Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
aww , bra lady had an accident , may she rest in peace . Course , the 12 year old little girl survived unscathed because of the gun that she had in her hand Brian .
You can't understand simple words but people are supposed to think that you can understand more complex issues? And this isn't even complex.No it doesn't.No, it makes them safer. You can't understand simple words.Read on, dummy. Easy access to firearms is not an indicator of safety for women.
Golly, the brain found a couple of cases of negligence so that demonstrates to the brain that no woman is safer with a gun.Like the woman who shot herself dead with the bra holster? Or maybe the one shot dead by her 2 year old?No, it makes them safer. You can't understand simple words.Read on, dummy. Easy access to firearms is not an indicator of safety for women.
I think I figured it out. The brain and lonesome want to be able to safely rape women.Do the women in those countries actually carry guns for self defense...it was only recently that our women started carrying guns in any real numbers....and guns are the most effective way to stop rape.Read on, dummy. Easy access to firearms is not an indicator of safety for women.That isn't what I said, and it wasn't complicated. You're an idiot.Hmmmmm. Women aren't safe unless they are carrying a firearm? Is that what we are to believe?
You can't understand simple words but people are supposed to think that you can understand more complex issues? And this isn't even complex.No it doesn't.No, it makes them safer. You can't understand simple words.Read on, dummy. Easy access to firearms is not an indicator of safety for women.
If a woman is armed she's going to have more opportunity to defend herself than one that isn't. The fact that you want to argue the point proves you're a dimwit.
Do your own homework, you stupid liar. I'm talking about reality, you're the one pretending it's a different environment. And you do it by dishonestly pretending the debate was what it would be like with no guns. A world we don't live in but even then a woman would be able to better defend herself. A normal 4 year old would run circles around you.You can't understand simple words but people are supposed to think that you can understand more complex issues? And this isn't even complex.No it doesn't.No, it makes them safer. You can't understand simple words.Read on, dummy. Easy access to firearms is not an indicator of safety for women.
If a woman is armed she's going to have more opportunity to defend herself than one that isn't. The fact that you want to argue the point proves you're a dimwit.
Like talking to a 4 year old.
I'm not discussing one of the imaginary self defense scenarios that you and your nutter pals love to hang your hats on. You dummies think women are safer in places with lots of guns. It's a retarded thing to think......and you actually say it out loud.
The idea that easy access to guns is the path to a reduction in rape crimes is not supported by the facts. Do some research.
You can't understand simple words but people are supposed to think that you can understand more complex issues? And this isn't even complex.No it doesn't.No, it makes them safer. You can't understand simple words.Read on, dummy. Easy access to firearms is not an indicator of safety for women.
If a woman is armed she's going to have more opportunity to defend herself than one that isn't. The fact that you want to argue the point proves you're a dimwit.
Like talking to a 4 year old.
I'm not discussing one of the imaginary self defense scenarios that you and your nutter pals love to hang your hats on. You dummies think women are safer in places with lots of guns. It's a retarded thing to think......and you actually say it out loud.
The idea that easy access to guns is the path to a reduction in rape crimes is not supported by the facts. Do some research.
A woman using a gun is less likely to be raped and more likely to not be injured during the attack....
However, most recent studies with improved methodology are consistently showing that the more forceful the resistance, the lower the risk of a completed rape, with no increase in physical injury. Sarah Ullman's original research (Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1998) and critical review of past studies (Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1997) are especially valuable in solidifying this conclusion.
I wish to single out one particular subtype of physical resistance: Use of a weapon, and especially a firearm, is statistically a woman's best means of resistance, greatly enhancing her odds of escaping both rape and injury, compared to any other strategy of physical or verbal resistance. This conclusion is drawn from four types of information.
First, a 1989 study (Furby, Journal of Interpersonal Violence) found that both male and female survey respondents judged a gun to be the most effective means that a potential rape victim could use to fend off the assault. Rape "experts" considered it a close second, after eye-gouging.
Second, raw data from the 1979-1985 installments of the Justice Department's annual National Crime Victim Survey show that when a woman resists a stranger rape with a gun, the probability of completion was 0.1 percent and of victim injury 0.0 percent, compared to 31 percent and 40 percent, respectively, for all stranger rapes (Kleck, Social Problems, 1990).
Third, a recent paper (Southwick, Journal of Criminal Justice, 2000) analyzed victim resistance to violent crimes generally, with robbery, aggravated assault and rape considered together. Women who resisted with a gun were 2.5 times more likely to escape without injury than those who did not resist and 4 times more likely to escape uninjured than those who resisted with any means other than a gun. Similarly, their property losses in a robbery were reduced more than six-fold and almost three-fold, respectively, compared to the other categories of resistance strategy.
Fourth, we have two studies in the last 20 years that directly address the outcomes of women who resist attempted rape with a weapon. (Lizotte, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1986; Kleck, Social Problems, 1990.) The former concludes,"Further, women who resist rape with a gun or knife dramatically decrease their probability of completion." (Lizotte did not analyze victim injuries apart from the rape itself.) The latter concludes that "resistance with a gun or knife is the most effective form of resistance for preventing completion of a rape"; this is accomplished "without creating any significant additional risk of other injury."
The best conclusion from available scientific data, then, is when avoidance of rape has failed and one must choose between being raped and resisting, a woman's best option is to resist with a gun in her hands.
Idiots.
Idiots.
Ah....great retort........when faced with actual research....call the other side idiots...do you lefties go to school to learn that debate technique....?
I would think the U.S.....completely different culture...they also have less crime in general...they are very reverent of the State and police....the conviction rate for crimes over there is over 90% and they can stop and search you or your home whenever they want.....also, they can coerce confessions without penalty....
So...different culture.....
I would think the U.S.....completely different culture...they also have less crime in general...they are very reverent of the State and police....the conviction rate for crimes over there is over 90% and they can stop and search you or your home whenever they want.....also, they can coerce confessions without penalty....
So...different culture.....
Who told you that shit?
I would think the U.S.....completely different culture...they also have less crime in general...they are very reverent of the State and police....the conviction rate for crimes over there is over 90% and they can stop and search you or your home whenever they want.....also, they can coerce confessions without penalty....
So...different culture.....
Who told you that shit?
Well...this guy...who actually researched Japanese gun control and police methods....
Japan Gun Control and People Control
I would think the U.S.....completely different culture...they also have less crime in general...they are very reverent of the State and police....the conviction rate for crimes over there is over 90% and they can stop and search you or your home whenever they want.....also, they can coerce confessions without penalty....
So...different culture.....
Who told you that shit?
Well...this guy...who actually researched Japanese gun control and police methods....
Japan Gun Control and People Control
That guy is a hack. His understanding of Japanese culture is secondary to his desire to promote lenient gun laws. You should read his words with that understanding.
The research that I presented isn't soiled by ideology. You should seek out information that doesn't begin with a conclusion.
This isn't Japan, limpdick. Any woman walking around pretending she's in Japan is just as stupid as you are.Idiots.
Ah....great retort........when faced with actual research....call the other side idiots...do you lefties go to school to learn that debate technique....?
Where are more women raped per capita.....the USA or Japan?
I would think the U.S.....completely different culture...they also have less crime in general...they are very reverent of the State and police....the conviction rate for crimes over there is over 90% and they can stop and search you or your home whenever they want.....also, they can coerce confessions without penalty....
So...different culture.....
Who told you that shit?
Well...this guy...who actually researched Japanese gun control and police methods....
Japan Gun Control and People Control
That guy is a hack. His understanding of Japanese culture is secondary to his desire to promote lenient gun laws. You should read his words with that understanding.
The research that I presented isn't soiled by ideology. You should seek out information that doesn't begin with a conclusion.
yeah...it is....it is anti gun nuttery concealed as research....