Heat to soar to record levels in next 5 years.

[EMH]

The last ice age ended over 20,000 years ago.

So Antarctica today is NOT an "ice age" and you STILL CANNOT explain a MAP of the ARCTIC....

LOL!!!

 

[multivita-man]

Not my fault a science hater who parrots the Gorebal warming cult

agenda but never even heard of the Maunder Minimum is here displaying what a fool you cultists are.

Dude you should put that on your license plate: MM-Chic. lol

You can’t define a woman but you can predict the weather a century from now!

What normal man spends time trying to define something he inherently understands. If you struggle to define women, that's on you, dick-breath.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Dude you should put that on your license plate: MM-Chic. lol



What normal man spends time trying to define something he inherently understands. If you struggle to define women, that's on you, dick-breath.

Cartoons, figures.
You know nothing about climatology and can only parrot what billionaires who fly private jets and own several beachfront mansions feed you.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Dude you should put that on your license plate: MM-Chic. lol



What normal man spends time trying to define something he inherently understands. If you struggle to define women, that's on you, dick-breath.

40 years ago I used to look at the ice caps on Mars with my telescope.
Not anymore.

Damn Martian fossil fuel burners.

Red Planet Heats Up: Ice Age Ending on Mars

Mars is emerging from an ice age, a finding that could shed light on the past and future climates of both Mars and Earth, researchers say.

www.space.com

 

[multivita-man]

40 years ago I used to look at the ice caps on Mars with my telescope.
Not anymore.

Damn Martian fossil fuel burners.

Red Planet Heats Up: Ice Age Ending on Mars

Mars is emerging from an ice age, a finding that could shed light on the past and future climates of both Mars and Earth, researchers say.

www.space.com

But, but...whatabout Mars?!

 

[multivita-man]

Cartoons, figures.
You know nothing about climatology

Maybe you have a point. I wouldn't say I know nothing about climatology, but I'm certainly no expert. I don't have to be, though, because I read people who do have that expertise. I (mostly) trust their expertise. I trust people who've studied this kind of stuff for years in their university programs and in their professional work.

I don't claim expertise I don't have - that's what you and other climate change "skeptics" do. You pretend to have knowledge you don't. You toss out terms like radiative forcing and Maunder Minimum because you probably read about it a time or two and then you use that as some sort of premise for your stubborn beliefs about phenomena you make no effort to understand, as it conflicts with your ideology or your desire to live and think as you please. That's your problem: you use bits and pieces of science to bend science to your ideological beliefs.

But I'm here to tell you: science doesn't give a shit what you or I believe. You and I will see that soon enough. Enjoy the ride while you still can.

and can only parrot what billionaires who fly private jets and own several beachfront mansions feed you.

Meh, was never a fan of Al Gore or even IPCC for that matter.

 

[EMH]

but I'm certainly no expert. I don't have to be, though, because I read people who do have that expertise. I (mostly) trust their expertise.

 

[Weatherman2020]

But, but...whatabout Mars?!

Obviously your puppeteers never mentioned to you about Mars warming despite nobody driving SUV’s there.

 

[multivita-man]

Obviously your puppeteers never mentioned to you about Mars warming despite nobody driving SUV’s there.

But, but...what about asteroids?!

 

[Weatherman2020]

But, but...what about asteroids?!

Why do you Leftards hate science so much?

 

[multivita-man]

Why do you Leftards hate science so much?

But, but...what about trans?! At least I know which bathroom to use, lol!

 

[Crick]

Why do you Leftards hate science so much?

Science? From your side? That must explain your position on global warming, overpopulation, pollution, evolution and creationism, race, vaccination, medicine, public education and free academia. Where the FUCK do you get the idea your side is pro-science?

See:

As America grows more polarized, conservatives increasingly reject science and rational thought

The Tea Party has intensified social pressure on conservative-leaning Americans to shun science and academia

www.salon.com

Study: Conservatives, liberals read different scientific books | Cornell Chronicle

Suggesting that science is not immune to political partisanship, new research by computational social scientist Michael Macy shows liberals and conservatives have stark differences in the types of scientific books they read.

news.cornell.edu

Trust In Science Has Declined Among Conservatives - Why?

There was a time when people on the right trusted science far more than moderates and liberals. Distrust of scientists, including levels that verged on raging paranoia, was limited to the left side of the political spectrum.

www.science20.com

Myopic Political Bubbles Apply to Science Books, Too

People buy science books for the same reasons they buy politics books: To reinforce their ideological beliefs.

www.wired.com

Conservatives' Trust In Science Has Fallen Dramatically Since Mid-1970s - Slashdot

An anonymous reader writes "While trust in science remained stable among people who self-identified as moderates and liberals in the United States between 1974 and 2010, trust in science fell among self-identified conservatives by more than 25 percent during the same period, according to a study...

politics.slashdot.org

 

[Weatherman2020]

Science? From your side? That must explain your position on global warming, overpopulation, pollution, evolution and creationism, race, vaccination, medicine, public education and free academia. Where the FUCK do you get the idea your side is pro-science?

See:

As America grows more polarized, conservatives increasingly reject science and rational thought

The Tea Party has intensified social pressure on conservative-leaning Americans to shun science and academia

www.salon.com

Study: Conservatives, liberals read different scientific books | Cornell Chronicle

Suggesting that science is not immune to political partisanship, new research by computational social scientist Michael Macy shows liberals and conservatives have stark differences in the types of scientific books they read.

news.cornell.edu

Trust In Science Has Declined Among Conservatives - Why?

There was a time when people on the right trusted science far more than moderates and liberals. Distrust of scientists, including levels that verged on raging paranoia, was limited to the left side of the political spectrum.

www.science20.com

Myopic Political Bubbles Apply to Science Books, Too

People buy science books for the same reasons they buy politics books: To reinforce their ideological beliefs.

www.wired.com

Conservatives' Trust In Science Has Fallen Dramatically Since Mid-1970s - Slashdot

An anonymous reader writes "While trust in science remained stable among people who self-identified as moderates and liberals in the United States between 1974 and 2010, trust in science fell among self-identified conservatives by more than 25 percent during the same period, according to a study...

politics.slashdot.org

Hilarious! You can’t even tell us what a male and female are that any 5 year old knows and you want to lecture to us about science!!!

Go get your weekly booster and wear your 5 masks while driving alone there, Dufus.

 

[miketx]

Everyone could have seen this coming.

The News​

Global temperatures are likely to soar to record highs over the next five years, driven by human-caused warming and a climate pattern known as El Niño, forecasters at the World Meteorological Organization said on Wednesday.

The record for Earth’s hottest year was set in 2016. There is a 98 percent chance that at least one of the next five years will exceed that, the forecasters said, while the average from 2023 to ’27 will almost certainly be the warmest for a five-year period ever recorded.

Why It Matters: Every fraction of a degree brings new risks.​

Even small increases in warming can exacerbate the dangers from heat waves, wildfires, drought and other calamities, scientists say. Elevated global temperatures in 2021 helped fuel a heat wave in the Pacific Northwest that shattered local records and killed hundreds of people.

El Niño conditions can cause further turmoil by shifting global precipitation patterns. The meteorological organization said it expected increased summer rainfall over the next five years in places like Northern Europe and the Sahel in sub-Saharan Africa and reduced rainfall in the Amazon and parts of Australia.

The organization reported that there is also a two thirds chance that one of the next five years could be 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, hotter than the 19th-century average.

That does not mean that the world will have officially breached the aspirational goal in the Paris climate agreement of holding global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. When scientists talk about that temperature goal, they generally mean a longer-term average over, say, two decades in order to root out the influence of natural variability.

Many world leaders have insisted on the 1.5-degree limit to keep the risks of climate change to tolerable levels. But nations have delayed so long in making the monumental changes necessary to achieve this goal, such as drastically cutting fossil-fuel emissions, that scientists now think the world will probably exceed that threshold around the early 2030s.

Background: La Niña, a cooling influence, is on the way out.​

Global average temperatures have already increased roughly 1.1 degrees Celsius since the 19th century, largely because humans keep burning fossil fuels and pumping heat-trapping gases like carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

But while that overall upward trend is clear, global temperatures can bounce up and down a bit from year to year because of natural variability. For instance, a cyclical phenomenon in the Pacific Ocean, the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, causes year-to-year fluctuations by shifting heat in and out of deeper ocean layers. Global surface temperatures tend to be somewhat cooler during La Niña years and somewhat hotter during El Niño years.

The last record hot year, 2016, was an El Niño year. By contrast, La Niña conditions have dominated for much of the past three years: while they’ve been unusually warm, they were still slightly below 2016 levels. Now, scientists are expecting El Niño conditions to return later this summer. When combined with steadily rising levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, that will most likely cause temperatures to accelerate to new highs.

Heat Will Likely Soar to Record Levels in Next 5 Years, New Analysis Says (Published 2023)

The World Meteorological Organization forecast “far-reaching repercussions for health, food security, water management and the environment.”

www.nytimes.com

Good! Maybe it will kill off all you commies.

 

[miketx]

Everyone could have seen this coming.

The News​

Global temperatures are likely to soar to record highs over the next five years, driven by human-caused warming and a climate pattern known as El Niño, forecasters at the World Meteorological Organization said on Wednesday.

The record for Earth’s hottest year was set in 2016. There is a 98 percent chance that at least one of the next five years will exceed that, the forecasters said, while the average from 2023 to ’27 will almost certainly be the warmest for a five-year period ever recorded.

Why It Matters: Every fraction of a degree brings new risks.​

Even small increases in warming can exacerbate the dangers from heat waves, wildfires, drought and other calamities, scientists say. Elevated global temperatures in 2021 helped fuel a heat wave in the Pacific Northwest that shattered local records and killed hundreds of people.

El Niño conditions can cause further turmoil by shifting global precipitation patterns. The meteorological organization said it expected increased summer rainfall over the next five years in places like Northern Europe and the Sahel in sub-Saharan Africa and reduced rainfall in the Amazon and parts of Australia.

The organization reported that there is also a two thirds chance that one of the next five years could be 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, hotter than the 19th-century average.

That does not mean that the world will have officially breached the aspirational goal in the Paris climate agreement of holding global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. When scientists talk about that temperature goal, they generally mean a longer-term average over, say, two decades in order to root out the influence of natural variability.

Many world leaders have insisted on the 1.5-degree limit to keep the risks of climate change to tolerable levels. But nations have delayed so long in making the monumental changes necessary to achieve this goal, such as drastically cutting fossil-fuel emissions, that scientists now think the world will probably exceed that threshold around the early 2030s.

Background: La Niña, a cooling influence, is on the way out.​

Global average temperatures have already increased roughly 1.1 degrees Celsius since the 19th century, largely because humans keep burning fossil fuels and pumping heat-trapping gases like carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

But while that overall upward trend is clear, global temperatures can bounce up and down a bit from year to year because of natural variability. For instance, a cyclical phenomenon in the Pacific Ocean, the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, causes year-to-year fluctuations by shifting heat in and out of deeper ocean layers. Global surface temperatures tend to be somewhat cooler during La Niña years and somewhat hotter during El Niño years.

The last record hot year, 2016, was an El Niño year. By contrast, La Niña conditions have dominated for much of the past three years: while they’ve been unusually warm, they were still slightly below 2016 levels. Now, scientists are expecting El Niño conditions to return later this summer. When combined with steadily rising levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, that will most likely cause temperatures to accelerate to new highs.

Heat Will Likely Soar to Record Levels in Next 5 Years, New Analysis Says (Published 2023)

The World Meteorological Organization forecast “far-reaching repercussions for health, food security, water management and the environment.”

www.nytimes.com

We saw it coming, this thread I mean. I just classify it as more leftist bullshit and lies.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Everyone could have seen this coming.

The News​

Global temperatures are likely to soar to record highs over the next five years, driven by human-caused warming and a climate pattern known as El Niño, forecasters at the World Meteorological Organization said on Wednesday.

The record for Earth’s hottest year was set in 2016. There is a 98 percent chance that at least one of the next five years will exceed that, the forecasters said, while the average from 2023 to ’27 will almost certainly be the warmest for a five-year period ever recorded.

Why It Matters: Every fraction of a degree brings new risks.​

Even small increases in warming can exacerbate the dangers from heat waves, wildfires, drought and other calamities, scientists say. Elevated global temperatures in 2021 helped fuel a heat wave in the Pacific Northwest that shattered local records and killed hundreds of people.

El Niño conditions can cause further turmoil by shifting global precipitation patterns. The meteorological organization said it expected increased summer rainfall over the next five years in places like Northern Europe and the Sahel in sub-Saharan Africa and reduced rainfall in the Amazon and parts of Australia.

The organization reported that there is also a two thirds chance that one of the next five years could be 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, hotter than the 19th-century average.

That does not mean that the world will have officially breached the aspirational goal in the Paris climate agreement of holding global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. When scientists talk about that temperature goal, they generally mean a longer-term average over, say, two decades in order to root out the influence of natural variability.

Many world leaders have insisted on the 1.5-degree limit to keep the risks of climate change to tolerable levels. But nations have delayed so long in making the monumental changes necessary to achieve this goal, such as drastically cutting fossil-fuel emissions, that scientists now think the world will probably exceed that threshold around the early 2030s.

Background: La Niña, a cooling influence, is on the way out.​

Global average temperatures have already increased roughly 1.1 degrees Celsius since the 19th century, largely because humans keep burning fossil fuels and pumping heat-trapping gases like carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

But while that overall upward trend is clear, global temperatures can bounce up and down a bit from year to year because of natural variability. For instance, a cyclical phenomenon in the Pacific Ocean, the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, causes year-to-year fluctuations by shifting heat in and out of deeper ocean layers. Global surface temperatures tend to be somewhat cooler during La Niña years and somewhat hotter during El Niño years.

The last record hot year, 2016, was an El Niño year. By contrast, La Niña conditions have dominated for much of the past three years: while they’ve been unusually warm, they were still slightly below 2016 levels. Now, scientists are expecting El Niño conditions to return later this summer. When combined with steadily rising levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, that will most likely cause temperatures to accelerate to new highs.

Heat Will Likely Soar to Record Levels in Next 5 Years, New Analysis Says (Published 2023)

The World Meteorological Organization forecast “far-reaching repercussions for health, food security, water management and the environment.”

www.nytimes.com

European Space Agency says 0.5C a decade.
You idiots can’t even get your BS lies coordinated.

BTW - The Little ice age ended a little over a century ago. Warming is what happens when ice ages end.

 

[miketx]

European Space Agency says 0.5C a decade.
You idiots can’t even get your BS lies coordinated.

BTW - The Little ice age ended a little over a century ago. Warming is what happens when ice ages end.

IMO, a lot of these leftist pieces of shit aren't even American.

 

[Weatherman2020]

IMO, a lot of these leftist pieces of shit aren't even American.

They can’t even define what a woman is while proclaiming they’re on the side of science.

 

[odanny]

We saw it coming, this thread I mean. I just classify it as more leftist bullshit and lies.

That's because you're scientifically illiterate.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Everyone could have seen this coming.

The News​

Global temperatures are likely to soar to record highs over the next five years, driven by human-caused warming and a climate pattern known as El Niño, forecasters at the World Meteorological Organization said on Wednesday.

The record for Earth’s hottest year was set in 2016. There is a 98 percent chance that at least one of the next five years will exceed that, the forecasters said, while the average from 2023 to ’27 will almost certainly be the warmest for a five-year period ever recorded.

Why It Matters: Every fraction of a degree brings new risks.​

Even small increases in warming can exacerbate the dangers from heat waves, wildfires, drought and other calamities, scientists say. Elevated global temperatures in 2021 helped fuel a heat wave in the Pacific Northwest that shattered local records and killed hundreds of people.

El Niño conditions can cause further turmoil by shifting global precipitation patterns. The meteorological organization said it expected increased summer rainfall over the next five years in places like Northern Europe and the Sahel in sub-Saharan Africa and reduced rainfall in the Amazon and parts of Australia.

The organization reported that there is also a two thirds chance that one of the next five years could be 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, hotter than the 19th-century average.

That does not mean that the world will have officially breached the aspirational goal in the Paris climate agreement of holding global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. When scientists talk about that temperature goal, they generally mean a longer-term average over, say, two decades in order to root out the influence of natural variability.

Many world leaders have insisted on the 1.5-degree limit to keep the risks of climate change to tolerable levels. But nations have delayed so long in making the monumental changes necessary to achieve this goal, such as drastically cutting fossil-fuel emissions, that scientists now think the world will probably exceed that threshold around the early 2030s.

Background: La Niña, a cooling influence, is on the way out.​

Global average temperatures have already increased roughly 1.1 degrees Celsius since the 19th century, largely because humans keep burning fossil fuels and pumping heat-trapping gases like carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

But while that overall upward trend is clear, global temperatures can bounce up and down a bit from year to year because of natural variability. For instance, a cyclical phenomenon in the Pacific Ocean, the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, causes year-to-year fluctuations by shifting heat in and out of deeper ocean layers. Global surface temperatures tend to be somewhat cooler during La Niña years and somewhat hotter during El Niño years.

The last record hot year, 2016, was an El Niño year. By contrast, La Niña conditions have dominated for much of the past three years: while they’ve been unusually warm, they were still slightly below 2016 levels. Now, scientists are expecting El Niño conditions to return later this summer. When combined with steadily rising levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, that will most likely cause temperatures to accelerate to new highs.

Heat Will Likely Soar to Record Levels in Next 5 Years, New Analysis Says (Published 2023)

The World Meteorological Organization forecast “far-reaching repercussions for health, food security, water management and the environment.”

www.nytimes.com

And that's AFTER the Arctic went ice free in 2012, er, or something