Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for admitting there is no way to know if they tried to hack Hitlery."it simply says they found no evidence of it."You really follow directions like a 2 year old spider monkey with ADD. It explains no such thing.........it simply says they found no evidence of it. They didn't even say they investigated it, did they?Read the link YOU posted earlier. It explains how Mueller concluded Russia hadn't attempted to hack that domain before Impeached Trump encouraged Russia to look for Hillary's missing emails. Read it a hundred times if that's how many times it takes for you to understand what it says.Hey Fawn, what is the specific evidence Mueller has that proves Russia never tried to hack Hitlery until this incident?
You will come back with some idiotic response such as 'It is secret".
So.............give us your best opinion. In a perfect world, what evidence would prove they never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Explain exactly what evidence would prove that. You are not limited to anything, not the Mueller report.....nothing. Use your imagination and tell us what evidence would prove that.
View attachment 366492
You tell us what evidence would prove Russia never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Ignore your " Mueller report" excuse.
Finally, you figured out why they claimed there was no evidence of prior hackings. Shit, you're fucking slow.
Of course not. Feel free to prove him wrong....Is Mueller infallible?Mueller investigated it. What did you do?Faux will never give up. He believes that if Mueller said it, then it must be true. Mueller is infallible!
And you've offered nothing to show he got it wrong. You claimed Barr said he was wrong about Flynn ... show Barr, or anyone, saying Mueller was wrong about this....Whether it "matters" isn't what we are discussing. Whether it's true is what we're discussing. So far, you have given us no reason to believe it.Mueller and his team investigated the matter while you sat on the toilet and popped out a bripat9643. His report matters. Your whining about it doesn't.The Mueller report contains opinions, not facts, moron.Nope, they spouted no opinion. The details in that article comes from the Mueller report. I see you're still too stupid to know the difference between journalism and opinion. Sucks to be you.No, the Mueller report is their opinion of what evidence they claimed they found, or didn't find.The Mueller report is the evidence. Thehill.com sourced that as the evidence for their article.You still think an article referencing the Mueller report is "evidence".LOLOLOLHey, the dude thinks an article by a leftist that references the Mueller report is actual evidence.Every media outlet and political publication is constantly checking the claims made by the other side. Your belief that there is some objective infallible source of truth only shows how fucking gullible you are.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.www.thegatewaypundit.com
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposingwww.newsbusters.org
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Short Bus is really gullible.
You idiot. You still think thehill.com is leftist??
... you really are as stupid as your posts express.
Man, your really are stupid.
Savvy?
I don't need to. There's nothing that proves him right.Of course not. Feel free to prove him wrong....Is Mueller infallible?Mueller investigated it. What did you do?Faux will never give up. He believes that if Mueller said it, then it must be true. Mueller is infallible!
Mueller found no evidence that domain was hacked previously.Thanks for admitting there is no way to know if they tried to hack Hitlery."it simply says they found no evidence of it."You really follow directions like a 2 year old spider monkey with ADD. It explains no such thing.........it simply says they found no evidence of it. They didn't even say they investigated it, did they?Read the link YOU posted earlier. It explains how Mueller concluded Russia hadn't attempted to hack that domain before Impeached Trump encouraged Russia to look for Hillary's missing emails. Read it a hundred times if that's how many times it takes for you to understand what it says.Hey Fawn, what is the specific evidence Mueller has that proves Russia never tried to hack Hitlery until this incident?
You will come back with some idiotic response such as 'It is secret".
So.............give us your best opinion. In a perfect world, what evidence would prove they never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Explain exactly what evidence would prove that. You are not limited to anything, not the Mueller report.....nothing. Use your imagination and tell us what evidence would prove that.
View attachment 366492
You tell us what evidence would prove Russia never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Ignore your " Mueller report" excuse.
Finally, you figured out why they claimed there was no evidence of prior hackings. Shit, you're fucking slow.
I'm not required to prove a negative, moron. You're the one required to prove he's right if you want to win this argument.And you've offered nothing to show he got it wrong. You claimed Barr said he was wrong about Flynn ... show Barr, or anyone, saying Mueller was wrong about this....Whether it "matters" isn't what we are discussing. Whether it's true is what we're discussing. So far, you have given us no reason to believe it.Mueller and his team investigated the matter while you sat on the toilet and popped out a bripat9643. His report matters. Your whining about it doesn't.The Mueller report contains opinions, not facts, moron.Nope, they spouted no opinion. The details in that article comes from the Mueller report. I see you're still too stupid to know the difference between journalism and opinion. Sucks to be you.No, the Mueller report is their opinion of what evidence they claimed they found, or didn't find.The Mueller report is the evidence. Thehill.com sourced that as the evidence for their article.You still think an article referencing the Mueller report is "evidence".LOLOLOLHey, the dude thinks an article by a leftist that references the Mueller report is actual evidence.Every media outlet and political publication is constantly checking the claims made by the other side. Your belief that there is some objective infallible source of truth only shows how fucking gullible you are.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Short Bus is really gullible.
You idiot. You still think thehill.com is leftist??
... you really are as stupid as your posts express.
Man, your really are stupid.
Savvy?
Now you're lying....I don't need to. There's nothing that proves him right.Of course not. Feel free to prove him wrong....Is Mueller infallible?Mueller investigated it. What did you do?Faux will never give up. He believes that if Mueller said it, then it must be true. Mueller is infallible!
No shit.Mueller found no evidence that domain was hacked previously.Thanks for admitting there is no way to know if they tried to hack Hitlery."it simply says they found no evidence of it."You really follow directions like a 2 year old spider monkey with ADD. It explains no such thing.........it simply says they found no evidence of it. They didn't even say they investigated it, did they?Read the link YOU posted earlier. It explains how Mueller concluded Russia hadn't attempted to hack that domain before Impeached Trump encouraged Russia to look for Hillary's missing emails. Read it a hundred times if that's how many times it takes for you to understand what it says.Hey Fawn, what is the specific evidence Mueller has that proves Russia never tried to hack Hitlery until this incident?
You will come back with some idiotic response such as 'It is secret".
So.............give us your best opinion. In a perfect world, what evidence would prove they never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Explain exactly what evidence would prove that. You are not limited to anything, not the Mueller report.....nothing. Use your imagination and tell us what evidence would prove that.
View attachment 366492
You tell us what evidence would prove Russia never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Ignore your " Mueller report" excuse.
Finally, you figured out why they claimed there was no evidence of prior hackings. Shit, you're fucking slow.
Um, Barr dropped the charges against Flynn, Moron.And you've offered nothing to show he got it wrong. You claimed Barr said he was wrong about Flynn ... show Barr, or anyone, saying Mueller was wrong about this....Whether it "matters" isn't what we are discussing. Whether it's true is what we're discussing. So far, you have given us no reason to believe it.Mueller and his team investigated the matter while you sat on the toilet and popped out a bripat9643. His report matters. Your whining about it doesn't.The Mueller report contains opinions, not facts, moron.Nope, they spouted no opinion. The details in that article comes from the Mueller report. I see you're still too stupid to know the difference between journalism and opinion. Sucks to be you.No, the Mueller report is their opinion of what evidence they claimed they found, or didn't find.The Mueller report is the evidence. Thehill.com sourced that as the evidence for their article.You still think an article referencing the Mueller report is "evidence".LOLOLOLHey, the dude thinks an article by a leftist that references the Mueller report is actual evidence.Every media outlet and political publication is constantly checking the claims made by the other side. Your belief that there is some objective infallible source of truth only shows how fucking gullible you are.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Short Bus is really gullible.
You idiot. You still think thehill.com is leftist??
... you really are as stupid as your posts express.
Man, your really are stupid.
Savvy?
That doesn't prove a thing.Now you're lying....I don't need to. There's nothing that proves him right.Of course not. Feel free to prove him wrong....Is Mueller infallible?Mueller investigated it. What did you do?Faux will never give up. He believes that if Mueller said it, then it must be true. Mueller is infallible!
Of course there is. According to Mueller's report, they tried phishing her accounts. That leaves a trace.Thanks for admitting there is no way to know if they tried to hack Hitlery."it simply says they found no evidence of it."You really follow directions like a 2 year old spider monkey with ADD. It explains no such thing.........it simply says they found no evidence of it. They didn't even say they investigated it, did they?Read the link YOU posted earlier. It explains how Mueller concluded Russia hadn't attempted to hack that domain before Impeached Trump encouraged Russia to look for Hillary's missing emails. Read it a hundred times if that's how many times it takes for you to understand what it says.Hey Fawn, what is the specific evidence Mueller has that proves Russia never tried to hack Hitlery until this incident?
You will come back with some idiotic response such as 'It is secret".
So.............give us your best opinion. In a perfect world, what evidence would prove they never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Explain exactly what evidence would prove that. You are not limited to anything, not the Mueller report.....nothing. Use your imagination and tell us what evidence would prove that.
View attachment 366492
You tell us what evidence would prove Russia never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Ignore your " Mueller report" excuse.
Finally, you figured out why they claimed there was no evidence of prior hackings. Shit, you're fucking slow.
Uh no. You posted Barr whining he was wrong.I'm not required to prove a negative, moron. You're the one required to prove he's right if you want to win this argument.And you've offered nothing to show he got it wrong. You claimed Barr said he was wrong about Flynn ... show Barr, or anyone, saying Mueller was wrong about this....Whether it "matters" isn't what we are discussing. Whether it's true is what we're discussing. So far, you have given us no reason to believe it.Mueller and his team investigated the matter while you sat on the toilet and popped out a bripat9643. His report matters. Your whining about it doesn't.The Mueller report contains opinions, not facts, moron.Nope, they spouted no opinion. The details in that article comes from the Mueller report. I see you're still too stupid to know the difference between journalism and opinion. Sucks to be you.No, the Mueller report is their opinion of what evidence they claimed they found, or didn't find.The Mueller report is the evidence. Thehill.com sourced that as the evidence for their article.You still think an article referencing the Mueller report is "evidence".LOLOLOLHey, the dude thinks an article by a leftist that references the Mueller report is actual evidence.Every media outlet and political publication is constantly checking the claims made by the other side. Your belief that there is some objective infallible source of truth only shows how fucking gullible you are.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Short Bus is really gullible.
You idiot. You still think thehill.com is leftist??
... you really are as stupid as your posts express.
Man, your really are stupid.
Savvy?
I've already posted the evidence showing that many of the claims in the Mueller report are wrong.
Prove Mueller's report is correct.Of course there is. According to Mueller's report, they tried phishing her accounts. That leaves a trace.Thanks for admitting there is no way to know if they tried to hack Hitlery."it simply says they found no evidence of it."You really follow directions like a 2 year old spider monkey with ADD. It explains no such thing.........it simply says they found no evidence of it. They didn't even say they investigated it, did they?Read the link YOU posted earlier. It explains how Mueller concluded Russia hadn't attempted to hack that domain before Impeached Trump encouraged Russia to look for Hillary's missing emails. Read it a hundred times if that's how many times it takes for you to understand what it says.Hey Fawn, what is the specific evidence Mueller has that proves Russia never tried to hack Hitlery until this incident?
You will come back with some idiotic response such as 'It is secret".
So.............give us your best opinion. In a perfect world, what evidence would prove they never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Explain exactly what evidence would prove that. You are not limited to anything, not the Mueller report.....nothing. Use your imagination and tell us what evidence would prove that.
View attachment 366492
You tell us what evidence would prove Russia never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Ignore your " Mueller report" excuse.
Finally, you figured out why they claimed there was no evidence of prior hackings. Shit, you're fucking slow.
Wow! Just when I thought you couldn't get an dumber.Of course there is. According to Mueller's report, they tried phishing her accounts. That leaves a trace.Thanks for admitting there is no way to know if they tried to hack Hitlery."it simply says they found no evidence of it."You really follow directions like a 2 year old spider monkey with ADD. It explains no such thing.........it simply says they found no evidence of it. They didn't even say they investigated it, did they?Read the link YOU posted earlier. It explains how Mueller concluded Russia hadn't attempted to hack that domain before Impeached Trump encouraged Russia to look for Hillary's missing emails. Read it a hundred times if that's how many times it takes for you to understand what it says.Hey Fawn, what is the specific evidence Mueller has that proves Russia never tried to hack Hitlery until this incident?
You will come back with some idiotic response such as 'It is secret".
So.............give us your best opinion. In a perfect world, what evidence would prove they never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Explain exactly what evidence would prove that. You are not limited to anything, not the Mueller report.....nothing. Use your imagination and tell us what evidence would prove that.
View attachment 366492
You tell us what evidence would prove Russia never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Ignore your " Mueller report" excuse.
Finally, you figured out why they claimed there was no evidence of prior hackings. Shit, you're fucking slow.
LOLOLNo shit.Mueller found no evidence that domain was hacked previously.Thanks for admitting there is no way to know if they tried to hack Hitlery."it simply says they found no evidence of it."You really follow directions like a 2 year old spider monkey with ADD. It explains no such thing.........it simply says they found no evidence of it. They didn't even say they investigated it, did they?Read the link YOU posted earlier. It explains how Mueller concluded Russia hadn't attempted to hack that domain before Impeached Trump encouraged Russia to look for Hillary's missing emails. Read it a hundred times if that's how many times it takes for you to understand what it says.Hey Fawn, what is the specific evidence Mueller has that proves Russia never tried to hack Hitlery until this incident?
You will come back with some idiotic response such as 'It is secret".
So.............give us your best opinion. In a perfect world, what evidence would prove they never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Explain exactly what evidence would prove that. You are not limited to anything, not the Mueller report.....nothing. Use your imagination and tell us what evidence would prove that.
View attachment 366492
You tell us what evidence would prove Russia never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Ignore your " Mueller report" excuse.
Finally, you figured out why they claimed there was no evidence of prior hackings. Shit, you're fucking slow.
So? Flynn is still a convicted felon.Um, Barr dropped the charges against Flynn, Moron.And you've offered nothing to show he got it wrong. You claimed Barr said he was wrong about Flynn ... show Barr, or anyone, saying Mueller was wrong about this....Whether it "matters" isn't what we are discussing. Whether it's true is what we're discussing. So far, you have given us no reason to believe it.Mueller and his team investigated the matter while you sat on the toilet and popped out a bripat9643. His report matters. Your whining about it doesn't.The Mueller report contains opinions, not facts, moron.Nope, they spouted no opinion. The details in that article comes from the Mueller report. I see you're still too stupid to know the difference between journalism and opinion. Sucks to be you.No, the Mueller report is their opinion of what evidence they claimed they found, or didn't find.The Mueller report is the evidence. Thehill.com sourced that as the evidence for their article.You still think an article referencing the Mueller report is "evidence".LOLOLOLHey, the dude thinks an article by a leftist that references the Mueller report is actual evidence.Every media outlet and political publication is constantly checking the claims made by the other side. Your belief that there is some objective infallible source of truth only shows how fucking gullible you are.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Short Bus is really gullible.
You idiot. You still think thehill.com is leftist??
... you really are as stupid as your posts express.
Man, your really are stupid.
Savvy?
Hey fuckstick, I quoted Mueller saying exactly that pages ago.LOLOLNo shit.Mueller found no evidence that domain was hacked previously.Thanks for admitting there is no way to know if they tried to hack Hitlery."it simply says they found no evidence of it."You really follow directions like a 2 year old spider monkey with ADD. It explains no such thing.........it simply says they found no evidence of it. They didn't even say they investigated it, did they?Read the link YOU posted earlier. It explains how Mueller concluded Russia hadn't attempted to hack that domain before Impeached Trump encouraged Russia to look for Hillary's missing emails. Read it a hundred times if that's how many times it takes for you to understand what it says.Hey Fawn, what is the specific evidence Mueller has that proves Russia never tried to hack Hitlery until this incident?
You will come back with some idiotic response such as 'It is secret".
So.............give us your best opinion. In a perfect world, what evidence would prove they never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Explain exactly what evidence would prove that. You are not limited to anything, not the Mueller report.....nothing. Use your imagination and tell us what evidence would prove that.
View attachment 366492
You tell us what evidence would prove Russia never tried to hack Hitlery before this incident. Ignore your " Mueller report" excuse.
Finally, you figured out why they claimed there was no evidence of prior hackings. Shit, you're fucking slow.
You say that now. Earlier when you claimed Mueller never explained his conclusion on that, I kept telling you he did.
Now you know.
Finally.
It describes his findings in detail, ya fucking moron..That doesn't prove a thing.Now you're lying....I don't need to. There's nothing that proves him right.Of course not. Feel free to prove him wrong....Is Mueller infallible?Mueller investigated it. What did you do?Faux will never give up. He believes that if Mueller said it, then it must be true. Mueller is infallible!
Not yet.So? Flynn is still a convicted felon.Um, Barr dropped the charges against Flynn, Moron.And you've offered nothing to show he got it wrong. You claimed Barr said he was wrong about Flynn ... show Barr, or anyone, saying Mueller was wrong about this....Whether it "matters" isn't what we are discussing. Whether it's true is what we're discussing. So far, you have given us no reason to believe it.Mueller and his team investigated the matter while you sat on the toilet and popped out a bripat9643. His report matters. Your whining about it doesn't.The Mueller report contains opinions, not facts, moron.Nope, they spouted no opinion. The details in that article comes from the Mueller report. I see you're still too stupid to know the difference between journalism and opinion. Sucks to be you.No, the Mueller report is their opinion of what evidence they claimed they found, or didn't find.The Mueller report is the evidence. Thehill.com sourced that as the evidence for their article.You still think an article referencing the Mueller report is "evidence".LOLOLOLHey, the dude thinks an article by a leftist that references the Mueller report is actual evidence.Every media outlet and political publication is constantly checking the claims made by the other side. Your belief that there is some objective infallible source of truth only shows how fucking gullible you are.Because they don't fact check everything nor does Fox. You truly are a fucking moron to think there should be only one fact checker. Don't you believe in capitalism which is built upon competition, one of it's pillars of foundation?If they aren't more credible than FOX, then why have them?Who said they're more credible than Fox? As far as Impeached Trump, everyone is more credible than him. I'm not sure a day passes where he doesn't lie about something.Supposedly, every news operation and political website does fact checking, but only the left believes you can create some infallible authority on truth. What makes the so-called "fact check" sites anymore credible than FOX news or even Trump, for that matter?They do fact checking, fucking moron...Where do they call themselves a "fact check" sight?Fucking moron, Google is your friend...Name one outfit that calls itself a "fact checker" that is right wing.LOLOLSo called "fact checkers" are nothing more than DNC propagandists. They are the last thing we need at a debate."Not everything..."Oh? Is he expected to know everything?Lol.....who didn't see this coming? This is more proof that mentally ill Quid Pro Quo Joe is not fit to serve as president. They know Trump will rip him to shreds in the debates.
HERE WE GO: Biden Campaign Wants Fact Checkers For Presidential Debates Because Joe Biden Is Incapable Forming Coherent Arguments (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Joe Biden Campaign Chair Cedric Richmond joined FOX and Friends Thursday morning to discuss the current state of the Biden campaign.
If Sleepy Joe is sharp enough to be President, he should be sharp enough to counter any arguments he hears during the debate himself without "fact checkers"
Not everything, but he should be informed about the important facts on the issues.
Hence the need for fact checkers. Especially for lyin' Impeached Trump who's been caught many times just making shit up.
Fucking moron, some factcheckers are also rightwing.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.
No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Newsbusters | Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias
Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
What I posted is a fact. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and no evidence of obstruction.No rational intelligent person gives a damn about Mueller's opinion.
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
Apparently not....
NewsBusters, the News Analysis Division’s fast paced and popular blog, is the leader in documenting, exposing, and neutralizing liberal media bias. Its team of expert news analysts monitor all the major media outlets 24 hours a day and produce comprehensive bias analysis as well as post showcasing the most ridiculous examples of leftist bias in the media.
And, no, they aren't more credible than Trump. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Short Bus is really gullible.
You idiot. You still think thehill.com is leftist??
... you really are as stupid as your posts express.
Man, your really are stupid.
Savvy?
His "findings" are just his opinions. Where's the evidence?It describes his findings in detail, ya fucking moron..That doesn't prove a thing.Now you're lying....I don't need to. There's nothing that proves him right.Of course not. Feel free to prove him wrong....Is Mueller infallible?Mueller investigated it. What did you do?Faux will never give up. He believes that if Mueller said it, then it must be true. Mueller is infallible!
