Harvard Economist: Immigration Costs US Workers $500 Billion A Year

How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.

More Canadian math?

The 2015 US workers income was $15T. So $500B is what percent?

Where do you think he got his math wrong?

Where do you think he got his math wrong?

I don't 'think' he got his math wrong. What percentage of $15T is $500B? AND, is that an issue?
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.

More Canadian math?

The 2015 US workers income was $15T. So $500B is what percent?

Where do you think he got his math wrong?

Where do you think he got his math wrong?

I don't 'think' he got his math wrong. What percentage of $15T is $500B? AND, is that an issue?

Where did the percentage ever come up in the discussion?
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.
Your source is pretty well known as presenting misleading or plain false information. This linked article is no different. I'll just leave the link to the actual hearing (where this site pulled the soundbite from) here:

United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

If you want the short of it, if you are a minority or low-skilled / educated worker (basically you are an idiot and poor), then you actually should fight tooth and nail against this influx of immigrants. You are directly suffering as a result of them. On the other hand, if you have skills or education then you actually should be a fan of keeping the borders open, and perhaps opening them even more.

To address the direct misleading information displayed here: Immigration adversely affects the workers with whom immigrants compete...typically lower skilled, uneducated workers (think your burger flippers or construction guys). EVERYBODY else benefits from them. The redistribution isn't from workers to businesses, it is from lower skilled workers to everybody else. Now, this does increase our growing inequality gap which you may or may not have an issue with, but that is a debate for another time.

TLDR: If you are poor and uneducated (especially if you are a minority) you should vote Trump (to close borders). If you have an education and have some money you should fight as hard as you can against Trump and closing the borders.
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.
But bripat you say all the do is sit around and draw welfare ... if thats all they do then, how can the make over a half of trillion dollars a year if they are all on welfare ???
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.
Your source is pretty well known as presenting misleading or plain false information. This linked article is no different. I'll just leave the link to the actual hearing (where this site pulled the soundbite from) here:

United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

If you want the short of it, if you are a minority or low-skilled / educated worker (basically you are an idiot and poor), then you actually should fight tooth and nail against this influx of immigrants. You are directly suffering as a result of them. On the other hand, if you have skills or education then you actually should be a fan of keeping the borders open, and perhaps opening them even more.

To address the direct misleading information displayed here: Immigration adversely affects the workers with whom immigrants compete...typically lower skilled, uneducated workers (think your burger flippers or construction guys). EVERYBODY else benefits from them. The redistribution isn't from workers to businesses, it is from lower skilled workers to everybody else. Now, this does increase our growing inequality gap which you may or may not have an issue with, but that is a debate for another time.

TLDR: If you are poor and uneducated (especially if you are a minority) you should vote Trump (to close borders). If you have an education and have some money you should fight as hard as you can against Trump and closing the borders.
everything Bripat post is misleading thats all he know how to do ... he gets his local right wing nut job journalist source, then goes nuts, because Bripat doesn't research anything ...
 
....that money is what they call the result of govt fraud, waste, and abuse....
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.

More Canadian math?

The 2015 US workers income was $15T. So $500B is what percent?

Where do you think he got his math wrong?

Where do you think he got his math wrong?

I don't 'think' he got his math wrong. What percentage of $15T is $500B? AND, is that an issue?
now don't get bripat doing math he will lose it ... get a major head ache
 
What the Harvard economist is saying is that immigrants add $1.6 trillion to the US GDP every year. Most of that goes to the immigrants.

$400 billion goes to the native born population. And most of that goes to the employers and investors instead of the workers.

In short, immigrants are a net financial gain. Just not to the average worker. They are a net gain for the one percenters.

Immigration and the American Worker

Yes redistributing to the wealthy. They benefit from cheaper labor.
They benefit from not paying the American without a high school diploma as little as possible. That's who the economist says is being harmed the most. You know...those people the Right scorns for asking for a higher minimum wage.

Those are the people the economist says are being robbed.

Don't think it is just the lowest paid, includes guest workers. Those are often better paying jobs.
Read the link. I even quoted him: "Immigration has its largest negative impact on the wage of native workers who lack a high school diploma".
Lack a high school diploma, aka Democrats
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.
But bripat you say all the do is sit around and draw welfare ... if thats all they do then, how can the make over a half of trillion dollars a year if they are all on welfare ???

When did I say that? Try debating what I've actually said rather than crap you make up.
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.
Your source is pretty well known as presenting misleading or plain false information. This linked article is no different. I'll just leave the link to the actual hearing (where this site pulled the soundbite from) here:

United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

If you want the short of it, if you are a minority or low-skilled / educated worker (basically you are an idiot and poor), then you actually should fight tooth and nail against this influx of immigrants. You are directly suffering as a result of them. On the other hand, if you have skills or education then you actually should be a fan of keeping the borders open, and perhaps opening them even more.

To address the direct misleading information displayed here: Immigration adversely affects the workers with whom immigrants compete...typically lower skilled, uneducated workers (think your burger flippers or construction guys). EVERYBODY else benefits from them. The redistribution isn't from workers to businesses, it is from lower skilled workers to everybody else. Now, this does increase our growing inequality gap which you may or may not have an issue with, but that is a debate for another time.

TLDR: If you are poor and uneducated (especially if you are a minority) you should vote Trump (to close borders). If you have an education and have some money you should fight as hard as you can against Trump and closing the borders.
everything Bripat post is misleading thats all he know how to do ... he gets his local right wing nut job journalist source, then goes nuts, because Bripat doesn't research anything ...

What a complete douche bag.
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.

More Canadian math?

The 2015 US workers income was $15T. So $500B is what percent?

Where do you think he got his math wrong?

Where do you think he got his math wrong?

I don't 'think' he got his math wrong. What percentage of $15T is $500B? AND, is that an issue?
now don't get bripat doing math he will lose it ... get a major head ache

What does math have to do with anything? When did this calculation become an issue in the discussion?
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.


No one who ever went to Harvard is saying that.

How stupid do you think we are?

How stupid are you not to read your own source and discover the lie.

Shit. Piece of.
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.


No one who ever went to Harvard is saying that.

How stupid do you think we are?

How stupid are you not to read your own source and discover the lie.

Shit. Piece of.

Where's the lie, douche bag?
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.


No one who ever went to Harvard is saying that.

How stupid do you think we are?

How stupid are you not to read your own source and discover the lie.

Shit. Piece of.

Where's the lie, douche bag?
You must have missed my previous post. Don't worry I'll help you out:

Your source is pretty well known as presenting misleading or plain false information. This linked article is no different. I'll just leave the link to the actual hearing (where this site pulled the soundbite from) here:

United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

If you want the short of it, if you are a minority or low skilled/educated worker (basically you are an idiot and poor), then you actually should fight tooth and nail against this influx of immigrants. You are directly suffering as a result of them. On the other hand, if you have skills or education then you actually should be a fan of keeping the borders open, and perhaps opening them even more.

To address the direct misleading information displayed here: Immigration adversely affects the workers with whom immigrants compete...typically lower skilled, uneducated workers (think your burger flippers or construction guys). EVERYBODY else benefits from them. The redistribution isn't from workers to businesses, it is from lower skilled workers to everybody else. Now, this does increase our growing inequality gap which you may or may not have an issue with, but that is a debate for another time.

TLDR: If you are poor and uneducated (especially if you are a minority) you should vote Trump (to close borders). If you have an education and have some money you should fight as hard as you can against Trump and closing the borders.
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.


No one who ever went to Harvard is saying that.

How stupid do you think we are?

How stupid are you not to read your own source and discover the lie.

Shit. Piece of.

Where's the lie, douche bag?
You must have missed my previous post. Don't worry I'll help you out:

Your source is pretty well known as presenting misleading or plain false information. This linked article is no different. I'll just leave the link to the actual hearing (where this site pulled the soundbite from) here:

United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

If you want the short of it, if you are a minority or low skilled/educated worker (basically you are an idiot and poor), then you actually should fight tooth and nail against this influx of immigrants. You are directly suffering as a result of them. On the other hand, if you have skills or education then you actually should be a fan of keeping the borders open, and perhaps opening them even more.

To address the direct misleading information displayed here: Immigration adversely affects the workers with whom immigrants compete...typically lower skilled, uneducated workers (think your burger flippers or construction guys). EVERYBODY else benefits from them. The redistribution isn't from workers to businesses, it is from lower skilled workers to everybody else. Now, this does increase our growing inequality gap which you may or may not have an issue with, but that is a debate for another time.

TLDR: If you are poor and uneducated (especially if you are a minority) you should vote Trump (to close borders). If you have an education and have some money you should fight as hard as you can against Trump and closing the borders.

So you don't think the rich benefit more from really cheap labor? Would like to see some numbers on that.
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.


No one who ever went to Harvard is saying that.

How stupid do you think we are?

How stupid are you not to read your own source and discover the lie.

Shit. Piece of.

Where's the lie, douche bag?
You must have missed my previous post. Don't worry I'll help you out:

Your source is pretty well known as presenting misleading or plain false information. This linked article is no different. I'll just leave the link to the actual hearing (where this site pulled the soundbite from) here:

United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

If you want the short of it, if you are a minority or low skilled/educated worker (basically you are an idiot and poor), then you actually should fight tooth and nail against this influx of immigrants. You are directly suffering as a result of them. On the other hand, if you have skills or education then you actually should be a fan of keeping the borders open, and perhaps opening them even more.

To address the direct misleading information displayed here: Immigration adversely affects the workers with whom immigrants compete...typically lower skilled, uneducated workers (think your burger flippers or construction guys). EVERYBODY else benefits from them. The redistribution isn't from workers to businesses, it is from lower skilled workers to everybody else. Now, this does increase our growing inequality gap which you may or may not have an issue with, but that is a debate for another time.

TLDR: If you are poor and uneducated (especially if you are a minority) you should vote Trump (to close borders). If you have an education and have some money you should fight as hard as you can against Trump and closing the borders.

So you don't think the rich benefit more from really cheap labor? Would like to see some numbers on that.

The people who benefit are employers, and the illegal aliens themselves. The people who get fucked up the ass are American workers.
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.


No one who ever went to Harvard is saying that.

How stupid do you think we are?

How stupid are you not to read your own source and discover the lie.

Shit. Piece of.

Where's the lie, douche bag?
You must have missed my previous post. Don't worry I'll help you out:

Your source is pretty well known as presenting misleading or plain false information. This linked article is no different. I'll just leave the link to the actual hearing (where this site pulled the soundbite from) here:

United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

If you want the short of it, if you are a minority or low skilled/educated worker (basically you are an idiot and poor), then you actually should fight tooth and nail against this influx of immigrants. You are directly suffering as a result of them. On the other hand, if you have skills or education then you actually should be a fan of keeping the borders open, and perhaps opening them even more.

To address the direct misleading information displayed here: Immigration adversely affects the workers with whom immigrants compete...typically lower skilled, uneducated workers (think your burger flippers or construction guys). EVERYBODY else benefits from them. The redistribution isn't from workers to businesses, it is from lower skilled workers to everybody else. Now, this does increase our growing inequality gap which you may or may not have an issue with, but that is a debate for another time.

TLDR: If you are poor and uneducated (especially if you are a minority) you should vote Trump (to close borders). If you have an education and have some money you should fight as hard as you can against Trump and closing the borders.

So you don't think the rich benefit more from really cheap labor? Would like to see some numbers on that.

The people who benefit are employers, and the illegal aliens themselves. The people who get fucked up the ass are American workers.

It seems to fit our growing inequality.
 
It's far leftist thinking to believe that getting rid of immigrants would create more jobs. Immigrants are more entrepreneurial than native-born Americans and create millions of jobs.

Despite accounting for only about 13 percent of the population, immigrants now start more than a quarter of new businesses in this country. Fast-growing ones, too--more than 20 percent of the 2014 Inc. 500 CEOs are immigrants. Immigrant-owned businesses pay an estimated $126 billion in wages per year, employing 1 in 10 Americans who work for private companies. In 2010, immigrant-owned businesses generated more than $775 billion in sales. If immigrant America were a stock, you'd be an idiot not to buy it. ...

As much as high-tech entrepreneurs like Pinhas and Chertok need Silicon Valley, it needs them too. Indeed, without immigrants, there would be no Silicon Valley as we know it. In the '80s and '90s, the area attracted more foreign-born scientists and engineers than any other part of the country; by 2000, 53 percent of the Valley's science and engineering work force was foreign-born. Immigrant founders started 52 percent of new Silicon Valley companies between 1995 and 2005. And in 2012, immigrant-founded engineering and technology companies in the U.S.--heavily clustered in California--employed 560,000 workers and generated $63 billion in sales.​

The Most Entrepreneurial Group in America Wasn't Born in America
 
How can anyone honestly claim immigration doesn't harm American workers if data like that is accurate?


Immigration effectively redistributes half a trillion dollars from U.S. workers to the businesses that hire immigrants each year, Harvard economist and immigration and wages expert George Borjas testified before Congress Wednesday.


No one who ever went to Harvard is saying that.

How stupid do you think we are?

How stupid are you not to read your own source and discover the lie.

Shit. Piece of.

Where's the lie, douche bag?
You must have missed my previous post. Don't worry I'll help you out:

Your source is pretty well known as presenting misleading or plain false information. This linked article is no different. I'll just leave the link to the actual hearing (where this site pulled the soundbite from) here:

United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

If you want the short of it, if you are a minority or low skilled/educated worker (basically you are an idiot and poor), then you actually should fight tooth and nail against this influx of immigrants. You are directly suffering as a result of them. On the other hand, if you have skills or education then you actually should be a fan of keeping the borders open, and perhaps opening them even more.

To address the direct misleading information displayed here: Immigration adversely affects the workers with whom immigrants compete...typically lower skilled, uneducated workers (think your burger flippers or construction guys). EVERYBODY else benefits from them. The redistribution isn't from workers to businesses, it is from lower skilled workers to everybody else. Now, this does increase our growing inequality gap which you may or may not have an issue with, but that is a debate for another time.

TLDR: If you are poor and uneducated (especially if you are a minority) you should vote Trump (to close borders). If you have an education and have some money you should fight as hard as you can against Trump and closing the borders.

So you don't think the rich benefit more from really cheap labor? Would like to see some numbers on that.
I already did. Did you really not follow the link I provided?
 

Forum List

Back
Top