cents each. Today, it appears to be the female's responsibility and even with free condoms and contraceptives, the female is not enforcing the male to use a condom.

Well, it's about education. Back in the day people were worried about having a kid. In the modern world less so because that social stigma isn't so great as it was.

Education before was about fear. With that gone you have to make education about knowledge.

No. There was little education. The emphasis was on responsibility. That's where the emphasis should still be placed.

What I mean by education is how people learned. People learned to be responsible because the impact would have been much higher than now. Now people are able to be more free because life is more free than it used to be. Therefore responsibility means less than it did back then.

This is a problem. But it doesn't just go away by saying "young people need to be more responsible", the right often just use these sorts of things as reasons to do nothing.

Sex ed in schools is now an extremely important thing to learn, in order to be decent functioning adults.

Even then..... I know a guy who's doing a PhD in some biological thing, and he managed to get himself an STD even after having had sex ed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top