Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
They have been busy re-writing climate history since 2010, that's for sure. Even the formation of the shale rock with hydrocarbon has been re-written since 2010. What our "climate science" purchases, re-writing history to fit the narrative...
The vast deposits of shale in North America contain 3 times the hydrocarbon of Saudi Arabia. Why is that not oil? Why and how was it "pressed" into rock? Climate "scientists" did not like that answer either. 30 million years of being under mile plus thick ice is the real answer.
The age of the ice in Chicago you cite is based upon the age of the scratches in rocks. It is not hard to understand that older scratches got "erased" over time.
In 2010 a search of North American Ice Age got many answers all citing the 30-50 million year old estimate. homO clearly told those receiving the taxpayer climate research dollars to re-write that. And now we have the bogus "glaciation cycles" clearly refuted by the NA-Greenland paradox.
So, show us the evidence of LIFE in Chicago 2-30 million years ago.... We have evidence of LIFE on Greenland 2 million years ago at the top and 400-800k years ago at the center.
LOL!!!
They'll fund some "new studies" to "refute" that, because THERE WAS NO LIFE.... and it isn't hard to figure out why.
They have been busy re-writing climate history since 2010, that's for sure.
You don't have a source from before 2010?
Chicago was under ice for 30 million years, but you're the only one who knows???