Has The Curtain Finally Been Pulled Back On Candidate Trump?

[easyt65]

A majority of Americans SNOWFLAKES have always known Trump to be a con man and unfit to be president.

There, I fixed it for you....

 

[jbrownson0831]

Anxious Democrats imagine Donald Trump as a political Houdini—a genius at escaping the most dire political straits. Somehow, they fear, he will summon serial October surprises beyond the capacity of lesser mortals.

Rubbish.

In truth, Trump is America’s ersatz Wizard of Oz—a one-trick faux populist with deep but finite appeal who, in 2016, filled the mother of inside straights. By 2018, he had squandered his winnings. In 2020, he’s become the little man behind the curtain, brutally exposed by his own incompetence and instability.

Trump is the Wizard of Oz—Only Nuts

The last ten days have shone a bright light on his selfish, erratic, irrational behavior.

thebulwark.com

After the interviews with the rightwing vomit machines this week, even they threw up in their mouths a little bit.

Yes, the curtain has been pulled back, and the President does NOT wear a diaper like the Democrat candidate.

 

[Seawytch]

What it means about America, is we ain't buy'n the commie shit you're sell'n.

What communist proposals am I advocating?

Go ahead. Back up your ignorant words.

Try every screwed up thing that would happen with a Trump defeat.

Govt take over of the health care system.
Open borders
Early indoctrination of children
Shit like the 1619 project
Green raw deal

I could go on, but you're not worth the effort

.

You guys said that when Obama was elected, that there was going to be a government takeover of healthcare. That never materialized. Hell, we didn't even get a public option out of the deal.

What action taken by Democrats leads you to believe that "open borders" is even a thing? What laws have they attempted to pass? Did Obama "open the borders" ? Why was Obama called "the deporter in chief"?

Indoctrination into what, education?

What's your issue with the 1619 project? What is wrong with learning about the contributions made by slaves to America?

I'm not even going to bother with the Green New Deal. You flat earthers don't recognize the issue of climate change so why would you bother with solutions.

You didn't get a public option only because there were a few moderate dems in the congress at the time. Those moderates have since been expunged from the party.

You got the wrong party, pumpkin, that's kicking out moderates. The Democrats still have plenty, Republicans have none.

But the country has shifted quite a bit since the ACA was first introduced. None of the GOP lies about it came true and it gained in popularity. (Just like Nancy Pelosi said in that speech Republicans try to mischaracterize) Maybe we actually will get a public option. Here's hoping.

I know you commies have no problem with schools being the government halls of indoctrination, but I disagree that pushing 3 year olds into those halls is a good thing. They are not mature enough to understand the structure of schools or reject the propaganda being pushed by many so called educators.

Pre-K won't be mandatory, dolt. Waiting for specifics on this "indoctrination" ...unless you actually believe education is "indoctrination" .

Pre-K: Decades Worth Of Studies, One Strong Message

What happens when a group of the nation's leading pre-K experts get together to lay out a blueprint for what parents, and educators, can learn from decades of research?

www.npr.org

Some of the nation's top researchers who've spent their careers studying early childhood education recently got together in Washington with one goal in mind: to cut through the fog of studies and the endless debates over the benefits of preschool.​

​

They came away with one clear, strong message: Kids who attend public preschool programs are better prepared for kindergarten than kids who don't.​

Even the author of the 1619 project has admitted that it is not historically accurate. But I see you have no problem teaching lies to American students.

Why are all of your posts so devoid of links to support your assertions?

Even if your claim is true, do you care as deeply about schools that teach "intelligent design"?

And of course you will never admit the hubris of the commies thinking man can alter the natural cycles of the earth. That would be having to admit that the all powerful government god you serve, isn't really all powerful.

Of course man is contributing to the changing climate. To ignore it is just silly at this point. Flat earthers. Not worth discussing the roundness of the earth with you. You think you're going to fall off the edge and no amount of fact will deter you. It's what helps make the perfect Trump psychophant.

Really, name a commie moderate in congress. Joe Mansion is the only one that I can think of the was once. Not so much now, he's been towing the party line lately.

The majority of them are moderate. Very few are Bernie Sanders or AOC.

The ACA was unconstitutional the day it was passed and no amount of popularity will make it constitutional. If you bothered to actually read the decision you would know the acrobatics the Roberts court went through to uphold the law. He invented a tax that was not contained in the law, he severed portions they found unconstitutional, even though there was no severance clause in the law that would allow him to do so. Then in subsequent decisions he invented congressional intent, that was not expressed in the law, in fact the law read the opposite of his decision and forced the congress to fund portions of the law, even though congress refused to provide those funds in the legislative process. You have proven you don't want a court that follows the law and the Constitution, but a super legislature that will fulfill your wish list. And you will try to destroy anyone who doesn't share you views.

And yet it WAS, in fact, found to be Constitutional. You can parrot whatever talking points make you feel warm and fuzzy, but it was found to be constitutional. And despite the Trump administration waiving the penalty tax (that was found to be Constitutional) millions continue to sign up for the popular ACA plans.

You couldn't destroy it legislatively so now you want the court to do it for you. Such hypocrisy.

You also can pretend that pre K is not mandatory, but tell me the average American family won't choose to send their child to a free pre K over paying for child care. Besides getting people free child care, the intent is getting children in school at the earliest possible age so the commies at the NEA can get their hooks in them and replace the parents roll in early development. BTW kindergarten was designed to prepare children for first grade at an age where they were mature enough to adapt to what was usually a half day in the schoolhouse.

You don't care that it won't be mandatory, people will like it and therefore it's bad.

Pre-K is good for the children, especially disadvantaged children. The rest of your paragraph is tinfoil nonsense.

As for the 1619 project, there have been threads on it showing where the author of the project admitted it wasn't based in true history. If you are incapable of paying attention to what has been posted in this forum, perhaps you should google the topic to cure your ignorance.

Again, so what? Curriculum based around the concept doesn't have to be. Why are you opposed to learning the history of America as it relates to slavery? You also didn't answer the question as to whether you show as much concern with schools that teach intelligent design.

And you are correct, you're not worth a discussion about what was once :global cooling" (mini ice age), changed to "global warming", changed to what has been occurring throughout the history of the earth, "climate change". Funny no matter the iteration, the solutions are always the same, more government control from your government god and less freedom for America.

What is happening now with the planet is not it's natural cycle, but a flat earther wouldn't understand. Careful you don't fall off the edge!!!!

Hey stupid, America didn't exist in 1619, and you don't teach curricula around a known false concept. Also intelligent design is just as credible as the "big bang theory". I have yet to have one of you commies explain what caused the big bang to occur in an otherwise stable nothingness? Was all the matter in all the galaxies just one giant ball that suddenly hiccuped. Also, if man evolved from apes, why are there still apes? So many questions, sooooo little proof.

.

The land existed. Schools teach about the "discovery" of America and the people that fled here. What's wrong with also teaching about the slaves they brought that were essential to the actual founding of this country? These things actually happened.

So I was right. You are fine with actual unsupported bovine excrement, but some factual inaccuracies regarding slaves....ooh, that gets you hot and bothered.

Poor little commie, when those inaccuracies are intentional to push a political agenda, hell yes I object. If you had an ounce of intellectual honesty you would as well.

.

You have zero proof that curriculum based on the concept of the 1619 project would be historically inaccurate.

You mean other than the author of it admitted it?

.

That was her piece that contained inaccuracies not the curriculum based on her concept.

Proof? Your opinion isn't worth much.

.

I can't prove a negative. You must provide proof that curriculum based on the author's concept of following slavery from the founding to freedom is historically inaccurate. Just because the author's piece was does not mean a history class based on her concept would be. You still haven't said why you are opposed to following the path and plight of slaves being brought to America. Why does that bother you?

It is beyond the height of hypocrisy to oppose actual factual history that might contain some inaccuracies, but fully support and embrace the teaching of "intelligent design" which has zero basis in fact or science. It's ridiculous even.

Poor little commie, actual factual history isn't actual or factual if it contains inaccuracies. I'm curious, why did you dodge my questions on the big bang theory?

.

Of course it is. And you still have zero proof that curriculum based on the concept of the 1619 project would be inaccurate. Since the original article is known to contain errors, history teachers would make the appropriate adjustments to curriculum.

The Big Bang model is supported by evidence

What Triggered the Big Bang? It's Complicated (Op-Ed)

The Big Bang is not a model of creation, but a theory that explains what we see of the universe's long history — without direct evidence, any predictions for time = 0 are more fantastical than fact, argues Paul Sutter.

www.space.com

Unlike “intelligent design”

 

[easyt65]

Would you rather have your life in the hands of the guy who stopped flights from the epicenter of the pandemic from coming to the US or the guy who politicized move, opposed it, called it 'Zenophobic', & said the virus was nothing to worry about?

Funny how many snowflakes will quickly respond by attacking the guy who actually acted to save their lives instead of the guy who said nothing should be done.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Anxious Democrats imagine Donald Trump as a political Houdini—a genius at escaping the most dire political straits. Somehow, they fear, he will summon serial October surprises beyond the capacity of lesser mortals.

Rubbish.

In truth, Trump is America’s ersatz Wizard of Oz—a one-trick faux populist with deep but finite appeal who, in 2016, filled the mother of inside straights. By 2018, he had squandered his winnings. In 2020, he’s become the little man behind the curtain, brutally exposed by his own incompetence and instability.

Trump is the Wizard of Oz—Only Nuts

The last ten days have shone a bright light on his selfish, erratic, irrational behavior.

thebulwark.com

After the interviews with the rightwing vomit machines this week, even they threw up in their mouths a little bit.

If Trump were to (again) lose the popular vote and (this time) the election, it would certainly be a good thing. '

The problem is that there are still so many who are willing to vote for him. We really need to examine this, what it means about the country, and what it also means about the Democrats.

It means that the Democrats suck 10 miles of donkey penis.

It means that the Democrats have sold out to the communists.

It means that Democrats like you have turned your head the other way while your entire party has been overthrown by Bolshevists.

It means you are the problem.

It'll be amusing to observe you Trumpsters if Biden wins, and I'm having my daily squabbles with the Regressive Lefties like I did when Obama was in office.

You probably "won't see" it.

If you are really taking on the leftist/Communists in your party, then I will give you an applause.

When you refuse to admit that BLM is a communist organization, I have my doubts. Get the point?

I don't give a shit about the group. They're just another reactionary organization that does more harm than good. Call them whatever you want, I don't support them.

You guys freak out over the dumbest stuff. You're missing the forest for the trees.

if you're telling me that I should not be alarmed by the complete Bolshevist effort that's been going on for decades and has heightened in the last six months then I truly believe you don't get it.

Otherwise, there's no reason to believe that you and I are not allies. I assume you want liberty. I assume you believe that any government action should be the least burdensome when it comes to individual rights. I assume you want to maximize the liberty of the people.

Am I wrong?

Nope. We just have different definitions of the terms.

And I think that two of the primary reasons that socialism (or call it whatever you want) is gaining in interest are (a) the Right has so overused the term that it no longer scares anyone (just like the Left has done with "racist") and (b) we have so badly misapplied capitalism that more people are looking for alternatives.

Perhaps we do disagree on terms. Perhaps I can convince you otherwise. Maybe these jackals will continue getting more bold and admit that they want government to take over the means of production. They won't admit it yet.

However, I agree that the terms are overused and that capitalism has been misapplied. Most of the misapplication of capitalism has been caused by government. A.k.a. crony capitalism.

 

[CowboyTed]

Anxious Democrats imagine Donald Trump as a political Houdini—a genius at escaping the most dire political straits. Somehow, they fear, he will summon serial October surprises beyond the capacity of lesser mortals.

Rubbish.

In truth, Trump is America’s ersatz Wizard of Oz—a one-trick faux populist with deep but finite appeal who, in 2016, filled the mother of inside straights. By 2018, he had squandered his winnings. In 2020, he’s become the little man behind the curtain, brutally exposed by his own incompetence and instability.

Trump is the Wizard of Oz—Only Nuts

The last ten days have shone a bright light on his selfish, erratic, irrational behavior.

thebulwark.com

After the interviews with the rightwing vomit machines this week, even they threw up in their mouths a little bit.

If Trump were to (again) lose the popular vote and (this time) the election, it would certainly be a good thing. '

The problem is that there are still so many who are willing to vote for him. We really need to examine this, what it means about the country, and what it also means about the Democrats.

Mac,

This is a very important point... Democrats say that GOP sells a utopia which when asked can not point to an example. There is no country in the world and no time in US History when GOP will say they want... The famous "Make a America Great Again' slogan is mute when faced with asking them when this time was when it was great before...
This is all helped by the Conservative Media which is more powerful and less honest. Local News is Conservative, Fox News and other publications... US Media by Global standards is Center Right with high tolerance for false information... Breitbart wouldn't get Press Creds in Europe and Fox News would be informed that there late night pundits are not acceptable for a News Channel and unless moved to another channel, Fox News would be struck from Press Corp. There is very little tolerance for organisations in Europe that misinform the public.

 

[Mac1958]

Anxious Democrats imagine Donald Trump as a political Houdini—a genius at escaping the most dire political straits. Somehow, they fear, he will summon serial October surprises beyond the capacity of lesser mortals.

Rubbish.

In truth, Trump is America’s ersatz Wizard of Oz—a one-trick faux populist with deep but finite appeal who, in 2016, filled the mother of inside straights. By 2018, he had squandered his winnings. In 2020, he’s become the little man behind the curtain, brutally exposed by his own incompetence and instability.

Trump is the Wizard of Oz—Only Nuts

The last ten days have shone a bright light on his selfish, erratic, irrational behavior.

thebulwark.com

After the interviews with the rightwing vomit machines this week, even they threw up in their mouths a little bit.

If Trump were to (again) lose the popular vote and (this time) the election, it would certainly be a good thing. '

The problem is that there are still so many who are willing to vote for him. We really need to examine this, what it means about the country, and what it also means about the Democrats.

It means that the Democrats suck 10 miles of donkey penis.

It means that the Democrats have sold out to the communists.

It means that Democrats like you have turned your head the other way while your entire party has been overthrown by Bolshevists.

It means you are the problem.

It'll be amusing to observe you Trumpsters if Biden wins, and I'm having my daily squabbles with the Regressive Lefties like I did when Obama was in office.

You probably "won't see" it.

If you are really taking on the leftist/Communists in your party, then I will give you an applause.

When you refuse to admit that BLM is a communist organization, I have my doubts. Get the point?

I don't give a shit about the group. They're just another reactionary organization that does more harm than good. Call them whatever you want, I don't support them.

You guys freak out over the dumbest stuff. You're missing the forest for the trees.

if you're telling me that I should not be alarmed by the complete Bolshevist effort that's been going on for decades and has heightened in the last six months then I truly believe you don't get it.

Otherwise, there's no reason to believe that you and I are not allies. I assume you want liberty. I assume you believe that any government action should be the least burdensome when it comes to individual rights. I assume you want to maximize the liberty of the people.

Am I wrong?

Nope. We just have different definitions of the terms.

And I think that two of the primary reasons that socialism (or call it whatever you want) is gaining in interest are (a) the Right has so overused the term that it no longer scares anyone (just like the Left has done with "racist") and (b) we have so badly misapplied capitalism that more people are looking for alternatives.

Perhaps we do disagree on terms. Perhaps I can convince you otherwise. Maybe these jackals will continue getting more bold and admit that they want government to take over the means of production. They won't admit it yet.

However, I agree that the terms are overused and that capitalism has been misapplied. Most of the misapplication of capitalism has been caused by government. A.k.a. crony capitalism.

I wonder about the same thing. I already know that if Biden wins I'll still be wrestling with them over PC, Identity Politics and Cancel Culture, and I may also be doing the same over capitalism. I'm afraid that wouldn't surprise me.

But right now, I think this country has a clear and present danger in the White House. First things first.

 

[Mac1958]

Anxious Democrats imagine Donald Trump as a political Houdini—a genius at escaping the most dire political straits. Somehow, they fear, he will summon serial October surprises beyond the capacity of lesser mortals.

Rubbish.

In truth, Trump is America’s ersatz Wizard of Oz—a one-trick faux populist with deep but finite appeal who, in 2016, filled the mother of inside straights. By 2018, he had squandered his winnings. In 2020, he’s become the little man behind the curtain, brutally exposed by his own incompetence and instability.

Trump is the Wizard of Oz—Only Nuts

The last ten days have shone a bright light on his selfish, erratic, irrational behavior.

thebulwark.com

After the interviews with the rightwing vomit machines this week, even they threw up in their mouths a little bit.

If Trump were to (again) lose the popular vote and (this time) the election, it would certainly be a good thing. '

The problem is that there are still so many who are willing to vote for him. We really need to examine this, what it means about the country, and what it also means about the Democrats.

Mac,

This is a very important point... Democrats say that GOP sells a utopia which when asked can not point to an example. There is no country in the world and no time in US History when GOP will say they want... The famous "Make a America Great Again' slogan is mute when faced with asking them when this time was when it was great before...
This is all helped by the Conservative Media which is more powerful and less honest. Local News is Conservative, Fox News and other publications... US Media by Global standards is Center Right with high tolerance for false information... Breitbart wouldn't get Press Creds in Europe and Fox News would be informed that there late night pundits are not acceptable for a News Channel and unless moved to another channel, Fox News would be struck from Press Corp. There is very little tolerance for organisations in Europe that misinform the public.

That's certainly a key element in our divisions. Who could have predicted that we'd end up with LITERALLY two competing realities? I have no idea what fixes this.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

But right now, I think this country has a clear and present danger in the White House. First things first.

Which is what? Convince me.

 

[Mac1958]

But right now, I think this country has a clear and present danger in the White House. First things first.

Which is what? Convince me.

I can't imagine that I can convince you. You know the arguments against Trump, I assume.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

This thread ignores 2018 happened. Trump was repudiated and the polls were right.

You have a very good point.

And Trump was on that ballot? Hint: Trump gets a lot of voters that don't vote generic republican......and I do vote straight GOP

This time around, you are voting straight Party of the Rump nationally. What you do locally may be different. I know I am voting primarily Republican locally. But those headed for Washington, I am NOT voting with the R next to their name because it's a lie. They need to have a (T) next to their name instead.

So wait why do you vote republican, pre Trump and locally?

It has to do with who does a good job. And our local Republicans do a pretty fair job around here. Why change horses.

And our local Republicans do a dreadful job, hence the warranted, non-partisan, opposition.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

But right now, I think this country has a clear and present danger in the White House. First things first.

Which is what? Convince me.

I can't imagine that I can convince you. You know the arguments against Trump, I assume.

I know quite a few bullshit arguments. I assume you don't buy into those nonsensical claims.

Trump is certainly not afraid to sign a huge spending bill into law. I have serious concerns about that.

He also banned bumpstocks which I couldn't care less about, but the principle is what concerns me; however Amy Coney Barrett is right of Scalia when it comes to gun rights, so I can let it slide for now.

I really wish he would kowtow less to the Jesus Nazis.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

What it means about America, is we ain't buy'n the commie shit you're sell'n.

What communist proposals am I advocating?

Go ahead. Back up your ignorant words.

Try every screwed up thing that would happen with a Trump defeat.

Govt take over of the health care system.
Open borders
Early indoctrination of children
Shit like the 1619 project
Green raw deal

I could go on, but you're not worth the effort

.

You guys said that when Obama was elected, that there was going to be a government takeover of healthcare. That never materialized. Hell, we didn't even get a public option out of the deal.

What action taken by Democrats leads you to believe that "open borders" is even a thing? What laws have they attempted to pass? Did Obama "open the borders" ? Why was Obama called "the deporter in chief"?

Indoctrination into what, education?

What's your issue with the 1619 project? What is wrong with learning about the contributions made by slaves to America?

I'm not even going to bother with the Green New Deal. You flat earthers don't recognize the issue of climate change so why would you bother with solutions.

You didn't get a public option only because there were a few moderate dems in the congress at the time. Those moderates have since been expunged from the party.

You got the wrong party, pumpkin, that's kicking out moderates. The Democrats still have plenty, Republicans have none.

But the country has shifted quite a bit since the ACA was first introduced. None of the GOP lies about it came true and it gained in popularity. (Just like Nancy Pelosi said in that speech Republicans try to mischaracterize) Maybe we actually will get a public option. Here's hoping.

I know you commies have no problem with schools being the government halls of indoctrination, but I disagree that pushing 3 year olds into those halls is a good thing. They are not mature enough to understand the structure of schools or reject the propaganda being pushed by many so called educators.

Pre-K won't be mandatory, dolt. Waiting for specifics on this "indoctrination" ...unless you actually believe education is "indoctrination" .

Pre-K: Decades Worth Of Studies, One Strong Message

What happens when a group of the nation's leading pre-K experts get together to lay out a blueprint for what parents, and educators, can learn from decades of research?

www.npr.org

Some of the nation's top researchers who've spent their careers studying early childhood education recently got together in Washington with one goal in mind: to cut through the fog of studies and the endless debates over the benefits of preschool.​

​

They came away with one clear, strong message: Kids who attend public preschool programs are better prepared for kindergarten than kids who don't.​

Even the author of the 1619 project has admitted that it is not historically accurate. But I see you have no problem teaching lies to American students.

Why are all of your posts so devoid of links to support your assertions?

Even if your claim is true, do you care as deeply about schools that teach "intelligent design"?

And of course you will never admit the hubris of the commies thinking man can alter the natural cycles of the earth. That would be having to admit that the all powerful government god you serve, isn't really all powerful.

Of course man is contributing to the changing climate. To ignore it is just silly at this point. Flat earthers. Not worth discussing the roundness of the earth with you. You think you're going to fall off the edge and no amount of fact will deter you. It's what helps make the perfect Trump psychophant.

Really, name a commie moderate in congress. Joe Mansion is the only one that I can think of the was once. Not so much now, he's been towing the party line lately.

The majority of them are moderate. Very few are Bernie Sanders or AOC.

The ACA was unconstitutional the day it was passed and no amount of popularity will make it constitutional. If you bothered to actually read the decision you would know the acrobatics the Roberts court went through to uphold the law. He invented a tax that was not contained in the law, he severed portions they found unconstitutional, even though there was no severance clause in the law that would allow him to do so. Then in subsequent decisions he invented congressional intent, that was not expressed in the law, in fact the law read the opposite of his decision and forced the congress to fund portions of the law, even though congress refused to provide those funds in the legislative process. You have proven you don't want a court that follows the law and the Constitution, but a super legislature that will fulfill your wish list. And you will try to destroy anyone who doesn't share you views.

And yet it WAS, in fact, found to be Constitutional. You can parrot whatever talking points make you feel warm and fuzzy, but it was found to be constitutional. And despite the Trump administration waiving the penalty tax (that was found to be Constitutional) millions continue to sign up for the popular ACA plans.

You couldn't destroy it legislatively so now you want the court to do it for you. Such hypocrisy.

You also can pretend that pre K is not mandatory, but tell me the average American family won't choose to send their child to a free pre K over paying for child care. Besides getting people free child care, the intent is getting children in school at the earliest possible age so the commies at the NEA can get their hooks in them and replace the parents roll in early development. BTW kindergarten was designed to prepare children for first grade at an age where they were mature enough to adapt to what was usually a half day in the schoolhouse.

You don't care that it won't be mandatory, people will like it and therefore it's bad.

Pre-K is good for the children, especially disadvantaged children. The rest of your paragraph is tinfoil nonsense.

As for the 1619 project, there have been threads on it showing where the author of the project admitted it wasn't based in true history. If you are incapable of paying attention to what has been posted in this forum, perhaps you should google the topic to cure your ignorance.

Again, so what? Curriculum based around the concept doesn't have to be. Why are you opposed to learning the history of America as it relates to slavery? You also didn't answer the question as to whether you show as much concern with schools that teach intelligent design.

And you are correct, you're not worth a discussion about what was once :global cooling" (mini ice age), changed to "global warming", changed to what has been occurring throughout the history of the earth, "climate change". Funny no matter the iteration, the solutions are always the same, more government control from your government god and less freedom for America.

What is happening now with the planet is not it's natural cycle, but a flat earther wouldn't understand. Careful you don't fall off the edge!!!!

Hey stupid, America didn't exist in 1619, and you don't teach curricula around a known false concept. Also intelligent design is just as credible as the "big bang theory". I have yet to have one of you commies explain what caused the big bang to occur in an otherwise stable nothingness? Was all the matter in all the galaxies just one giant ball that suddenly hiccuped. Also, if man evolved from apes, why are there still apes? So many questions, sooooo little proof.

.

The land existed. Schools teach about the "discovery" of America and the people that fled here. What's wrong with also teaching about the slaves they brought that were essential to the actual founding of this country? These things actually happened.

So I was right. You are fine with actual unsupported bovine excrement, but some factual inaccuracies regarding slaves....ooh, that gets you hot and bothered.

“What's wrong with also teaching about the slaves they brought that were essential to the actual founding of this country?”

It undermines the conservative, white grievance political narrative hostile to persons of color and immigrants.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

What it means about America, is we ain't buy'n the commie shit you're sell'n.

What communist proposals am I advocating?

Go ahead. Back up your ignorant words.

Try every screwed up thing that would happen with a Trump defeat.

Govt take over of the health care system.
Open borders
Early indoctrination of children
Shit like the 1619 project
Green raw deal

I could go on, but you're not worth the effort

.

You guys said that when Obama was elected, that there was going to be a government takeover of healthcare. That never materialized. Hell, we didn't even get a public option out of the deal.

What action taken by Democrats leads you to believe that "open borders" is even a thing? What laws have they attempted to pass? Did Obama "open the borders" ? Why was Obama called "the deporter in chief"?

Indoctrination into what, education?

What's your issue with the 1619 project? What is wrong with learning about the contributions made by slaves to America?

I'm not even going to bother with the Green New Deal. You flat earthers don't recognize the issue of climate change so why would you bother with solutions.

You didn't get a public option only because there were a few moderate dems in the congress at the time. Those moderates have since been expunged from the party.

You got the wrong party, pumpkin, that's kicking out moderates. The Democrats still have plenty, Republicans have none.

But the country has shifted quite a bit since the ACA was first introduced. None of the GOP lies about it came true and it gained in popularity. (Just like Nancy Pelosi said in that speech Republicans try to mischaracterize) Maybe we actually will get a public option. Here's hoping.

I know you commies have no problem with schools being the government halls of indoctrination, but I disagree that pushing 3 year olds into those halls is a good thing. They are not mature enough to understand the structure of schools or reject the propaganda being pushed by many so called educators.

Pre-K won't be mandatory, dolt. Waiting for specifics on this "indoctrination" ...unless you actually believe education is "indoctrination" .

Pre-K: Decades Worth Of Studies, One Strong Message

What happens when a group of the nation's leading pre-K experts get together to lay out a blueprint for what parents, and educators, can learn from decades of research?

www.npr.org

Some of the nation's top researchers who've spent their careers studying early childhood education recently got together in Washington with one goal in mind: to cut through the fog of studies and the endless debates over the benefits of preschool.​

​

They came away with one clear, strong message: Kids who attend public preschool programs are better prepared for kindergarten than kids who don't.​

Even the author of the 1619 project has admitted that it is not historically accurate. But I see you have no problem teaching lies to American students.

Why are all of your posts so devoid of links to support your assertions?

Even if your claim is true, do you care as deeply about schools that teach "intelligent design"?

And of course you will never admit the hubris of the commies thinking man can alter the natural cycles of the earth. That would be having to admit that the all powerful government god you serve, isn't really all powerful.

Of course man is contributing to the changing climate. To ignore it is just silly at this point. Flat earthers. Not worth discussing the roundness of the earth with you. You think you're going to fall off the edge and no amount of fact will deter you. It's what helps make the perfect Trump psychophant.

Really, name a commie moderate in congress. Joe Mansion is the only one that I can think of the was once. Not so much now, he's been towing the party line lately.

The majority of them are moderate. Very few are Bernie Sanders or AOC.

The ACA was unconstitutional the day it was passed and no amount of popularity will make it constitutional. If you bothered to actually read the decision you would know the acrobatics the Roberts court went through to uphold the law. He invented a tax that was not contained in the law, he severed portions they found unconstitutional, even though there was no severance clause in the law that would allow him to do so. Then in subsequent decisions he invented congressional intent, that was not expressed in the law, in fact the law read the opposite of his decision and forced the congress to fund portions of the law, even though congress refused to provide those funds in the legislative process. You have proven you don't want a court that follows the law and the Constitution, but a super legislature that will fulfill your wish list. And you will try to destroy anyone who doesn't share you views.

And yet it WAS, in fact, found to be Constitutional. You can parrot whatever talking points make you feel warm and fuzzy, but it was found to be constitutional. And despite the Trump administration waiving the penalty tax (that was found to be Constitutional) millions continue to sign up for the popular ACA plans.

You couldn't destroy it legislatively so now you want the court to do it for you. Such hypocrisy.

You also can pretend that pre K is not mandatory, but tell me the average American family won't choose to send their child to a free pre K over paying for child care. Besides getting people free child care, the intent is getting children in school at the earliest possible age so the commies at the NEA can get their hooks in them and replace the parents roll in early development. BTW kindergarten was designed to prepare children for first grade at an age where they were mature enough to adapt to what was usually a half day in the schoolhouse.

You don't care that it won't be mandatory, people will like it and therefore it's bad.

Pre-K is good for the children, especially disadvantaged children. The rest of your paragraph is tinfoil nonsense.

As for the 1619 project, there have been threads on it showing where the author of the project admitted it wasn't based in true history. If you are incapable of paying attention to what has been posted in this forum, perhaps you should google the topic to cure your ignorance.

Again, so what? Curriculum based around the concept doesn't have to be. Why are you opposed to learning the history of America as it relates to slavery? You also didn't answer the question as to whether you show as much concern with schools that teach intelligent design.

And you are correct, you're not worth a discussion about what was once :global cooling" (mini ice age), changed to "global warming", changed to what has been occurring throughout the history of the earth, "climate change". Funny no matter the iteration, the solutions are always the same, more government control from your government god and less freedom for America.

What is happening now with the planet is not it's natural cycle, but a flat earther wouldn't understand. Careful you don't fall off the edge!!!!

Hey stupid, America didn't exist in 1619, and you don't teach curricula around a known false concept. Also intelligent design is just as credible as the "big bang theory". I have yet to have one of you commies explain what caused the big bang to occur in an otherwise stable nothingness? Was all the matter in all the galaxies just one giant ball that suddenly hiccuped. Also, if man evolved from apes, why are there still apes? So many questions, sooooo little proof.

.

The land existed. Schools teach about the "discovery" of America and the people that fled here. What's wrong with also teaching about the slaves they brought that were essential to the actual founding of this country? These things actually happened.

So I was right. You are fine with actual unsupported bovine excrement, but some factual inaccuracies regarding slaves....ooh, that gets you hot and bothered.

Poor little commie, when those inaccuracies are intentional to push a political agenda, hell yes I object. If you had an ounce of intellectual honesty you would as well.

.

You have zero proof that curriculum based on the concept of the 1619 project would be historically inaccurate.

That the curriculum based on the concept of the 1619 project is accurate and factual is why there’s baseless rightwing opposition to that curriculum; a classic example of facts and the truth in conflict with wrongheaded conservative dogma.

 

[Billiejeens]

Oh brother....You nutbars must really want guys like me who drooped out years ago to go vote this time around.

View attachment 399838

Apparently, it's been too difficult up to now?

 

[OKTexas]

What it means about America, is we ain't buy'n the commie shit you're sell'n.

What communist proposals am I advocating?

Go ahead. Back up your ignorant words.

Try every screwed up thing that would happen with a Trump defeat.

Govt take over of the health care system.
Open borders
Early indoctrination of children
Shit like the 1619 project
Green raw deal

I could go on, but you're not worth the effort

.

You guys said that when Obama was elected, that there was going to be a government takeover of healthcare. That never materialized. Hell, we didn't even get a public option out of the deal.

What action taken by Democrats leads you to believe that "open borders" is even a thing? What laws have they attempted to pass? Did Obama "open the borders" ? Why was Obama called "the deporter in chief"?

Indoctrination into what, education?

What's your issue with the 1619 project? What is wrong with learning about the contributions made by slaves to America?

I'm not even going to bother with the Green New Deal. You flat earthers don't recognize the issue of climate change so why would you bother with solutions.

You didn't get a public option only because there were a few moderate dems in the congress at the time. Those moderates have since been expunged from the party.

You got the wrong party, pumpkin, that's kicking out moderates. The Democrats still have plenty, Republicans have none.

But the country has shifted quite a bit since the ACA was first introduced. None of the GOP lies about it came true and it gained in popularity. (Just like Nancy Pelosi said in that speech Republicans try to mischaracterize) Maybe we actually will get a public option. Here's hoping.

I know you commies have no problem with schools being the government halls of indoctrination, but I disagree that pushing 3 year olds into those halls is a good thing. They are not mature enough to understand the structure of schools or reject the propaganda being pushed by many so called educators.

Pre-K won't be mandatory, dolt. Waiting for specifics on this "indoctrination" ...unless you actually believe education is "indoctrination" .

Pre-K: Decades Worth Of Studies, One Strong Message

What happens when a group of the nation's leading pre-K experts get together to lay out a blueprint for what parents, and educators, can learn from decades of research?

www.npr.org

Some of the nation's top researchers who've spent their careers studying early childhood education recently got together in Washington with one goal in mind: to cut through the fog of studies and the endless debates over the benefits of preschool.​

​

They came away with one clear, strong message: Kids who attend public preschool programs are better prepared for kindergarten than kids who don't.​

Even the author of the 1619 project has admitted that it is not historically accurate. But I see you have no problem teaching lies to American students.

Why are all of your posts so devoid of links to support your assertions?

Even if your claim is true, do you care as deeply about schools that teach "intelligent design"?

And of course you will never admit the hubris of the commies thinking man can alter the natural cycles of the earth. That would be having to admit that the all powerful government god you serve, isn't really all powerful.

Of course man is contributing to the changing climate. To ignore it is just silly at this point. Flat earthers. Not worth discussing the roundness of the earth with you. You think you're going to fall off the edge and no amount of fact will deter you. It's what helps make the perfect Trump psychophant.

Really, name a commie moderate in congress. Joe Mansion is the only one that I can think of the was once. Not so much now, he's been towing the party line lately.

The majority of them are moderate. Very few are Bernie Sanders or AOC.

The ACA was unconstitutional the day it was passed and no amount of popularity will make it constitutional. If you bothered to actually read the decision you would know the acrobatics the Roberts court went through to uphold the law. He invented a tax that was not contained in the law, he severed portions they found unconstitutional, even though there was no severance clause in the law that would allow him to do so. Then in subsequent decisions he invented congressional intent, that was not expressed in the law, in fact the law read the opposite of his decision and forced the congress to fund portions of the law, even though congress refused to provide those funds in the legislative process. You have proven you don't want a court that follows the law and the Constitution, but a super legislature that will fulfill your wish list. And you will try to destroy anyone who doesn't share you views.

And yet it WAS, in fact, found to be Constitutional. You can parrot whatever talking points make you feel warm and fuzzy, but it was found to be constitutional. And despite the Trump administration waiving the penalty tax (that was found to be Constitutional) millions continue to sign up for the popular ACA plans.

You couldn't destroy it legislatively so now you want the court to do it for you. Such hypocrisy.

You also can pretend that pre K is not mandatory, but tell me the average American family won't choose to send their child to a free pre K over paying for child care. Besides getting people free child care, the intent is getting children in school at the earliest possible age so the commies at the NEA can get their hooks in them and replace the parents roll in early development. BTW kindergarten was designed to prepare children for first grade at an age where they were mature enough to adapt to what was usually a half day in the schoolhouse.

You don't care that it won't be mandatory, people will like it and therefore it's bad.

Pre-K is good for the children, especially disadvantaged children. The rest of your paragraph is tinfoil nonsense.

As for the 1619 project, there have been threads on it showing where the author of the project admitted it wasn't based in true history. If you are incapable of paying attention to what has been posted in this forum, perhaps you should google the topic to cure your ignorance.

Again, so what? Curriculum based around the concept doesn't have to be. Why are you opposed to learning the history of America as it relates to slavery? You also didn't answer the question as to whether you show as much concern with schools that teach intelligent design.

And you are correct, you're not worth a discussion about what was once :global cooling" (mini ice age), changed to "global warming", changed to what has been occurring throughout the history of the earth, "climate change". Funny no matter the iteration, the solutions are always the same, more government control from your government god and less freedom for America.

What is happening now with the planet is not it's natural cycle, but a flat earther wouldn't understand. Careful you don't fall off the edge!!!!

Hey stupid, America didn't exist in 1619, and you don't teach curricula around a known false concept. Also intelligent design is just as credible as the "big bang theory". I have yet to have one of you commies explain what caused the big bang to occur in an otherwise stable nothingness? Was all the matter in all the galaxies just one giant ball that suddenly hiccuped. Also, if man evolved from apes, why are there still apes? So many questions, sooooo little proof.

.

The land existed. Schools teach about the "discovery" of America and the people that fled here. What's wrong with also teaching about the slaves they brought that were essential to the actual founding of this country? These things actually happened.

So I was right. You are fine with actual unsupported bovine excrement, but some factual inaccuracies regarding slaves....ooh, that gets you hot and bothered.

Poor little commie, when those inaccuracies are intentional to push a political agenda, hell yes I object. If you had an ounce of intellectual honesty you would as well.

.

You have zero proof that curriculum based on the concept of the 1619 project would be historically inaccurate.

You mean other than the author of it admitted it?

.

That was her piece that contained inaccuracies not the curriculum based on her concept.

Proof? Your opinion isn't worth much.

.

I can't prove a negative. You must provide proof that curriculum based on the author's concept of following slavery from the founding to freedom is historically inaccurate. Just because the author's piece was does not mean a history class based on her concept would be. You still haven't said why you are opposed to following the path and plight of slaves being brought to America. Why does that bother you?

It is beyond the height of hypocrisy to oppose actual factual history that might contain some inaccuracies, but fully support and embrace the teaching of "intelligent design" which has zero basis in fact or science. It's ridiculous even.

Poor little commie, actual factual history isn't actual or factual if it contains inaccuracies. I'm curious, why did you dodge my questions on the big bang theory?

.

Of course it is. And you still have zero proof that curriculum based on the concept of the 1619 project would be inaccurate. Since the original article is known to contain errors, history teachers would make the appropriate adjustments to curriculum.

The Big Bang model is supported by evidence

What Triggered the Big Bang? It's Complicated (Op-Ed)

The Big Bang is not a model of creation, but a theory that explains what we see of the universe's long history — without direct evidence, any predictions for time = 0 are more fantastical than fact, argues Paul Sutter.

www.space.com

Unlike “intelligent design”

Still laughing, the op-ed dude said the universe was once the size of a peach, yet he never even speculated where the peach came form. How about you tell me, where did the tiny ball of densely packed matter come from?

And I thank you for the video, it was great for several belly laughs. That dude is a fucking idiot.

.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Anxious Democrats imagine Donald Trump as a political Houdini—a genius at escaping the most dire political straits. Somehow, they fear, he will summon serial October surprises beyond the capacity of lesser mortals.

Rubbish.

In truth, Trump is America’s ersatz Wizard of Oz—a one-trick faux populist with deep but finite appeal who, in 2016, filled the mother of inside straights. By 2018, he had squandered his winnings. In 2020, he’s become the little man behind the curtain, brutally exposed by his own incompetence and instability.

Trump is the Wizard of Oz—Only Nuts

The last ten days have shone a bright light on his selfish, erratic, irrational behavior.

thebulwark.com

After the interviews with the rightwing vomit machines this week, even they threw up in their mouths a little bit.

Why is it PROGS project their filth on others?

Guilt conscious

 

[Brain357]

President Trump is the best American president we have yet witnessed.

Four more years!

Yeah nothing like the biggest deficits ever, giant bailouts, riots, recession, increasing crime, most pandemic deaths... what a success.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Give me a Dem candidate who is for liberty (all liberty) and that person will have my vote.

Right now, most Dems are:

• gun-grabbers
• communists/socialists
• big spending tax rapists
• free speech haters
• race baters
• PC super nazis
• Military/Industrial Complex dick suckers
• Spend-Thrift Asswipe
• global economic redistributionists (see global warming/climate change BS)
  • see also One World Order asswipes

Give me a Republican candidate with a fucking spine who is not:

• gun-grabber
• a Jesus Nazi
• free speech hater
• PC super nazi
• Military/Industrial Complex dick sucker
• Spend-Thrift Asswipe
• One World Order cocksucker

It's really quite simple. I bet I represent about 85% of the electorate on these issues.

 

[Brain357]

Give me a Dem candidate who is for liberty (all liberty) and that person will have my vote.

Right now, most Dems are:

• gun-grabbers
• communists/socialists
• big spending tax rapists
• free speech haters
• race baters
• PC super nazis
• Military/Industrial Complex dick suckers
• Spend-Thrift Asswipe
• global economic redistributionists (see global warming/climate change BS)
  • see also One World Order asswipes

Give me a Republican candidate with a fucking spine who is not:

• gun-grabber
• a Jesus Nazi
• free speech hater
• PC super nazi
• Military/Industrial Complex dick sucker
• Spend-Thrift Asswipe
• One World Order cocksucker

It's really quite simple. I bet I represent about 85% of the electorate on these issues.

Gonna be a long time before you get those. Outside of guns we are probably mostly in agreement. What is it you would say trump has done well? I look around and 4 years ago looks great. Most his big policy I feel failed. Tariffs hurt our manufacturing. Tax cuts lead to giant deficits.