Harry Reid Calls Bundy Supporters 'Domestic Terrorists'

[jasonnfree]

Bundy supporters took up sniper positions on a bridge and aimed their military assault weapons at officers of the law.

You bet they are terrorists.

one more thing dumbass..,

==============THE TRUTH ABOUT ASSAULT WEAPONS==============

The Truth About Assault Weapons

read my tag line......, or you can remain stupid like every fucking liarberal who calls a semi-auto an "assault weapon", an AR-15 is a semi-auto sporting rifle as is any other SEMI-AUTO loading rifle

Can you prove that none of these people had fully automatic weapons? I mean, they don't believe in the rule of law, why would they obey something as trivial as the distinction between semi-auto and full auto?

If they have the mentality of some that post on this board, some of those weapons were probably full auto.

 

[Camp]

If some Muslims or heck, some black folks, decide to hold a demonstration or protest rally, would it be OK for them to have people with scoped hunting rifles on top of building pointing their weapons at the cops just in case the cops got bossy or misbehaved?

 

[Wildman]

Well, there is a difference. The feds represent the law.

and so do the citizens who are using the Constitution as their RIGHT to dissent.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Think about terrorism for a minute. Who was the terrorist when armed members of the federal government shot Bundy's prize bulls, tore down his fences, destroyed his water tanks and killed a substantial number of cattle while rounding them up during the birthing season on horseback and with helicopters? It was more reminiscent of the old Indian raids where the federal government forced Indians off their land for one reason or another. The show of force by the government was intended to terrorize. What changed in the area since the Bundy's settled there in the 1800's? Nothing except the rules.

The rules (laws) that Bundy agreed to abide by but then changed his mind.

Can YOU get away with getting a driver's license by agreeing to abide by the laws and then driving on the sidewalk because you changed your mind?

And, if you go to court, TWICE, and the judge finds you guilty of breaking the laws you agreed to, do you then get to shoot at anyone who tries to stop you from driving on the sidewalk?

 

[Howey]

If some Muslims or heck, some black folks, decide to hold a demonstration or protest rally, would it be OK for them to have people with scoped hunting rifles on top of building pointing their weapons at the cops just in case the cops got bossy or misbehaved?

Of course they'll say that's totally different.

 

[Howey]

Well, there is a difference. The feds represent the law.

and so do the citizens who are using the Constitution as their RIGHT to dissent.

Nobody said they don't have a right to dissent.

However, they do not have a right to dissent by pointing a gun at law enforcement officers enforcing a law.

 

[Wildman]

one more thing dumbass..,

==============THE TRUTH ABOUT ASSAULT WEAPONS==============

The Truth About Assault Weapons

read my tag line......, or you can remain stupid like every fucking liarberal who calls a semi-auto an "assault weapon", an AR-15 is a semi-auto sporting rifle as is any other SEMI-AUTO loading rifle

Can you prove that none of these people had fully automatic weapons? I mean, they don't believe in the rule of law, why would they obey something as trivial as the distinction between semi-auto and full auto?

If they have the mentality of some that post on this board, some of those weapons were probably full auto.

we can go back and forth on this for eternity, but.., most of the privately owned firearms "probably" were NOT select fire weapons. i seriously doubt there were any select fire rifles in the hands of citizens, it was the feds who held all the full auto weapons.., is that clear now ?

 

[BlindBoo]

Can you prove that none of these people had fully automatic weapons? I mean, they don't believe in the rule of law, why would they obey something as trivial as the distinction between semi-auto and full auto?

If they have the mentality of some that post on this board, some of those weapons were probably full auto.

we can go back and forth on this for eternity, but.., most of the privately owned firearms "probably" were NOT select fire weapons. i seriously doubt there were any select fire rifles in the hands of citizens, it was the feds who held all the full auto weapons.., is that clear now ?

As to the Second Amendment you have in your Sig:

"The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;

So I'm thinking the armed militants who threaten violence against federal agents, carrying out a federal court order, on federal lands, are not part of the Militia as described in the US Constitution.

 

[bodecea]

[youtube]sTxdYhSIIvY[/youtube]

Where'e that solar plant, again?

 

[Theowl32]

Liberals....left wing voting people are so fucking easy to lie to that they actually think this about tortoises.

They are such fucking hypocrites, they have not made the connections between Harvey Whitmore, campaign donations (illegal), and not to mention precious metals China connections.

Not that any of these hypocritical obama squishpots care. They love and trust their crooks and just move to the lefty script.

 

[bodecea]

Reid and the libs call anyone who don't agree with them terrorists.

Nothing new here. It's just what leftist scum say all the time.

Where the hell is Reid during the crisis.............Where was he at as the Fed owns over 81.1% of Nevada's land..............Perhaps he was at a Communist rally telling everyone how good Gov't is today.

Over cows, the feds bring in 200 feds...................Their power will not be opposed. You will be assimulated.

That's not true at all.

If you use violence..or the threat of violence to further a political agenda?

That's terrorism.

No, it's called doing what our founding fathers expect us to have done. But sooner. We are failing miserably in getting our house in order

-Geaux

Ah...so supporting a free-loader who refused to pay his bills for 20 years is like our Nations' Founders.....ooooookaaaay.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

That's not true at all.

If you use violence..or the threat of violence to further a political agenda?

That's terrorism.

No, it's called doing what our founding fathers expect us to have done. But sooner. We are failing miserably in getting our house in order

-Geaux

Ah...so supporting a free-loader who refused to pay his bills for 20 years is like our Nations' Founders.....ooooookaaaay.

Well sure - because rw's can pick and choose which laws and which contracts they'll abide by.

And, by gawd, they think the US gumt and US military should back them up.

 

[Erand7899]

Reid and the libs call anyone who don't agree with them terrorists.

Nothing new here. It's just what leftist scum say all the time.

Where the hell is Reid during the crisis.............Where was he at as the Fed owns over 81.1% of Nevada's land..............Perhaps he was at a Communist rally telling everyone how good Gov't is today.

Over cows, the feds bring in 200 feds...................Their power will not be opposed. You will be assimulated.

That's not true at all.

If you use violence..or the threat of violence to further a political agenda?


That's terrorism.

Then, you are stating that all those armed federal agents were terrorists?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Reid and the libs call anyone who don't agree with them terrorists.

Nothing new here. It's just what leftist scum say all the time.

Where the hell is Reid during the crisis.............Where was he at as the Fed owns over 81.1% of Nevada's land..............Perhaps he was at a Communist rally telling everyone how good Gov't is today.

Over cows, the feds bring in 200 feds...................Their power will not be opposed. You will be assimulated.

That's not true at all.

If you use violence..or the threat of violence to further a political agenda?


That's terrorism.

Then, you are stating that all those armed federal agents were terrorists?

For upholding the law that Bundy previously agreed to abide by.

 

[peach174]

No, it's called doing what our founding fathers expect us to have done. But sooner. We are failing miserably in getting our house in order

-Geaux

Ah...so supporting a free-loader who refused to pay his bills for 20 years is like our Nations' Founders.....ooooookaaaay.

Well sure - because rw's can pick and choose which laws and which contracts they'll abide by.

And, by gawd, they think the US gumt and US military should back them up.

Our Federal Government is the one who is picking and choosing which laws and contracts they abide by.

When the Federal Government becomes lawless the people no longer follow the laws either.

 

[nodoginnafight]

Harry Reid Calls Bundy Supporters 'Domestic Terrorists'

Some of them are - all of them are not

 

[Erand7899]

You can lead a horse to water..

Oh brother.

Dunno what to tell you.

You are like the guy standing at the flank of an elephant that says "What elephant? All I see is gray".

It may not be entirely your fault.

The United States Federal government is huge and it does a lot of things.

Things most people take for granted.

I'll give you a hint.

Open your wallet. Pull out a bill.

The government made that.

True Story!

Here's that clue that you have been looking for. We have many governments, they are not all created equal, and they are not some amalgamated mass.

The federal government does not build all of our roads and bridges, not all of our infrastructure, nor does it supply our electricity and water. The federal government does not supply our police and firefighters, fill our potholes, or build our sidewalks.

 

[Erand7899]

I love how this has gotten the Right to throw not just the Constitution overboard, but also the very idea of a federal government.

The madness of crowds is a very enjoyable spectacle to witness...

...and to think these are the same people who will tell you tomorrow they want the federal government's authority to ban all abortion and define marriage as one man one woman.

lol. It's more satirical comedy being played out in real life.

Your logic is comedy. Your idea of the federal government is not everyone's idea of the federal government, and therefore, negatng your dumbass idea of what the federal government should be, is not throwing away the very idea of a federal government.

But, that is why we consider you loons to be low infomation voters.

 

[peach174]

Reid and the libs call anyone who don't agree with them terrorists.

Nothing new here. It's just what leftist scum say all the time.

Where the hell is Reid during the crisis.............Where was he at as the Fed owns over 81.1% of Nevada's land..............Perhaps he was at a Communist rally telling everyone how good Gov't is today.

Over cows, the feds bring in 200 feds...................Their power will not be opposed. You will be assimulated.

That's not true at all.

If you use violence..or the threat of violence to further a political agenda?

That's terrorism.

When were they violent or threated violence?
The State Militias that showed up are legal and they never pointed their guns at anyone.

Unlike the left who have used violence like blowing up public buildings. This is what is called Terrorists.

Not organized legal State Militias who were there to stop the abuse of a Federal Department.

 

[peach174]

Reid and the libs call anyone who don't agree with them terrorists.

Nothing new here. It's just what leftist scum say all the time.

Where the hell is Reid during the crisis.............Where was he at as the Fed owns over 81.1% of Nevada's land..............Perhaps he was at a Communist rally telling everyone how good Gov't is today.

Over cows, the feds bring in 200 feds...................Their power will not be opposed. You will be assimulated.

That's not true at all.

If you use violence..or the threat of violence to further a political agenda?

That's terrorism.

What political agenda Sallow?
This is about the abuse of a Federal Department that should concern all Americans no matter what your political affiliate is.