Gowdy lays out why Pelosi MUST remove Schiff from House Intel panel, and it’s brutally honest

[Darkwind]

You're so full of shit it isn't funny. Prove Barr is covering up anything.

Barr decided that Trump shouldn't be prosecuted for "obstruction of justice". It's not Barr's call to make, since the Justice Department has a policy that they won't indict a sitting President, this determination can ONLY be made by the House. So in deciding that Trump shouldn't be prosecuted, Barr has both over-reached, and made conclusions he's not authorized to make.

It is up to Barr to give the House the unredacted report and let the House Judicial Committee make the determination, as did Starr and Leon Jaworski, before him.

Link to the actual law that says that Barr has cannot make the decision regarding a DOJ investigation. Plus, if the Dept. has a policy, you should have no problem linking to the OFFICIAL DOJ policy that says that they cannot prosecute a sitting President.

The fact is, the House Judicial Committee cannnot be trusted, period. Not as long as Schitt is in control of it.

Do your own fucking research, you lazy little shit

I trust Adam Schiff a whole lot more than Devon Nunes.

Then you're a fool. I don't trust either, but in this matter, Schitt is fucking Charles Manson.

First off, Adam Schiff is head of the Intelligence Committee. Elijah Cummings is the head of the Judicial Committee, which is the Committee which would be impeaching Donald Trump, not Adam Schiff.

Why are you discussing this shit when you haven't the vaguest clue who or what is in charge here? Your ignorance should disqualify you from opining on stuff you don't know. Your just some dumb knuckledragging Russian going on Democrats bad, Republicans good. Nunez was supposed to be doing oversight, not running to the White House with closed door evidence against Trump.

yeah, I mixed up the committees, big deal.

Schitt has been running around making criminal accusations to influence an election without proof. So fuck him. He should be charged criminally, not lead a committee. Trump has been cleared of these charges, as per the USAG. He has more credibility than any of the committee leaders.

Perhaps you should take your own advice.

BTW...I was correct. The house wants to impeach Trump and were planning on using the Mueller report to do that has no reflection on the fact that Schitt has no proof (something he claimed) of Trump committing a crime. One committee will be trying to wash the back of the o ther.

 

[airplanemechanic]

You've got to be kidding!

Did Gowdy insist Nunes be removed as chairman when he was working with Trump behind the scenes.... remember his midnight ride to the whitehouse fiasco?

Or when Nunes refused to investigate Russia and the trump team, let them lie to him and let the witnesses refuse to testify, never subpoenaed a soul when they gave their convoluted answers of an alleged privilege that they did not legally have.... then closed the case exonerating Trump and team without ever doing or finishing the investigation?

Spare us all from this garbage, please! SERIOUSLY!

Did the Progs when they held a massive advantage in 2009 and 2010 investigate Obama's past. We know more about Jesus from teenager to adult then Obama.

What about President Obama's past, was connected to licking the murderous Valdimir's Putin's ass, that needed to be investigated for our National Security? What close up, personal connections did Obama have with an enemy foreign dictator thug, was there to investigate? What did Obama try to hide from the American people of any importance? His college grades? Which President Trump is hiding himself, via threat, from his crony thug lawyer Michael Cohen?

Obama tells Russia's Medvedev more flexibility after election | Reuters

Pretty damning evidence there. Flexibility for what? Imagine if fucking Trump would have told Putin he would have more flexibility after he was elected. Holy fucking shit. There would be like a Russian collusion investigation or something.

Why didn't dems call for an immediate investigation into Obama Putin collusion?

 

[mudwhistle]

You've got to be kidding!

Did Gowdy insist Nunes be removed as chairman when he was working with Trump behind the scenes.... remember his midnight ride to the whitehouse fiasco?

Or when Nunes refused to investigate Russia and the trump team, let them lie to him and let the witnesses refuse to testify, never subpoenaed a soul when they gave their convoluted answers of an alleged privilege that they did not legally have.... then closed the case exonerating Trump and team without ever doing or finishing the investigation?

Spare us all from this garbage, please! SERIOUSLY!

Do you have proof of this conspiracy, or are you just parroting Democrats talking points?

The fact is the House has oversight in these matters, and talking to the White House isn't illegal or immoral. It's the way things always have been done. Call it common curiosity. Right now the Democrats in congress are enemy combatants, not public servants.

 

[Dragonlady]

Rosenstein wrote nothing, and has said nothing. Barr is back-pedalling on his "not a summary" as fast as he can. Barr was a political hack for George Bush, telling him torture was legal, and other questionable calls. Now he's doing the same job on behalf of another corrupt President.

We know NOTHING, other than Barr is running cover and delaying release of the full report, one can only assume in order to keep the public from knowing the truth. 400 pages, 100 charges, Mueller must have found a shit ton of stuff to get all of those arrests and guilty pleas.

So keep trying to pretend that you now know everything, when in fact we don't know any more than we knew BEFORE Mueller released his report.

You're so full of shit it isn't funny. Prove Barr is covering up anything.

Barr decided that Trump shouldn't be prosecuted for "obstruction of justice". It's not Barr's call to make, since the Justice Department has a policy that they won't indict a sitting President, this determination can ONLY be made by the House. So in deciding that Trump shouldn't be prosecuted, Barr has both over-reached, and made conclusions he's not authorized to make.

It is up to Barr to give the House the unredacted report and let the House Judicial Committee make the determination, as did Starr and Leon Jaworski, before him.

Link to the actual law that says that Barr has cannot make the decision regarding a DOJ investigation. Plus, if the Dept. has a policy, you should have no problem linking to the OFFICIAL DOJ policy that says that they cannot prosecute a sitting President.

The fact is, the House Judicial Committee cannnot be trusted, period. Not as long as Schitt is in control of it.

Why can't schiff be trusted? Tell us...

Did Starr charge Bill Clinton with Obstruction, NO he did not, he left it up to the House to indict in an impeachment.

Did the Watergate Prosecutor indict Nixon for obstruction of Justice, no he did not, he left it up to the House for an article of impeachment....

As far as the Justice Department RULE not LAW.... it is Justice department policy not to indict in a court of law, but to leave it up to the House of Representatives to indict in an article of impeachment, you can google it.

For two years he has been frothing at the mouth -- meaning he has been rabid -- against Trump for winning an election. The fact he is a progressive makes him all the more untrustworthy.

The House can still impeach Trump, it has nothing to do with the Mueller investigation. The Democrats were just hoping to use that as a reason. Well, now we know that Trump hasn't done any of the things that Schitt and the rest of the Democrats have been accusing him of.

There is only one thing that Schitt could teach, and that would be to the Republicans. He could teach them how to not give in to the opposition!

Schiff wasn't upset at Trump getting elected. Schiff has been trying to get the House to do a proper investigation into Russian interference, while Devon Nunes did everything possible to sabotage the investigation, refusing to sign subpoenas, allowing witnesses to lie unquestioned.

As the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, it was Schiff's JOB to seriously look at Russian interference in the election to prevent the Russians and others from doing it again. Nunes refused to do that. He refused to even call half of the people the Democrats wanted to talk to. Schiff won't back down.

The Russian Investigation is NOT just about Trump. It's about keeping foreign entities out of the 2020 elections too. You fools prattle on about butthurt over Hillary's loss but Democrats gave up on a Clinton presidency on the day the Electoral College voted, and moved on to preventing Russia from doing this again.

Idiots like you keep going on as if this is all about Trump. It's not.

ETA: Jerry Nadler is the Chair of the Judiciary Committee, not Cummings.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Gowdy lays out why Pelosi MUST remove Schiff from House Intel panel, and it’s brutally honest​

Trey Gowdy lays out why Nancy Pelosi MUST remove Adam Schiff from House Intelligence Committee, and it’s brutally honest
3/30/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
Since special counsel Robert Mueller filed his mandatory report with the Justice Department a week ago officially clearing POTUS Donald Trump of the “Russian collusion” hoax, some Democrats have continued to push the lie. One of them just happens to be the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee — Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).
Everyone in D.C. knows that the collusion narrative was a hoax from the outset, a fabrication designed by the Obama regime and carried out by Deep State operatives in the Justice Department, FBI, and Intelligence Community to undermined POTUS and, frankly, to depose him.

Trey Gowdy on next steps for Mueller report, Schiff's future






~~~~~~
If not for Gowdy pushing on Benghazi and forcing the production of documents Obama did not want to produce, we would never have learned of Hillary’s secret server. The election was close enough that the blowback from that may have been a deciding factor in Trump winning.
If not for Gowdy pushing on Benghazi and forcing the production of documents Obama did not want to produce, we would never have learned of Hillary’s secret server. The election was close enough that the blowback from that may have been a deciding factor in Trump winning.
Gowdy at least tried to uncover the truth. That is more than we can say for all but a few so I am puzzled by the venom he gets from the Left.
Congress critters talk. It is what they do. The only one of them that wields serious power is the speaker of the house and senate majority leader. The rest are just one of the hundreds.

Trey Gowdy is a smart man who knows his business, but he is also a deeply deeply conservative, paranoid and suspicious man who cannot be trusted to view any situation without a biased filter.
He is no longer in Congress. He needs to get used to that and stop advising them what to do. If he wanted to be in control, he should have stayed in Congress.

So you want to remove his right to free speech? Wow!

So you want to remove his right to free speech? Wow!

And what of Schiff's ?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Gowdy lays out why Pelosi MUST remove Schiff from House Intel panel, and it’s brutally honest​

Trey Gowdy lays out why Nancy Pelosi MUST remove Adam Schiff from House Intelligence Committee, and it’s brutally honest
3/30/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
Since special counsel Robert Mueller filed his mandatory report with the Justice Department a week ago officially clearing POTUS Donald Trump of the “Russian collusion” hoax, some Democrats have continued to push the lie. One of them just happens to be the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee — Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).
Everyone in D.C. knows that the collusion narrative was a hoax from the outset, a fabrication designed by the Obama regime and carried out by Deep State operatives in the Justice Department, FBI, and Intelligence Community to undermined POTUS and, frankly, to depose him.

Trey Gowdy on next steps for Mueller report, Schiff's future






~~~~~~
If not for Gowdy pushing on Benghazi and forcing the production of documents Obama did not want to produce, we would never have learned of Hillary’s secret server. The election was close enough that the blowback from that may have been a deciding factor in Trump winning.
If not for Gowdy pushing on Benghazi and forcing the production of documents Obama did not want to produce, we would never have learned of Hillary’s secret server. The election was close enough that the blowback from that may have been a deciding factor in Trump winning.
Gowdy at least tried to uncover the truth. That is more than we can say for all but a few so I am puzzled by the venom he gets from the Left.
Congress critters talk. It is what they do. The only one of them that wields serious power is the speaker of the house and senate majority leader. The rest are just one of the hundreds.

I know this will be a shock to you, but Pelosi does not give a flying fuck what Gowdy thinks or says.

Betcha she'll fill her Depends if Gowdy is appointed as Special Counsel. Rumors have been flying around Capitol Hill for the past week. Dems will go bugfuk if that happens.

And that is definitely what needs to happen. Gowdy is the most efficient man in Washington DC

Yes, at failing.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Gowdy lays out why Pelosi MUST remove Schiff from House Intel panel, and it’s brutally honest​

Trey Gowdy lays out why Nancy Pelosi MUST remove Adam Schiff from House Intelligence Committee, and it’s brutally honest
3/30/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
Since special counsel Robert Mueller filed his mandatory report with the Justice Department a week ago officially clearing POTUS Donald Trump of the “Russian collusion” hoax, some Democrats have continued to push the lie. One of them just happens to be the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee — Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).
Everyone in D.C. knows that the collusion narrative was a hoax from the outset, a fabrication designed by the Obama regime and carried out by Deep State operatives in the Justice Department, FBI, and Intelligence Community to undermined POTUS and, frankly, to depose him.

Trey Gowdy on next steps for Mueller report, Schiff's future






~~~~~~
If not for Gowdy pushing on Benghazi and forcing the production of documents Obama did not want to produce, we would never have learned of Hillary’s secret server. The election was close enough that the blowback from that may have been a deciding factor in Trump winning.
If not for Gowdy pushing on Benghazi and forcing the production of documents Obama did not want to produce, we would never have learned of Hillary’s secret server. The election was close enough that the blowback from that may have been a deciding factor in Trump winning.
Gowdy at least tried to uncover the truth. That is more than we can say for all but a few so I am puzzled by the venom he gets from the Left.
Congress critters talk. It is what they do. The only one of them that wields serious power is the speaker of the house and senate majority leader. The rest are just one of the hundreds.

Let’s just correct some of your missed statements in the OP.

We don’t know that the Mueller report has in fact clear Donald Trump of anything because we haven’t seen it. What we have is William Barr’s synopsis (not a summary), that he doesn’t think Trump should be charged with obstruction.

It’s not Barr’s call. That’s up to the House. Barr cannot charge a sitting President. Only the House can impeach.

Mueller’s report is 400 pages and it lays out what he did find. Until we see Mueller’s report we have no idea whether or not Trump has been cleared of all allegations and it is bullshit to say that he has been based on Barr’s summary.

Co-Summary by Rosenstein (and DOJ high-level staff). Rosenstein who was mules boss. Give it up loon, there is no there there. If there was, one or many of mules staff would be running to MSLSD saying "it's a lie") and you already know that but you want to spread nonsense to get attention. All this after at least two other investigations cleared the issue.

There was no report summary.
Barr quoted two sentences of a nearly 400 page report.

 

[tigerred59]

Trey Gowdy was appointed by President Bill Clinton as a Federal prosecutor... and you claim it was a Clinton Cartel that was out to get him.... seriously, all of ya'll need some psychological help with your paranoia deep state bull crud....

No more a credible argument than saying that Mueller is a republican...They're all from the same slimy swamp.

Oddly enough, I agree with you. Mueller knows good and gotdamn well, Trump not only colluded with Putin, he obstructed the investigation every which way possible, in your face, open to the public and Mully has doubts???????? Even a hearing impaired blind 4 year old retard could see the guys guilty!!

 

[tigerred59]

Gowdy lays out why Pelosi MUST remove Schiff from House Intel panel, and it’s brutally honest​

Trey Gowdy lays out why Nancy Pelosi MUST remove Adam Schiff from House Intelligence Committee, and it’s brutally honest
3/30/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
Since special counsel Robert Mueller filed his mandatory report with the Justice Department a week ago officially clearing POTUS Donald Trump of the “Russian collusion” hoax, some Democrats have continued to push the lie. One of them just happens to be the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee — Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).
Everyone in D.C. knows that the collusion narrative was a hoax from the outset, a fabrication designed by the Obama regime and carried out by Deep State operatives in the Justice Department, FBI, and Intelligence Community to undermined POTUS and, frankly, to depose him.

Trey Gowdy on next steps for Mueller report, Schiff's future






~~~~~~
If not for Gowdy pushing on Benghazi and forcing the production of documents Obama did not want to produce, we would never have learned of Hillary’s secret server. The election was close enough that the blowback from that may have been a deciding factor in Trump winning.
If not for Gowdy pushing on Benghazi and forcing the production of documents Obama did not want to produce, we would never have learned of Hillary’s secret server. The election was close enough that the blowback from that may have been a deciding factor in Trump winning.
Gowdy at least tried to uncover the truth. That is more than we can say for all but a few so I am puzzled by the venom he gets from the Left.
Congress critters talk. It is what they do. The only one of them that wields serious power is the speaker of the house and senate majority leader. The rest are just one of the hundreds.

Let’s just correct some of your missed statements in the OP.

We don’t know that the Mueller report has in fact clear Donald Trump of anything because we haven’t seen it. What we have is William Barr’s synopsis (not a summary), that he doesn’t think Trump should be charged with obstruction.

It’s not Barr’s call. That’s up to the House. Barr cannot charge a sitting President. Only the House can impeach.

Mueller’s report is 400 pages and it lays out what he did find. Until we see Mueller’s report we have no idea whether or not Trump has been cleared of all allegations and it is bullshit to say that he has been based on Barr’s summary.

Co-Summary by Rosenstein (and DOJ high-level staff). Rosenstein who was mules boss. Give it up loon, there is no there there. If there was, one or many of mules staff would be running to MSLSD saying "it's a lie") and you already know that but you want to spread nonsense to get attention. All this after at least two other investigations cleared the issue.

There was no report summary.
Barr quoted two sentences of a nearly 400 page report.

Anyone with a working brain cell, realizing Trump perhaps is innocent would release the full report to the public yesterday....only a report pointing out guilt is handled this way, like duy? I hate that Trump and his peeps, think because they have all this support from rural retards, that somehow we're all in that same dumb swamp boat with this idiots.

 

[tigerred59]

Wasn't Goudy that idiot that ran all those investigations and found no wrong doing? He's a real winner, isn't he?

No you ignorant ass Tard....

It was you Alt left wing nuts that ran all of those investigations that found no wrong doing....

You are real winners aren’t you....

No . That was Goudy dumb ass.

So...….

Trump just keeps making fools of you ignorant Tards......

Can't wait to see which Tard you send to be slaughtered in 2020.....

Are we having fun or what?

WINNING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Winning at what? What the fuck are you moron's winning at? Looking like the biggest doops since Hitler fooled the germans?

 

[justoffal]

Let’s just correct some of your missed statements in the OP.

We don’t know that the Mueller report has in fact clear Donald Trump of anything because we haven’t seen it. What we have is William Barr’s synopsis (not a summary), that he doesn’t think Trump should be charged with obstruction.

It’s not Barr’s call. That’s up to the House. Barr cannot charge a sitting President. Only the House can impeach.

Mueller’s report is 400 pages and it lays out what he did find. Until we see Mueller’s report we have no idea whether or not Trump has been cleared of all allegations and it is bullshit to say that he has been based on Barr’s summary.

No we do know this because the report was writing by Barr AND Rosenstein (why do you guys never bring him up?)
Rosenstein started this special counsel and oversaw it for 2 years.....He got the reports from Mueller


any questions?

Rosenstein wrote nothing, and has said nothing. Barr is back-pedalling on his "not a summary" as fast as he can. Barr was a political hack for George Bush, telling him torture was legal, and other questionable calls. Now he's doing the same job on behalf of another corrupt President.

We know NOTHING, other than Barr is running cover and delaying release of the full report, one can only assume in order to keep the public from knowing the truth. 400 pages, 100 charges, Mueller must have found a shit ton of stuff to get all of those arrests and guilty pleas.

So keep trying to pretend that you now know everything, when in fact we don't know any more than we knew BEFORE Mueller released his report.

You're so full of shit it isn't funny. Prove Barr is covering up anything.

Barr decided that Trump shouldn't be prosecuted for "obstruction of justice". It's not Barr's call to make, since the Justice Department has a policy that they won't indict a sitting President, this determination can ONLY be made by the House. So in deciding that Trump shouldn't be prosecuted, Barr has both over-reached, and made conclusions he's not authorized to make.

It is up to Barr to give the House the unredacted report and let the House Judicial Committee make the determination, as did Starr and Leon Jaworski, before him.

Link to the actual law that says that Barr has cannot make the decision regarding a DOJ investigation. Plus, if the Dept. has a policy, you should have no problem linking to the OFFICIAL DOJ policy that says that they cannot prosecute a sitting President.

The fact is, the House Judicial Committee cannnot be trusted, period. Not as long as Schitt is in control of it.

It doesn't matter who controls it. The founding fathers knew damn well that you don't give prosecution powers to elected hacks.

 

[justoffal]

Wasn't Goudy that idiot that ran all those investigations and found no wrong doing? He's a real winner, isn't he?

No you ignorant ass Tard....

It was you Alt left wing nuts that ran all of those investigations that found no wrong doing....

You are real winners aren’t you....

No . That was Goudy dumb ass.

So...….

Trump just keeps making fools of you ignorant Tards......

Can't wait to see which Tard you send to be slaughtered in 2020.....

Are we having fun or what?

WINNING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Winning at what? What the fuck are you moron's winning at? Looking like the biggest doops since Hitler fooled the germans?

Don't rush it! this Democratic primary is going to be more fun than a tornado in a trailer park. I wouldn't miss this for the world. Warren's already drawing blood from Biden on the me-too thing.

Take a deep breath get out your popcorn and watch with pleasure.

Jo

 

[Care4all]

You've got to be kidding!

Did Gowdy insist Nunes be removed as chairman when he was working with Trump behind the scenes.... remember his midnight ride to the whitehouse fiasco?

Or when Nunes refused to investigate Russia and the trump team, let them lie to him and let the witnesses refuse to testify, never subpoenaed a soul when they gave their convoluted answers of an alleged privilege that they did not legally have.... then closed the case exonerating Trump and team without ever doing or finishing the investigation?

Spare us all from this garbage, please! SERIOUSLY!

Yeah, and when Nunez was punk d by those two Ukrainian comedians, that was the final straw. But all kidding aside, where is all this evidence Schiff said he had? All the political idol worshipping aside, this evidence he said and says he has, where is it?

Did you not read or watch his statement spelling it out? It's been in plain sight for the past couple of years...




Have you read the Mueller report? Neither have I.

 

[buckeye45_73]

You've got to be kidding!

Did Gowdy insist Nunes be removed as chairman when he was working with Trump behind the scenes.... remember his midnight ride to the whitehouse fiasco?

Or when Nunes refused to investigate Russia and the trump team, let them lie to him and let the witnesses refuse to testify, never subpoenaed a soul when they gave their convoluted answers of an alleged privilege that they did not legally have.... then closed the case exonerating Trump and team without ever doing or finishing the investigation?

Spare us all from this garbage, please! SERIOUSLY!

Yeah, and when Nunez was punk d by those two Ukrainian comedians, that was the final straw. But all kidding aside, where is all this evidence Schiff said he had? All the political idol worshipping aside, this evidence he said and says he has, where is it?

Did you not read or watch his statement spelling it out? It's been in plain sight for the past couple of years...




Have you read the Mueller report? Neither have I.

Nope but Barr and Rosenstein have.......not looking good for the anti Trumpers....

 

[Crixus]

You've got to be kidding!

Did Gowdy insist Nunes be removed as chairman when he was working with Trump behind the scenes.... remember his midnight ride to the whitehouse fiasco?

Or when Nunes refused to investigate Russia and the trump team, let them lie to him and let the witnesses refuse to testify, never subpoenaed a soul when they gave their convoluted answers of an alleged privilege that they did not legally have.... then closed the case exonerating Trump and team without ever doing or finishing the investigation?

Spare us all from this garbage, please! SERIOUSLY!

Yeah, and when Nunez was punk d by those two Ukrainian comedians, that was the final straw. But all kidding aside, where is all this evidence Schiff said he had? All the political idol worshipping aside, this evidence he said and says he has, where is it?

Did you not read or watch his statement spelling it out? It's been in plain sight for the past couple of years...




Have you read the Mueller report? Neither have I.

You don’t need to, hell you have openly made a case here Saying the dossier is factual. You strike me as the type that could be pulled into a secret room and shown the whole report and come out saying that “it just ain’t enough”. For you, Trump will have always payed hookers to piss on Obama’s pillow and Trump is a Putin spy.

 

[justoffal]

You've got to be kidding!

Did Gowdy insist Nunes be removed as chairman when he was working with Trump behind the scenes.... remember his midnight ride to the whitehouse fiasco?

Or when Nunes refused to investigate Russia and the trump team, let them lie to him and let the witnesses refuse to testify, never subpoenaed a soul when they gave their convoluted answers of an alleged privilege that they did not legally have.... then closed the case exonerating Trump and team without ever doing or finishing the investigation?

Spare us all from this garbage, please! SERIOUSLY!

Yeah, and when Nunez was punk d by those two Ukrainian comedians, that was the final straw. But all kidding aside, where is all this evidence Schiff said he had? All the political idol worshipping aside, this evidence he said and says he has, where is it?

Did you not read or watch his statement spelling it out? It's been in plain sight for the past couple of years...




Have you read the Mueller report? Neither have I.

You don’t need to, hell you have openly made a case here Saying the dossier is factual. You strike me as the type that could be pulled into a secret room and shown the whole report and come out saying that “it just ain’t enough”. For you, Trump will have always payed hookers to piss on Obama’s pillow and Trump is a Putin spy.

Correct....

He has his own truth which is far too important to be diddled by the facts or the real world. HE KNOWS! HE KNOWS ALL!

It's kinda like an opiate addiction. Once a person is hooked on opiates the chemistry of the brain changes forever so that they are never really free from the urge. They are always either on the street drug or a legal replacement.

jo

 

[lantern2814]

Funny how if Barr is lying about the results here, that Rosenstein, Mueller, and other people have kept totally silent. Not one objection or correction. No outage at being misrepresented. Why would that be? As for Schitt for brains, if he had evidence and did not turn it over to Mueller, he is guilty of obstruction of justice.

 

[BULLDOG]

Funny how if Barr is lying about the results here, that Rosenstein, Mueller, and other people have kept totally silent. Not one objection or correction. No outage at being misrepresented. Why would that be? As for Schitt for brains, if he had evidence and did not turn it over to Mueller, he is guilty of obstruction of justice.

Good, then you and Trump have nothing to worry about with the release. SHOW THE REPORT!!

 

[lantern2814]

Funny how if Barr is lying about the results here, that Rosenstein, Mueller, and other people have kept totally silent. Not one objection or correction. No outage at being misrepresented. Why would that be? As for Schitt for brains, if he had evidence and did not turn it over to Mueller, he is guilty of obstruction of justice.

Good, then you and Trump have nothing to worry about with the release. SHOW THE REPORT!!

Good ,then you have no problem with the law being followed as to what's released. Now run along chihuahua. You'll get what you're allowed to see and nothing more.

 

[BULLDOG]

Funny how if Barr is lying about the results here, that Rosenstein, Mueller, and other people have kept totally silent. Not one objection or correction. No outage at being misrepresented. Why would that be? As for Schitt for brains, if he had evidence and did not turn it over to Mueller, he is guilty of obstruction of justice.

Good, then you and Trump have nothing to worry about with the release. SHOW THE REPORT!!

Good ,then you have no problem with the law being followed as to what's released. Now run along chihuahua. You'll get what you're allowed to see and nothing more.

Got it. Protect Trump from his actions. Can't have him being held responsible for his behavior, can we?