EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 14,245
- 9,791
- 2,138
Very closely-related to the “science” that Asserts that Bruce Jenner is a woman.
"The Science"
vs.
Science
"The Science"
masks won't work, but three days later I will say they do work!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Very closely-related to the “science” that Asserts that Bruce Jenner is a woman.
Got me.189%.
The fellow whose seen it triple, then, was born one year before me.189%.
2.89X189%.
2.89X
What science has to say about Bruce Jenner and whatever her current name is, is irrelevant. It is the LAW that says she is now a woman.Very closely-related to the “science” that Asserts that Bruce Jenner is a woman.
What science has to say about Bruce Jenner and whatever her current name is, is irrelevant. It is the LAW that says she is now a woman.
You've gone completely off topic.“If the law supposes that,” said Mr. Bumble, squeezing his hat emphatically in both hands, “the law is a ass—a idiot.”—Charlese Dickens, Oliver Twist
Hard reality cannot be changed by enacting a law.
If a law is passed, which declares that two plus two equals ten, then what is the sum of two plus two?
If you have this many objects: ••
And you add this many more: ••
And the law says that two plus two equals ten, then how many of those objects do you now have?
Or, as Abraham Lincoln once put it, How many legs does a dog have if you call his tail a leg? The answer is that the dog has four legs. Calling a tail a leg does not make it so.
Why would it do that? Where do you see a conspiracy in the disappearance of Himalayan glaciers?This is not in Conspiracy theories yet?
Easy...MSN
www.msn.com
"Himalayan glaciers disappeared 65% faster since 2010 than in the previous decade and reducing snow cover due to global warming will result in reduced fresh water for people living downstream. The study found that 200 glacier lakes across these mountains are deemed dangerous, and the region could see a significant spike in glacial lake outburst floods by the end of the century."
How about some of you folks that think these problems will be easily overcome explain how we will replace drinking water for a billion people.
We could always start building a shade with moon dust at the L1 LaGrange point. Keep it bounded somehow so it can be reduced or removed later.Easy...
Put a rheostat on the sun.
Pretty simple.
Jo
Lol....I see a business opportunity!We could always start building a shade with moon dust at the L1 LaGrange point. Keep it bounded somehow so it can be reduced or removed later.
I have a goodly amount of moon dust under my bed and I'd be willing to part with it for the right price...Lol....I see a business opportunity!
I have a goodly amount of moon dust under my bed and I'd be willing to part with it for the right price...
I have a goodly amount of moon dust under my bed and I'd be willing to part with it for the right price...
Why would it do that? Where do you see a conspiracy in the disappearance of Himalayan glaciers?
Arctic ice free: check
Snow a thing of the past: check
No polar ice caps since 2008: check
Polar bears extinct: check
Guam tipped over: check
Please do so. Certify that the Himalayan glaciers in question are still growing.This is the Co2 fraud cherry picking and likely fudging and lying but for the Himalayans I can only certify that the range is still growing and wasn't there 100 million years ago.
But this is about GLOBAL warming... GLOBAL.... and hence the issue is whether or not there is an ONGOING NET ICE MELT for the planet as a whole....
I don't think you said what you think you said. And, as the graph above shows, Antarctica is losing ice mass.Which is convenient and easy because 90% of Earth is in one place called Antarctica...
And you cannot show us liquid water on Antarctica because there isn't any... which is a clue that it is not melting...
Still waiting for some response from EMH "certifying" that Himalayan glaciers are growing, that there is no net global ice mass loss and that there is no liquid water to be found on Antarctica.Please do so. Certify that the Himalayan glaciers in question are still growing.
Climate Change Indicators: Ice Sheets | US EPA
This indicator examines the balance between snow accumulation and melting in the ice sheets that cover Greenland and Antarctica.www.epa.gov
I don't think you said what you think you said. And, as the graph above shows, Antarctica is losing ice mass.
View attachment 801970
McMurdo Sound, Antarctica meltpools
View attachment 801971
Melt pools on Petermann Glacier, Antarctica
Lakes of Melted Snow Are Literally Bending Antarctica's Ice Shelves in Half