Holder says Mueller could prosecute Trump for OOJ

In normal circumstances yes, but nothing will stick until its proved Trump conspired with Russia over the election.

So far the circumstantial case that there was a quid pro quo is pretty strong. Russia wanted the sanctions lifted and a Trump wanted help of the stolen emails and possibly targeting info for propaganda purposes these would be crimes.

After that the Obstruction and abuse of power (Nunes memo was abuse of power) charges are added weight to the main charges of criminal conspiracy etc.
 
Former AG Holder says Mueller could prosecute Trump for obstruction

Yup...the Trump regime may have lots of problems coming up.

LOL, Holder? Now THERE'S an unbiased source. You're a maroon kid.
If you dont like Holder, you can get the same thing from Clapper.

“If Trump exercises his power — even his lawful power — with a corrupt motive of interfering with an investigation, that’s obstruction,” says Lisa Kern Griffin, an expert on criminal law at Duke University. “The attempt is sufficient, and it seems to be a matter of public record already.”

Or better yet, just watch Lester Holt interview.
 
Former AG Holder says Mueller could prosecute Trump for obstruction

Yup...the Trump regime may have lots of problems coming up.
When you fire the person that is investigating you, order the firing of his replacement, release documents favorable to your cause, and block documents that aren't, there is only one conclusion.

Ah...you're pissed about a bogus investigation instigated by your political enemies and kept alive by a liberal media that isn't even attempting to be unbiased any more?

All the denials of Russian contacts have turned out to be lies. Mueller knows by now the truth. Soon...the American public will know.

Oh...now it's Russian "contacts" that are the problem? I thought it was "collusion" to fix our election? Now it's an issue if you even talked to a Russian? Any Russian? About anything? Of course nobody in Hillary's camp talked to any Russians...right, Jim? Oh wait...not only did they TALK to some Russians...they paid some Russians money to put out a fake dossier on Donald Trump to smear him before the election! Tell me again how this works? It's wrong if anyone in the Trump camp even had a conversation with anyone from Russia...but it's perfectly fine for Hillary Clinton's camp and the DNC to pay money to Russians to put out a fake dossier?

How do you not grasp how ridiculous you look trying to make this argument?
 
Former AG Holder says Mueller could prosecute Trump for obstruction

Yup...the Trump regime may have lots of problems coming up.

LOL, Holder? Now THERE'S an unbiased source. You're a maroon kid.
If you dont like Holder, you can get the same thing from Clapper.

“If Trump exercises his power — even his lawful power — with a corrupt motive of interfering with an investigation, that’s obstruction,” says Lisa Kern Griffin, an expert on criminal law at Duke University. “The attempt is sufficient, and it seems to be a matter of public record already.”

Or better yet, just watch Lester Holt interview.

Good luck proving that "corrupt motive" in a court of law, Lisa! Another "expert" teaching at another of our bastions of higher learning who doesn't like Trump? Gee, what a shock!
 
Former AG Holder says Mueller could prosecute Trump for obstruction

Yup...the Trump regime may have lots of problems coming up.
When you fire the person that is investigating you, order the firing of his replacement, release documents favorable to your cause, and block documents that aren't, there is only one conclusion.

Ah...you're pissed about a bogus investigation instigated by your political enemies and kept alive by a liberal media that isn't even attempting to be unbiased any more?

All the denials of Russian contacts have turned out to be lies. Mueller knows by now the truth. Soon...the American public will know.

It's funny that so many in this criminal regime lied about Russian collusion? Collusion leads to Treason...
 
Former AG Holder says Mueller could prosecute Trump for obstruction

Yup...the Trump regime may have lots of problems coming up.

LOL, Holder? Now THERE'S an unbiased source. You're a maroon kid.
If you dont like Holder, you can get the same thing from Clapper.

“If Trump exercises his power — even his lawful power — with a corrupt motive of interfering with an investigation, that’s obstruction,” says Lisa Kern Griffin, an expert on criminal law at Duke University. “The attempt is sufficient, and it seems to be a matter of public record already.”

Or better yet, just watch Lester Holt interview.

Good luck proving that "corrupt motive" in a court of law, Lisa! Another "expert" teaching at another of our bastions of higher learning who doesn't like Trump? Gee, what a shock!
Prior to coming to Duke, Griffin taught at the UCLA School of Law. She graduated from Stanford Law School, where she served as President of the Stanford Law Review and was elected to the Order of the Coif. After law school, she clerked for Judge Dorothy Nelson of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor of the Supreme Court of the United States. Griffin also spent five years as a federal prosecutor in the Chicago United States Attorney’s Office.
 
I'm sure Holder would try Trump for Obstruction. Or anything he was ordered to since he was Obama's bitch.
Maybe, but Mueller will not try the president. That's the job of the congress. He will report his findings and leave it to congress to deal with Trump. Charging a sitting president in federal court would lead to a constitutional crisis. Most republicans in congress would certainly rather deal with a President Pence than Trump. Trump has been a pain in the ass for congress from the get go. Trump has obstructed both his own agenda as well that of congress. They would certainly welcome a change.

Trump was sent to Washington to be a pain in the ass for Congress, Flopper! What part of that concept is so hard for you on the left to grasp? Congress isn't going to impeach Donald Trump except in your wet dreams. If they did...the people would rise up and vote them out en mass!
Funny, I thought Trump voters sent him to Washington to make America great again but maybe I'm wrong. His supporters may actually just want someone to express their disgust for the establishment and create hatred and division which he seems to be doing quite well.
 
Former AG Holder says Mueller could prosecute Trump for obstruction

Yup...the Trump regime may have lots of problems coming up.

LOL, Holder? Now THERE'S an unbiased source. You're a maroon kid.
If you dont like Holder, you can get the same thing from Clapper.

“If Trump exercises his power — even his lawful power — with a corrupt motive of interfering with an investigation, that’s obstruction,” says Lisa Kern Griffin, an expert on criminal law at Duke University. “The attempt is sufficient, and it seems to be a matter of public record already.”

Or better yet, just watch Lester Holt interview.

Good luck proving that "corrupt motive" in a court of law, Lisa! Another "expert" teaching at another of our bastions of higher learning who doesn't like Trump? Gee, what a shock!
Presidents are not tried in a court law but rather by congress which is a political process, impeachment. The Mueller investigation could come up with damning evidence of collusion and congress could elect not to act.
 
Last edited:
Former AG Holder says Mueller could prosecute Trump for obstruction

Yup...the Trump regime may have lots of problems coming up.

LOL, Holder? Now THERE'S an unbiased source. You're a maroon kid.
If you dont like Holder, you can get the same thing from Clapper.

“If Trump exercises his power — even his lawful power — with a corrupt motive of interfering with an investigation, that’s obstruction,” says Lisa Kern Griffin, an expert on criminal law at Duke University. “The attempt is sufficient, and it seems to be a matter of public record already.”

Or better yet, just watch Lester Holt interview.

Good luck proving that "corrupt motive" in a court of law, Lisa! Another "expert" teaching at another of our bastions of higher learning who doesn't like Trump? Gee, what a shock!
Prior to coming to Duke, Griffin taught at the UCLA School of Law. She graduated from Stanford Law School, where she served as President of the Stanford Law Review and was elected to the Order of the Coif. After law school, she clerked for Judge Dorothy Nelson of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor of the Supreme Court of the United States. Griffin also spent five years as a federal prosecutor in the Chicago United States Attorney’s Office.


Attempted obstruction to collude!!
 
Former AG Holder says Mueller could prosecute Trump for obstruction

Yup...the Trump regime may have lots of problems coming up.

LOL, Holder? Now THERE'S an unbiased source. You're a maroon kid.
If you dont like Holder, you can get the same thing from Clapper.

“If Trump exercises his power — even his lawful power — with a corrupt motive of interfering with an investigation, that’s obstruction,” says Lisa Kern Griffin, an expert on criminal law at Duke University. “The attempt is sufficient, and it seems to be a matter of public record already.”

Or better yet, just watch Lester Holt interview.

Good luck proving that "corrupt motive" in a court of law, Lisa! Another "expert" teaching at another of our bastions of higher learning who doesn't like Trump? Gee, what a shock!
Presidents are not tried in a court law but rather by congress which is a political process, impeachment. The Mueller investigation could come up damning evidence of collusion and congress could let him off.

The Mueller investigation could come up with Zip, Nada, Zilch and Democrats in Congress like Maxine (Is my wig on straight?) Waters would still call for impeachment! I don't think you could get a Grand Jury to indict on the evidence I've seen so far, Flopper and they'll indict just about ANYONE!
 
I'm sure Holder would try Trump for Obstruction. Or anything he was ordered to since he was Obama's bitch.
Maybe, but Mueller will not try the president. That's the job of the congress. He will report his findings and leave it to congress to deal with Trump. Charging a sitting president in federal court would lead to a constitutional crisis. Most republicans in congress would certainly rather deal with a President Pence than Trump. Trump has been a pain in the ass for congress from the get go. Trump has obstructed both his own agenda as well that of congress. They would certainly welcome a change.

Trump was sent to Washington to be a pain in the ass for Congress, Flopper! What part of that concept is so hard for you on the left to grasp? Congress isn't going to impeach Donald Trump except in your wet dreams. If they did...the people would rise up and vote them out en mass!
Funny, I thought Trump voters sent him to Washington to make America great again but maybe I'm wrong. His supporters may actually just want someone to express their disgust for the establishment and create hatred and division which he seems to be doing quite well.

I know he's created hatred on the Left and in the Main Stream Media, Flopper! I've never seen anything that even comes close to the nonstop attacks that have been launched against Trump since he beat Hillary! CNN has become a running joke.

As for what he's done since becoming President? Hate to point out the obvious here...but Trump is slowly but surely checking off the promises that he ran on and doing so despite opposition from not only Democrats but the GOP establishment.
 

Forum List

Back
Top