OnePercenter
Gold Member
- Apr 10, 2013
- 23,667
- 1,880
- 265
[MENTION=20545]Mr. H.[/MENTION]It would be interesting to see even on piece of "infrastructure" legislation that has been obstructed and filibustered. But don't put yourself out for lil' ol' me.
Understand that we already pay enough taxes to fund it but the R won't allow it any more than they'll allow immigration or anything else.
Economic Sabotage: Republicans Obstruct Infrastructure Work
Senate blocks $60 billion infrastructure plan, another part of Obama jobs bill - The Washington Post
http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com...bill-for-veterans/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0
Thanks for these. Without digging too deeply, I can already see there's more than meets the eye.
Democrats want a tax on wealthy to fund infrastructure, Republicans don't.
Republicans offer up something, Democrats knock it down.
Also Thursday, Democrats joined to block a separate Republican proposal to extend the governments highway spending authority for the next two years and roll back some environmental regulations. A procedural motion to advance the measure was rejected 53 to 47. The current highway spending authority will lapse in February.
Republicans would rather see more efficiency and accountability in government and more responsible management of spending habits. Even printing $58 billion a month has done little to nothing for our economy other than hold interest rates artificially low and make fat cats out of Wall Street investors.
I'm not pleased with either party's performance in D.C., but I more favor the Republican approach to managing this country. Hey that's just me.![]()
Why should we roll back some environmental regulations? Which regulations are they, and how would they effect/affect the roadway?