JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
Yeah, you are.We're not the ones bitching about the rich.. We're not the hypocrites, yoAnd what? Republicans who're eligible aren't?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, you are.We're not the ones bitching about the rich.. We're not the hypocrites, yoAnd what? Republicans who're eligible aren't?
Hint: retired veterans, medicare and SS recipients, etc., earned their payouts. You did not. Trot along.About 60% of wage earners pay about 2.6% of Federal taxes.
That means about 40% of wage earners pay about 97% of Federal taxes.
This is not a sustainable economic model.
As usual the fucking LIBs want to take even more from the 40%.
There is no economic model for Government theft. But it appears that 47% of Americans have become so brainwashed by media leftist koolaid they actually believe in redistribution schemes from dishonest corrupt professional politicians.
We're not the ones bitching about the rich.. We're not the hypocrites, yoAnd what? Republicans who're eligible aren't?
Easily and already refuted.Very well stated and impossible to refute. Thank you.
About 60% of wage earners pay about 2.6% of Federal taxes.
That means about 40% of wage earners pay about 97% of Federal taxes.
This is not a sustainable economic model.
As usual the fucking LIBs want to take even more from the 40%.
Yes.Easily and already refuted.Very well stated and impossible to refute. Thank you.
Because my statement was self obvious. There, I fixed your far right nonsense for you.The far right would explode if anyone said Reagan should not have been taking his SS payments.
......because you say so. There, I fixed this left wing bullshit for you.
I am sorry to hear that you are being forced to read our posts. Pobrecito.No, I take in monthly interest from oil and gas royalties from wells on my property.Are you taking monthly Social Security payments?Of course she is, for you see Liberals grab at every hand out or bribe that comes their way whether they need it or not.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/20/hillary-clinton-ignores-liberals-calls-to-expand-s/ /
So you're living on mineral rights. You contribute nothing to your world but take oily handouts for doing absolutely nothing. You're a fucking sponge, living on earth farts. Courageous.
And we get to be the beneficiaries of your ludicrous posts that free time makes possible. Lucky us.
You think having to read the whiney leftist crap from you is beneficial?
And that means she should or should not take her SS? You are lame.Allow me to educate you. Please get informed before responding to my posts.Remember Hillary taking a tax deduction for giving her used underwear to charity? She is so caring and thoughtful.More fool him.Ron Paul isn't taking it.
Umm... nnnnnnno. I sure don't.
You're actually following Hillary Clinton's underwear?
What, there's an app for that?
See a psychologist.
From the NY Times:
In previous returns, when Mr. Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas and his wife was a partner in a Little Rock law firm, the Clintons had gone so far as to deduct $2 for underwear donated to charities. The deduction was ridiculed by comedians and pundits, and the White House did not itemize the Clintons' $17,000 in charitable contributions on the 1993 return.
Clinton Taxes Laid Bare Line by Line - NYTimes.com
Libertarian ideology implodes automatically. Veterans, social security and medicare users, all have earned the pay outs, yet you call them dishonest. And you wonder why you folks lose elections. You do not represent conservatism or the GOP, the followers of both which despise you hanger-on parasites.There is no economic model for Government theft. But it appears that 47% of Americans have become so brainwashed by media leftist koolaid they actually believe in redistribution schemes from dishonest corrupt professional politicians.
Are you taking monthly Social Security payments?Are you taking monthly Social Security payments?Of course she is, for you see Liberals grab at every hand out or bribe that comes their way whether they need it or not.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/20/hillary-clinton-ignores-liberals-calls-to-expand-s/ /
Does Hillary need the money to survive? or is this just another of her hypocritical actions?
Must you always post inanities?And that means she should or should not take her SS? You are lame.Allow me to educate you. Please get informed before responding to my posts.Remember Hillary taking a tax deduction for giving her used underwear to charity? She is so caring and thoughtful.More fool him.Ron Paul isn't taking it.
Umm... nnnnnnno. I sure don't.
You're actually following Hillary Clinton's underwear?
What, there's an app for that?
See a psychologist.
From the NY Times:
In previous returns, when Mr. Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas and his wife was a partner in a Little Rock law firm, the Clintons had gone so far as to deduct $2 for underwear donated to charities. The deduction was ridiculed by comedians and pundits, and the White House did not itemize the Clintons' $17,000 in charitable contributions on the 1993 return.
Clinton Taxes Laid Bare Line by Line - NYTimes.com
When dealing with your silliness, it is hard not to.Must you always post inanities?
Another strawman post from the partisan.Libertarian ideology implodes automatically. Veterans, social security and medicare users, all have earned the pay outs, yet you call them dishonest. And you wonder why you folks lose elections. You do not represent conservatism or the GOP, the followers of both which despise you hanger-on parasites.There is no economic model for Government theft. But it appears that 47% of Americans have become so brainwashed by media leftist koolaid they actually believe in redistribution schemes from dishonest corrupt professional politicians.
And that means she should or should not take her SS? You are lame.Allow me to educate you. Please get informed before responding to my posts.Remember Hillary taking a tax deduction for giving her used underwear to charity? She is so caring and thoughtful.More fool him.Ron Paul isn't taking it.
Umm... nnnnnnno. I sure don't.
You're actually following Hillary Clinton's underwear?
What, there's an app for that?
See a psychologist.
From the NY Times:
In previous returns, when Mr. Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas and his wife was a partner in a Little Rock law firm, the Clintons had gone so far as to deduct $2 for underwear donated to charities. The deduction was ridiculed by comedians and pundits, and the White House did not itemize the Clintons' $17,000 in charitable contributions on the 1993 return.
Clinton Taxes Laid Bare Line by Line - NYTimes.com
And you're too dishonest to even admit that pensioners continue paying state and local, and in may cases, fed income tax.Another strawman post from the partisan.Libertarian ideology implodes automatically. Veterans, social security and medicare users, all have earned the pay outs, yet you call them dishonest. And you wonder why you folks lose elections. You do not represent conservatism or the GOP, the followers of both which despise you hanger-on parasites.There is no economic model for Government theft. But it appears that 47% of Americans have become so brainwashed by media leftist koolaid they actually believe in redistribution schemes from dishonest corrupt professional politicians.
Does the partisan ever tire of using strawman tactics? I say no.
Is it better to speak of such things, or lock them away?And that means she should or should not take her SS? You are lame.Allow me to educate you. Please get informed before responding to my posts.Remember Hillary taking a tax deduction for giving her used underwear to charity? She is so caring and thoughtful.More fool him.
Umm... nnnnnnno. I sure don't.
You're actually following Hillary Clinton's underwear?
What, there's an app for that?
See a psychologist.
From the NY Times:
In previous returns, when Mr. Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas and his wife was a partner in a Little Rock law firm, the Clintons had gone so far as to deduct $2 for underwear donated to charities. The deduction was ridiculed by comedians and pundits, and the White House did not itemize the Clintons' $17,000 in charitable contributions on the 1993 return.
Clinton Taxes Laid Bare Line by Line - NYTimes.com
The point that you libtards can't get is that the clintons demonize the rich and the tax breaks available to them, AND THEN THEY DO THE EXACT SAME THINGS WITH THEIR MONEY.
Its called hypocrisy------------do as I say, not as I do.