Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Read the link YOU posted earlier. It explains how Mueller concluded Russia hadn't attempted to hack that domain before Impeached Trump encouraged Russia to look for Hillary's missing emails. Read it a hundred times if that's how many times it takes for you to understand what it says.Hey Fawn, what is the specific evidence Mueller has that proves Russia never tried to hack Hitlery until this incident?
You will come back with some idiotic response such as 'It is secret".
So.............give us your best opinion. In a perfect world, what evidence would prove they never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Explain exactly what evidence would prove that. You are not limited to anything, not the Mueller report.....nothing. Use your imagination and tell us what evidence would prove that.
View attachment 366492
And where did Mueller include the evidence that led him to make that conclusion?Read the link YOU posted earlier. It explains how Mueller concluded Russia hadn't attempted to hack that domain before Impeached Trump encouraged Russia to look for Hillary's missing emails. Read it a hundred times if that's how many times it takes for you to understand what it says.Hey Fawn, what is the specific evidence Mueller has that proves Russia never tried to hack Hitlery until this incident?
You will come back with some idiotic response such as 'It is secret".
So.............give us your best opinion. In a perfect world, what evidence would prove they never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Explain exactly what evidence would prove that. You are not limited to anything, not the Mueller report.....nothing. Use your imagination and tell us what evidence would prove that.
View attachment 366492
Fucking moron, Mueller investigated it, you didn't. His words matter. Yours don't.There isn't any evidence in the Mueller report, moron. All the Mueller report has is Mueller's opinion about the evidence, if it even exists. You've already been told that.The Mueller report is the evidence. Thehill.com sourced that as the evidence for their article.You still think an article referencing the Mueller report is "evidence".LOLOLOLHey, the dude thinks an article by a leftist that references the Mueller report is actual evidence.Every media outlet and political publication is constantly checking the claims made by the other side. Your belief that there is some objective infallible source of truth only shows how fucking gullible you are.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.www.thegatewaypundit.com
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposingwww.newsbusters.org
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Short Bus is really gullible.
You idiot. You still think thehill.com is leftist??
... you really are as stupid as your posts express.
TheHill.com must be even dumber than you.
Savvy?
More lies by you.Nope, they spouted no opinion. The details in that article comes from the Mueller report. I see you're still too stupid to know the difference between journalism and opinion. Sucks to be you.No, the Mueller report is their opinion of what evidence they claimed they found, or didn't find.The Mueller report is the evidence. Thehill.com sourced that as the evidence for their article.You still think an article referencing the Mueller report is "evidence".LOLOLOLHey, the dude thinks an article by a leftist that references the Mueller report is actual evidence.Every media outlet and political publication is constantly checking the claims made by the other side. Your belief that there is some objective infallible source of truth only shows how fucking gullible you are.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Short Bus is really gullible.
You idiot. You still think thehill.com is leftist??
... you really are as stupid as your posts express.
Man, your really are stupid.
Faux will never give up. He believes that if Mueller said it, then it must be true. Mueller is infallible!More lies by you.Nope, they spouted no opinion. The details in that article comes from the Mueller report. I see you're still too stupid to know the difference between journalism and opinion. Sucks to be you.No, the Mueller report is their opinion of what evidence they claimed they found, or didn't find.The Mueller report is the evidence. Thehill.com sourced that as the evidence for their article.You still think an article referencing the Mueller report is "evidence".LOLOLOLHey, the dude thinks an article by a leftist that references the Mueller report is actual evidence.Every media outlet and political publication is constantly checking the claims made by the other side. Your belief that there is some objective infallible source of truth only shows how fucking gullible you are.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Short Bus is really gullible.
You idiot. You still think thehill.com is leftist??
... you really are as stupid as your posts express.
Man, your really are stupid.
You really follow directions like a 2 year old spider monkey with ADD. It explains no such thing.........it simply says they found no evidence of it. They didn't even say they investigated it, did they?Read the link YOU posted earlier. It explains how Mueller concluded Russia hadn't attempted to hack that domain before Impeached Trump encouraged Russia to look for Hillary's missing emails. Read it a hundred times if that's how many times it takes for you to understand what it says.Hey Fawn, what is the specific evidence Mueller has that proves Russia never tried to hack Hitlery until this incident?
You will come back with some idiotic response such as 'It is secret".
So.............give us your best opinion. In a perfect world, what evidence would prove they never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Explain exactly what evidence would prove that. You are not limited to anything, not the Mueller report.....nothing. Use your imagination and tell us what evidence would prove that.
View attachment 366492
Faux will never give up. He believes that if Mueller said it, then it must be true. Mueller is infallible!More lies by you.Nope, they spouted no opinion. The details in that article comes from the Mueller report. I see you're still too stupid to know the difference between journalism and opinion. Sucks to be you.No, the Mueller report is their opinion of what evidence they claimed they found, or didn't find.The Mueller report is the evidence. Thehill.com sourced that as the evidence for their article.You still think an article referencing the Mueller report is "evidence".LOLOLOLHey, the dude thinks an article by a leftist that references the Mueller report is actual evidence.Every media outlet and political publication is constantly checking the claims made by the other side. Your belief that there is some objective infallible source of truth only shows how fucking gullible you are.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Short Bus is really gullible.
You idiot. You still think thehill.com is leftist??
... you really are as stupid as your posts express.
Man, your really are stupid.
Looks like politfact got that one right.PolitiFact Tags Black Conservative Larry Elder as 'Mostly False,' But He's NotGreat, post some of these lies....The so-called "fact checkers" are the biggest liars of all, moron.Why? Why should either candidate get to stand up there and lie to the American people? Why not fact-check their statements as they make them.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
If Biden wants to have spinmeisters and fact checkers go over President Trumps assertations after the debate, no problem at all. Nothing to stop him.
But having them as part of the official debate officers, that's just stupid.
In other words, what are you afraid of?
What difference does it make what they call themselves if they're doing fact-checking. You yourself just cited their fact-checking of politifact.As I told you, there are no right wing organizations that call themselves "fact checkers."Who said they'd be lying about him? Why do you assume rightwing factcheckers would lie about Impeached Trump's bullshit?Why wouldn't Trump object to a bunch of leftist "journalists" spouting lies about him?LOLOLThey have been doing it since debates began. Trump has you morons on tilt.Why? Why should either candidate get to stand up there and lie to the American people? Why not fact-check their statements as they make them.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
If Biden wants to have spinmeisters and fact checkers go over President Trumps assertations after the debate, no problem at all. Nothing to stop him.
But having them as part of the official debate officers, that's just stupid.
In other words, what are you afraid of?
You are terrified of Crazy Joe having to actually debate using the same rules that have always been in place.
Your fear of having Impeached Trump fact-checked real time is noted and laughed at.
Mueller and his team investigated the matter while you sat on the toilet and popped out a bripat9643. His report matters. Your whining about it doesn't.The Mueller report contains opinions, not facts, moron.Nope, they spouted no opinion. The details in that article comes from the Mueller report. I see you're still too stupid to know the difference between journalism and opinion. Sucks to be you.No, the Mueller report is their opinion of what evidence they claimed they found, or didn't find.The Mueller report is the evidence. Thehill.com sourced that as the evidence for their article.You still think an article referencing the Mueller report is "evidence".LOLOLOLHey, the dude thinks an article by a leftist that references the Mueller report is actual evidence.Every media outlet and political publication is constantly checking the claims made by the other side. Your belief that there is some objective infallible source of truth only shows how fucking gullible you are.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Short Bus is really gullible.
You idiot. You still think thehill.com is leftist??
... you really are as stupid as your posts express.
Man, your really are stupid.
LOLOLROFL! Yeah, Mueller is an angel from heaven who never lies or gets things wrong. Mueller didn't even write the report. That sleazy leftwing hatchet-man Wiesmann wrote it.Fucking moron, Mueller investigated it, you didn't. His words matter. Yours don't.There isn't any evidence in the Mueller report, moron. All the Mueller report has is Mueller's opinion about the evidence, if it even exists. You've already been told that.
TheHill.com must be even dumber than you.
Savvy?
You are so stupid and gullible that it must hurt.
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
Ask Mueller.And where did Mueller include the evidence that led him to make that conclusion?Read the link YOU posted earlier. It explains how Mueller concluded Russia hadn't attempted to hack that domain before Impeached Trump encouraged Russia to look for Hillary's missing emails. Read it a hundred times if that's how many times it takes for you to understand what it says.Hey Fawn, what is the specific evidence Mueller has that proves Russia never tried to hack Hitlery until this incident?
You will come back with some idiotic response such as 'It is secret".
So.............give us your best opinion. In a perfect world, what evidence would prove they never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Explain exactly what evidence would prove that. You are not limited to anything, not the Mueller report.....nothing. Use your imagination and tell us what evidence would prove that.
View attachment 366492
I know. It became evident that he didn't even know what was in it when he testified before Congress.Faux will never give up. He believes that if Mueller said it, then it must be true. Mueller is infallible!More lies by you.Nope, they spouted no opinion. The details in that article comes from the Mueller report. I see you're still too stupid to know the difference between journalism and opinion. Sucks to be you.No, the Mueller report is their opinion of what evidence they claimed they found, or didn't find.The Mueller report is the evidence. Thehill.com sourced that as the evidence for their article.You still think an article referencing the Mueller report is "evidence".LOLOLOLHey, the dude thinks an article by a leftist that references the Mueller report is actual evidence.Every media outlet and political publication is constantly checking the claims made by the other side. Your belief that there is some objective infallible source of truth only shows how fucking gullible you are.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Short Bus is really gullible.
You idiot. You still think thehill.com is leftist??
... you really are as stupid as your posts express.
Man, your really are stupid.
Mueller hasn't even read the report- its the work of that doofus Andrew Weissman.
Mueller investigated it. What did you do?Faux will never give up. He believes that if Mueller said it, then it must be true. Mueller is infallible!More lies by you.Nope, they spouted no opinion. The details in that article comes from the Mueller report. I see you're still too stupid to know the difference between journalism and opinion. Sucks to be you.No, the Mueller report is their opinion of what evidence they claimed they found, or didn't find.The Mueller report is the evidence. Thehill.com sourced that as the evidence for their article.You still think an article referencing the Mueller report is "evidence".LOLOLOLHey, the dude thinks an article by a leftist that references the Mueller report is actual evidence.Every media outlet and political publication is constantly checking the claims made by the other side. Your belief that there is some objective infallible source of truth only shows how fucking gullible you are.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Short Bus is really gullible.
You idiot. You still think thehill.com is leftist??
... you really are as stupid as your posts express.
Man, your really are stupid.
In other words, you don't know where the evidence is.Ask Mueller.And where did Mueller include the evidence that led him to make that conclusion?Read the link YOU posted earlier. It explains how Mueller concluded Russia hadn't attempted to hack that domain before Impeached Trump encouraged Russia to look for Hillary's missing emails. Read it a hundred times if that's how many times it takes for you to understand what it says.Hey Fawn, what is the specific evidence Mueller has that proves Russia never tried to hack Hitlery until this incident?
You will come back with some idiotic response such as 'It is secret".
So.............give us your best opinion. In a perfect world, what evidence would prove they never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Explain exactly what evidence would prove that. You are not limited to anything, not the Mueller report.....nothing. Use your imagination and tell us what evidence would prove that.
View attachment 366492
Is Mueller infallible?Mueller investigated it. What did you do?Faux will never give up. He believes that if Mueller said it, then it must be true. Mueller is infallible!
"it simply says they found no evidence of it."You really follow directions like a 2 year old spider monkey with ADD. It explains no such thing.........it simply says they found no evidence of it. They didn't even say they investigated it, did they?Read the link YOU posted earlier. It explains how Mueller concluded Russia hadn't attempted to hack that domain before Impeached Trump encouraged Russia to look for Hillary's missing emails. Read it a hundred times if that's how many times it takes for you to understand what it says.Hey Fawn, what is the specific evidence Mueller has that proves Russia never tried to hack Hitlery until this incident?
You will come back with some idiotic response such as 'It is secret".
So.............give us your best opinion. In a perfect world, what evidence would prove they never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Explain exactly what evidence would prove that. You are not limited to anything, not the Mueller report.....nothing. Use your imagination and tell us what evidence would prove that.
View attachment 366492
You tell us what evidence would prove Russia never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Ignore your " Mueller report" excuse.
Whether it "matters" isn't what we are discussing. Whether it's true is what we're discussing. So far, you have given us no reason to believe it.Mueller and his team investigated the matter while you sat on the toilet and popped out a bripat9643. His report matters. Your whining about it doesn't.The Mueller report contains opinions, not facts, moron.Nope, they spouted no opinion. The details in that article comes from the Mueller report. I see you're still too stupid to know the difference between journalism and opinion. Sucks to be you.No, the Mueller report is their opinion of what evidence they claimed they found, or didn't find.The Mueller report is the evidence. Thehill.com sourced that as the evidence for their article.You still think an article referencing the Mueller report is "evidence".LOLOLOLHey, the dude thinks an article by a leftist that references the Mueller report is actual evidence.Every media outlet and political publication is constantly checking the claims made by the other side. Your belief that there is some objective infallible source of truth only shows how fucking gullible you are.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Short Bus is really gullible.
You idiot. You still think thehill.com is leftist??
... you really are as stupid as your posts express.
Man, your really are stupid.
Savvy?
"There is no way to know that Russia never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident."Faun clearly can't even make up evidence that would prove Russia never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident.
I think we can put this one to bed. There is no way to know that Russia never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident.
That makes the Mueller report useless on this issue.
Run along Fawn, I have completely schooled you.
....awaits lameass response.........
