Have you seen 2000 Mules yet? Not a trailer. The whole thing?

[Harpy Eagle]

The evidence was gathered the same way law enforcement does. They get convictions on it. Why all of a sudden is it no good?

Because they have not yet taken it to law enforcement. they have not let the new evidence be counter examined in a court of law.

What is said in a movie is a one sided view and is quite frankly meaningless.

 

[Lastamender]

Because they have not yet taken it to law enforcement. they have not let the new evidence be counter examined in a court of law.

What is said in a movie is a one sided view and is quite frankly meaningless.

Yes they have. They said they did in the film. Can you prove they have not?

What makes geotracking one sided?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yes they have

Then give the links to the cases where they have proven in court that what is in 2000 mules is true.

I will be happy to wait.

 

[Lastamender]

Then give the links to the cases where they have proven in court that what is in 2000 mules is true.

I will be happy to wait.

I said they gave it to law enforcement. They are not the courts, are they? Should I wait until law enforcement becomes the court?

Do you remember you were not going to discuss fraud. This has you sweating.

 

[Faun]

Well, no shit genuis...At least to the judge presiding. And, that had to do more with bias, than the law, IMHO.

A pity you don't possess an ounce of evidence to back that bullshit claim of yours. You just say it, citing yourself.

 

[Faun]

OK. Family members. Does it take 30 trips to drop boxes to drop all of your families ballots? You cannot get around the multiple trips that went on for days before the election or discount the same people going to non -profits and back to more drop boxes. Period.

Such lame excuses are laughable.

You have no proof of any such multiple dropoffs.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Here ya go. The whole thing.

Yes seen it and it failed.

The only interesting part which came close was the geo tracking data. But as it turns out it proves nothing as gthere are many logical and reasonable explanations for the anamoly.

They CLAIMED that there was video evidence showing hundreds of people visiting multiple polling stations and dropping off ballots. But they did not present said video evidence. Only two videos of two seperate individuals visiting one polling station each.

If you do not show the evidence it does not exist.

 

[Mac1958]

What is said in a movie is a one sided view and is quite frankly meaningless.

This really is one of the most destructive and frustrating things about observing those who are consumed by an ideology, on either end: It robs people of any degree of human intellectual curiosity they may have once had.

Clearly, CLEARLY, this thing is only showing one (1) side of the story. But I don't think it occurs to these people when they watch it, for even a split second, that they may not be getting the whole picture. Or, they just don't care.

Tell them that we need to see the WHOLE story at one time, with plenty of opportunities for challenges from both sides and contrary information, and it's clearly not what they want. They have NO INTEREST in that.

How in the world do you communicate with that?

 

[Soupnazi630]

That is a lie. Show us where and when geotracking evidence went before a court. I'll wait.

The geo tracking evidence is not evidence of electionb theft or fraud sorry loser.

 

[Faun]

It proved people went to multiple boxes and non-profits and back to the drop boxes. The data does not lie. your sorry ass does.

You're lying again, FruitLoops. That film proved no such thing. Despite being in possession of 4 million minutes of video, they don't show a single person going to multiple drop boxes.

Not one.

And the only claim that multiple people did drop off ballots at multiple drop boxes is really just a guess that's what happened by the same known liar who falsely claimed there was also massive voter fraud in 2016.

 

[Rigby5]

No, that means the cases lacked merit, evidence or standing.

I do not believe there was a successful massive voter fraud, but there is a problem.
No electronic voting machines should have ever been used or legal.
The fact judges have not ruled as such, IS a problem.
There IS something wrong with the judiciary, and it is not a case of merit, evidence, or standing.
There simply is no way computerized voting machine can ever remotely be trusted, and are always easily hacked.
There also has never been a voting machine company willing to open source their code, and never will be.
They always have and will have backdoors.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I said they gave it to law enforcement.

And how many arrest has there been so far?

 

[Mac1958]

You're lying again, FruitLoops. That film proved no such thing. Despite being in possession of 4 million minutes of video, they don't show a single person going to multiple drop boxes.

Not one.

This is the kind of stretching they do all the time, especially during this circus. A plus B equals Frog. If this over here happened, then that over there MUST have happened. Absolutely.

Reminds me of the Underwear Gnomes on Southpark:

Phase One: Collect Underpants
Phase Two: ?
Phase Three: Profit!

 

[Lastamender]

The geo tracking evidence is not evidence of electionb theft or fraud sorry loser.

How would you know?

 

[Faun]

The old cases rejected on technicalities have nothing to do with the new evidence. The evidence was gathered the same way law enforcement does. They get convictions on it. Why all of a sudden is it no good?

All they can tell by that technology is that someone is probably within 1-2 meters of a location. It doesn't reveal what said individual is doing.

And in 2000 Mules, they talk about the murder of an 8 year old girl and they make it appear like their research with geolocation helped find the suspect -- but they didn't. In reality, the suspect turned himself in about a week after the murder after a photo of him carrying a rifle was distributed throughout the area.

Person of interest in Atlanta girl's death says he is innocent

A man identified as the second person of interest in the shooting death of 8-year-old Secoriea Turner denies being involved in the incident, according to Channel 2 Action News.

www.ajc.com

 

[Lastamender]

You have no proof of any such multiple dropoffs.

The phone pings are evidence. The number of times those people were at different drop boxes is evidence. You, again, have lost the argument and are just plain desperate, which is a very good thing.

 

[Lastamender]

All they can tell by that technology is that someone is probably within 1-2 meters of a location. It doesn't reveal what said individual is doing.

And in 2000 Mules, they talk about the murder of an 8 year old girl and they make it appear like their research with geolocation helped find the suspect -- but they didn't. In reality, the suspect turned himself in about a week after the murder after a photo of him carrying a rifle was distributed throughout the area.

Person of interest in Atlanta girl's death says he is innocent

A man identified as the second person of interest in the shooting death of 8-year-old Secoriea Turner denies being involved in the incident, according to Channel 2 Action News.

www.ajc.com

It is much more precise than 1 or 2 meters. The NYT says it is. They would not lie would they?

Opinion | Twelve Million Phones, One Dataset, Zero Privacy (Published 2019)

What we learned from the spy in your pocket.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Lastamender]

And how many arrest has there been so far?

None. That only proves state officials were complicit. It does not help your argument in anyway shape or form.

 

[Soupnazi630]

How would you know?

Because that is the nature of reality you uneducated fool.

The movie did present a lot of geo tracking evidence but failed to counter the fact that there are many logical and legal explanations for vote harvesting.

Once again YOU HAVE NO fucking evidence that the elction was stolen.

NOT ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE.

You have never posted any evidence and you never will because you are a liar and treasonous coward.

You are truly a disgrace and an embarrrassmenet to this nation you marx loving pig.

 

[Lastamender]

Because that is the nature of reality you uneducated fool.

The movie did present a lot of geo tracking evidence but failed to counter the fact that there are many logical and legal explanations for vote harvesting.

Once again YOU HAVE NO fucking evidence that the elction was stolen.

NOT ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE.

You have never posted any evidence and you never will because you are a liar and treasonous coward.

You are truly a disgrace and an embarrrassmenet to this nation you marx loving pig.