bendog
Diamond Member
- Mar 4, 2013
- 46,279
- 9,696
The last time a Clinton ran for office, they were paying 31% of their income in taxes. Personally, I don't begrudge anyone wealth, but I do not like it when they pay substantially less a percentage of tax than I have to .... like Mitt.And that means she should or should not take her SS? You are lame.Allow me to educate you. Please get informed before responding to my posts.Remember Hillary taking a tax deduction for giving her used underwear to charity? She is so caring and thoughtful.More fool him.
Umm... nnnnnnno. I sure don't.
You're actually following Hillary Clinton's underwear?
What, there's an app for that?
See a psychologist.
From the NY Times:
In previous returns, when Mr. Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas and his wife was a partner in a Little Rock law firm, the Clintons had gone so far as to deduct $2 for underwear donated to charities. The deduction was ridiculed by comedians and pundits, and the White House did not itemize the Clintons' $17,000 in charitable contributions on the 1993 return.
Clinton Taxes Laid Bare Line by Line - NYTimes.com
The point that you libtards can't get is that the clintons demonize the rich and the tax breaks available to them, AND THEN THEY DO THE EXACT SAME THINGS WITH THEIR MONEY.
Its called hypocrisy------------do as I say, not as I do.
Hillary Clinton wants credit for paying income tax. Here s how much she deserves. - The Washington Post
Even W was paying over 25%, or something like that.