Hillary Clinton: Email Investigation Doesn't Matter To Voters I've Met

[Lakhota]

Seems like the poll was of one person who is obviously brain damaged. And I don't mean you I mean Mrs. Clinton.

I do believe she doesn't know she sent classified information, she just don't know.

when someone has e-mails that talk about surveillance of communications and satellite photos, how can they not at least strongly suspect it's not classified?

Whose responsibility is it to classify government documents and communications?

What point are you making?

Who has responsibility for classifying government documents - the originator or receiver?

Both have responsibility to treat them as secret

In other words - you don't know.

Frequently Asked Questions on Identifying and handling Classified Records in Private Papers

 

[Obiwan]

To date - it has not been shown or proven that Hillary violated any laws or rules.

But it's coming...

The FBI is investigating, and the prosecutor that got Petraeus is already involved.

Uh Oh Petraeus Prosecutor Looking Into Clinton Server US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[Lakhota]

To date - it has not been shown or proven that Hillary violated any laws or rules.

But it's coming...

The FBI is investigating, and the prosecutor that got Petraeus is already involved.

Uh Oh Petraeus Prosecutor Looking Into Clinton Server US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Good. The sooner Hillary is cleared the better. Petraeus knowingly shared classified information with his mistress - who was not authorized to hear, see or have it. He should have served prison time. You're trying to compare apples and oranges. Keep throwing your NaziCon monkey shit...

 

[kaz]

when someone has e-mails that talk about surveillance of communications and satellite photos, how can they not at least strongly suspect it's not classified?

Whose responsibility is it to classify government documents and communications?

What point are you making?

Who has responsibility for classifying government documents - the originator or receiver?

Both have responsibility to treat them as secret

In other words - you don't know.

Frequently Asked Questions on Identifying and handling Classified Records in Private Papers

And that says that when active government employees receive classified information they aren't responsible for keeping it secret where exactly? I didn't see that section.

BTW, when you provide a link, you are suppose to cut and paste the relevant text, not just say here's a document, spend the next half hour reading it. I did look through it though and must have missed that section

 

[Lakhota]

Will Clinton email witch hunt snare GOP 'witches'?

It now appears that the Republican witch hunt against Hillary Clinton over the use of private emails will soon uncover some GOP "witches" too! The Associated Press has now left the starting gate with a major story about leading Republican candidates for president who have themselves liberally used private emails on matters affecting their business. Will GOP congressional witch-hunters now call as witnesses current Republican Govs. Scott Walker (Wis.), Chris Christie (N.J.), Bobby Jindal (La.) and former Republican Govs. Jeb Bush (Fla.) and Rick Perry (Texas) to discuss their own use of private emails?

Will Bush, a user of private emails himself, apologize to Clinton for GOP attacks against Clinton for doing what he did too? Will Walker be asked to testify about how former aides were convicted of offenses that involved the use of private email when he was holding county office? Will there be any private emails demanded from Christie involving a certain bridge? Will GOP investigative sleuths inquire about whether former Vice President Cheney used private emails to promote their claims of weapons of mass destruction prior to the Iraq war?

It is also high time to ask Republican senators running for president, such as Marco Rubio (Fla.), Rand Paul (Ky.) and Ted Cruz (Texas), whether they used private emails. Shouldn't every member of every House committee investigating President Obama or former Secretary of State Clinton be asked whether they used private emails to promote media stories about their investigations, spread rumors about or attacks against Obama or Clinton to the media, or disseminate classified information?

More: Will Clinton email witch hunt snare GOP witches? TheHill

What goes around comes around...

 

[Asclepias]

Will Clinton email witch hunt snare GOP 'witches'?

It now appears that the Republican witch hunt against Hillary Clinton over the use of private emails will soon uncover some GOP "witches" too! The Associated Press has now left the starting gate with a major story about leading Republican candidates for president who have themselves liberally used private emails on matters affecting their business. Will GOP congressional witch-hunters now call as witnesses current Republican Govs. Scott Walker (Wis.), Chris Christie (N.J.), Bobby Jindal (La.) and former Republican Govs. Jeb Bush (Fla.) and Rick Perry (Texas) to discuss their own use of private emails?

Will Bush, a user of private emails himself, apologize to Clinton for GOP attacks against Clinton for doing what he did too? Will Walker be asked to testify about how former aides were convicted of offenses that involved the use of private email when he was holding county office? Will there be any private emails demanded from Christie involving a certain bridge? Will GOP investigative sleuths inquire about whether former Vice President Cheney used private emails to promote their claims of weapons of mass destruction prior to the Iraq war?

It is also high time to ask Republican senators running for president, such as Marco Rubio (Fla.), Rand Paul (Ky.) and Ted Cruz (Texas), whether they used private emails. Shouldn't every member of every House committee investigating President Obama or former Secretary of State Clinton be asked whether they used private emails to promote media stories about their investigations, spread rumors about or attacks against Obama or Clinton to the media, or disseminate classified information?

More: Will Clinton email witch hunt snare GOP witches? TheHill

What goes around comes around...

Counter punch and knock out.

 

[Obiwan]

Will Clinton email witch hunt snare GOP 'witches'?

It now appears that the Republican witch hunt against Hillary Clinton over the use of private emails will soon uncover some GOP "witches" too! The Associated Press has now left the starting gate with a major story about leading Republican candidates for president who have themselves liberally used private emails on matters affecting their business. Will GOP congressional witch-hunters now call as witnesses current Republican Govs. Scott Walker (Wis.), Chris Christie (N.J.), Bobby Jindal (La.) and former Republican Govs. Jeb Bush (Fla.) and Rick Perry (Texas) to discuss their own use of private emails?

Will Bush, a user of private emails himself, apologize to Clinton for GOP attacks against Clinton for doing what he did too? Will Walker be asked to testify about how former aides were convicted of offenses that involved the use of private email when he was holding county office? Will there be any private emails demanded from Christie involving a certain bridge? Will GOP investigative sleuths inquire about whether former Vice President Cheney used private emails to promote their claims of weapons of mass destruction prior to the Iraq war?

It is also high time to ask Republican senators running for president, such as Marco Rubio (Fla.), Rand Paul (Ky.) and Ted Cruz (Texas), whether they used private emails. Shouldn't every member of every House committee investigating President Obama or former Secretary of State Clinton be asked whether they used private emails to promote media stories about their investigations, spread rumors about or attacks against Obama or Clinton to the media, or disseminate classified information?

More: Will Clinton email witch hunt snare GOP witches? TheHill

What goes around comes around...

So which ones are you claiming mishandled TS/NOFOR? Please provide links for verification.

 

[S.J.]

Will Clinton email witch hunt snare GOP 'witches'?

It now appears that the Republican witch hunt against Hillary Clinton over the use of private emails will soon uncover some GOP "witches" too! The Associated Press has now left the starting gate with a major story about leading Republican candidates for president who have themselves liberally used private emails on matters affecting their business. Will GOP congressional witch-hunters now call as witnesses current Republican Govs. Scott Walker (Wis.), Chris Christie (N.J.), Bobby Jindal (La.) and former Republican Govs. Jeb Bush (Fla.) and Rick Perry (Texas) to discuss their own use of private emails?

Will Bush, a user of private emails himself, apologize to Clinton for GOP attacks against Clinton for doing what he did too? Will Walker be asked to testify about how former aides were convicted of offenses that involved the use of private email when he was holding county office? Will there be any private emails demanded from Christie involving a certain bridge? Will GOP investigative sleuths inquire about whether former Vice President Cheney used private emails to promote their claims of weapons of mass destruction prior to the Iraq war?

It is also high time to ask Republican senators running for president, such as Marco Rubio (Fla.), Rand Paul (Ky.) and Ted Cruz (Texas), whether they used private emails. Shouldn't every member of every House committee investigating President Obama or former Secretary of State Clinton be asked whether they used private emails to promote media stories about their investigations, spread rumors about or attacks against Obama or Clinton to the media, or disseminate classified information?

More: Will Clinton email witch hunt snare GOP witches? TheHill

What goes around comes around...

I guess accusing the other side of doing what your side has been caught doing is a valid defense in the world of liberalism. Is innuendo all you can scrounge up?

 

[Lakhota]

Will Clinton email witch hunt snare GOP 'witches'?

It now appears that the Republican witch hunt against Hillary Clinton over the use of private emails will soon uncover some GOP "witches" too! The Associated Press has now left the starting gate with a major story about leading Republican candidates for president who have themselves liberally used private emails on matters affecting their business. Will GOP congressional witch-hunters now call as witnesses current Republican Govs. Scott Walker (Wis.), Chris Christie (N.J.), Bobby Jindal (La.) and former Republican Govs. Jeb Bush (Fla.) and Rick Perry (Texas) to discuss their own use of private emails?

Will Bush, a user of private emails himself, apologize to Clinton for GOP attacks against Clinton for doing what he did too? Will Walker be asked to testify about how former aides were convicted of offenses that involved the use of private email when he was holding county office? Will there be any private emails demanded from Christie involving a certain bridge? Will GOP investigative sleuths inquire about whether former Vice President Cheney used private emails to promote their claims of weapons of mass destruction prior to the Iraq war?

It is also high time to ask Republican senators running for president, such as Marco Rubio (Fla.), Rand Paul (Ky.) and Ted Cruz (Texas), whether they used private emails. Shouldn't every member of every House committee investigating President Obama or former Secretary of State Clinton be asked whether they used private emails to promote media stories about their investigations, spread rumors about or attacks against Obama or Clinton to the media, or disseminate classified information?

More: Will Clinton email witch hunt snare GOP witches? TheHill

What goes around comes around...

So which ones are you claiming mishandled TS/NOFOR? Please provide links for verification.

What are you talking about? Please be specific - with "credible" proof.

 

[kaz]

Will Clinton email witch hunt snare GOP 'witches'?

It now appears that the Republican witch hunt against Hillary Clinton over the use of private emails will soon uncover some GOP "witches" too! The Associated Press has now left the starting gate with a major story about leading Republican candidates for president who have themselves liberally used private emails on matters affecting their business. Will GOP congressional witch-hunters now call as witnesses current Republican Govs. Scott Walker (Wis.), Chris Christie (N.J.), Bobby Jindal (La.) and former Republican Govs. Jeb Bush (Fla.) and Rick Perry (Texas) to discuss their own use of private emails?

Will Bush, a user of private emails himself, apologize to Clinton for GOP attacks against Clinton for doing what he did too? Will Walker be asked to testify about how former aides were convicted of offenses that involved the use of private email when he was holding county office? Will there be any private emails demanded from Christie involving a certain bridge? Will GOP investigative sleuths inquire about whether former Vice President Cheney used private emails to promote their claims of weapons of mass destruction prior to the Iraq war?

It is also high time to ask Republican senators running for president, such as Marco Rubio (Fla.), Rand Paul (Ky.) and Ted Cruz (Texas), whether they used private emails. Shouldn't every member of every House committee investigating President Obama or former Secretary of State Clinton be asked whether they used private emails to promote media stories about their investigations, spread rumors about or attacks against Obama or Clinton to the media, or disseminate classified information?

More: Will Clinton email witch hunt snare GOP witches? TheHill

What goes around comes around...

I guess accusing the other side of doing what your side has been caught doing is a valid defense in the world of liberalism. Is innuendo all you can scrounge up?

The Republicans were wrong, but it's OK when Democrats do it because the Republicans did it

 

[Obiwan]

Will Clinton email witch hunt snare GOP 'witches'?

It now appears that the Republican witch hunt against Hillary Clinton over the use of private emails will soon uncover some GOP "witches" too! The Associated Press has now left the starting gate with a major story about leading Republican candidates for president who have themselves liberally used private emails on matters affecting their business. Will GOP congressional witch-hunters now call as witnesses current Republican Govs. Scott Walker (Wis.), Chris Christie (N.J.), Bobby Jindal (La.) and former Republican Govs. Jeb Bush (Fla.) and Rick Perry (Texas) to discuss their own use of private emails?

Will Bush, a user of private emails himself, apologize to Clinton for GOP attacks against Clinton for doing what he did too? Will Walker be asked to testify about how former aides were convicted of offenses that involved the use of private email when he was holding county office? Will there be any private emails demanded from Christie involving a certain bridge? Will GOP investigative sleuths inquire about whether former Vice President Cheney used private emails to promote their claims of weapons of mass destruction prior to the Iraq war?

It is also high time to ask Republican senators running for president, such as Marco Rubio (Fla.), Rand Paul (Ky.) and Ted Cruz (Texas), whether they used private emails. Shouldn't every member of every House committee investigating President Obama or former Secretary of State Clinton be asked whether they used private emails to promote media stories about their investigations, spread rumors about or attacks against Obama or Clinton to the media, or disseminate classified information?

More: Will Clinton email witch hunt snare GOP witches? TheHill

What goes around comes around...

So which ones are you claiming mishandled TS/NOFOR? Please provide links for verification.

What are you talking about? Please be specific - with "credible" proof.

Read the thread... Do I have to constantly spam it with links for verification, just to have you ignore them and keep posting your tripe????

 

[Lakhota]

Media continue to use the news that two emails Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton turned over to the State Department from her time as secretary of state may be retroactively classified as "top secret" to push myths about Clinton's handling of government information and scandalize her email use.

FACT: There Are "No Indications" That Emails Have Been Stripped Of Classifications

FACT: Officials Say Emails Include Discussion Of News Article And "Nothing In The Message Is 'Lifted' From Classified Documents"

FACT: Clinton Voluntarily Turned Over Her Email Server

For additional myths and facts about the allegedly "top secret" materials in Clinton's email server, click here

Much More: More Myths And Facts On Top Secret Materials In Hillary Clinton's Email

The NaziCon lies and spin are hilarious!

 

[TooTall]

Seems like the poll was of one person who is obviously brain damaged. And I don't mean you I mean Mrs. Clinton.

I do believe she doesn't know she sent classified information, she just don't know.

when someone has e-mails that talk about surveillance of communications and satellite photos, how can they not at least strongly suspect it's not classified?

Whose responsibility is it to classify government documents and communications?

What point are you making?

Who has responsibility for classifying government documents - the originator or receiver?

I don't know, do you?

 

[Obiwan]

Media continue to use the news that two emails Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton turned over to the State Department from her time as secretary of state may be retroactively classified as "top secret" to push myths about Clinton's handling of government information and scandalize her email use.

FACT: There Are "No Indications" That Emails Have Been Stripped Of Classifications

FACT: Officials Say Emails Include Discussion Of News Article And "Nothing In The Message Is 'Lifted' From Classified Documents"

FACT: Clinton Voluntarily Turned Over Her Email Server

For additional myths and facts about the allegedly "top secret" materials in Clinton's email server, click here

Much More: More Myths And Facts On Top Secret Materials In Hillary Clinton's Email

The NaziCon lies and spin are hilarious!

MediaDon'tMatter isn't a source, since they are the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party and get caught in lies more often than you change your undershorts.

 

[S.J.]

Media continue to use the news that two emails Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton turned over to the State Department from her time as secretary of state may be retroactively classified as "top secret" to push myths about Clinton's handling of government information and scandalize her email use.

FACT: There Are "No Indications" That Emails Have Been Stripped Of Classifications

FACT: Officials Say Emails Include Discussion Of News Article And "Nothing In The Message Is 'Lifted' From Classified Documents"

FACT: Clinton Voluntarily Turned Over Her Email Server

For additional myths and facts about the allegedly "top secret" materials in Clinton's email server, click here

Much More: More Myths And Facts On Top Secret Materials In Hillary Clinton's Email

The NaziCon lies and spin are hilarious!

MediaDon'tMatter isn't a source, since they are the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party and get caught in lies more often than you change your undershorts.

That's not very often.

 

[Lakhota]

Media continue to use the news that two emails Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton turned over to the State Department from her time as secretary of state may be retroactively classified as "top secret" to push myths about Clinton's handling of government information and scandalize her email use.

FACT: There Are "No Indications" That Emails Have Been Stripped Of Classifications

FACT: Officials Say Emails Include Discussion Of News Article And "Nothing In The Message Is 'Lifted' From Classified Documents"

FACT: Clinton Voluntarily Turned Over Her Email Server

For additional myths and facts about the allegedly "top secret" materials in Clinton's email server, click here

Much More: More Myths And Facts On Top Secret Materials In Hillary Clinton's Email

The NaziCon lies and spin are hilarious!

MediaDon'tMatter isn't a source, since they are the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party and get caught in lies more often than you change your undershorts.

Please provide "credible" proof of even one Media Matters lie.

 

[Lakhota]

Seems like the poll was of one person who is obviously brain damaged. And I don't mean you I mean Mrs. Clinton.

I do believe she doesn't know she sent classified information, she just don't know.

when someone has e-mails that talk about surveillance of communications and satellite photos, how can they not at least strongly suspect it's not classified?

Whose responsibility is it to classify government documents and communications?

What point are you making?

Who has responsibility for classifying government documents - the originator or receiver?

I don't know, do you?

Yes, I do. The originator.

 

[TooTall]

when someone has e-mails that talk about surveillance of communications and satellite photos, how can they not at least strongly suspect it's not classified?

Whose responsibility is it to classify government documents and communications?

What point are you making?

Who has responsibility for classifying government documents - the originator or receiver?

I don't know, do you?

Yes, I do. The originator.

If the originator determines the classification of a government document, why are some of the documents in Hillary's e-mails said to be classified after the fact? There seems to be some contradiction of facts.

 

[kaz]

when someone has e-mails that talk about surveillance of communications and satellite photos, how can they not at least strongly suspect it's not classified?

Whose responsibility is it to classify government documents and communications?

What point are you making?

Who has responsibility for classifying government documents - the originator or receiver?

I don't know, do you?

Yes, I do. The originator.

They both have responsibility to treat it as secret, Holmes

 

[kaz]

Whose responsibility is it to classify government documents and communications?

What point are you making?

Who has responsibility for classifying government documents - the originator or receiver?

I don't know, do you?

Yes, I do. The originator.

If the originator determines the classification of a government document, why are some of the documents in Hillary's e-mails said to be classified after the fact? There seems to be some contradiction of facts.

Democrats are claiming it wasn't obvious to her that surveillance photos and intercepted communications are classified. You agree with that?